Palliative care utilization and racial and ethnic disparities among women with de novo metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

PURPOSE: The potential disparities in palliative care delivery for underrepresented minorities with breast cancer are not well known. We sought to determine whether race and ethnicity impact the receipt of palliative care for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the National Cancer Database for female patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer between 2010 and 2017 who received palliative care following diagnosis of MBC to assess the proportion of patients who received palliative care, including non-curative-intent local-regional or systemic therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with receiving palliative care. RESULTS: 60,685 patients were diagnosed with de novo MBC. Of these, only 21.4% (n = 12,963) received a palliative care service. Overall, there was a positive trend in palliative care receipt from 18.2% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2017 (P < 0.001), which persisted when stratified by race and ethnicity. Relative to non-Hispanic White women, Asian/Pacific Islander women (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90, P < 0.001), Hispanic women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.76, P < 0.001), and non-Hispanic Black women (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, P = 0.03) were less likely to receive palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 25% of women with MBC received palliative care between 2010 and 2017. While palliative care has significantly increased for all racial/ethnic groups, Hispanic White, Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander women with MBC still receive significantly less palliative care than non-Hispanic White women. Further research is needed to identify the socioeconomic and cultural barriers to palliative care utilization.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a single-institution experience.

Background: To assess outcomes and toxicity after low-energy intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). Materials and methods: We reviewed patients with unilateral ESBC treated with breast-conserving surgery and 50-kV IORT at our institution. Patients were prescribed 20 Gy to the surface of the spherical applicator, fitted to the surgical cavity during surgery. Patients who did not meet institutional guidelines for IORT alone on final pathology were recommended adjuvant treatment, including additional surgery and/or external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). We analyzed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, overall survival, recurrence-free survival and toxicity. Results: Among 201 patients (median follow-up, 5.1 years; median age, 67 years), 88% were Her2 negative and ER positive and/or PR positive, 98% had invasive ductal carcinoma, 87% had grade 1 or 2, and 95% had clinical T1 disease. Most had pathological stage T1 (93%) N0 (95%) disease. Mean IORT applicator dose at 1-cm depth was 6.3 Gy. Post-IORT treatment included additional surgery, 10%; EBRT, 11%; adjuvant chemotherapy, 9%; and adjuvant hormonal therapy, 74%. Median total EBRT dose was 42.4 (range, 40.05-63) Gy and median dose per fraction was 2.65 Gy. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 2.7%, the overall survival rate was 95% with no breast cancer-related deaths, and the recurrence-free survival rate was 96%. For patients who were deemed unsuitable for postoperative IORT alone and did not receive recommended risk-adapted EBRT, the IBTR rate was 4.7% versus 1.7% (p = 0.23) for patients who were either suitable for IORT alone or unsuitable and received adjuvant EBRT. Cosmetic toxicity data was available for 83%, with 7% experiencing grade 3 breast toxicity and no grade 4-5 toxicity. Conclusions: IORT for select patients with ESBC results in acceptable outcomes in regard to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and toxicity.

Five-Year Breast Surgeon Experience in LYMPHA at Time of ALND for Treatment of Clinical T1-4N1-3M0 Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a source of postoperative morbidity for breast cancer survivors. Lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) is a technique used to prevent BCRL at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We report the 5-year experience of a breast surgeon trained in LYMPHA and investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent LYMPHA following ALND for treatment of cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer was performed in patients who underwent ALND with and without LYMPHA. Diagnosis of BCRL was made by certified lymphedema therapists. Descriptive statistics and lymphedema surveillance data were analyzed using results of Fisher's exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Logistic regression and propensity matching were performed to assess the reduction of BCRL occurrence following LYMPHA. RESULTS: In a 5-year period, 132 patients met inclusion criteria with 76 patients undergoing LYMPHA at the time of ALND and 56 patients undergoing ALND alone. Patients who underwent LYMPHA at the time of ALND were significantly less likely to develop BCRL than those who underwent ALND alone (p = 0.045). Risk factors associated with BCRL development were increased patient age (p = 0.007), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.003), and, in patients undergoing LYMPHA, number of positive nodes (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: LYMPHA may be successfully employed by breast surgeons trained in lymphatic-venous anastomosis at the time of ALND. While research efforts should continue to focus on prevention and surveillance of BCRL, LYMPHA remains an option to reduce BCRL and improve patient quality of life.

Effects on Lung Tissue After Breast Cancer Radiation: Comparing Photon and Proton Therapies.

