Electrophysiology in diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain.

Electrophysiological techniques demonstrate abnormalities in somatosensory transmission, hence providing objective evidence of 'somatosensory lesion or disease' which is crucial to the diagnosis of neuropathic pain (NP). Since most instances of NP result from damage to thermo-nociceptive pathways (thin fibres and spino-thalamo-cortical systems), specific activation of these is critical to ensure diagnostic accuracy. This is currently achieved using laser pulses or contact heat stimuli, and in a near future probably also with contact cold and intra-epidermal low-intensity currents. Standard electrical stimuli, although of lesser diagnostic yield, are useful when large and small fibres are affected together. Nociceptive evoked potentials to laser (LEPs) and contact heat (CHEPs) have shown adequate sensitivity and specificity to be of clinical use in the differential diagnosis of NP, in conditions involving Aδ of C-fibres and spino-thalamo-cortical pathways. LEPs have also a role in the detection of patients at risk of developing central post-stroke pain after brainstem, thalamic or cortical injury. Cognitive cortical responses and autonomic reactions (sympathetic skin responses) reflect pain-related arousal and can document objectively positive symptoms such as allodynia and hyperalgesia. They are of help in the differential diagnosis of somatisation disorders, by discriminating conscious simulation (malingering) from conversive sensory loss. The electrophysiological approach to patients suspected, or at risk, of NP is a cost-effective procedure that should never be absent in the diagnostic armamentarium of pain clinics.

Does an observer's empathy influence my pain? Effect of perceived empathetic or unempathetic support on a pain test.

The physiological and behavioural effects of empathy for other's pain have been widely investigated, while the opposite situation, i.e. the influence on one's pain of empathetic feedback from others, remains largely unexplored. Here, we assessed whether and how empathetic and unempathetic comments from observers modulate pain and associated vegetative reactions. In Study 1, conversations between observers of a pain study were recorded by professional actors. Comments were prepared to be perceived as empathetic, unempathetic or neutral, and were validated in 40 subjects. In a subsequent pain experiment (Study 2), changes in subjective pain and heart rate were investigated in 30 naïve participants who could overhear the empathetic or unempathetic conversations pre-recorded in study 1. Subjective pain was significantly attenuated when hearing empathetic comments, as compared to both unempathetic and neutral conditions, while unempathetic comments failed to significantly modulate pain. Heart rate increased when hearing unempathetic remarks and when receiving pain stimuli, but heart acceleration to nociceptive stimulation was not correlated with pain ratings. These results suggest that empathetic feedback from observers has a positive influence on pain appraisal and that this effect may surpass the negative effect of unempathetic remarks. Negative remarks can either trigger feelings of guilt or induce irritation/anger, with antagonistic effects on pain that might explain inter-individual variation. As in basal conditions heart rate and pain perception are positively correlated, their dissociation here suggests that changes in subjective pain were linked to a cognitive bias rather than changes in sensory input.

EAN guidelines on central neurostimulation therapy in chronic pain conditions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to update previous European Federation of Neurological Societies guidelines on neurostimulation for neuropathic pain, expanding the search to new techniques and to chronic pain conditions other than neuropathic pain, and assessing the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials published between 2006 and December 2014 was conducted. Pain conditions included neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I and post-surgical chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct electrical stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) were assessed. The GRADE system was used to assess quality of evidence and propose recommendations. RESULTS: The following recommendations were reached: 'weak' for SCS added to conventional medical management in diabetic painful neuropathy, CBLP and CRPS, for SCS versus reoperation in CBLP, for MCS in neuropathic pain, for rTMS of M1 in neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia and for tDCS of M1 in neuropathic pain; 'inconclusive' for DBS in neuropathic pain, rTMS and tDCS of the DLPFC, and for motor cortex tDCS in fibromyalgia and spinal cord injury pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the poor to moderate quality of evidence identified by this review, future large-scale multicentre studies of non-invasive and invasive neurostimulation are encouraged. The collection of higher quality evidence of the predictive factors for the efficacy of these techniques, such as the duration, quality and severity of pain, is also recommended.

