Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Variability in speech perception outcomes with cochlear implants remains largely unexplained. Recently, electrocochleography, or measurements of cochlear potentials in response to sound, has been used to assess residual cochlear function at the time of implantation. Our objective was to characterize the potentials recorded preimplantation in subjects of all ages, and evaluate the relationship between the responses, including a subjective estimate of neural activity, and speech perception outcomes. DESIGN: Electrocochleography was recorded in a prospective cohort of 284 candidates for cochlear implant at University of North Carolina (10 months to 88 years of ages). Measurement of residual cochlear function called the "total response" (TR), which is the sum of magnitudes of spectral components in response to tones of different stimulus frequencies, was obtained for each subject. The TR was then related to results on age-appropriate monosyllabic word score tests presented in quiet. In addition to the TR, the electrocochleography results were also assessed for neural activity in the forms of the compound action potential and auditory nerve neurophonic. RESULTS: The TR magnitude ranged from a barely detectable response of about 0.02 µV to more than 100 µV. In adults (18 to 79 years old), the TR accounted for 46% of variability in speech perception outcome by linear regression (r = 0.46; p < 0.001). In children between 6 and 17 years old, the variability accounted for was 36% (p < 0.001). In younger children, the TR accounted for less of the variability, 15% (p = 0.012). Subjects over 80 years old tended to perform worse for a given TR than younger adults at the 6-month testing interval. The subjectively assessed neural activity did not increase the information compared with the TR alone, which is primarily composed of the cochlear microphonic produced by hair cells. CONCLUSIONS: The status of the auditory periphery, particularly of hair cells rather than neural activity, accounts for a large fraction of variability in speech perception outcomes in adults and older children. In younger children, the relationship is weaker, and the elderly differ from other adults. This simple measurement can be applied with high throughput so that peripheral status can be assessed to help manage patient expectations, create individually-tailored treatment plans, and identify subjects performing below expectations based on residual cochlear function.

Impedance Measures During in vitro Cochlear Implantation Predict Array Positioning.

OBJECTIVE: Improper electrode placement during cochlear implant (CI) insertion can adversely affect speech perception outcomes. However, the intraoperative methods to determine positioning are limited. Because measures of electrode impedance can be made quickly, the goal of this study was to assess the relationship between CI impedance and proximity to adjacent structures. METHODS: An Advanced Bionics CI array was inserted into a clear, plastic cochlea one electrode contact at a time in a saline bath (nine trials). At each insertion depth, response to biphasic current pulses was used to calculate access resistance (Ra), polarization resistance (Rp), and polarization capacitance (Cp). These measures were correlated to actual proximity as assessed by microscopy using linear regression models. RESULTS: Impedance increased with insertion depth and proximity to the inner wall. Specifically, Ra increased, Cp decreased, and Rp slightly increased. Incorporating all impedance measures afforded a prediction model (r = 0.88) while optimizing for sub-mm positioning afforded a model with 78.3% specificity. CONCLUSION: Impedance in vitro greatly changes with electrode insertion depth and proximity to adjacent structures in a predicable manner. SIGNIFICANCE: Assessing proximity of the CI to adjacent structures is a significant first step in qualifying the electrode-neural interface. This information should aid in CI fitting, which should help maximize hearing and speech outcomes with a CI. Additionally, knowledge of the relationship between impedance and positioning could have utility in other tissue implants in the brain, retina, or spinal cord.