Establishing Benchmarks For Minimum Competence With Dry Lab Robotic Surgery Drills.

The Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (R-OSATS) is a previously validated assessment tool that is used to assess 5 standardized inanimate robotic surgery drills. R-OSATS is used to evaluate performance on surgical drills, with scores of 0 to 20 for each drill. Our objective was to establish the minimum threshold score that denotes competence on these drills. Thus, we performed a standard setting study using data from surgeons and trainees in 8 academic medical centers. Cutoff scores for the minimal level of competence using R-OSATS were established using 2 techniques: the modified Angoff and the contrasting groups methods. For the modified Angoff method, 8 content experts met and, in an iterative process, derived the scores that a minimally competent trainee should receive. After 2 iterative rounds of scoring and discussion with the modified Angoff method, we established a minimum competence score per drill with high agreement (rWG range, 0.92-0.98). There was unanimous consensus that a trainee needs to achieve competence on each independent drill. A second method, the contrasting groups method, was used to verify our results. In this method, we compared R-OSATS scores from "inexperienced" (34 postgraduate year 1 and 2 trainees) with "experienced" (22 faculty and fellow) robotic surgeons. The distributions of scores from both groups were plotted, and a cutoff score for each drill was determined from the intersection of the 2 curves. Using this method, the minimum score for competence would be 14 per drill, which is slightly more stringent but confirms the results obtained from the modified Angoff approach. In conclusion, using 2 well-described standard setting techniques, we have established minimum benchmarks designating trainee competence for 5 dry lab robotic surgery drills.

Obstetric vulvar lacerations and postpartum dyspareunia.

OBJECTIVE: To report the type and prevalence of obstetric lacerations in a primigravid patient population after term spontaneous vaginal delivery without episiotomy. We examined the characteristics of lacerations in patients with postpartum dyspareunia or vulvodynia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of primiparous patients who spontaneously delivered in the residents' service at a large urban hospital under the supervision of Ob/Gyn faculty. Data was extracted from medical records using discharge diagnosis codes. Postpartum medical records and diagnostic codes of all patients with lacerations and postpartum dyspareunia were reviewed. The study was IRB approved. RESULTS: A cohort of 1617 primiparous patients with spontaneous vaginal delivery met the inclusion criteria. No tears were recorded in 836 patients (51.7%), first-degree tears in 413 cases (25.5%), second-degree tears in 271 cases (16.8%), third-degree tears in 58 cases (3.6%), fourth-degree in 21 cases (1.3%), and 18 cases (1.1%) were not further classified. Only 51 patients (3.2%) with first- and second-degree lacerations had postpartum complications, and merely 6 (0.4%) had vulvar pain and 6 (0.4%) had dyspareunia. However, 4 of those patients (33.3%) required vulvoplasty for complete dyspareunia remission. CONCLUSION: Almost half of patients with spontaneous vaginal delivery without episiotomy experienced some type of vaginal laceration. A first degree was documented in >25% of cases; however, <10% of those subsequently had complaints of vulvar pain or dyspareunia.

Lichen sclerosus: a 5-year follow-up after topical, subdermal, or combined therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare clinical data regarding patients with pruritic lichen sclerosus (LS) at moderate or severe stages using 2 different therapies with a 5-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and was presented as a retrospective clinical data review of patients with pruritic biopsy diagnosis LS who underwent therapy at our university private practice from 2002 to 2005. We compared the results of a weekly topical application of high-potency steroid (HPS) with a combined HPS and monthly anesthetic/steroid subdermal injection (ASI). Outcomes were timed to achieve pruritus-free status, the number of symptomatic recurrences, and patient satisfaction with therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with LS between 2002 and 2005. There were 13 patients who had mild-stage, 25 who had moderate-stage, and 16 who had severe-stage LS. Five-year follow-up data on 17 patients with moderate-stage LS and 14 patients with severe-stage LS were obtained. Time to pruritus free was 6 weeks with ASI and 19 weeks with HPS for moderate-stage LS (p = .04) and 9 weeks with ASI and 24 weeks with HPS for severe-stage LS (p = .03). Recurrences were more frequent on HPS for moderate-stage LS (p = .04) but not significant with HPS for severe-stage LS (p = .15). Only ASI was successful at treating patients with recalcitrant pruritus. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, patients with symptomatic moderate-stage LS seem to have a more rapid and prolonged response to ASI than to HPS but are less satisfied with the injections.

