RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Influenza and pneumonia combined are the leading causes of death due to infectious diseases in the United States. We describe factors associated with pneumonia among adults hospitalized with influenza. METHODS: Through the Emerging Infections Program, we identified adults ≥ 18 years, who were hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza during October 2005 through April 2008, and had a chest radiograph (CXR) performed. Pneumonia was defined as the presence of a CXR infiltrate and either an ICD-9-CM code or discharge summary diagnosis of pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 4,765 adults hospitalized with influenza, 1392 (29 %) had pneumonia. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with pneumonia included: age ≥ 75 years, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.27 (95 % confidence interval 1.10-1.46), white race AOR 1.24 (1.03-1.49), nursing home residence AOR 1.37 (1.14-1.66), chronic lung disease AOR 1.37 (1.18-1.59), immunosuppression AOR 1.45 (1.19-1.78), and asthma AOR 0.76 (0.62-0.92). Patients with pneumonia were significantly more likely to require intensive care unit (ICU) admission (27 % vs. 10 %), mechanical ventilation (18 % vs. 5 %), and to die (9 % vs. 2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia was present in nearly one-third of adults hospitalized with influenza and was associated with ICU admission and death. Among patients hospitalized with influenza, older patients and those with certain underlying conditions are more likely to have pneumonia. Pneumonia is common among adults hospitalized with influenza and should be evaluated and treated promptly.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/virología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Respiración Artificial , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because pneumococcal pneumonia was prevalent during previous influenza pandemics, we evaluated invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) rates during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations and IPP cases (pneumococcus isolated from normally sterile sites with discharge diagnoses of pneumonia) using active, population-based surveillance in the United States. We compared IPP rates during peak pandemic months (April 2009-March 2010) to mean IPP rates in nonpandemic years (April 2004-March 2009) and, using Poisson models, to 2006-2008 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Higher IPP rates occurred during the peak pandemic month compared to nonpandemic periods in 5-24 (IPP rate per 10 million: 48 vs 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-13), 25-49 (74 vs 53 [CI, 41-65]), 50-64 (188 vs 114 [CI, 85-143]), and ≥65-year-olds (229 vs 187 [CI, 159-216]). In the models with seasonal influenza rates included, observed IPP rates during the pandemic peak were within the predicted 95% CIs, suggesting this increase was not greater than observed with seasonal influenza. CONCLUSIONS: The recent influenza pandemic likely resulted in an out-of-season IPP peak among persons ≥5 years. The IPP peak's magnitude was similar to that seen during seasonal influenza epidemics.
Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/patogenicidad , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Gripe Humana/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía Neumocócica/virología , Distribución de Poisson , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We assessed telephone surveys as a novel surveillance method, comparing data obtained by telephone with existing national influenza surveillance systems, and evaluated the utility of telephone surveys. METHODS: We used the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the 2007 National Immunization Survey-Adult (NIS-Adult) to estimate the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI), medically attended ILI, provider-diagnosed influenza, influenza testing, and treatment of influenza with antiviral medications during the 2006-2007 influenza season. RESULTS: With the January-May BRFSS, among persons aged 18 years and older, the cumulative incidence of seasonal ILI and provider-diagnosed influenza was 37.9 and 5.7 adults per 100 persons, respectively. Monthly medically attended ILI and provider-diagnosed influenza among adults were temporally associated with influenza activity, as documented by national surveillance. With the NIS-Adult survey data, estimated provider-diagnosed influenza, influenza testing, and antiviral treatment were 2.8%, 1.4%, and 0.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our telephone interview-based estimates of influenza morbidity were consistent with those from national influenza surveillance systems. Telephone surveys may provide an alternative method by which population-based influenza morbidity information can be gathered.
Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Teléfono , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Statins may have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that could reduce the risk of mortality from influenza virus infections. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program conducts active surveillance for persons hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza in 59 counties in 10 states. We analyzed data for hospitalized adults during the 2007-2008 influenza season to evaluate the association between receiving statins and influenza-related death. RESULTS: We identified 3043 patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza, of whom 1013 (33.3%) received statins and 151 (5.0%) died within 30 days of their influenza test. Patients who received statins were more likely to be older, male, and white; to suffer from cardiovascular, metabolic, renal, and chronic lung disease; and to have been vaccinated against influenza that season. In a multivariable logistic regression model, administration of statins prior to or during hospitalization was associated with a protective odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59 [95% confidence interval, .38-.92]) when adjusting for age; race; cardiovascular, lung, and renal disease; influenza vaccination; and antiviral administration. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use may be associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized with influenza.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Vigilancia de la Población , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Emerging Infections Programs (EIP) network has conducted population-based surveillance for hospitalizations due to laboratory-confirmed influenza among children since 2003, with the network expanding in 2005 to include adults. METHODS: From 15 April 2009 through 30 April 2010, the EIP conducted surveillance among 22.1 million people residing in 10 states. Incidence rates per 100 000 population were calculated using US Census Bureau data. Mean historic rates were calculated on the basis of previously published and unpublished EIP data. RESULTS: During the 2009 pandemic of influenza A virus subtype H1N1 infection, rates of hospitalizations due to laboratory-confirmed influenza were 202, 88, 49, 31, 27, 36, 28, and 27 episodes per 100 000 among persons aged <6 months, 6-23 months, 2-4 years, 5-17 years, 18-49 years, 50-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years, respectively. Comparative mean rates from previous influenza seasons during which EIP conducted surveillance were 153, 53, 20, 6, 4, 8, 20, and 56 episodes per 100 000 among persons aged <6 months, 6-23 months, 2-4 years, 5-17 years, 18-49 years, 50-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, rates of hospitalization due to laboratory-confirmed influenza among individuals aged 5-17 years and 18-49 years increased 5-fold and 6-fold, respectively, compared with mean rates from previous influenza seasons. Hospitalization rates for other pediatric and adult age groups increased, compared with mean rates from previous influenza seasons, whereas the rate among individuals aged ≥75 years decreased.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/patogenicidad , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/patología , Pandemias , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Influenza antiviral treatment is recommended for all persons hospitalized with influenza virus infection. During the 2010-2011 influenza season, antiviral treatment of children and adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza declined significantly compared with treatment during the 2009 pandemic (children, 56% vs 77%; adults, 77% vs 82%; both P < .01).
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/virología , Orthomyxoviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcal disease is one of the most common infections in the first week after birth. In 2002, national guidelines recommended universal late antenatal screening of pregnant women for colonization with group B streptococcus to identify candidates for intrapartum chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We evaluated the implementation of the guidelines in a multistate, retrospective cohort selected from the Active Bacterial Core surveillance, a 10-state, population-based system that monitors invasive group B streptococcal disease. We abstracted data from the labor and delivery records of a stratified random sample of live births and of all cases in which the newborn had early-onset group B streptococcal disease (i.e., disease in infants <7 days of age) in 2003 and 2004. We compared our results with those from a study with a similar design that evaluated screening practices in 1998 and 1999. RESULTS: We abstracted records of 254 births in which the infant had group B streptococcal disease and 7437 births in which the infant did not. The rate of screening for group B streptococcus before delivery increased from 48.1% in 1998-1999 to 85.0% in 2003-2004; the percentage of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics increased from 26.8% to 31.7%. Chemoprophylaxis was administered in 87.0% of the women who were positive for group B streptococcus and who delivered at term, but in only 63.4% of women with unknown colonization status who delivered preterm. The overall incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease was 0.32 cases per 1000 live births. Preterm infants had a higher incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease than did term infants (0.73 vs. 0.26 cases per 1000 live births); however, 74.4% of the cases of group B streptococcal disease (189 of 254) occurred in term infants. Missed screening among mothers who delivered at term accounted for 34 of the 254 cases of group B streptococcal disease (13.4%). A total of 61.4% of the term infants with group B streptococcal disease were born to women who had tested negative for group B streptococcus before delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for universal screening were rapidly adopted. Improved management of preterm deliveries and improved collection, processing, and reporting of culture results may prevent additional cases of early-onset group B streptococcal disease.