Inverse effect of the APOE epsilon4 allele in late- and early-onset Alzheimer's disease.

In Alzheimer's disease patients (AD), the age at onset (AAO) ranges from 40 to 90. Usually, AD patients who develop symptoms before the age of 65 are classified as early onset (EO). The best known genetic risk factor for AD is the ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE). In this study, 474 subjects with AD were consecutively recruited in the memory clinic of the Santa Lucia Foundation in Rome. The best fitting model  for the discrimination between EO and late onset (LO) was chosen based on lowest value of the Bayesian Information Criterion, which suggests the theoretical model with minimal deviation from the empirical distribution function of AAO in our sample. The FMM was used to compare EO and LO groups with respect to the following demographic and clinical variables: gender, age, education, MMSE and NPI. Furthermore a quantitative assessment of ADL and IADL was performed. Finally, the frequency of the APOE ε4 allele was compared in EO and LO groups. Using the admixture analysis, we established that the AAO discriminating EO from LO-AD was 63-64. Higher education was associated with earlier onset in the EO but not in LO, and duration of illness was associated with earlier onset only in LO. The ε4 allele was associated with later onset in EO but earlier onset in LO. Finally, increased impairment in ADL, IADL and NPI was associated with later onset only in the LO subgroup. Thus, the ε4 allele of the APOE gene was significantly associated with both EO and LO distributions but with opposite effect, suggesting genetic heterogeneity. Additional studies are needed to further clarify the genetic mechanisms differentiating EO- and LO-AD.

Comparison between Early-Onset and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Patients with Amnestic Presentation: CSF and (18)F-FDG PET Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the differences in brain glucose consumption between patients with early onset of Alzheimer's disease (EOAD, aged ≤65 years) and patients with late onset of Alzheimer's disease (LOAD, aged >65 years). METHODS: Differences in brain glucose consumption between the groups have been evaluated by means of Statistical Parametric Mapping version 8, with the use of age, sex, Mini-Mental State Examination and cerebrospinal fluid values of AΒ1-42, phosphorylated Tau and total Tau as covariates in the comparison between EOAD and LOAD. RESULTS: As compared to LOAD, EOAD patients showed a significant decrease in glucose consumption in a wide portion of the left parietal lobe (BA7, BA31 and BA40). No significant differences were obtained when subtracting the EOAD from the LOAD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that patients with EOAD show a different metabolic pattern as compared to those with LOAD that mainly involves the left parietal lobe.