Comparison of methods for the detection of in vitro synergy in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: The use of combined antibiotic therapy has become an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The time-kill (TK) assay is considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of in vitro synergy, but it is a time-consuming and expensive method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two methods for testing in vitro antimicrobial combinations: the disk diffusion method through disk approximation (DA) and the agar gradient diffusion method via the MIC:MIC ratio. The TK assay was included as the gold standard. MDR Gram-negative clinical isolates (n = 62; 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 14 Serratia marcescens) were submitted to TK, DA, and MIC:MIC ratio synergy methods. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement between the DA and TK assays ranged from 20 to 93%. The isolates of A. baumannii showed variable results of synergism according to TK, and the calculated agreement was statistically significant in this species against fosfomycin with meropenem including colistin-resistant isolates. The MIC:MIC ratiometric agreed from 35 to 71% with TK assays. The kappa test showed good agreement for the combination of colistin with amikacin (K = 0.58; P = 0.04) among the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The DA and MIC:MIC ratiometric methods are easier to perform and might be a more viable tool for clinical microbiology laboratories.

Synergistic Effect of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with Meropenem against Panresistant, Carbapenemase-Harboring Acinetobacter baumannii and Serratia marcescens Investigated Using Time-Kill and Disk Approximation Assays.

Susceptibility of ceftazidime-avibactam and in vitro synergy with meropenem were investigated using disk approximation and time-kill assays against 11 multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates harboring oxacillinases and 5 Serratia marcescens isolates carrying blaKPC-2 Ceftazidime-avibactam was very active and synergistic with meropenem against multiresistant S. marcescens isolates. On the other hand, only the A. baumannii isolates coharboring blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-117 displayed synergy. The disk approximation technique presented good sensitivity for synergism in S. marcescens infection.

Fosfomycin in severe infections due to genetically distinct pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms: synergy with meropenem.

Background: In vitro and clinical studies using parenteral fosfomycin have suggested the possibility of using this drug against infections caused by MDR microorganisms. The aim of this study was to describe a case series of patients treated with fosfomycin who had severe infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: We describe a prospective series of cases of hospitalized patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria resistant to ß-lactams and colistin, treated with 16 g of fosfomycin daily for 10-14 days. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and synergism of fosfomycin with meropenem. We tested for resistance genes and performed typing using PCR and WGS. Results: Thirteen patients received fosfomycin (seven immunosuppressed); they had bloodstream infections (n = 11; 85%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 1; 8%) and surgical site infection (n = 1; 8%), caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 9), Serratia marcescens (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). Overall, eight (62%) patients were cured. Using time-kill assays, synergism between fosfomycin and meropenem occurred in 9 (82%) of 11 isolates. Typing demonstrated that K. pneumoniae were polyclonal. Eight patients (62%) had possible adverse events, but therapy was not discontinued. Conclusions: Fosfomycin may be safe and effective against infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms with different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and there seems to be synergism with meropenem.