RESUMEN
Diffusion of atoms or ions in solid crystalline lattice is crucial in many areas of solid-state technology. However, controlling ion diffusion and migration is challenging in nanoscale lattices. In this work, we intentionally insert a CdZnS alloyed interface layer, with small cationic size mismatch with Mn(ii) dopant ions, as an "atomic trap" to facilitate directional (outward and inward) dopant migration inside core/multi-shell quantum dots (QDs) to reduce the strain from the larger cationic mismatch between dopants and host sites. Furthermore, it was found that the initial doping site/environment is critical for efficient dopant trapping and migration. Specifically, a larger Cd(ii) substitutional site (92 pm) for the Mn(ii) dopant (80 pm), with larger local lattice distortion, allows for efficient atomic trapping and dopant migration; while Mn(ii) dopant ions can be very stable with no significant migration when occupying a smaller Zn(ii) substitutional site (74 pm). Density functional theory calculations revealed a higher energy barrier for a Mn(ii) dopant hopping from the smaller Zn substitutional tetrahedral (Td) site as compared to a larger Cd substitutional Td site. The controlled dopant migration by "atomic trapping" inside QDs provides a new way to fine tune the properties of doped nanomaterials.
RESUMEN
Long non-coding RNA SLC25A25 antisense RNA 1 (SLC25A25-AS1) exerts antitumour activity in colorectal cancer. The present study investigated whether SLC25A25-AS1 is implicated in the aggressiveness of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the possible underlying mechanism. SLC25A25-AS1 expression in NSCLC was determined by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of NSCLC cells were tested in vitro through cell counting kit-8 assay, flow cytometry analysis, Transwell migration and invasion assays, followed by in vivo validation using animal experiments. Additionally, the competitive endogenous RNA theory for SLC25A25-AS1, microRNA-195-5p (miR-195-5p) and integrin α2 (ITGA2) was identified using subcellular fractionation, bioinformatics analysis, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, western blotting, a luciferase assay and RNA immunoprecipitation. As compared with normal lung tissues, increased expression of SLC25A25-AS1 was demonstrated in NSCLC tissues using The Cancer Genome Atlas database.. In addition, SLC25A25-AS1 was overexpressed in both NSCLC tissues and cell lines. High SLC25A25-AS1 expression was markedly associated with shorter overall survival time of patients with NSCLC. SLC25A25-AS1 silencing impeded NSCLC cell proliferation and triggered apoptosis, while restricting cell migration and invasion. Tumour growth in vivo was also impaired by SLC25A25-AS1 silencing. Mechanistically, SLC25A25-AS1 was demonstrated to be an miR-195-5p sponge in NSCLC cells. miR-195-5p mimics decreased ITGA2 expression in NSCLC cells by directly targeting ITGA2, and SLC25A25-AS1 interference decreased ITGA2 expression by sequestering miR-195-5p. Furthermore, the antitumour effects of SLC25A25-AS1 silencing on malignant behaviours were counteracted when ITGA2 was restored or when miR-195-5p was silenced. In summary, by controlling the miR-195-5p/ITGA2 axis, SLC25A25-AS1 served tumour-promoting roles in NSCLC cells. Therefore, the SLC25A25-AS1/miR-195-5p/ITGA2 signalling pathway might be an attractive target for future therapeutic options in NSCLC.
RESUMEN
In recent years, the morbidity rate resulting from numerous types of malignant tumor has increased annually, and the treatment of tumors has been attracting an increasing amount of attention. A number of recent studies have revealed that the water channel protein aquaporin-5 (AQP5) has become a major player in multiple types of cancer. AQP5 is abnormally expressed in a variety of tumor tissues or cells and has multiple effects on certain biological functions of tumors, such as regulating the proliferation, apoptosis and migration of tumor cells. It has been suggested that AQP5 may play an important role in the process of tumor development, opening up a new field of tumor research. The present review highlighted the structure of AQP5 and its role in tumor progression. Furthermore, the expression of AQP5 in different malignant neoplasms was summarized. In addition, the influence of not only drugs, but also different compounds on AQP5 were summarized. In conclusion, according to the findings in the present review, AQP5 has potential as a novel therapeutic target in human cancer, and other AQPs should be similarly investigated.
RESUMEN
Efficacy comparison of icotinib and pemetrexed in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma and the effects on the prognostic survival rate of patients were investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed in 132 lung adenocarcinoma patients who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University from July 2010 to July 2015. Among them, 69 patients were treated with icotinib (icotinib group), and 63 patients were treated with pemetrexed (pemetrexed group). In the icotinib group, 125 mg icotinib was orally administered continuously, 3 times a day, until progressive disease or intolerable adverse reactions occurred. In the pemetrexed group, 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed was intravenously dripped for a total of 4 cycles, 21 days for 1 cycle, until progressive disease or intolerable adverse reactions occurred. The efficacy, toxic and side effects, and survival rate of the two groups were evaluated. There was a statistically significant difference in toxic and side effects between the two groups of drugs after the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). The median survival time of patients was 16 months in the icotinib group and 10 months in the pemetrexed group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The 1-year survival rate was higher in the icotinib group than that in the pemetrexed group (P<0.05). There was no difference in 2- and 3-year survival rates between the two groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of icotinib is similar to that of pemetrexed in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, but icotinib has less adverse reactions, with better improvement in disease control.