Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 18(4): 628-33, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27214585

RESUMEN

Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a consequence of intestinal dysbiosis and is particularly common following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective method of treating CDI by correcting intestinal dysbiosis by passive transfer of healthy donor microflora. FMT has not been widely used in immunocompromised patients, including HSCT recipients, owing to concern for donor-derived infection. Here, we describe initial results of an FMT program for CDI at a US HSCT center. Seven HSCT recipients underwent FMT between February 2015 and February 2016. Mean time post HSCT was 635 days (25-75 interquartile range [IQR] 38-791). Five of the patients (71.4%) were on immunosuppressive therapy at FMT; 4 had required long-term suppressive oral vancomycin therapy because of immediate recurrence after antibiotic cessation. Stool donors underwent comprehensive health and behavioral screening and laboratory testing of serum and stool for 32 potential pathogens. FMT was administered via the naso-jejunal route in 6 of the 7 patients. Mean follow-up was 265 days (IQR 51-288). Minor post-FMT adverse effects included self-limited bloating and urgency. One patient was suspected of having post-FMT small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. No serious adverse events were noted and all-cause mortality was 0%. Six of 7 (85.7%) patients had no recurrence; 1 patient recurred at day 156 post FMT after taking an oral antibiotic and required repeat FMT, after which no recurrence has occurred. Diarrhea was improved in all patients and 1 patient with gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease was able to taper off systemic immunosuppression after FMT. With careful donor selection and laboratory screening, FMT appears to be a safe and effective therapy for CDI in HSCT patients and may confer additional benefits. Larger studies are necessary to confirm safety and efficacy and explore other possible effects.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Diarrea/terapia , Disbiosis/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Disbiosis/complicaciones , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/mortalidad , Heces/química , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/inmunología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Intestinos/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 17(5): 688-94, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26256692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have documented adverse outcomes for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization and infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients, data are inadequate for patients undergoing autologous (auto-)HSCT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 300 consecutive patients receiving an auto-HSCT between 2006 and 2014. Patients had stool cultures for VRE on admission and weekly during hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of patients had VRE gastrointestinal (GI) colonization and 3% developed a VRE bloodstream infection (BSI), all of whom were colonized. VRE strain typing of BSI isolates showed that some patients shared identical patterns. Rates of colonization and BSI in colonized patients were similar to simultaneous patients undergoing allo-HSCT, except that the latter had a higher rate of colonization at admission. A diagnosis of lymphoma was associated with an increased risk of colonization. VRE BSI was associated with longer lengths of stay and possibly higher costs, but no decrease in overall survival, and colonized patients had no VRE infections during the year following discharge. Repeat stool cultures in patients subsequently undergoing allo-HSCT suggested that most, if not all, VRE-positive auto-HSCT patients lose their detectable GI colonization within a few months of discharge. CONCLUSION: VRE colonization is frequent but carries a low risk for infection in patients undergoing auto-HSCT. However, these patients can serve as reservoirs for transmission to higher risk patients. Moreover, patients may remain colonized if proceeding to an allo-HSCT shortly after auto-HSCT, potentially increasing the risk of the allogeneic procedure.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/etiología , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/inmunología , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA