Gender Differences in Family Caregiving. Do female caregivers do more or undertake different tasks?

BACKGROUND: Two out of three family caregivers are female. However, current trends show that men are more likely to undertake caregiving duties, yet female caregivers report a higher burden. This paper analyzed data from long-term family caregivers to determine whether, under similar circumstances, gender differences in caregiving persist. We examined whether the observed gender gap affects caregivers' satisfaction with their health and quality of life. METHODS: We analyze cross-sectional data from family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. The data provides comprehensive information about the time and type of weekly tasks family caregivers undertake. To determine differences in caregiving related to gender, we balanced the characteristics of the caregiver and the cared-for person using a propensity score kernel matching. With the balanced sample, we estimated how the observed differences in caregiving varied across cohorts using a Poisson regression. RESULTS: Under similar circumstances, male and female caregivers invest similar time in caregiving. This result holds for 21 caregiving tasks, except for household chores, where women spent, on average, four more hours per week than male caregivers. Despite these differences, female caregivers report a quality of life and satisfaction with their health that is similar to that of male caregivers. CONCLUSION: Gender differences in caregiving narrow over time, except for household chores, where female caregivers continue to spend significantly more hours than male caregivers. Measures designed for family caregivers must consider these gender differences, as the support needs of female caregivers can differ greatly from those of male caregivers.

Prevalence, causes, and risk profile of rehospitalizations in persons with spinal cord injury within the first 10 years after primary rehabilitation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the prevalence, causes, time pattern and risk profile of rehospitalizations in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) within a 10-year period following primary rehabilitation and identify most common secondary health conditions (SHCs) and risk profile leading to rehospitalizations. SETTING: Specialized hospital and rehabilitation center for SCI in Switzerland. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from persons with SCI, discharged from initial rehabilitation between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, and followed up over a period of ten years post-discharge. Descriptive statistical methods were utilized to compute the rehospitalization prevalence and to identify the primary reasons. RESULTS: 225 participants were included, 70% were male (n = 179), and the mean age was 50 years (SD 19, Range 17-88). 54% were classified as having paraplegia (n = 122), and 77% incomplete injuries (n = 180). Over the 10-year observation period post-discharge, 120 were readmitted at least once, (prevalence 53%). In total, 66 persons (29%) were rehospitalized once or twice, while 54 persons (24%) were rehospitalized three or more times, with a maximum of 14 times. In the 10-year period, the most common SHCs leading to rehospitalization were infections (19%), pressure injuries (18%), and gastrointestinal problems (16%). During the study period, 57 persons (25%) passed away. CONCLUSIONS: Rehospitalization after primary rehabilitation is frequent and in the majority of the cases due to SHCs. The study findings are valuable for resource planning in healthcare and can guide the implementation of preventive measures to avoid SHCs.

Risk factors of major complications after flap surgery in the treatment of stage III and IV pressure injury in people with spinal cord injury/disorder: a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors associated with major complications after flap surgery in people with spinal cord injury or disorder (SCI/D) and stage III and IV pressure injury (PI). SETTING: Swiss hospital specialized in the treatment of people with SCI/D using the Basel Decubitus Approach. METHODS: We examined 60 risk factors for major postoperative complications in PIs over sacrum/coccyx, ischium or trochanter between 01/2016 and 12/2021. We performed descriptive analysis and computed global p-values using likelihood ratio tests adjusted for clustering of PIs in individuals. RESULTS: We included 220 PI treatment procedure from 149 individuals. The study population consisted of 163 (74%) men, 133 (60%) traumatic SCI, 136 (58%) stage IV PI, 198 (90%) individuals with paraplegia, 93 (42%) with osteomyelitis, and 85 (39%) with recurrent PI. Major complications 42 (19%) occurred more often in individuals with stage IV PI (p < 0.01), individuals without osteomyelitis (p < 0.03), and individuals with pathological blood concentrations of cystatin c (p < 0.028), calcium (p < 0.048), and vitamin B12 (p < 0.0049) as well as normal blood concentrations of HbA1c (p < 0.033). Immobilization (p < 0.0089) and hospital stay (p < 0.0001) of individuals with major complications was longer. CONCLUSION: In the Basel Decubitus Approach, stage IV PI, absence of osteomyelitis, reduced vitamin B12 and calcium, elevated cystatin c, and normal HbA1c should be addressed to reduce major complications.

