Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?

PURPOSE: This is the first study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative specimen radiography on margin level and its potential to reduce second surgeries in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 174 cases receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of primary breast cancer. Conventional specimen radiography (CSR) was performed to assess potential margin infiltration and recommend an intraoperative re-excision of any radiologically positive margin. The histological workup of the specimen served as gold standard for the evaluation of the accuracy of CSR and the potential reduction of second surgeries by CSR-guided re-excisions. RESULTS: 1044 margins were assessed. Of 47 (4.5%) histopathological positive margins, CSR identified 9 correctly (true positive). 38 infiltrated margins were missed (false negative). This resulted in a sensitivity of 19.2%, a specificity of 89.2%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 7.7%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.9%. The rate of secondary procedures was reduced from 23 to 16 with a number needed to treat (NNT) of CSR-guided intraoperative re-excisions of 25. In the subgroup of patients with cCR, the prevalence of positive margins was 10/510 (2.0%), PPV was 1.9%, and the NNT was 85. CONCLUSION: Positive margins after NACT are rare and CSR has only a low sensitivity to detect them. Thus, the rate of secondary surgeries cannot be significantly reduced by recommending targeted re-excisions, especially in cases with cCR. In summary, CSR after NACT is inadequate for intraoperative margin assessment but remains useful to document removal of the biopsy site clip.

Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: To explore the ability of intraoperative specimen radiography (SR) to correctly identify positive margins in patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS). To assess whether the reoperation rate can be reduced by using this method. METHODS: This retrospective study included 470 consecutive cases receiving BCS due to a primarily diagnosed breast cancer. SR was carried out in two planes, assessing the specimen regarding the presence of the lesion and its relation to all margins. If indicated, re-excision of selective orientations was advised. Under consideration of gross inspection and the SR-findings, it was up to the surgeon whether to perform re-resections. The recommendations for re-excision were, separately for each orientation, compared to the histopathological results, serving as gold standard. RESULTS: Intraoperative SR was performed in 470 cases, thus 2820 margins were assessed. Of those, 2510 (89.0%) were negative and 310 (11.0%) positive. SR identified 2179 (77.3%) margins correctly as negative, whereas 331 (11.7%) clear margins were misjudged as positive. Of 310 infiltrated margins, SR identified 114 (4.0%) correctly, whereas 196 (7.0%) infiltrated margins were missed. This resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 36.8%/86.8% and PPV/NPV of 25.6%/91.8%. Through targeted re-resections positive margins could be reduced by 31.0% [310 to 214 (7.6%)]. On case level, the rate of secondary procedures could be reduced by 37.0% [from 162 to 102 (21.7%)]. CONCLUSIONS: SR is a helpful tool to identify infiltrated margins and to reduce the rate of secondary surgeries by recommending targeted re-excisions of according orientations in order to obtain a final negative margin status.

Prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is shear wave elastography a useful tool in clinical routine?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the validity of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for the preoperative assessment of pathological complete response (pCR) to standard clinical assessment in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, consecutive clinical trial was conducted under routine clinical practice. Analysis included 134 patients. SWE served as index test, final pathology from surgical specimen as reference standard. PCR (ypT0) was defined as primary endpoint. Elasticity changes were compared for the pCR- vs. non-pCR group. To determine the validity of shear wave velocity (Vs), ROC analyses and diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated and compared to the final standard clinical assessment by physical examination, mammography and B-mode ultrasound (ycT + vs. ycT0). RESULTS: Vs was significantly reduced in pCR and non-pCR groups during NACT (pCR: ΔVs(abs) = 3.90 m/s, p < 0.001; non-pCR: ΔVs(abs) = 3.10 m/s, p < 0.001). The pCR-group showed significant lower Vs for all control visits (t1,2,END: p < 0.001). ROC analysis of Vs yielded moderate AUCs for the total population (t0: 0.613, t1: 0.745, t2: 0.685, tEND: 0.718). Compared to standard clinical assessment, Vs(tEND) (cut-off: ≤3.35 m/s) was superior in sensitivity (79.6 % vs. 54.5 %), NPV (86.4 % vs. 77.5 %), FNR (20.4 % vs. 45.5 %), inferior in specificity (58.6 % vs. 77.5 %), PPV (46.3 % vs. 54.5 %), FPR (41.4 % vs. 22.5 %). CONCLUSION: SWE measures significant differences in tumour elasticity changes in pCR vs. non-pCR cases. SWE shows improved sensitivity compared to standard clinical assessment, high NPV and low FNR, but failed in specificity in order to predict pCR under routine conditions.