RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification of a vascular pedicle is an uncommon, but established, phenomenon occasionally seen incidentally on post-operative imaging after fibular free flap reconstruction. Symptomatic cases of pedicle ossification, however, are much rarer, with very few cases requiring operative intervention. We present the largest case of pedicle ossification recorded to date, review the literature on symptomatic pedicle ossification, and describe our experience with the surgical management and outcomes of this complication in symptomatic patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 60-year-old man with a 7 cm neck mass and neck pain presents six months after fibular free flap reconstruction of an osteonecrotic mandible. CT demonstrates heterotopic ossification of the free flap vascular pedicle. The patient underwent surgical resection of the ossification with preservation of the pedicle and had an uncomplicated post-operative course with resolution of symptoms. DISCUSSION: While pedicle ossification following fibula free flap surgery appears to be a somewhat common occurrence in the literature, clinically significant and symptomatic cases are rare. Symptomatic pedicle ossification may require secondary surgical intervention if large, painful, or disfiguring. Although there are surgical techniques described which may decrease the incidence of postoperative ossification, the rarity of symptomatic cases may not justify the additional surgical risks created by subperiosteal dissection. CONCLUSION: Here, we present what appears to be the largest case of pedicle ossification in the literature. We believe this case may aid in the understanding of pedicle ossification and contribute towards a standard treatment protocol in the prevention and treatment of clinically relevant pedicle ossification.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/cirugía , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/efectos adversos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/métodos , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Recognize the avoidable costs incurred due to overpacking of rhinoplasty instrument trays. Reduce rhinoplasty instrument trays by including only instruments used frequently. Establish methods to reduce trays prepared for other otolaryngologic procedures. METHODS: This is a prospective study. The study evaluates the specific use of instruments opened for rhinoplasty procedures at the New York Eye & Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai. Instruments were counted in 10 rhinoplasty cases. Usage rate was calculated for each instrument. Additionally, all instruments used in at least 20% of cases were noted. This "20%" threshold was used to create new rhinoplasty tray inventories more reflective of actual instrument usage. Some instruments above the 20% threshold were included in multiples (i.e. two Adson Brown forceps vs. one curved iris scissor). RESULTS: 189 instruments were opened, and 32 instruments were used on average in each rhinoplasty. 55 instruments were used in at least 20% of cases. The 55 "high usage" instruments were used to create new, reduced rhinoplasty tray inventory lists. Based on our analysis, a new rhinoplasty tray inventory was created comprised of 68 instruments, a 64% reduction from 189. CONCLUSION: Instruments are sterilized and packed in gross excess for rhinoplasty procedures. Previously published figures estimate re-sterilization costs of $0.51 to $0.77 per instrument. Reduction in instruments opened from 189 to 68 is expected to lead to cost savings ranging from $62 to $93 per case, yielding a savings between $6200 and $9300 per 100 cases performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.
Asunto(s)
Rinoplastia/instrumentación , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/economía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinoplastia/economía , Esterilización/economíaAsunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Resinas Acrílicas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Rellenos Dérmicos/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Absceso/diagnóstico , Absceso/etiología , Resinas Acrílicas/administración & dosificación , Mejilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Mejilla/cirugía , Rellenos Dérmicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/efectos adversos , Tejido Subcutáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgeon use of a soft cervical collar during endoscopic and microscopic otologic surgery is feasible and impacts surgeon ergonomics as measured by inertial sensors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective crossover trial. SETTING: US-based otolaryngology training program. PATIENTS: Otolaryngology residents and fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic-use of a soft cervical collar during simulated otologic surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time spent in high-risk angles of neck and back flexion and extension; average angle of neck flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending; validated assessment of neck pain; average daily phone use. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects met criteria for inclusion. Ten of 15 (67%) were male. Seven of 15 (47%) were postgraduate year 1-2. Seven of 15 (47%) reported a history of neck pain. None reported prior spinal steroid injections or surgery. Across all subjects, use of the soft cervical collar significantly reduced time spent in high-risk angles of neck flexion/extension during both endoscopic (56% vs. 35%, p < 0.05) and microscopic (60% vs. 32%, p < 0.05) otologic surgery. There was no effect on back flexion or extension. There was no difference in time spent in high-risk neck or back angles between endoscopic and microscopic surgery. Average angles of neck or back flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation were not significantly different for subgroups with more operative experience, increased phone use, perception of good posture, or history of neck pain. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a soft cervical collar during simulated otologic surgery significantly reduced time spent in high-risk neck positions. These data support feasibility of soft collar use during otologic surgery and hold promise for reduction in the high rates of neck pain reported by neurotologists. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED: Improving surgeon ergonomics for otologic surgery. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: To identify a therapeutic intervention to mitigate neck pain in surgeons caused by assumption of high-risk cervical neck flexion and extension. DESIRED RESULT: To demonstrate that use of a readily available soft cervical collar reduces risk of neck pain in otologic surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. INDICATE IRB OR IACUC: Exempt.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Cuello , Cirujanos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Ergonomía , Cuello/cirugía , Dolor de Cuello/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios CruzadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE(S): Despite advancements in imaging techniques and cytological analysis, plunging ranula remains a challenging surgical, radiologic, and pathologic phenomenon. Of the 18 patients we evaluated at our institution, we highlight three cases that illustrate the high rate of misleading imaging and cytological results when assessing plunging ranula. METHODS: Imaging results, biopsy findings, operative techniques, and pathological reports were reviewed from patients who had either a preoperative or postoperative diagnosis of ranula and underwent surgery by a single head and neck surgeon at a tertiary care center. RESULTS: Of the 18 identified patients, computed tomography was correct on preoperative imaging 73% of the time and magnetic resonance imaging was correct on preoperative imaging 71% of the time. Two patients underwent preoperative ultrasound and their ultrasound reports did not accurately diagnose the presence of a ranula. Two patients underwent preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy due to inconclusive preoperative imaging, in which results suggested either a ranula or epidermal cyst. Both ultimately did not match the final pathology. Three of eighteen patients (17%) underwent an inappropriate initial surgery due to incorrect imaging diagnoses and/or biopsy findings. CONCLUSION: Despite use of preoperative modalities to distinguish plunging ranula from other cystic floor of mouth lesions, surgeons must be aware that no workup modality is fully precise. The potential for revision surgery must be included in all preoperative discussions for presumed plunging ranula. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2689-2696, 2024.