Use of professional home care in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community often require care. The boundaries between professional home care and informal care are blurred, and it is unclear who the typical user of home care is. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of persons with SCI using professional home care in Switzerland, determine the frequency of home care visits, and investigate the association of sociodemographic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, secondary health conditions, and functional independence with the use of home care. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the 2017 community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI). Out of 3,959 eligible individuals 1294 completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis (response rate 33%). Using descriptive statistics, differences between home care users and non-users as well as the frequency of home care visits were investigated. The association between sociodemographic factors, SCI-specific characteristics, secondary health conditions, functional independence and the use of home care was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. RESULTS: Of 1,294 participants, 280 (22%) used professional home care. The median weekly professional home care duration was 6 h (Q1 = 2, Q3 = 12). More home care was used in persons with lower functional independence (Odds ratio (OR) 0.30 per 10 unit decrease in the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, 95%-Confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.37), fewer secondary health conditions (OR 0.96 per unit Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale, 95%-CI 0.94-0.99), tetraplegia (OR 2.77, 95%-CI 1.92-4.00), women (OR 2.42, 95%-CI 1.70-3.43), higher age (OR 1.22 per 10 years increase, 95%-CI 1.06-1.39), living alone (OR 2.48, 95%-CI 1.53-4.03), and those receiving support from an informal caregiver (OR 1.88, 95%-CI 1.27-2.77). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the use of professional home care from the perspective of persons with SCI in Switzerland. Lower functional independence strongly predicts increased home care use. The findings showed that professional home care complements informal care and is more likely to be used by individuals with SCI who live alone, have tetraplegia, and are female.

Effect of a computerized decision support system on the treatment approach of stage III or IV pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Stage III and IV pressure injuries (PIs) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) require complex interdisciplinary and interprofessional treatment approaches that are difficult to implement. Practical aspects, such as information exchange and coordination, remain challenging. We investigated whether a computerized decision support system (CDSS) could increase treatment adherence and improve clinical outcomes and interprofessional collaboration. METHOD: In this feasibility study, a core team developed the initial treatment process and adapted it based on several discussions with clinical experts and information technologists. The CDSS followed the Basel Decubitus Approach and was used in a clinic specializing in SCI. Thirty patients with SCI admitted for stage III/IV PI between July 2016 and May 2017 were randomly allocated to standard or CDSS-supported care. Between-group differences in treatment adherence, complication rates, length of stay, and costs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The use of the CDSS and potential barriers and facilitators were evaluated through interprofessional focus groups, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed (30 participants). RESULTS: No differences in SCI characteristics, comorbidities, or PI characteristics (localization: ischium [number (n) = 19 PI, 63%], sacrum [n = 10 PI, 33%], recurrent PI [n = 21, 70%]) were found between the two groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed in treatment adherence, frequency of major (20% vs. 13% between CDSS and control group) and minor (33% vs 27%) complications, and length of stay (98 [±28] vs 81 [±23] days). Healthcare professionals found the CDSS to be helpful for visualizing the treatment process. However, the high workload and difficulties in the information technology processes, such as missing reminders, slow computer performance and data processing, and poor accessibility, hindered the effective implementation of the CDSS. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the CDSS to support the treatment of stage III/IV PI in patients with SCI was feasible and included definitions of milestones, interventions, and outcomes. However, to assess the impact of the CDSS, a longer observation period is required. Further, the technical difficulties must be addressed, and solid integration of the CDSS into the clinical information system is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This quality improvement project received a declaration of no objection from the Ethics Committee of Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ UBE-16/003), and ethical approval was received for the focus groups (EKNZ Req-2017-00860).