Modulation of the spinal N13 SEP component by high- and low-frequency electrical stimulation. Experimental pain models matter.

OBJECTIVE: The N13 component of somatosensory evoked potential (N13 SEP) represents the segmental response of cervical dorsal horn neurons. Neurophysiological studies in healthy participants showed that capsaicin-induced central sensitization causes an increase of the N13 SEP amplitude. Consequently, in human research, this spinal component may serve as a valuable readout of central sensitization. In this study, we wanted to verify if the sensitivity of the N13 SEP for detecting central sensitization is consistent across different experimental pain models inducing central sensitization and secondary hyperalgesia, namely high and low-frequency electrical stimulation (HFS and LFS). METHODS: In 18 healthy participants, we recorded SEP after bilateral ulnar nerve stimulation before and after secondary hyperalgesia was induced through HFS and LFS applied on the ulnar nerve territory of the hand of one side. The area of secondary hyperalgesia was mapped with a calibrated 128-mN pinprick probe, and the mechanical pain sensitivity with three calibrated 16-64-256-mN pinprick probes. RESULTS: Although both HFS and LFS successfully induced secondary hyperalgesia only LFS increased the amplitude of the N13 SEP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the sensitivity of the N13 SEP for detecting dorsal horn excitability changes may critically depend on the different experimental pain models. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that LFS and HFS could trigger central sensitization at the dorsal horn level through distinct mechanisms, however this still needs confirmation by replication studies.

Functional exploration for neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain (NP) may become refractory to conservative medical management, necessitating neurosurgical procedures in carefully selected cases. In this context, the functional neurosurgeon must have suitable knowledge of the disease he or she intends to treat, especially its pathophysiology. This latter factor has been studied thanks to advances in the functional exploration of NP, which will be detailed in this review. The study of the flexion reflex is a useful tool for clinical and pharmacological pain assessment and for exploring the mechanisms of pain at multiple levels. The main use of evoked potentials is to confirm clinical, or detect subclinical, dysfunction in peripheral and central somato-sensory pain pathways. LEP and SEP techniques are especially useful when used in combination, allowing the exploration of both pain and somato-sensory pathways. PET scans and fMRI documented rCBF increases to noxious stimuli. In patients with chronic NP, a decreased resting rCBF is observed in the contralateral thalamus, which may be reversed using analgesic procedures. Abnormal pain evoked by innocuous stimuli (allodynia) has been associated with amplification of the thalamic, insular and SII responses, concomitant to a paradoxical CBF decrease in ACC. Multiple PET studies showed that endogenous opioid secretion is very likely to occur as a reaction to pain. In addition, brain opioid receptors (OR) remain relatively untouched in peripheral NP, while a loss of ORs is most likely to occur in central NP, within the medial nociceptive pathways. PET receptor studies have also proved that antalgic Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS), indicated in severe refractory NP, induces endogenous opioid secretion in key areas of the endogenous opioid system, which may explain one of the mechanisms of action of this procedure, since the secretion is proportional to the analgesic effect.

Theta-burst versus 20 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in neuropathic pain: A head-to-head comparison.

OBJECTIVE: High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to reduce neuropathic pain, but intermittent "theta-burst" stimulation (iTBS) could be a better alternative because of shorter duration and greater ability to induce cortical plasticity. Here we compared head-to-head the pain-relieving efficacy of the two modalities when applied daily for 5 days to patients with neuropathic pain. METHODS: Forty-six patients received 20 Hz-rTMS and/or iTBS protocols and 39 of them underwent the full two procedures in a random cross-over design. They rated pain intensity, sleep quality, fatigue and general health status daily during 5 consecutive weeks. RESULTS: Pain relief during the month following stimulation was superior after 20 Hz-rTMS relative to iTBS (F(1,38) = 4.645; p = 0.037). Correlation between respective levels of maximal relief showed a significant deviation toward the 20 Hz-rTMS effect. A greater proportion of individuals responded to 20 Hz-rTMS (52% vs 32%, 95 %CI[0.095-3.27]; p = 0.06), and reports of fatigue significantly improved after 20 Hz-rTMS relative to iTBS (p = 0.01). General health and sleep quality scores did not differentiate both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency rTMS appeared superior to iTBS for neuropathic pain relief. SIGNIFICANCE: Adequate matching between the oscillatory activity of motor cortex and that of rTMS may increase synaptic efficacy, thus enhancing functional connectivity of motor cortex with distant structures involved in pain regulation.