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus agalactiae , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Vigilancia de la Población , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/transmisiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 2009 influenza pandemic led to guidelines emphasizing antiviral treatment for all persons hospitalized with influenza, including pregnant women. We compared antiviral use among adults hospitalized with influenza before and during the pandemic. METHODS: The Emerging Infections Program conducts active population-based surveillance for persons hospitalized with community-acquired, laboratory-confirmed influenza in 10 states. We analyzed data collected via medical record review of patients aged ≥18 years admitted during prepandemic (1 October 2005 through 14 April 2009) and pandemic (15 April 2009 through 31 December 2009) time frames. RESULTS: Of 5943 adults hospitalized with influenza in prepandemic seasons, 3235 (54%) received antiviral treatment, compared with 4055 (82%) of 4966 during the pandemic. Forty-one (22%) of 187 pregnant women received antiviral treatment in prepandemic seasons, compared with 369 (86%) of 430 during the pandemic. Pregnancy was a negative predictor of antiviral treatment before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], .16-.35) but was independently associated with treatment during the pandemic (aOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.32-2.96). Antiviral treatment among adults hospitalized >2 days after illness onset increased from 43% before the pandemic to 79% during the pandemic (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Antiviral treatment of hospitalized adults increased during the pandemic, especially among pregnant women. This suggests that many clinicians followed published guidance to treat hospitalized adults with antiviral agents. However, compliance with antiviral recommendations could be improved.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amantadina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitalización , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Rimantadina/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Zanamivir/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae serotype b (Hib) conjugate vaccines, there has been a dramatic reduction of Hib disease in young children and the epidemiological trends of invasive H. influenzae have shifted. METHODS: Data were collected from active surveillance for invasive H. influenzae disease conducted through Active Bacterial Core surveillance sites during 1989-2008. RESULTS: During 1999-2008, the estimated mean annual incidence of H. influenzae infection was 1.62 cases per 100 000 population; 15.3% of cases were fatal. Incidence was higher among adults aged ≥65 years, compared with other age groups. The largest burden of disease among children aged <5 years was in infants aged <1 year; many of these cases occurred during the first month of life in preterm or low-birth weight infants. An estimated 10% of the total burden of disease among children aged <5 years occurred in American Indian and Alaska Native children. During 1989-2008, 7559 cases of H. influenzae disease were reported from Active Bacterial Core surveillance sites. Small increases in the incidence of serotypes a, e, and f were observed during 1989-2008. The largest of these increases was in serotype f and was primarily among adults aged ≥18 years. CONCLUSIONS: Since the introduction of Hib conjugate vaccines, the incidence of invasive disease caused by H. influenzae in the United States has decreased dramatically; however, a considerable burden of non-Hib disease is still present in the oldest and youngest age groups. There is no evidence of substantial replacement disease with non-b serotypes in young children in the United States.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/microbiología , Haemophilus influenzae/clasificación , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Etnicidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Haemophilus/mortalidad , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Serotipificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We sought to describe characteristics of hospitalized reproductive-aged (15-44 years) women with seasonal (2005/2006 through 2008/2009) and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. We used population-based data from the Emerging Infections Program in 10 US states, and compared characteristics of pregnant (n = 150) and nonpregnant (n = 489) seasonal, and pregnant (n = 489) and nonpregnant (n = 1088) pandemic influenza cases using χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests. Pregnant women represented 23.5% and 31.0% of all reproductive-aged women hospitalized for seasonal and pandemic influenza, respectively. Significantly more nonpregnant than pregnant women with seasonal (71.2% vs 36.0%) and pandemic (69.7% vs 31.9%) influenza had an underlying medical condition other than pregnancy. Antiviral treatment was significantly more common with pandemic than seasonal influenza for both pregnant (86.5% vs 24.0%) and nonpregnant (82.0% vs 55.2%) women. Pregnant women comprised a significant proportion of influenza-hospitalized reproductive-aged women, underscoring the importance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Pandemias , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Adolescente , Adulto , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Notifiable disease surveillance systems are critical for communicable disease control, and accurate and timely reporting of hospitalized patients who represent the most severe cases is important. A local health department in metropolitan Denver used inpatient hospital discharge (IHD) data to evaluate the sensitivity, timeliness, and data quality of reporting eight notifiable diseases to the Colorado Electronic Disease Reporting System (CEDRS). METHODS: Using IHD data, we detected hospitalized patients admitted from 2003 through 2005 with a discharge diagnosis associated with one of eight notifiable diseases. Initially, we compared all cases identified through IHD diagnoses fields with cases reported to CEDRS. Second, we chose four diseases and conducted medical record review to confirm the IHD diagnoses before comparison with CEDRS cases. RESULTS: Relying on IHD diagnoses only, shigellosis, salmonellosis, and Neisseria meningitidis invasive disease had high sensitivity (> or = 90%) and timeliness (> or = 75%); legionellosis, pertussis, and West Nile virus infection were intermediate; and hepatitis A and Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) invasive disease had low sensitivity (> or = 25%) and timeliness (< or = 33%). Medical record review improved the sensitivity to > or = 90% and timeliness to > or = 80% for H. influenza invasive disease, legionellosis, and pertussis; however, hepatitis A retained suboptimal sensitivity (67%) and timeliness (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge data are useful for evaluating notifiable disease surveillance systems. Limitations encountered by using discharge diagnoses alone can be overcome by conducting medical record review. Public health agencies should conduct periodic surveillance system evaluations among hospitalized patients and reinforce notifiable disease reporting among the people responsible for this activity.
Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Colorado/epidemiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Legionelosis/epidemiología , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rates of influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States have been estimated using modeling techniques with data from pneumonia and influenza hospitalization discharge diagnoses, but they have not been directly estimated from laboratory-positive cases. METHODS: We calculated overall, age-specific, and site-specific rates of laboratory-positive, influenza-associated hospitalization among adults and compared demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized cases by season with use of data collected by the Emerging Infections Program Network during the 2005-2006 through 2007-2008 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Overall rates of adult influenza-associated hospitalization per 100,000 persons were 9.9 during the 2005-2006 season, 4.8 during the 2006-2007 season, and 18.7 during the 2007-2008 season. Rates of hospitalization varied by Emerging Infections Program site and increased with increasing age. Higher overall and age-specific rates of hospitalization were observed during influenza A (H3) predominant seasons and during periods of increased circulation of influenza B. More than 80% of hospitalized persons each season had > or =1 underlying medical condition, including chronic cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Rates varied by season, age, geographic location, and type/subtype of circulating influenza viruses. Influenza-associated hospitalization surveillance is essential for assessing the relative severity of influenza seasons over time and the burden of influenza-associated complications.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/patología , Orthomyxoviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In January 2005, a quadrivalent (serogroups A, C , Y, and W-135) meningococcal conjugate vaccine was licensed for use in adolescents. This report describes the epidemiologic features of meningococcal disease in the United States from January 1998 through December 2007, before and during implementation of adolescent quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccination. METHODS: Data were collected from active surveillance for invasive Neisseria meningitidis conducted through the Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) sites during 1998-2007. Isolates from cases were serogrouped at the ABCs site and confirmed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of the incidence and number of cases in the 50 states were calculated, standardizing for race and age group. RESULTS: In the period 1998-2007, a total of 2262 cases of meningococcal disease were reported from ABCs sites; 11.3% of these cases were fatal. The estimated United States average annual incidence of meningococcal disease was 0.53 cases per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.55), and an estimated 1525 (95% confidence interval, 1470-1598) cases occurred annually. The annual incidence decreased 64.1%, from 0.92 cases per 100,000 population in 1998 to 0.33 cases per 100,000 population in 2007. Infants aged <1 year have the highest incidence of meningococcal disease (5.38 cases per 100,000 population). After introduction of the quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, no significant decrease in serogroup C or Y meningococcal disease was seen among those aged 11-19 years in 2006-2007, compared with 2004-2005. CONCLUSIONS: Before the introduction of the quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, the incidence of meningococcal disease in the United States decreased to a historic low. However, meningococcal disease still causes a substantial burden of disease among all age groups. Future vaccination strategies may include targeting infants and preventing serogroup B meningococcal disease.