Does the socioeconomic status predict health service utilization in persons with enhanced health care needs? Results from a population-based survey in persons with spinal cord lesions from Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that the socioeconomic status (SES) affects individuals' health service utilization. Spinal cord injury is a condition that often leads to physical impairments and enhanced health care needs. It therefore presents an informative and yet under-researched case in point to investigate social inequalities in health service utilization. This study aims to describe associations between SES and health service utilization in adults with spinal cord injury from Switzerland. METHODS: We use cross-sectional data from 1,294 participants of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study community survey 2017. SES was operationalized with education, household income, perceived financial hardship, subjective status, and granting of supplementary financial benefits. Health service utilization was assessed with information on visits to 13 different health care providers and four health care institutions (inpatient stays, outpatient clinics, emergency departments, specialized spinal cord centers) during the past 12 months. The dichotomized outcomes on service utilization (visited vs. not visited) were regressed on SES indicators, including adjustments for sociodemographics, lesion characteristics, and health status. RESULTS: Persons with higher SES reported higher likelihood for specialist, dentist, and dental hygienist visits and reported utilizing a larger number of different care providers. Further, specific SES indicators were associated with certain care provider visits (i.e., higher education and subjective status: higher odds for pharmacist visits; higher income: higher odds for natural healer visits; higher subjective status: higher odds for chiropractor visits; supplementary benefit granting: higher odds for general practitioner and home care service visits). We found statistically non-significant trends towards lower likelihood for inpatient stays, outpatient clinic and emergency department visits and enhanced likelihood for specialized spinal cord-center visits in higher SES groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study generally supports the claim that basic health care provision is guaranteed for all patients with spinal cord injury in Switzerland, independently of their SES. However, social inequalities were still observed for the utilization of specific providers, such as oral health care providers. Given that oral health is key for health maintenance in persons with spinal cord injury, specific interventions to enhance regular dental check-ups in lower SES groups are highly recommended.

Healthcare service utilization patterns and patient experience in persons with spinal cord injury: a comparison across 22 countries.

BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury frequently visit numerous clinical settings. Such all-around experience of the system may serve as a comprehensive experience indicator. This study compared the patient experience of persons with chronic SCI in relation to healthcare service utilization patterns in 22 countries, hypothesizing that primary-care oriented patterns would offer a better experience. METHODS: This study was based on International Spinal Cord Injury Survey with 12,588 participants across 22 countries worldwide. Utilization patterns/clusters were identified by cluster analysis and experience score - by the partial credit model. The association between healthcare utilization and experience at the provider and cluster level was explored by regression analysis. RESULTS: The highest share of visits was to primary care physicians (18%) and rehabilitation physicians (16%). Utilization patterns had diverse orientations: from primary care to specialized and from inpatient to outpatient. The experience was reported as very good and good across different dimensions: 84% reported respectful treatment; 81% - clear explanations; 77% - involvement in decision making; 65% - satisfaction with care. The average experience score (0-100) was 64, highest - 74 (Brazil) and the lowest - 52 (Japan, South Korea). Service utilization at provider and at cluster levels were associated with patient experience, but no utilization pattern resulted in uniformly better patient experience. CONCLUSION: While there are distinct patterns between countries on how persons with chronic SCI navigate the healthcare system, we found that different utilization patterns led to similar patient experience. The observed difference in patient experience is likely determined by other contextual factors than service utilization.

Who are the beneficiaries and what are the reasons for non-utilization of care respite and support services? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers assume substantial caregiving responsibilities for persons with chronic conditions, such as individuals with spinal cord injury, which leads to negative impacts on their lives. Respite care and other services are provided as a temporary relief and support for them. Design of appropriate respite care programs depends on identification of beneficiary subgroups for the different types of service. This study aimed to quantify the uptake of different respite and support services for family caregivers, the reasons for non-use, and to explore the respective predictors. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury was conducted nationwide in Switzerland. The use of 11 different respite and support services during the previous 12 months was investigated, along with caregivers' reasons for not using any respite. Classification trees were used to characterize the beneficiaries and reasons for not using respite. RESULTS: About a third of family caregivers used at least one type of respite or support service during the previous 12 months. Utilization of respite care was greater among those who employed professional home care (57% vs 24% of those without professional home care). Marked cantonal differences were also observed in utilization of respite care. The primary reason for not using respite services was "no demand" (80% of non-users of respite services), mainly among caregivers who were less emotionally affected by their caregiving tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of respite and support services depends more on place of residence and use of home care services than on functional status of the care recipient. Accordingly, programs should be tailored to the cultural context of their potential users. This is best achieved through coordination with local health care professionals who can identify needs, provide information, initiate referrals, and integrate the care into a larger support plan.

An exploration of information seeking behavior among persons living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using data from the second community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (Survey 2017). OBJECTIVES: To examine information seeking of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland and its association with personal characteristics, quality of life, satisfaction with health, and healthcare services utilization. SETTING: Community. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used to describe information needs, information sources, and health literacy of the participants. Linear, logistic, and Poisson regression analyses were used to assess the association of information-related variables with personal characteristics, quality of life, satisfaction with health, and healthcare services utilization. RESULTS: One quarter of the 1294 study participants (24.6%) reported having information needs. Most frequently mentioned were needs for medical information about SCI, complications and comorbidities (30.5%), and information on living with SCI (28.6%). The most often used sources of information were healthcare professionals (72.3%), the Internet (43.2%), and other people living with SCI (40.8%). Almost half of the participants (41.4%) were only somewhat or not at all confident in their ability to find information. Having information needs was associated with suboptimal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of information for individuals living with SCI. By providing evidence on topics to be addressed and modalities of information delivery, our findings can help institutions in developing information to support individuals living with SCI in their daily activities. Information should cover all aspects of living with SCI, be relevant to and understandable for people of all backgrounds, and be made available online and offline.

The challenges characterizing the lived experience of caregiving. A qualitative study in the field of spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory study. OBJECTIVES: To explore the lived experience of SCI caregivers, with a focus on the challenges of their role. SETTING: Caregivers of people with SCI living in the community in Switzerland. METHODS: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: The sample included 22 participants (16 women, 15 life partners) with a mean age of 61 years who had been caregivers for an average of 18 years. Caregiving in SCI seemed to be characterized by two phases. The first phase was relatively short and was central to becoming a caregiver; it was marked by challenges related to adjusting to the role of caregiver (e.g., dealing with shock, feeling unprepared). The second phase is lifelong and is characterized by a number of recurrent challenges related to balancing caregiving and personal life (e.g., having to prioritize caregiving over personal wishes, negotiating tasks and workload). Challenges related to lacking appropriate housing, facing financial uncertainty and dealing with bureaucracy were noted during both phases. Caregivers had to deal with these challenges to stay in step with life changes and newly emerging needs. CONCLUSIONS: Informal caregivers have a major role in supporting people with SCI. But their needs are not static. Any strategy to empower them has to adapt to an evolving role characterized by multiple tasks and challenges. A functional relationship between caregivers and care recipients is based on the recognition of their individualities and the different phases of adaptation, which is also an enriching process.

Factors influencing specialized health care utilization by individuals with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional survey.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study using data from the second community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (Survey 2017) conducted between 03/2017 and 03/2018. OBJECTIVES: To identify facilitators of and barriers to utilizing SCI-specialized outpatient clinic and inpatient care by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Community. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing (1) the attendance at annual check-ups at SCI-specialized treatment facilities, (2) the utilization of SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care by those who utilized any outpatient clinic care, and (3) the utilization of SCI-specialized inpatient care by those who were hospitalized. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. RESULTS: Out of 3959 eligible individuals, 1294 completed the questionnaire (response rate 33%). In the last 12 months, 51% of study participants attended the annual check-up, 33% of outpatient clinic care users utilized SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care, and 44% of those who were hospitalized were hospitalized at a SCI center. Annual check-ups were attended less by women, the elderly, and those with nontraumatic SCI. SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care was less likely to be utilized when individuals with SCI were living with cancer, lived farther away from SCI-specialized treatment facilities or in a minority language region. Specialized inpatient care was less likely to be utilized by women and those with incomplete lesions. CONCLUSIONS: SCI-specialized outpatient clinic care must be provided near the residence of individuals with SCI, otherwise non-specialized care is utilized. The reasons why women utilize SCI-specialized care less frequently than men merits further investigation.

