Diversity of Dystrophin Gene Mutations and Disease Progression in a Contemporary Cohort of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Abnormal dystrophin production due to mutations in the dystrophin gene causes Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Cases demonstrate considerable genetic and disease progression variability. It is unclear if specific gene mutations are prognostic of outcomes in this population. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of DMD patients followed at 17 centers across the USA and Canada from 2005 to 2015 with goal of understanding the genetic variability of DMD and its impact on clinical outcomes. Cumulative incidence of clinically relevant outcomes was stratified by genetic mutation type, exon mutation location, and extent of exon deletion. Of 436 males with DMD, 324 (74.3%) underwent genetic testing. Deletions were the most common mutation type (256, 79%), followed by point mutations (45, 13.9%) and duplications (23, 7.1%). There were 131 combinations of mutations with most mutations located along exons 45 to 52. The number of exons deleted varied between 1 and 52 with a median of 3 exons deleted (IQR 1-6). Subjects with mutations starting at exon positions 40-54 had a later onset of arrhythmias occurring at median age 25 years (95% CI 18-∞), p = 0.01. Loss of ambulation occurred later at median age of 13 years (95% CI 12-15) in subjects with mutations that started between exons 55-79, p = 0.01. There was no association between mutation type or location and onset of cardiac dysfunction. We report the genetic variability in DMD and its association with timing of clinical outcomes. Genetic modifiers may explain some phenotypic variability.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) use has not been characterized in this population but is considered for symptomatic patients with severe LV dysfunction (SLVD) receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). We evaluated ICD utilization and efficacy in patients with DMD. Retrospective cohort study of DMD patients from 17 centers across North America between January 2, 2005 and December 31, 2015. ICD use and its effect on survival were evaluated in patients with SLVD defined as ejection fraction (EF) < 35% and/ or shortening fraction (SF) < 16% on final echocardiogram. SLVD was present in 57/436 (13.1%) patients, of which 12 (21.1%) died during the study period. Of these 12, (mean EF 20.9 ± 6.2% and SF 13.7 ± 7.2%), 8 received GDMT, 5 received steroids, and none received an ICD. ICDs were placed in 9/57 (15.8%) patients with SLVD (mean EF 31.2 ± 8.5% and SF 10.3 ± 4.9%) at a mean age of 20.4 ± 6.3 years; 8/9 received GDMT, 7 received steroids, and all were alive at study end; mean ICD duration was 36.1 ± 26.2 months. Nine ICDs were implanted at six different institutions, associated with two appropriate shocks for ventricular tachycardia in two patients, no inappropriate shocks, and one lead fracture. ICD use may be associated with improved survival and minimal complications in DMD cardiomyopathy with SLVD. However, inconsistent GDMT utilization may be a significant confounder. Future studies should define optimal indications for ICD implantation in patients with DMD cardiomyopathy.

Risk Factors for Cardiac and Non-cardiac Causes of Death in Males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

As survival and neuromuscular function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) have improved with glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and ventilatory support, cardiac deaths are increasing. Little is known about risk factors for cardiac and non-cardiac causes of death in DMD. A multi-center retrospective cohort study of 408 males with DMD, followed from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015, was conducted to identify risk factors for death. Those dying of cardiac causes were compared to those dying of non-cardiac causes and to those alive at study end. There were 29 (7.1%) deaths at a median age of 19.5 (IQR: 16.9-24.6) years; 8 (27.6%) cardiac, and 21 non-cardiac. Those living were younger [14.9 (IQR: 11.0-19.1) years] than those dying of cardiac [18 (IQR 15.5-24) years, p = 0.03] and non-cardiac [19 (IQR: 16.5-23) years, p = 0.002] causes. GC use was lower for those dying of cardiac causes compared to those living [2/8 (25%) vs. 304/378 (80.4%), p = 0.001]. Last ejection fraction prior to death/study end was lower for those dying of cardiac causes compared to those living (37.5% ± 12.8 vs. 54.5% ± 10.8, p = 0.01) but not compared to those dying of non-cardiac causes (37.5% ± 12.8 vs. 41.2% ± 19.3, p = 0.58). In a large DMD cohort, approximately 30% of deaths were cardiac. Lack of GC use was associated with cardiac causes of death, while systolic dysfunction was associated with death from any cause. Further work is needed to ensure guideline adherence and to define optimal management of systolic dysfunction in males with DMD with hopes of extending survival.