A Risk-Stratified Peri-Operative Protocol for Reducing Surgical Site Infection after Cesarean Delivery.

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are multifaceted. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors influence the risk of developing an infection. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of an infection risk-stratification checklist, utilizing known SSI risk factors, and a tailored surgical protocol for SSI prevention in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Patients and Methods: A prospective project to reduce SSI was conducted for women undergoing cesarean delivery on the resident staff service at a midwestern, urban tertiary care hospital. Patients were categorized according to an SSI risk-stratification checklist as high risk or low risk. The low-risk group received the local standard of care (single prophylactic dose of pre-operative intravenous antibiotics and a standard pressure dressing). In the high-risk group, prophylactic antibiotic agents were given pre-operatively and continued for the first 24 hours post-operatively. Additionally, patients at high risk received an absorbent dressing (Mepilex Ag®; Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) that was applied in the operating room and worn for one week. Results: The overall rate of SSIs decreased from 6.1% (pre-study rate) to 1.4% after initiation of the protocol, a 77% reduction (p < 0.001). The low- and high-risk groups did not differ in infection rate (0% and 1.4%, respectively; p < 0.59). Both deep incisional and organ/space SSIs decreased after initiation of the protocol (91% and 62% decrease, respectively). Conclusion: Stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups with tailored peri-operative management strategies reduced overall SSIs. The protocol incorporates known risk factors for SSI in a surgical procedure with high rates of SSI. This approach offers a structured method that can be adopted by other hospital systems for SSI prevention in patients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Hysteroscopic morcellator to overcome cervical stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To report a step-by-step technique to using a hysteroscopic morcellator to safely gain access into the intrauterine cavity in two patients with severe cervical stenosis and concomitant intrauterine pathology. DESIGN: Video article introducing the hysteroscopic morcellator for overcoming severe cervical stenosis. SETTING: Academic-based practice. PATIENT(S): A 36-year-old G0 female with primary infertility and uterine polyps and a 34-year-old G0 female with uterine polyps and a difficult trial transfer before undergoing an IVF cycle. In both patients, preoperative saline-infused sonography revealed submucosal filling defects and severe cervical stenosis. INTERVENTION(S): A hysteroscopic technique using the Hologic Myosure to overcome severe cervical stenosis with or without the use of intraoperative ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Despite using preoperative Cytotec, cervical stenosis was identified. Under direct visualization, a 4-mm Myosure XL blade was placed through a 7.25-mm Myosure XL hysteroscopy. The cutter blade, powered by an electromechanical drive system, enables simultaneous rotation and reciprocation. The blade allows one to shave and remove tissue and is applied to cervical stenosis, allowing safe access into the intrauterine cavity. RESULT(S): The intrauterine hysteroscopic Myosure morcellator allowed for safe and direct entry into the uterine cavity. We have since applied this technique to all patients where cervical stenosis is identified and have minimized potential uterine perforation and false tracks in our patients. CONCLUSION(S): Our technique is an alternative method for overcoming severe cervical stenosis and minimizing potential intraoperative complications.

Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills.

OBJECTIVE: Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills have been developed to measure the skill of surgical trainees. Our aim was to develop an Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills specifically for trainees learning robotic surgery. METHODS: This is a multiinstitutional study conducted in eight academic training programs. We created an assessment form to evaluate robotic surgical skill through five inanimate exercises. Gynecology, general surgery, and urology residents, Fellows, and faculty completed five robotic exercises on a standard training model. Study sessions were recorded and randomly assigned to three blinded judges who scored performance using the assessment form. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing scores between participants with different levels of surgical experience; interrater and intrarater reliability were also assessed. RESULTS: We evaluated 83 residents, nine Fellows, and 13 faculty totaling 105 participants; 88 (84%) were from gynecology. Our assessment form demonstrated construct validity with faculty and Fellows performing significantly better than residents (mean scores 89±8 faculty, 74±17 Fellows, 59±22 residents; P<.01). In addition, participants with more robotic console experience scored significantly higher than those with fewer prior console surgeries (P<.01). Robotic Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills demonstrated good interrater reliability across all five drills (mean Cronbach's α 0.79±0.02). Intrarater reliability was also high (mean Spearman's correlation 0.91±0.11). CONCLUSION: We developed a valid and reliable assessment form for robotic surgical skill. When paired with standardized robotic skill drills, this form may be useful to distinguish between levels of trainee performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.