Methodology and study population of the second Swiss national community survey of functioning after spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study of the second community survey of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (Survey 2017) conducted between 03/2017 and 03/2018. OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology, recruitment results, characteristics of participants and non-participants, and non-response of the Survey 2017. SETTING: Community. METHODS: Description of the sampling strategy and sampling frame. Recruitment results and characteristics of participants and non-participants of the two Survey 2017 questionnaire modules were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Determinants of survey participation were examined using multivariable logistic regression, and the impact of non-response bias on survey results was evaluated using inverse-probability weighting. RESULTS: Out of 3959 persons who met the eligibility criteria, 1530 responded to module 1 (response rate 38.6%) and 1294 to module 2 (response rate 32.7%) of the Survey 2017. Of the 4493 invited persons, 1549 had participated in the first SwiSCI community survey conducted in 2012/2013. Of these, 1332 were invited to the Survey 2017 and 761 participated in module 1 (response rate 58.9%) and 685 in module 2 (response rate 53.1%). The majority of module 1 participants were male (71.2%, 95% CI: 68.9, 73.5), with a median age of 57 (IQR: 46.0, 67.0) years and incomplete paraplegia (41.9%, 95% CI: 39.3, 44.5). Survey non-response was higher in the oldest age group, among females, and those with tetraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: The design of the Survey 2017 was successful in recruiting a substantial proportion of the SCI source population in Switzerland. To counteract survey non-response, survey weights may be applied to subsequent analyses. SPONSORSHIP: none.

Utilization of health care providers by individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaire survey conducted in 2017 as part of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI). OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the use of outpatient health care providers by individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in a situation of free choice and ample supply. SETTING: Community, nationwide. METHODS: The frequency of visits was compared to that of a survey conducted five years earlier. Using regression tree analysis, the characteristics of individuals with extensive use of health care providers' services were investigated. Substitution effects, where health care users replace one provider type by another, were quantified using likelihood ratios for positive outcomes. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 1,294 persons (response rate 33%). Participants reported visits to 14 different health care providers within the previous 12 months. Most often visited was the general practitioner (GP) by 82%. Older individuals used fewer health care providers than younger participants. Individuals with spasticity and females visited a broader variety of health care providers than the average user. The participants used fewer providers than they did five years ago. Health care users were not found to be substituting one provider type with another. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with spinal cord injury in Switzerland use a wide array of medical service providers. All providers were used complementary to each other without redundancies between providers. The use of providers is driven by health-related factors and gender. Old age was not as much a driver for high utilization as described in other settings.

First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

BACKGROUND: Although general practitioners (GPs) are generally considered as the first point of contact for care, this may be different for persons with complex conditions, such as those with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study is to understand the differences in long-term care provision by GPs and SCI-specialists, by examining (1) the first contact of care for SCI health problems, (2) the morbidity profile and use of health-care services in relation to first contact, and (3) the factors associated with the choice of first contact. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study based on data derived from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Community Survey 2017, the main outcome measure was the reported first contact for SCI-specific care. This information was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis of groups based on patient characteristics, use of health-care services and secondary health conditions assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). RESULTS: Out of 1294 respondents, 1095 reported their first contact for SCI-specific care; 56% indicated SCI-specialists and 44% specified GPs. On average, participants who first contacted a GP reported higher number of GP consultations (5.1 ± 5.2 vs. 3.9 ± 7.2), planned visits to ambulatory clinics (3.7 ± 7.3 vs. 3.6 ± 6.7) and hospital admissions (GP, 1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3), but lower number of visits to SCI-specialists (1.7 ± 1.8 vs. 2.6 ± 1.7) and of hospital days (22.8 ± 43.2 vs. 31.0 ± 42.8). The likelihood to contact a GP first was significantly higher in persons ≥75 years old (OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 1.85-10.69), Italian speakers (OR = 5.06, 95% CI = 2.44-10.47), had incomplete lesions (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.71-3.35), experiencing pain (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04-2.09) or diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.05-3.27), but lower for those situated closer to SCI centres (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51-0.93) or had higher SCI-SCS scores (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.99). CONCLUSION: Age, language region, travel distance to SCI centres, lesion completeness, and occurrence of secondary conditions play a significant role in determining the choice of first contact of care, however there is still some unwarranted variation that remains unclear and requires further research.