How different experimental models of secondary hyperalgesia change the nociceptive flexion reflex.

OBJECTIVE: In this neurophysiological study in healthy humans, we assessed how central sensitization induced by either high-frequency stimulation (HFS) or topical capsaicin application modulates features of the RIII reflex response. The ability of these stimuli to engage the endogenous pain modulatory system was also tested. METHODS: In 26 healthy participants we elicited an RIII reflex using suprathreshold stimulation of the sural nerve. Subsequently HFS or capsaicin were applied to the foot and the RIII reflex repeated after 15 minutes. Contact heating of the volar forearm served as the heterotopic test stimulus to probe activation of the endogenous pain modulatory system. RESULTS: HFS significantly reduced the pain threshold by 29% and the RIII reflex threshold by 20%. Capsaicin significantly reduced the pain threshold by 17% and the RIII reflex threshold by 18%. Both HFS and capsaicin left RIII reflex size unaffected. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores elicited by the heterotopic noxious heat stimulus were unaffected by capsaicin and slightly increased by HFS. CONCLUSIONS: HFS and capsaicin similarly modulated the pain threshold and RIII reflex threshold, without a concomitant inhibitory effect of the endogenous pain modulatory system. SIGNIFICANCE: Our neurophysiological study supports the use of the RIII reflex in investigating central sensitization in humans.

Modulation of the N13 component of the somatosensory evoked potentials in an experimental model of central sensitization in humans.

The N13 component of somatosensory evoked potential (N13 SEP) represents the segmental response of dorsal horn neurons. In this neurophysiological study, we aimed to verify whether N13 SEP might reflect excitability changes of dorsal horn neurons during central sensitization. In 22 healthy participants, we investigated how central sensitization induced by application of topical capsaicin to the ulnar nerve territory of the hand dorsum modulated N13 SEP elicited by ulnar nerve stimulation. Using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, we also tested whether pregabalin, an analgesic drug with proven efficacy on the dorsal horn, influenced capsaicin-induced N13 SEP modulation. Topical application of capsaicin produced an area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia, a sign of central sensitization, and increased the N13 SEP amplitude but not the peripheral N9 nor the cortical N20-P25 amplitude. This increase in N13 SEP amplitude paralleled the mechanical hyperalgesia and persisted for 120 min. Pregabalin prevented the N13 SEP modulation associated with capsaicin-induced central sensitization, whereas capsaicin application still increased N13 SEP amplitude in the placebo treatment session. Our neurophysiological study showed that capsaicin application specifically modulates N13 SEP and that this modulation is prevented by pregabalin, thus suggesting that N13 SEP may reflect changes in dorsal horn excitability and represent a useful biomarker of central sensitization in human studies.

EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We have revised the previous EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain (NP) assessment, which aimed to provide recommendations for the diagnostic process, screening tools and questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing (QST), microneurography, pain-related reflexes and evoked potentials, functional neuroimaging and skin biopsy. METHODS: We have checked and rated the literature published in the period 2004-2009, according to the EFNS method of classification for diagnostic procedures. RESULTS: Most of the previous recommendations were reinforced by the new studies. The main revisions relate to: (i) the new definition of NP and a diagnostic grading system; (ii) several new validated clinical screening tools that identify NP components, and questionnaires which assess the different types of NP; (iii) recent high-quality studies on laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and skin biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: History and bedside examination are still fundamental to a correct diagnosis, whilst screening tools and questionnaires are useful in indicating probable NP; QST is also useful for indicating the latter, and to assess provoked pains and treatment response. Amongst laboratory tests, LEPs are the best tool for assessing Adelta pathway dysfunction, and skin biopsy for assessing neuropathies with distal loss of unmyelinated nerve fibres.

