Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(5): 1145-50, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617502

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MR angiography sequence (Syngo Native Space, Siemens Healthcare) to detect and quantify lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients known to have lower-limb arteriopathy were included in this prospective study. For every patient, we performed Native sequence and CE-MRA on a 1.5-T system. We evaluated examination duration, image quality, and location, number, and severity of lesions. RESULTS: Examination duration was longer for Native sequence (mean, 39.6 min, vs 10 min for CE-MRA). Image quality was significantly better for CE-MRA, with 92% of images listed as good to excellent for CE-MRA, compared to 53% for Native. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of Native were respectively 75%, 95%, 89%, and 88% for all mixed levels; 52%, 97%, 88%, and 87% for aortoiliac level; 87%, 99%, 95%, and 92% for femoropopliteal level; and 82%, 87%, 87%, and 85% for subpopliteal level. If we considered only patients with Leriche and Fontaine stage II arteriopathy, Native results were slightly better, with respective specificities and NPVs of 96% and 91% for all mixed levels; 98% and 90% for aortoiliac level; 98% and 93% for femoropopliteal level; and 91% and 90% for subpopliteal level. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR angiography, cheaper than CE-MRA, showed in our study a good NPV, which suggests its utility as first-line test to screen for PAD, especially in patients at risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.


Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/patología , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Meglumina , Compuestos Organometálicos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Marcadores de Spin
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 199(5): W629-37, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23096208

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to assess the feasibility and performance of an unenhanced 3D balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence, compared with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA), which is the reference standard to detect and quantify renal artery stenoses (RAS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients were included in this prospective study. Balanced SSFP sequence (Native) and CEMRA were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Signal quality and stenosis grade were assessed per segment for renal arteries and for ostia of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). We compared signal quality of Native and CEMRA. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were also calculated. RESULTS: Evaluation involved 114 renal arteries, 51 celiac trunks, and 51 SMAs. By use of CEMRA, 20 significant stenoses were found for renal arteries, 10 stenoses and three occlusions for celiac trunk, and three stenoses for SMA. At artery-by-artery analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV of the balanced SSFP sequence in detecting stenosis were respectively 85%, 96%, 94%, and 96% for renal arteries; 100%, 97%, 98%, and 100% for celiac trunk; and 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for SMA. No significant difference of signal quality was found for the entire examination and for the different segments evaluated except for hilar and intrarenal branches, which showed better signal quality on balanced SSFP sequence. CONCLUSION: The NPV results in our study suggest that unenhanced balanced SSFP MR angiography can be the first-choice imaging method to exclude RAS in patients at high risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. However, when stenosis is found, other imaging modalities are necessary for better estimation.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteria Celíaca , Medios de Contraste , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Masculino , Meglumina , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Acta Radiol ; 53(4): 401-5, 2012 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22517982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Isolated non-traumatic renal artery dissection (RAD) is a rare disorder with uncertain natural history. The management may be surgical reconstruction, endovascular repair, or conservative medical treatment, yet no official consensus had been established. PURPOSE: To report the management of four cases of isolated non-traumatic RAD, emphasizing the beneficial role of conservative medical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the year 2000 till 2011, four male patients with mean age of 42.5 years (range 34-48 years) presented with isolated non-traumatic RAD and were initially treated with medical therapy. Transcatheter in situ thrombolysis was performed in a case with thrombotic occlusion. RESULTS: Isolated non-traumatic RAD in four patients involving at least seven branches progressed to thrombotic occlusion in two branches, luminal narrowing in five, dual lumens in two, and aneurysmal dilatation in three. Medical treatment was efficacious in three patients, who showed persistent preserved renal function, controlled blood pressure, and favorable arterial remodeling. After failure of medical therapy, the fourth patient was referred to surgery. Thrombolysis was successful to dissolute an occluding thrombotic dissection. CONCLUSION: Conservative therapy is safe and effective when the renal artery is patent and blood pressure is controlled: we propose it as the first line of treatment, reserving interventional management for refractory cases.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/terapia , Arteria Renal , Adulto , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Trombolítica , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Acta Radiol ; 53(4): 430-4, 2012 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22434929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Renal artery aneurysms (RAA) are a relatively rare vascular entity. Treatment could be either surgical or via an endovascular route. The main aim of therapy is to prevent lethal rupture. PURPOSE: To evaluate the angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment (EVT) of eight renal artery aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2011, 18 patients presented with 18 renal artery aneurysms. One was classified as Rundback type I, 15 were type II, and two aneurysms were type III. Endovascular treatment was considered unsafe in 10 cases (all were Rundback type II), and were referred to surgery. The remaining eight aneurysms were treated endovascularly during altogether nine sessions. Among these, four patients were asymptomatic, three were hypertensive, and one presented with ipsilateral flank pains. Aneurysmal sac diameter varied between 12 and 50 mm. EVT included selective coil embolization in five cases, covered stents in two cases, and parent artery occlusion in one. RESULTS: Follow-up with CT angiography was obtained in all endovascularly treated aneurysms (range 6-54 months, mean 15 months). Complete durable occlusion was achieved in all aneurysms except one, which showed re-expansion after 20 months and was retreated with covered stent implantation. Clinically silent, branch occlusion occurred after four procedures with subsequent limited (less than 25%) ischemic parenchymal loss. All patients were discharged with preserved renal function. Clinical improvement was noted in all symptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of renal artery aneurysms is an adequate treatment and can be proposed, if feasible, as first step.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Stents , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA