Minimally Invasive Osteotomy for Correction of Post-Traumatic Tibia Internal Rotation Deformity: A Case Report.

Introduction: Intramedullary nailing is a commonly performed surgery for tibia diaphysis fractures. However, in selected cases, this procedure can get complicated with rotational malalignment if not checked carefully intra-operatively. Case Report: A 29 year-old male sustained polytrauma and was treated with intramedullary nailing for bilateral femur and right-side tibia fractures. Postoperatively, the patient noticed extreme in-toeing suggesting an internal rotation deformity, which caused great difficulty in walking. The patient was planned for a revision surgery to correct the internal rotation deformity, 6 months after the index surgery. A minimally invasive metaphyseal osteotomy was performed, away from his fracture site by drilling multiple holes. The distal locking bolts of the interlocking nail were removed, and two K wires used to achieve the desired correction angle. After rotating the distal fragment, locking bolts were reinserted in new holes. We kept the patient on our regular follow-up till he achieved sound union at the osteotomy site, after which we allowed him unrestricted activities. Conclusion: The presence of an intramedullary nail can hence help the surgeon in correcting such isolated rotational deformities without getting into the hassle of implant removal to achieve the same.

Medial versus anterior approach for open reduction of hip in children with DDH under two years - A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Purpose: Open reduction (OR) is usually required in developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) for children below 24 months of age, those who failed to achieve a satisfactory reduction by the closed method. OR in this age group can be performed either through a medial or anterior approach. However, there is a paucity of literature and a lack of more substantial evidence regarding which approach (medial versus anterior) is superior for performing OR in this age group with minimal complications. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant articles reporting outcomes and complication rates of DDH children less than 24 months undergone OR either through medial or anterior approach using pre-defined keywords. Data on avascular necrosis (AVN) rates, further corrective surgery (FCS) rates, and clinical and radiological grading using McKay clinical criteria and Severin radiological criteria were assessed. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan (Review Manager 5.4) software. Results: Five comparative studies, having a minimum of two-year follow-up, were included for final analysis. According to the MINORS tool assessment, all five studies were of good to high quality. Of 257 hips, 151 and 106 underwent OR through medial and anterior approaches, respectively. Our meta-analysis showed a statistically significant (p = 0.01) number of AVN cases with the anterior approach compared to the medial approach. The overall random effect showed the odds of having AVN with an anterior approach to be 2.27 (95% CI: 1.18,4.38) times more than the same with a medial approach. Regarding FCS rates, the meta-analysis depicted no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.63). The two groups had no statistically significant difference regarding clinical and radiological outcomes using McKay and Severin criteria, respectively. Following surgery, improvement in the acetabular index from pre-operative value showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.48). Conclusions: Medial approach is safe and effective for OR of the hip in DDH up to 24 months of age. Our analysis showed that AVN rates are lower with a medial approach than the anterior approach, with similar clinical and radiological outcomes and rates of FCS. However, one should consider the surgeon's expertise while choosing between these approaches.

Forgotten Foreign Bodies Mimicking Osteomyelitis, a Diagnostic Dilemma - A Report of Two Cases.

Introduction: The first differential diagnosis for a chronic discharging sinus on an extremity is usually chronic osteomyelitis. These patients are usually treated with surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotics. However, all discharging sinuses are not osteomyelitis. Case Report: We encountered two such cases, initially treated as osteomyelitis, which did not respond to initial surgical debridement and, on further workup, were found to have foreign bodies in situ that mimicked osteomyelitis. The first case is a 1 ½-year-old child with an intact rubber band inside the wrist, presenting with sinuses on the wrist, and the second one is a 12-year-old with an old penetrating injury to the foot through the sole of a rubber slipper. Both patients recovered completely once the foreign bodies were removed. Conclusion: We stress the importance of keeping the possibility of a foreign body in mind in patients with discharging sinuses not responding adequately to debridement and antibiotics.