Brain activity sustaining the modulation of pain by empathetic comments.

Empathetic verbal feedback from others has been shown to alleviate the intensity of experimental pain. To investigate the brain changes associated with this effect, we conducted 3T-fMRI measurements in 30 healthy subjects who received painful thermal stimuli on their left hand while overhearing empathetic, neutral or unempathetic comments, supposedly made by experimenters, via headsets. Only the empathetic comments significantly reduced pain intensity ratings. A whole-brain BOLD analysis revealed that both Empathetic and Unempathetic conditions significantly increased the activation of the right anterior insular and posterior parietal cortices to pain stimuli, while activations in the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus (PCC/Prec) were significantly stronger during Empathetic compared to Unempathetic condition. BOLD activity increased in the DLPFC in the Empathetic condition and decreased in the PCC/Prec and vmPFC in the Unempathetic condition. In the Empathetic condition only, functional connectivity increased significantly between the vmPFC and the insular cortex. These results suggest that modulation of pain perception by empathetic feedback involves a set of high-order brain regions associated with autobiographical memories and self-awareness, and relies on interactions between such supra-modal structures and key nodes of the pain system.

Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials.

The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) is in the process of updating its Recommendations for clinical practice published in 1999. These new recommendations dedicated to somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) update the methodological aspects and general clinical applications of standard SEPs, and introduce new sections dedicated to the anatomical-functional organization of the somatosensory system and to special clinical applications, such as intraoperative monitoring, recordings in the intensive care unit, pain-related evoked potentials, and trigeminal and pudendal SEPs. Standard SEPs have gained an established role in the health system, and the special clinical applications we describe here are drawing increasing interest. However, to prove clinically useful each of them requires a dedicated knowledge, both technical and pathophysiological. In this article we give technical advice, report normative values, and discuss clinical applications.

[Central post-stroke pain]. / Les douleurs centrales post-AVC.

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is known since the famous Dejerine-Roussy syndrome and its description has not improved. The subject has however been revived over the last decade thanks to advances in central nervous system imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the description of allodynia functional phenomena with fMRI, the study of opioid receptors, and above all, the analysis of pain pathways by laser-evoked potentials. Progress has also occurred in CPSP treatment with motor cortex stimulation, which probably opens a period of neuromodulation of the cortical areas controlling pain. The thalamus plays a prominent role in this disorder of central control of pain.

Somatotopic effects of rTMS in neuropathic pain? A comparison between stimulation over hand and face motor areas.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic influence of somatotopic matching between pain topography and motor cortex stimulation site for neuropathic pain (NP) remains controversial. METHODS: Thirty-two patients suffering from NP involving the upper limb (n = 20) or the face (n = 12) received two high-frequency rTMS neuronavigated sessions targeting hand and face motor cortical areas, versus placebo. The cortical target was defined by anatomical MRI and EMG responses in all patients, completed in 19 of them by functional MRI. Sessions were separated by at least 2 weeks and applied in random order. Pain relief was assessed using numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: In terms of percentage of pain relief, rTMS over the hand motor area was significantly superior to both face rTMS and placebo. When comparing pre- and post-NRS scores, a significant decrease in pain was observed after hand area rTMS for the two pain localizations, while stimulation of the face area induced a slight but nonsignificant effect on upper limb pain after correction. Sham-rTMS did not exert any effect. The percentage of patients with clinically significant (>30%) or mild (15-30%) pain relief did not differ, however, between rTMS addressed to the hand or face area. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not support a somatotopic effect of motor rTMS for NP. Lack of clinically relevant somatotopic effects in upper limb or face pain suggests that much of the rTMS analgesic effect may depend on high-order mechanisms involving cognitive and affective appraisal of pain, rather than on a sensory effect related to the specific motor area stimulated. SIGNIFICANCE: Strict somatotopic targeting of rTMS does not appear warranted for the treatment of upper limb or face NP. Since the hand motor area is easier to target and provides better results, it might be privileged for both types of pain.