Use of advanced heart failure therapies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: As survival and neuromuscular function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) improve with glucocorticoid therapy and respiratory advances, the proportion of cardiac deaths is increasing. Little is known about the use and outcomes of advanced heart failure (HF) therapies in this population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 436 males with DMD was performed, from January 1, 2005-January 1, 2018, with the primary outcome being use of advanced HF therapies including: implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and heart transplantation (HTX). RESULTS: Nine subjects had an ICD placed, 2 of whom (22.2%) had appropriate shocks for ventricular tachycardia; 1 and 968 days after implant, and all of whom were alive at last follow-up; median 18 (IQR: 12.5-25.5) months from implant. Four subjects had a LVAD implanted with post-LVAD survival of 75% at 1 year; 2 remaining on support and 1 undergoing HTX. One subject was bridged to HTX with ICD and LVAD and was alive at last follow-up, 53 months after HTX. CONCLUSION: Advanced HF therapies may be used effectively in select subjects with DMD. Further studies are needed to better understand risk stratification for ICD use and optimal candidacy for LVAD implantation and HTX, with hopes of improving cardiac outcomes.

Risk Factors for Cardiac Arrest or Mechanical Circulatory Support in Children with Fulminant Myocarditis.

In children with fulminant myocarditis (FM), we sought to describe presenting characteristics and clinical outcomes, and identify risk factors for cardiac arrest and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A retrospective review of patients with FM admitted at our institution between January 1, 2004, and June 31, 2015, was performed. We compared characteristics and outcomes of FM patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and/or were placed on MCS (CPR/MCS group) to those who did not develop these outcomes (Control group). There were 28 patients who met criteria for FM. Median age was 1.2 years (1 day-17 years). Recovery of myocardial function occurred in 13 patients (46%); 6 (21%) had chronic ventricular dysfunction, 6 (21%) underwent heart transplantation, and 3 (11%) died prior to hospital discharge (including one death following heart transplant). Of the 28 FM patients, 13 (46%) developed cardiac arrest (n = 11) and/or received MCS (n = 8). When compared to controls, patients in the CPR/MCS group had a higher peak b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (p = 0.03) and peak inotropic scores (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found between groups in demographics; chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, or echocardiogram findings; or initial laboratory values including BNP, troponin, C-reactive protein, lactate, and creatinine (p > 0.05 for all). Children with FM are at high risk of cardiovascular collapse leading to the use of CPR or MCS. Aside from peak BNP levels and inotropic scores, the most presenting characteristics were not helpful for predicting these outcomes. FM patients should ideally receive care in centers that provide emergent MCS.

The landscape of cardiovascular care in pediatric cancer patients and survivors: a survey by the ACC Pediatric Cardio-Oncology Work Group.

OBJECTIVE: To enhance the understanding of cardiovascular care delivery in childhood cancer patients and survivors. STUDY DESIGN: A 20-question survey was created by the Pediatric Cardio-oncology Work Group of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Cardio-oncology Section to assess the care, management, and surveillance tools utilized to manage pediatric/young adult cardio-oncology patients. The survey distribution was a collaborative effort between Cardio-oncology Section and membership of the Adult Congenital and Pediatric Cardiology Section (ACPC) of the ACC. RESULTS: Sixty-five individuals, all self-identified as physicians, responded to the survey. Most respondents (n = 58,89%) indicated childhood cancer patients are regularly screened prior to and during cancer therapy at their centers, predominantly by electrocardiogram (75%), standard echocardiogram (58%) and advanced echocardiogram (50%) (i.e. strain, stress echo). Evaluation by a cardiologist prior to/during therapy was reported by only 8(12%) respondents, as compared to post-therapy which was reported by 28 (43%, p < 0.01). The most common indications for referral to cardiology at pediatric centers were abnormal test results (n = 31,48%) and history of chemotherapy exposure (n = 27,42%). Of note, during post-treatment counseling, common cardiovascular risk-factors like blood pressure (31,48%), lipid control (22,34%), obesity & smoking (30,46%) and diet/exercise/weight loss (30,46%) were addressed by fewer respondents than was LV function (72%). CONCLUSIONS: The survey data demonstrates that pediatric cancer patients are being screened by EKG and/or imaging prior to/during therapy at most centers. Our data, however, highlight the potential for greater involvement of a cardiovascular specialist for pre-treatment evaluation process, and for more systematic cardiac risk factor counseling in posttreatment cancer survivors.