Asunto(s)
Meningitis Meningocócica/epidemiología , Meningitis Meningocócica/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the rates of hospitalization with seasonal influenza in children aged <18 years from a large, diverse surveillance area during 2003 to 2008. STUDY DESIGN: Through the Emerging Infections Program Network, population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza was conducted in 10 states, including 5.3 million children. Hospitalized children were identified retrospectively; clinicians made influenza testing decisions. Data collected from the hospital record included demographics, medical history, and clinical course. Incidence rates were calculated with census data. RESULTS: The highest hospitalization rates occurred in children aged <6 months (seasonal range, 9-30/10 000 children), and the lowest rates occurred in children aged 5 to 17 years (0.3-0.8/10 000). Overall, 4015 children were hospitalized, 58% of whom were identified with rapid diagnostic tests alone. Forty percent of the children who were hospitalized had underlying medical conditions; asthma (18%), prematurity (15% of children aged <2 years), and developmental delay (7%) were the most common. Severe outcomes included intensive care unit admission (12%), respiratory failure (5%), bacterial coinfection (2%), and death (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza-associated hospitalization rates varied by season and age and likely underestimate true rates because many hospitalized children are not tested for influenza. The proportion of children with severe outcomes was substantial across seasons. Quantifying incidence of influenza hospitalization and severe outcomes is critical to defining disease burden.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Gripe Humana/terapia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estaciones del Año , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We examined associations between the socioeconomic characteristics of census tracts and racial/ethnic disparities in the incidence of bacteremic community-acquired pneumonia among US adults. METHODS: We analyzed data on 4870 adults aged 18 years or older with community-acquired bacteremic pneumonia identified through active, population-based surveillance in 9 states and geocoded to census tract of residence. We used data from the 2000 US Census to calculate incidence by age, race/ethnicity, and census tract characteristics and Poisson regression to estimate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During 2003 to 2004, the average annual incidence of bacteremic pneumonia was 24.2 episodes per 100 000 Black adults versus 10.1 per 100 000 White adults (RR = 2.40; 95% CI = 2.24, 2.57). Incidence among Black residents of census tracts with 20% or more of persons in poverty (most impoverished) was 4.4 times the incidence among White residents of census tracts with less than 5% of persons in poverty (least impoverished). Racial disparities in incidence were reduced but remained significant in models that controlled for age, census tract poverty level, and state. CONCLUSIONS: Adults living in impoverished census tracts are at increased risk of bacteremic pneumonia and should be targeted for prevention efforts.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Infecciones por Haemophilus/etnología , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Neumonía Neumocócica/etnología , Áreas de Pobreza , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Análisis de Regresión , Riesgo , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pyogenes/aislamiento & purificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Influenza causes significant widespread illness each year. Emergency department (ED) clinicians are often first-line providers to evaluate and make treatment decisions for patients presenting with influenza. We sought to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment practices in the Emerging Infections Program Network, a federal, state, and academic collaboration that conducts active surveillance for influenza-associated hospitalizations. METHODS: During 2007, a survey was administered to ED clinicians who worked in Emerging Infections Program catchment area hospitals' EDs. The survey encompassed the role of the clinician, years since completing clinical training, hospital type, influenza testing practices, and use of antiviral medications during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season. We examined factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral use. RESULTS: A total of 1,055 ED clinicians from 123 hospitals responded to the survey. A majority of respondents (85.3%; n=887) reported they had tested their patients for influenza during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season (Emerging Infections Program site range: 59.3 to 100%; P<.0001). When asked about antiviral medications, 55.7% (n=576) of respondents stated they had prescribed antiviral medications to some of their patients in 2006 to 2007 (Emerging Infections Program site range 32.9% to 80.3%; P<.0001). A positive association between influenza testing and prescribing antiviral medications was observed. Additionally, the type of hospital, location in which an ED clinician worked, and the number of years since medical training were associated with prescribing antiviral influenza medications. CONCLUSION: There is much heterogeneity in clinician-initiated influenza testing and treatment practices. Additional exploration of the role of hospital testing and treatment policies, clinicians' perception of influenza disease, and methods for educating clinicians about new recommendations is needed to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment decisions, especially in an environment of rapidly changing influenza clinical guidelines. Until influenza testing and treatment guidelines are better promulgated, clinicians may continue to test and treat influenza with inconsistency.