Purpose: In breast cancer, improved treatment approaches that reduce injury to lung tissue and early diagnosis and intervention for lung toxicity are increasingly important in survivorship. The aims of this study are to (1) compare lung tissue radiographic changes in women treated with conventional photon radiation therapy and those treated with proton therapy (PT), (2) assess the volume of lung irradiated to 5 Gy (V5) and 20 Gy (V20) by treatment modality, and (3) quantify the effects of V5, V20, time, and smoking history on the severity of tissue radiographic changes. Patients and Methods: A prospective observational study of female breast cancer patients was conducted to monitor postradiation subclinical lung tissue radiographic changes. Repeated follow-up x-ray computed tomography scans were acquired through 2 years after treatment. In-house software was used to quantify an internally normalized measure of pulmonary tissue density change over time from the computed tomography scans, emphasizing the 6- and 12-month time points. Results: Compared with photon therapy, PT was associated with significantly lower lung V5 and V20. Lung V20 (but not V5) correlated significantly with increased subclinical lung tissue radiographic changes 6 months after treatment, and neither correlated with lung effects at 12 months. Significant lung tissue density changes were present in photon therapy patients at 6 and 12 months but not in PT patients. Significant lung tissue density change persisted at 12 months in ever-smokers but not in never-smokers. Conclusion: Patients treated with PT had significantly lower radiation exposure to the lungs and less statistically significant tissue density change, suggesting decreased injury and/or improved recovery compared to photon therapy. These findings motivate additional studies in larger, randomized, and more diverse cohorts to further investigate the contributions of treatment modality and smoking regarding the short- and long-term radiographic effects of radiation on lung tissue.

Racial and Ethnic Demographic Reporting in Phase 2 Proton Therapy Clinical Trials: A Review.

Purpose: Equitable inclusion of racial and ethnic participation in clinical trials is crucial to improving disparities in health care, especially for historically marginalized populations. Our study aims to describe the racial and ethnic demographics of patients enrolled in published phase 2 clinical trials involving proton therapy in the United States. Materials and Methods: Published manuscripts were identified in PubMed, Embase, World of Science, and Cochrane. Phase 2 trials evaluating proton therapy for US patients were included. For each article in the study, data were collected comprising authors, title, and publication year, and clinical trial numbers were verified. Additional data included tumor site, primary institution, sample size, reported race/ethnicity, and raw number/percentile of race/ethnicity. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Results: Overall, 970 titles were identified; 636 remained after duplicate screening, and 75 full-text articles were assessed. We identified 38 eligible manuscripts for inclusion comprising 2648 patients. Only 15 (39%) of the publications reported race/ethnicity. Of these, 8 (21%) and 10 (26%) documented Hispanic or Black trial participants, respectively; however, only 6 (16%) documented trial participation for both Hispanic and Black patients. Of the 1409 patients with a documented race/ethnicity, 89.0% (n = 1254) were non-Hispanic white, 5.3% (n = 75) were Black, and 2.2% (n = 31) were Hispanic. Other and unknown race/ethnicity comprised the remaining patients (3.5%; n = 49). Conclusion: We identified underreporting of demographic data in published phase 2 proton therapy trials, which unfortunately mirrored underreporting for cancer drug clinical trials. We also noted dramatic Black and Hispanic patient underrepresentation across the trials in which race and ethnicity are reported. Findings highlight the urgent need to identify and address barriers to proton therapy trials for Black and Hispanic patients ensuring clinical trials in radiation oncology are representative of the patients seen in clinical practice.

Nationwide changes in radiation oncology travel and location of care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to coronavirus disease (COVID). Transportation barriers made travel to obtain medical care more difficult during the pandemic. Whether these factors led to changes in the distance traveled for radiotherapy and the coordinated location of radiation treatment is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients across 60 cancer sites in the National Cancer Database from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed for changes in distance traveled for radiotherapy. We designated the facilities in the 99th percentile or above in terms of the proportion of patients who traveled more than 200 miles as "destination facilities." We defined "coordinated care" as undergoing radiotherapy at the same facility where the cancer was diagnosed. RESULTS: We evaluated 1,151,954 patients. There was a greater than 1% decrease in the proportion of patients treated in the Mid-Atlantic States. Mean distance traveled from place of residence to radiation treatment decreased from 28.6 to 25.9 miles, and the proportion traveling greater than 50 miles decreased from 7.7% to 7.1%. At "destination facilities," the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 29.3% in 2018 to 24% in 2020. In comparison, at the other hospitals, the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 1.07% to 0.97%. In 2020, residing in a rural area resulted in a lower odds of having coordinated care (multivariable odds ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95). CONCLUSION: The first year of the COVID pandemic measurably impacted the location of U.S. radiation therapy treatment.