Outpatient and community care for preventing pressure injuries in spinal cord injury. A qualitative study of service users' and providers' experience.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory study. OBJECTIVES: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a major secondary condition occurring after spinal cord injuries (SCI). Optimization of outpatient and community care may be a promising approach to better support community-dwelling individuals with SCI in preventing PIs. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of individuals with SCI, family caregivers and health professionals (HPs) in using or providing outpatient and community services for early treatment and prevention of PIs in SCI. SETTING: Switzerland. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with a sample of Swiss residents community-dwelling individuals with SCI (n = 20), family caregivers (n = 5) and HPs (n = 22) were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: General practitioners (GPs), home care providers, SCI-specialized outpatient clinics and an SCI-specialized nursing service are involved in the prevention and early treatment of PIs. Our findings show that the needs of individuals with SCI are not fully met: outpatient and community care is often fragmented, mono-professional and non-specialized, while persons with SCI and HPs prefer coordinated, inter-professional and specialized services for preventing and treating PIs. Our findings also highlight the challenges faced by HPs in providing care to individuals with SCI in the community. CONCLUSIONS: Although there seems to be a gap in service provision, there is the potential for improvement by better integrating the different providers in a network and structuring their collaborations. Concrete suggestions are: systematizing knowledge transfer to home care providers and GPs; redefining the role of involved HPs and individuals with SCI and reinforcing the role of the SCI-specialized nursing service.

Complexity as a factor for task allocation among general practitioners and nurse practitioners: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: General practitioner (GP) shortages and increasing demand for care led to the introduction of nurse practitioners (NPs) to primary care. Many concepts for task sharing among health professionals feature complexity. The aim of this narrative review was to examine how complexity is used as a factor for task allocation between GPs and NPs. METHODS: According to the PRISMA statement, PubMed and CINAHL were searched systematically, and eligibility criteria were applied to detect literature concerning GPs and NPs in primary care and complexity in the context of task allocation. Relevant information was extracted, and a narrative analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies from seven countries were included, comprising quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Complexity was used to describe patients, their needs, and health professionals' tasks. The understanding of the use of complexity as a factor for task allocation between NPs and GPs was based on the patient population (specific vs. unspecific), the setting (specific vs. unspecific), the numbers of health professionals involved (two vs. more than two), and the NP role (distinct model of care vs. no model). Despite similarities in these areas, the tasks which NPs perform range from providing minor to complex care. However, there is a slight trend towards NPs treating socially complex patients and GPs focusing on medically complex cases. CONCLUSION: Complexity as a concept is prominent in primary care but remains broad and inconsistent as a factor for task allocation between NPs and GPs. This review can be used as a point of reference when practitioners are seeking methods for task allocation in a collaborative primary care setting.

Differences in patient population and service provision between nurse practitioner and general practitioner consultations in Swiss primary care: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Primary care systems around the world have implemented nurse practitioners (NPs) to ensure access to high quality care in times of general practitioner (GP) shortages and changing health care needs of a multimorbid, ageing population. In Switzerland, NPs are currently being introduced, and their exact role is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to get insight into patient characteristics and services provided in NP consultations compared to GP consultations in Swiss primary care. METHODS: This case study used retrospective observational data from electronic medical records of a family practice with one NP and two GPs. Data on patient-provider encounters were collected between August 2017 and December 2018. We used logistic regression to assess associations between the assignment of the patients to the NP or GP and patient characteristics and delivered services respectively. RESULTS: Data from 5210 patients participating in 27,811 consultations were analyzed. The average patient age was 44.3 years (SD 22.6), 47.1% of the patients were female and 19.4% multimorbid. 1613 (5.8%) consultations were with the NP, and 26,198 (94.2%) with the two GPs. Patients in NP consultations were more often aged 85+ (OR 3.43; 95%-CI 2.70-4.36), multimorbid (OR 1.37; 95%-CI 1.24-1.51; p < 0.001) and polypharmaceutical (OR 1.28; 95%-CI 1.15-1.42; p < 0.001) in comparison to GP consultations. In NP consultations, vital signs (OR 3.05; 95%-CI 2.72-3.42; p < 0.001) and anthropometric data (OR 1.33; 95%-CI 1.09-1.63; p 0.005) were measured more frequently, and lab tests (OR 1.16; 95%-CI 1.04-1.30; p 0.008) were ordered more often compared to GP consultations, independent of patient characteristics. By contrast, medications (OR 0.35; 95%-CI 0.30-0.41; p < 0.001) were prescribed or changed less frequently in NP consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative data from pilot projects provide valuable insights into NP tasks and activities in Swiss primary care. Our results provide first indications that NPs might have a focus on and could offer care to the growing number of multimorbid, polypharmaceutical elderly in Swiss primary care.