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Medicina de Emergencia , Adhesión a Directriz , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/terapia , Tamizaje Masivo , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Utilización de Medicamentos , Humanos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogen of public health importance; MRSA prevention programs that may affect MRSA transmission and infection are increasingly common in health care settings. Whether there have been changes in MRSA infection incidence as these programs become established is unknown; however, recent data have shown that rates of MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units are decreasing. OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in rates of invasive health care-associated MRSA infections from 2005 through 2008 among residents of 9 US metropolitan areas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Active, population-based surveillance for invasive MRSA in 9 metropolitan areas covering a population of approximately 15 million persons. All reports of laboratory-identified episodes of invasive (from a normally sterile body site) MRSA infections from 2005 through 2008 were evaluated and classified based on the setting of the positive culture and the presence or absence of health care exposures. Health care-associated infections (ie, hospital-onset and health care-associated community-onset), which made up 82% of the total infections, were included in this analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in incidence of invasive health care-associated MRSA infections and health care-associated MRSA BSIs using population of the catchment area as the denominator. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2008, there were 21,503 episodes of invasive MRSA infection; 17,508 were health care associated. Of these, 15,458 were MRSA BSIs. The incidence rate of hospital-onset invasive MRSA infections was 1.02 per 10,000 population in 2005 and decreased 9.4% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7% to 3.8%; P = .005), and the incidence of health care-associated community-onset infections was 2.20 per 10,000 population in 2005 and decreased 5.7% per year (95% CI, 9.7% to 1.6%; P = .01). The decrease was most prominent for the subset of infections with BSIs (hospital-onset: -11.2%; 95% CI -15.9% to -6.3%; health care-associated community-onset: -6.6%; 95% CI -9.5% to -3.7%). CONCLUSION: Over the 4-year period from 2005 through 2008 in 9 diverse metropolitan areas, rates of invasive health care-associated MRSA infections decreased among patients with health care-associated infections that began in the community and also decreased among those with hospital-onset invasive disease.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), traditionally considered to be a neonatal pathogen, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults and among those with underlying medical conditions. We used population-based surveillance to examine trends in adult GBS disease during the period 1990-2007 and to describe the epidemiology of adult GBS disease to guide prevention efforts. METHODS: Active Bacterial Core surveillance was conducted in selected counties in 10 US states. A case was defined as isolation of GBS from a normally sterile site in a nonpregnant resident of a surveillance area who was 18 years of age. Rates were calculated using US Census data. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from medical records. Serotyping and susceptibility testing were performed on isolates collected from a subset of case patients. RESULTS: A total of 19,512 GBS cases were identified in nonpregnant adults during 1990-2007 (median patient age, 63 years); the incidence of adult GBS disease doubled from 3.6 cases per 100,000 persons during 1990 to 7.3 cases per 100,000 persons during 2007 (P < .001). The mean difference in incidence between black and white persons was 4.6 cases per 100,000 persons (range, 3.1 cases per 100,000 persons during 1991 to 5.8 cases per 100,000 persons during 1999). Common clinical syndromes in 2007 included bacteremia without focus (39.3%), skin and/or soft-tissue infection (25.6%), and pneumonia (12.6%). Most (88.0%) GBS cases in adults had 1 underlying condition; diabetes was present in 44.4% of cases. Serotypes V, Ia, II, and III accounted for 80.8% of infections during 1998-1999 and 78.5% of infections during 2005-2006. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive GBS disease in nonpregnant adults represents a substantial and increasing burden, particularly among older persons, black persons, and adults with diabetes. Prevention strategies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus agalactiae/clasificación , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Población Negra , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Serotipificación , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Colorado became the first state to make laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations a case-based reportable condition in 2004. We summarized surveillance for influenza hospitalizations in Colorado during the first 4 recorded influenza seasons (2004-2008). We highlight the similarities and differences among influenza seasons; no 2 seasons were entirely the same. The 2005-06 influenza season had 2 distinct waves of activity (types A and B), the 2006-07 season was substantially later and milder, and 2007-08 had substantially greater influenza B activity. The case-based surveillance for influenza hospitalizations provides information regarding the time course of seasonal influenza activity, reported case numbers and population-based rates by age group and influenza virus type, and a measure of relative severity. Influenza hospitalization surveillance provides more information about seasonal influenza activity than any other surveillance measure (e.g., surveillance for influenza-like illness) currently in widespread use among states. More states should consider implementing case-based surveillance for influenza hospitalizations.