Randomized double-blind controlled study of bedtime low-dose amitriptyline in chronic neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Amitriptyline has well-established efficacy in several chronic pain conditions. While optimal treatment for chronic neck pain (CNP) remains controversial, amitriptyline was not tested for CNP. We evaluated the effect of bedtime amitriptyline in the management of CNP. METHODS: A total of 220 patients suffering from idiopathic CNP were randomized to receive either placebo pill (n = 108) or 5 mg of amitriptyline (n = 112) at bedtime for 2 months. Primary outcome measure was visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Secondary outcome measures were neck pain disability index (NPDI), Bergen Insomnia Score (BIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), measured before and at the end of 2 months of treatment, with the percentage of patient satisfaction measured at the end of follow-up only. RESULTS: Eight of 112 patients (7.14%) in the amitriptyline group withdrew from the study because of intolerance. Amitriptyline group showed significantly lower VAS scores than placebo group (3.34 ± 1.45 vs. 6.12 ± 0.92; p < 0.0001), which corresponds to a 53.06 ± 20.29% of improvement from baseline pain as compared to 14.41 ± 11.05%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Similar significant improvements were observed with lesser extents for secondary outcome measures: NPDI, BIS, HAD-A, HAD-D and percentage of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Low-dose amitriptyline is effective for the management of idiopathic CNP with few side effects and high patients' satisfaction. SIGNIFICANCE: This randomized controlled trial is the first to show the effectiveness and tolerance of a medication, low-dose amitriptyline, in managing idiopathic chronic neck pain and its related comorbidities. The optimal treatment of this condition was still controversial in the literature. It extends the indication of low-dose amitriptyline to another chronic pain condition.

EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain.

Pharmacological relief of neuropathic pain is often insufficient. Electrical neurostimulation is efficacious in chronic neuropathic pain and other neurological diseases. European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) launched a Task Force to evaluate the evidence for these techniques and to produce relevant recommendations. We searched the literature from 1968 to 2006, looking for neurostimulation in neuropathic pain conditions, and classified the trials according to the EFNS scheme of evidence for therapeutic interventions. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is efficacious in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I (level B recommendation). High-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) may be better than placebo (level C) although worse than electro-acupuncture (level B). One kind of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has transient efficacy in central and peripheral neuropathic pains (level B). Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is efficacious in central post-stroke and facial pain (level C). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) should only be performed in experienced centres. Evidence for implanted peripheral stimulations is inadequate. TENS and r-TMS are non-invasive and suitable as preliminary or add-on therapies. Further controlled trials are warranted for SCS in conditions other than failed back surgery syndrome and CRPS and for MCS and DBS in general. These chronically implanted techniques provide satisfactory pain relief in many patients, including those resistant to medication or other means.

Right frontal event related EEG coherence (ERCoh) differentiates good from bad performers of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).

AIM: To investigate changes in Event-Related Coherence (ERCoh) associated to good and bad resolution of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). METHODS: Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were recorded from a sample of 30 university students while they performed a computerized version of the WCST. ERCoh was calculated for frontal and parietal electrodes for two specific moments: immediately before the response and after the feedback cues. RESULTS: Bad performers presented significantly reduced ERCoh at the right frontal region (in alpha, beta-1 and beta-2 bands), while no consistent group differences emerged for parietal ERCoh. Furthermore, the strength of functional coupling (ERCoh) between midfrontal and right-frontal electrodes was a good predictor of WCST behavioural parameters, such as the percentage of perseverative errors or the number of categories achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the right prefrontal cortex is specifically involved in executive functions, such as planning and foresight, tapped by the WCST. Although the specificity of the WCST to explore frontal lesions has been recently questioned, the present findings support that prefrontal areas are specifically involved in the successful resolution of the test by healthy subjects.