Prevalence of and factors associated with expressed and unmet service needs reported by persons with spinal cord injury living in the community.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, predictors, and consequences of self-reported service needs among community-dwelling persons with SCI. SETTING: Community-based, Switzerland. METHODS: Participants were 490 people who took part in the health services module of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI) 2012 community survey. We determined the prevalence of 20 service needs and the extent to which they were unmet. Predictors and consequences of service needs were examined with multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: High-prevalence needs (e.g., general health care, accessible housing) exhibited a high level of fulfillment. Conversely, less prevalent service needs (e.g., peer support, support for family caregivers) showed lower levels of fulfillment. Across three specific service domains (peer support, support for family caregivers, sports activities), lower household income predicted most consistently a higher likelihood of unmet needs. The total number of expressed needs was higher in non-Swiss nationals, persons with complete para- or tetraplegia and lower income individuals. Being female, French language region and lower household income predicted more total unmet needs. Increased expressed and unmet service needs were associated with lower life satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Service needs with a high prevalence seem to be adequately met by the current service provision system. However, rehabilitation professionals should remain alert to clients' specific and cumulative unmet needs, in particular with respect to less common ones, and their impact on successful community reintegration and life satisfaction.

What influences the use of professional home care for individuals with spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify what characteristics of the family caregivers influenced the use of professional home care for persons with SCI in Switzerland. SETTING: Community setting, nationwide in Switzerland. METHODS: Questionnaires were filled out by the adult family caregivers of persons with SCI. Influence of characteristics of the caregivers was analyzed with regression models, adjusting for the characteristics of the person with SCI. Logistic regression was used for whether professional home care was used. Poisson regression was applied for the absolute and relative amount of professional home care. RESULTS: In total, 717 family caregivers participated in the study (31% response rate). Among the participants, 33% hired professional home care for 10 h per week on average. The level of dependency of the persons with SCI had a significant influence on the utilization of care. The availability and proximity of the primary family caregiver, namely being spouse and cohabiting, reduced the amount of services used, whereas caregivers who worked full time employed more services. Higher levels of education and income increased the use of professional home care. Compared with their reference groups, caregivers with older age and those with a migratory background used comparable or larger absolute amount of professional services, which, however, represented a smaller proportion of total hours of care. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate support requires consideration of the characteristics of both the caregiver and of the person with SCI. The needs of family caregivers should also be assessed systematically in the needs assessment.

Residential location of people with chronic spinal cord injury: the importance of local health care infrastructure.

BACKGROUND: People with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from complex secondary health conditions and rely on specialized health care services, which are often centralized and difficult to reach for individuals living in remote areas. As a consequence, they might move to regions where they expect better access to care. The aims of this study were: 1) to identify regions where people with SCI live compared with the general population, 2) to examine whether their choice of residence is related to the availability of local health care infrastructure, and 3) to ascertain determinants of their consideration to change residence when aging. METHODS: This study used information from a nationwide Swiss SCI cohort and inpatient hospital discharge data. To detect clusters in the distribution of people with chronic SCI in Switzerland, a spatial cluster detection test was conducted using the normative population of a region as offset. To identify associations between the residential location of people with SCI and infrastructure variables, a negative binomial model was set up at a regional level with the frequency of people with SCI as outcome, geographical indicators as explanatory variables, and the normative population as offset. Determinants of the consideration to change residence when aging were investigated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: People with SCI were not living equally distributed among the normative population, but clustered in specific areas. They were more likely than the general population to reside close to specialized SCI centers, in areas with a high density of outpatient physicians, and in urban regions. People with SCI living in rural areas were more likely to consider relocating when aging than those living in urban areas. However, only a few people with SCI considered moving closer to specialized centers when such a move required crossing language barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Good access to appropriate health care services and amenities of daily life seems to play such an important role in the lives of people with SCI that they are willing to choose their residential location based on local availability of appropriate health care services.