Proton Radiation Therapy After Chemotherapy in the Management of Aggressive Mediastinal Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Lymphoma Subcommittee Collaboration.

Purpose: Combined modality therapy with multiagent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is a standard treatment option for aggressive mediastinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (AMNHLs); however, concerns regarding acute and late radiation toxicities have fueled an effort to use systemic therapy alone. The use of proton therapy (PT) is a promising treatment option, but there are still limited data regarding clinical outcomes with this treatment modality. In this Particle Therapy Cooperative Group lymphoma subcommittee collaboration, we report outcomes of patients with AMNHL treated with pencil-beam scanning PT or double-scatter PT after chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: This was a multi-institutional retrospective observational cohort study of patients with AMNHL treated with PT following chemotherapy between 2011 and 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. PT toxicity was graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A 2-tailed paired t test was used for dosimetric comparisons. Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified. With a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (range, 0.2-8.9 years), the estimated 5-year PFS for all patients was 93%, 5-year LRFS was 96%, and estimated 5-year OS was 87%. Maximum acute grade 1 (G1) toxicities occurred in 18 patients, and 7 patients had maximum G2 toxicities. No G3+ radiation-related toxicities were observed. Average mean lung dose and lung V20 Gy were lower for patients treated with pencil-beam scanning PT compared with double-scatter PT (P = .016 and .006, respectively), while patients with lower mediastinal disease had higher doses for all evaluated dosimetric heart parameters. Conclusions: PT after chemotherapy for patients with AMNHL resulted in excellent outcomes with respect to 5-year PFS, LRFS, and OS without high-grade toxicities. Future work with larger sample sizes is warranted to further elucidate the role of PT in the treatment of AMNHL.

Strategic Operational Redesign Improves Prior Authorization Access: A Validation Study.

Purpose: Obtaining prior authorization (PA) before treatment is becoming increasingly burdensome in oncology, especially in radiation oncology. Here, we describe the impact of a strategic novel operational PA redesign to shorten authorization time and to improve patient access to cancer care at a large United States academic proton therapy center. We ask whether such a redesign may be replicable and adoptable across oncology centers. Materials and Methods: Our PA redesign strategy was based on a 3-tiered approach. Specifically, we (1) held payors accountable to legally backed timelines, (2) leveraged expertise on insurance policies and practices, and (3) updated the submission, appeal writing, and planning procedures for PA. Metrics were compared at the following 3 time points: 6 months before, at phase-in, and at 6 months after intervention. Results: In analyzing the impact of improving PA access to care, the percentage of approvals for commercial proton beam therapy improved by an absolute 30.6% postintervention (P < .001). The proportion of commercially insured patients treated with proton beam therapy also increased by 6.2%, and the number of new starts rose by 11.7 patients/mo. Overall patient census increased by 13 patients/d. Median authorization time was 1 week, and 90% of surveyed providers reported reduced PA burden and improved patient care. Conclusion: This is the first validated, comprehensive operational strategy to improve access to cancer therapy while reducing the burden of PA. This novel approach may be helpful for addressing barriers to PA in medical and surgical oncology because the redesign is predicated on laws that regulate PA across disciplines.

Hyperfractionated-Accelerated Reirradiation with Proton Therapy for Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma.

Purpose: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) is a rare complication among patients treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer. Hyperfractionated-accelerated reirradiation (HART) improves local control after surgery. Proton therapy may further improve the therapeutic ratio by mitigating potential toxicity. Materials and Methods: Six patients enrolled in a prospective registry with localized RAAS received HART with proton therapy between 2015 and 2021. HART was delivered twice or thrice daily in fraction sizes of 1.5 or 1.0 Gy, respectively. All patients received 45 Gy to a large elective volume followed by boosts to a median dose of 65 (range, 60-75) Gy. Toxicity was recorded prospectively by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: The median follow-up duration was 1.5 (range, 0.25-2.9) years. The median age at RAAS diagnosis was 73 (range, 60-83) years with a median latency of 8.9 (range, 5-14) years between radiation therapy completion and RAAS diagnosis. The median mean heart dose was 2.2 (range, 0.1-4.96) Gy. HART was delivered postoperatively (n = 1), preoperatively (n = 3), preoperatively for local recurrence after initial management with mastectomy (n = 1), and as definitive treatment (n = 1). All patients had local control of disease throughout follow-up. Three of 4 patients treated preoperatively had a pathologic complete response. The patient treated definitively had a complete metabolic response on her posttreatment PET/CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) scan. Two patients developed distant metastatic disease despite local control and died of their disease. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 3 patients: 2 patients undergoing preoperative HART experienced wound dehiscence and 1 postoperatively developed grade 3 wound infection, which resolved. Conclusion: HART with proton therapy appears effective for local control of RAAS with a high rate of pathologic complete response and no local recurrences to date. However, vigilant surveillance for distant metastasis should occur. Toxicity is comparable to that in photon/electron series. Proton therapy for RAAS may maximize normal tissue sparing in this large-volume reirradiation setting.