Central representation of the RIII flexion reflex associated with overt motor reaction: an fMRI study.

Recent neuroimaging studies precised the functions of the brain regions included in the so-called "pain-matrix". They isolated brain structures mediating attentional, emotional, anticipatory, cognitive, and discriminative aspects of pain perception. Surprisingly, little attention was devoted to isolate the cerebral network associated with the motor response to pain. In this study, we used fMRI to measure BOLD signal changes in nine volunteers while they received low- (L-) and high- (H-) intensity painful electrical shocks on the (left) lower limb. High-intensity stimulation was associated with a significantly stronger pain sensation and with a pronounced motor (withdrawal) reflex. BOLD responses common to L- and H-stimulation intensities were found in the right prefrontal and right posterior parietal cortices. These did not correlate with subjective pain ratings and probably mediate attentional processes unrelated to pain intensity and withdrawal. In contrast, signal changes in insula, left SII cortices and right amygdala did correlate with pain ratings and are therefore likely to encode for pain intensity. High-intensity shocks selectively recruited a motor network, including vermis, MI, SI, and paracentral cortices bilaterally, right premotor, right SII and posterior cingulate cortices. These responses, assessed for the first time in a functional imaging study, emphazised on the presence of a motor component in what has been described as the pain-matrix. They should be considered as a motor component of pain-related processes activated in case of intense pain.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease : anatomical and electrophysiological localization of active contacts.

OBJECTIVES: 1 - To assess the anatomical localization of the active contacts of deep brain stimulation targeted to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease patients. 2 - To analyze the stereotactic spatial distribution of the active contacts in relation to the dorsal and the ventral electrophysiologically-defined borders of the STN and the stereotactic theoretical target. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent bilateral high-frequency stimulation of the STN (HFS-STN). An indirect anatomical method based on ventriculography coupled to electrophysiological techniques were used to localize the STN. Clinical improvement was evaluated by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score (UPDRS III). The normalized stereotactic coordinates of the active contact centres, dorsal and ventral electrophysiologically-defined borders of the STN were obtained from intraoperative X-rays images. These coordinates were represented in a three-dimensional stereotactic space and in the digitalized atlas of the human basal ganglia. RESULTS: HFS-STN resulted in significant improvement of motor function (62.8%) in off-medication state and levodopa-equivalent dose reduction of 68.7% (p < 0.05). Most of the active contacts (78.6%) were situated close to (+/- 1.6 mm) the dorsal border of the STN (STN-DB), while 16% were dorsal and 5.4% were ventral to it. Similar distribution was observed in the atlas. The euclidean distance between the STN-DB distribution center and the active contacts distribution center was 0.31 mm, while the distance between the active contacts distribution center and the stereotactic theoretical target was 2.15 mm. Most of the space defined by the active contacts distribution (53%) was inside that defined by the STN-DB distribution. CONCLUSION: In our series, most of the active electrodes were situated near the STN-DB. This suggests that HFS-STN could influence not only STN but also the dorsal adjacent structures (zona incerta and/or Fields of Forel).

Learning to react: anticipatory mechanisms in children and adults during a visuospatial attention task.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanisms underlying age-related improvement in response times during forewarned motor tasks, using reaction times (RTs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) during a variant of the Posner paradigm. METHODS: Children and adults reacted to visual targets preceded by a spatial cue. RESULTS: As expected, adults responded faster than children whatever the cue-target combination, but this advantage could not be explained by differences in attentional orienting to, or detection of, target stimuli. ERP differences between children and adults corresponded almost exclusively to the period preceding target stimuli, where adults, but not children, exhibited a slow negative wave that extended from the delivery of the cue to slightly beyond the presentation of the target. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The timing, morphology and topography of this slow negativity corresponded to those of 'Contingent Negative Variation' and 'Readiness Potential' processes. We argue that the relative slowness of motor reactions in children during this task was not due to a deficit in spatial orienting or target evaluation, but rather to a failure in developing anticipatory and preparatory reactions in response to cues, i.e. a deficit in executive functions.