Combined Modulation of Tumor Metabolism by Metformin and Diclofenac in Glioma.

Glioblastoma remains a fatal diagnosis. Previous research has shown that metformin, which is an inhibitor of complex I of the respiratory chain, may inhibit some brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), albeit at dosages that are too high for clinical use. Here, we explored whether a combined treatment of metformin and diclofenac, which is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) shown to inhibit glycolysis by interfering with lactate efflux, may lead to additive or even synergistic effects on BTICs (BTIC-8, -11, -13 and -18) and tumor cell lines (TCs, U87, and HTZ349). Therefore, we investigated the functional effects, including proliferation and migration, metabolic effects including oxygen consumption and extracellular lactate levels, and effects on the protein level, including signaling pathways. Functional investigation revealed synergistic anti-migratory and anti-proliferative effects of the combined treatment with metformin and diclofenac on BTICs and TCs. Signaling pathways did not sufficiently explain synergistic effects. However, we observed that metformin inhibited cellular oxygen consumption and increased extracellular lactate levels, indicating glycolytic rescue mechanisms. Combined treatment inhibited metformin-induced lactate increase. The combination of metformin and diclofenac may represent a promising new strategy in the treatment of glioblastoma. Combined treatment may reduce the effective doses of the single agents and prevent metabolic rescue mechanisms. Further studies are needed in order to determine possible side effects in humans.

Feasibility of ABUS as an Alternative to Handheld Ultrasound for Response Control in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The Invenia Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening (ABUS) is indicated as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic women with high-density breast tissue. ABUS provides time-efficient evaluation of the 3-dimensional recordings within 3 to 6 minutes. The role and advantages of ABUS in everyday clinical practice, especially in routine examination during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is not clear. The aim of this monocentric, noninterventional retrospective study is to evaluate the use of ABUS in patients who are under NACT treatment for response control. METHODS: Regular sonographic response check with handheld ultrasound (HHUS) examination and with ABUS were conducted in 83 women who underwent NACT. The response controls were conducted every 3 to 6 weeks during NACT. The handheld sonography was performed with GE Voluson S8. Handheld sonographic measurements and ABUS measurements were compared with the final pathologic tumor size. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the measurements with HHUS examination or ABUS compared with final pathologic tumor size (P = .47). The average difference from ABUS measured tumor size to final pathologic tumor size was 9.8 mm. The average difference from handheld measured tumor size to final pathologic tumor size was 9/3 mm. Both the specificity of ABUS and HHUS examination in predicting pathologic complete remission was 100%. CONCLUSION: ABUS seems to be a suitable method to conduct response control in neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment. ABUS may facilitate preoperative planning and offers remarkable time saving for physicians compared with HHUS examination and thus should be considered for clinical practice.

Metformin inhibits proliferation and migration of glioblastoma cells independently of TGF-ß2.

To this day, glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable brain tumor. Previous research has shown that metformin, an oral anti-diabetic drug, may decrease GBM cell proliferation and migration especially in brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs). As transforming growth factor ß 2 (TGF-ß2) has been reported to promote high-grade glioma and is inhibited by metformin in other tumors, we explored whether metformin directly interferes with TGF-ß2-signaling. Functional investigation of proliferation and migration of primary BTICs after treatment with metformin+/-TGF-ß2 revealed that metformin doses as low as 0.01 mM metformin thrice a day were able to inhibit proliferation of susceptible cell lines, whereas migration was impacted only at higher doses. Known cellular mechanisms of metformin, such as increased lactate secretion, reduced oxygen consumption and activated AMPK-signaling, could be confirmed. However, TGF-ß2 and metformin did not act as functional antagonists, but both rather inhibited proliferation and/or migration, if significant effects were present. We did not observe a relevant influence of metformin on TGF-ß2 mRNA expression (qRT-PCR), TGF-ß2 protein expression (ELISA) or SMAD-signaling (Western blot). Therefore, it seems that metformin does not exert its inhibitory effects on GBM BTIC proliferation and migration by altering TGF-ß2-signaling. Nonetheless, as low doses of metformin are able to reduce proliferation of certain GBM cells, further exploration of predictors of BTICs' susceptibility to metformin appears justified.