Predicting which patients may benefit from the hybrid intracavitary+interstitial needle (IC/IS) applicator for advanced cervical cancer: A dosimetric comparison and toxicity benefit analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the predicted rate of local control and bladder and rectum toxicity rates for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy plans using a tandem and ovoid (T/O) applicator versus using a simulated hybrid intracavitary/interstitial tandem and ring applicator with needles (T/R + N) for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ≥ FIGO Stage IIB locally advanced cervical cancer treated with T/O from a single institution were included. Simulated treatment plans were created with a T/R + N applicator for the best high-risk clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and minimal dose to organs at risk. Three-year local control rate was estimated using published dose-volume effect relationships. Next, the high-risk CTV EQD2 D90 of T/R + N plans were calculated, and bladder and rectum toxicity rates were estimated. Analysis was performed in subpatient groups defined based on tumor volume and ratio of maximal and minimal tumor radii (RR) that reflects tumor shape asymmetry. RESULTS: Improvements in predicted local control rate for the T/R + N were 0.8, 4.1, 1.6, and 3.9% for groups with tumor volume <35 cc, ≥35 cc, RR < 2.0, and ≥2.0, respectively, with the latter three being statistically significant. Predicted reductions in Grade 2-4 toxicity rates of bladder and rectum were significant in all groups except bladder toxicity in tumor volume <35 cc, when T/R + N plans were normalized to the same CTV coverage as the T/O plans. Comparing unnormalized T/R + N plans and T/O plans, predicted toxicity reductions were significant in all groups except rectum toxicity in RR ≥ 2.0. Predicted reduction of toxicity rate was larger for patients with large tumor or large tumor RR, although some reductions were relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Cases with large tumor (volume ≥35 cc) or large tumor asymmetry (RR ≥ 2.0) would probably benefit more from the use of hybrid applicators.

Concomitant Radiation Recall Dermatitis and Organizing Pneumonia following Breast Radiotherapy: A Case Report.

PURPOSE: Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is a rare complication that occurs after completion of radiation therapy (RT) and initiation of a precipitating agent, most commonly chemotherapeutic medications. Various theories attempt to explain the mechanism, including activation of the body's inflammatory pathways through nonimmune activation. Likewise, radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening complication of RT that, while not fully understood, is suspected to be partly an autoimmune reaction. PATIENT: We present the case of a 71-year-old female with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, interstitial cystitis, and osteoarthritis who presented with clinical stage T1N0M0 ER+/PR-/HER2- invasive ductal carcinoma of the lower outer quadrant of the left breast, for which she underwent left segmental mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. Her final pathologic stage was T1N1M0. RESULT: The patient developed RRD and later RIOP following receipt of radiation and chemotherapy, which resolved with steroid administration. CONCLUSIONS: The rarity of both RRD and RIOP occurring in a patient, as in our case, suggests a shared pathophysiology behind these two complications. As both reactions involve some degree of inflammation and respond to corticosteroids, it seems likely that the etiologies of RRD and RIOP lie within the inflammatory pathway. However, further investigation should evaluate the frequency, duration, and triggering of concomitant RRD and RIOP.

A Case Study: Proton Therapy for Male Breast Cancer with Previous Irradiation.

This is a case report of a male patient with previous radiation for a thymic carcinoma (20 years ago) who presented with a left breast cancer. He underwent a partial mastectomy followed by proton radiation therapy with a dose of 5040 cGy to the whole breast in 28 fractions with simultaneous boost to 5800 cGy to the lumpectomy cavity. Proton beam therapy was used instead of conventional photon radiation therapy to spare the heart and lung and to avoid any previously irradiated areas. This study describes the technique and comparative dosimetry for this case.