Novel Methods for Quantification of Vasodepression and Cardioinhibition During Tilt-Induced Vasovagal Syncope.

RATIONALE: Assessing the relative contributions of cardioinhibition and vasodepression to the blood pressure (BP) decrease in tilt-induced vasovagal syncope requires methods that reflect BP physiology accurately. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative contributions of cardioinhibition and vasodepression to tilt-induced vasovagal syncope using novel methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the parameters determining BP, that is, stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), and total peripheral resistance (TPR), in 163 patients with tilt-induced vasovagal syncope documented by continuous ECG and video EEG monitoring. We defined the beginning of cardioinhibition as the start of an HR decrease (HR) before syncope and used logarithms of SV, HR, and TPR ratios to quantify the multiplicative relation BP=SV·HR·TPR. We defined 3 stages before syncope and 2 after it based on direction changes of these parameters. The earliest BP decrease occurred 9 minutes before syncope. Cardioinhibition was observed in 91% of patients at a median time of 58 seconds before syncope. At that time, SV had a strong negative effect on BP, TPR a lesser negative effect, while HR had increased (all P<0.001). At the onset of cardioinhibition, the median HR was at 98 bpm higher than baseline. Cardioinhibition thus initially only represented a reduction of the corrective HR increase but was nonetheless accompanied by an immediate acceleration of the ongoing BP decrease. At syncope, SV and HR contributed similarly to the BP decrease (P<0.001), while TPR did not affect BP. CONCLUSIONS: The novel methods allowed the relative effects of SV, HR, and TPR on BP to be assessed separately, although all act together. The 2 major factors lowering BP in tilt-induced vasovagal syncope were reduced SV and cardioinhibition. We suggest that the term vasodepression in reflex syncope should not be limited to reduced arterial vasoconstriction, reflected in TPR, but should also encompass venous pooling, reflected in SV.

A higher proportion of men than of women fainted in the phase without nitroglycerin in tilt-induced vasovagal syncope.

PURPOSE: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) affects more women than men. We determined whether this sex ratio affects tilt table test (TTT) results. METHODS: We retrospectively studied TTT outcomes in suspected VVS. TTT consisted of supine rest, a maximum 20 min of head-up tilt without and, if nitroglycerin was needed, a further maximum 20 min after nitroglycerin administration. TTT was terminated if VVS occurred. We used binary logistic regression for the entire TTT and for each phase, with VVS as outcome and age and sex as predictors. RESULTS: TTT provoked vasovagal (pre)syncope in 494 out of 766 tests (64%). The proportion of men and women who fainted during the entire TTT did not differ significantly between the sexes (p = 0.13, corrected for age). A lower proportion of women than men had VVS in the phase without nitroglycerin (odds ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.79; p = 0.002, corrected for age), whereas a higher proportion of women than men fainted after nitroglycerin (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.21; p = 0.008, corrected for age). These sex differences remained significant after correction for a history of orthostatic versus emotional triggers. The effect of sex on TTT outcome was closely associated with differences of blood pressure change upon tilt-up (lower in men in both TTT phases: without nitroglycerin p = 0.003; with nitroglycerin p = 0.05), but not with heart rate changes. CONCLUSION: Men were more susceptible to induction of VVS without nitroglycerin and women after it. The unexpected findings may be due to sex-specific pathophysiological differences.

Influence of Age on Magnitude and Timing of Vasodepression and Cardioinhibition in Tilt-Induced Vasovagal Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Cardioinhibition may diminish with age, but the changing balance of cardioinhibition and vasodepression with age has not been quantified, leaving the mechanism of vasovagal syncope (VVS) in old age unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify age-related changes of vasodepression and cardioinhibition in tilt-induced VVS. METHODS: We studied 163 cases of tilt-induced VVS, evoked using the Italian protocol with blood pressure, heart rate, and video-electroencephalographic monitoring. Presyncope was excluded. Cardioinhibition was defined as the heart rate decrease before syncope; asystolic pauses (≥3 seconds) were divided into early and late asystole, ie, beginning early enough to or too late to be the major cause of loss of consciousness. The log-ratio method was used to quantify contributions of cardioinhibition and vasodepression, assessed in 2 10-second periods before the onset of cardioinhibition and before syncope. RESULTS: With increasing age, cardioinhibition decreased, ie, heart rate decreased less and more slowly near syncope (P < 0.0001), while vasodepression increased. Asystolic pauses were less frequent in the older one-half of the group than the younger one-half (26% vs 57%; P < 0.00001), but when it did, late asystole occurred more often (58% vs 15%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The shift toward less cardioinhibition and more vasodepression with increased age probably reflects a physiological shift in circulatory control. The weakening of cardioinhibition with age may detract from the efficacy of pacing in older patients with VVS. Cardioinhibition-vasodepression balance should be considered in pacing decisions in older subjects with VVS.

New hemodynamic criteria to separate classical orthostatic hypotension from vasovagal syncope.

OBJECTIVE: To define and evaluate hemodynamic criteria to distinguish between classical orthostatic hypotension (cOH) and vasovagal syncope (VVS) in tilt table testing (TTT). METHODS: Inclusion criteria for VVS were a history of VVS and tilt-induced syncope defined as a blood pressure (BP) decrease and electroencephalographic changes during syncope with complaint recognition. Criteria for cOH were a history of cOH and a BP decrease meeting published criteria. Clinical diagnoses were established prior to TTT. We assessed (1) whether the decrease of systolic BP accelerated, "convex," or decelerated, "concave"; (2) the time from head-up tilt to when BP reached one-half its maximal decrease; (3) the difference between baseline heart rate (HR) and HR at BP nadir. We calculated the diagnostic yield of optimized thresholds of these features and their combinations. RESULTS: We included 82 VVS cases (40% men, median age 44 years) and 65 cOH cases (66% men, median age 70 years). BP decrease was concave in cOH in 79% and convex in VVS in 94% (p < 0.001). The time to reach half the BP decrease was shorter in cOH (median 34 sec, interquartile range (IQR) 19-98 sec) than in VVS (median 1571 sec, IQR 1381-1775 sec, p < 0.001). Mean HR increased by 11 ± 11 bpm in cOH and decreased by 20 ± 19 bpm in VVS (p < 0.001). When all three features pointed to VVS, sensitivity for VVS was 82% and specificity was 100%. When all three pointed to cOH, sensitivity for cOH was 71% and specificity was 100%. INTERPRETATION: These new hemodynamic criteria reliably differentiate cOH from VVS.