Asunto(s)
Ránula , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Ránula/diagnóstico , Ránula/cirugía , Ránula/patología , Ránula/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Ultrasonografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Errores DiagnósticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of lumbar drains (LDs) in the success of spontaneous temporal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and encephalocele repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic health system. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing repair of spontaneous temporal lobe encephaloceles or middle fossa CSF leaks during years 2017 to 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Transmastoid, middle fossa craniotomy, or combination approaches to CSF leak repair. OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure rate, complication rate, length of stay (LOS), readmission. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included, with a combination approach performed in 78.3%, transmastoid in 17.4%, and isolated middle fossa craniotomy in 4.3%. Mean body mass index was 33.2, mean bony defect size width was 6.51 mm, and defect locations included the epitympanum, antrum, mastoid, and petrous apex. Multilayer closure with three or more layers was performed in 87.0%. LD was used in 73.9% of cases for a mean duration 2.27 days and was associated with longer LOS (3.27 vs. 1.56 d, p = 0.006) but not with failure rate, complications, discharge destination, or readmission. Only one major complication occurred as a result of the drain, but low-pressure headache was anecdotally common. CONCLUSIONS: Use of LD in the repair of spontaneous CSF leaks and temporal lobe encephaloceles is associated with longer LOS but not failure rates or other admission-level outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Encefalocele , Humanos , Encefalocele/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/complicaciones , Apófisis Mastoides/cirugía , Lóbulo Temporal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Herein we present an unusual case of a primary HPV+ perigeniculate, extra-axial middle fossa skull base tumor and our management thereof. Laryngoscope, 133:3158-3160, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced otolaryngologists to seek new methods of providing patient care in a remote setting. The effect of this paradigm shift on patient satisfaction, however, remains unelucidated. This study compares patient satisfaction with telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic to that with in-office visits during the same period in 2019. METHODS: Press Ganey survey responses of patients seen by otolaryngologists within a large, academic, multicenter hospital system were gathered. Responses were included in analyses if they corresponded with a visit that occurred either in clinic March to December 2019 or via telehealth March to December 2020. Chi-Square Test of Independence and Fisher's Exact Test were employed to detect differences between years. Binary logistic regressions were performed to detect the factors most predictive of positive telehealth experiences. RESULTS: Patient overall satisfaction with in-office and telehealth visits did not differ significantly (76.4% in 2019 vs 78.0% in 2020 rated visit overall as "very good," P = .09). Patients seen by a Head and Neck (odds ratio 4.13, 95% confidence interval 1.52-11.26, P = .005), Laryngology (OR 5.96, 95% CI 1.51-23.50, P = .01), or Rhinology (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.55-10.43, P = .004) provider were significantly more likely to report a positive telehealth experience. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seen via telehealth during COVID-19 reported levels of satisfaction similar to those seen in-office the year prior. These telehealth satisfaction levels, however, are contextualized within the expected confines of a pandemic. Further research is required to determine whether satisfaction remains consistent as telemedicine becomes a ubiquitous component of medical practice.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Otolaringología , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pandemias , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon and aggressive salivary malignancy. The oncocytoid variant of salivary duct carcinoma (OSDC) has only been reported in the English literature once before. Here we detail two new patients. A 71-year-old female presented with a painless enlarging left parotid mass. Imaging and fine-needle aspiration were nondiagnostic. The second patient, a 79-year-old male, presented with painless swelling in the right cheek. Imaging was nondiagnostic. Both patients underwent surgical resection. Histopathology revealed bland yet infiltrative OSDC in both cases. These tumors were AR+ (androgen receptor) by immunohistochemistry. Potential difficulty exists in distinguishing the oncocytoid variant of SDC, a rare and relatively bland tumor, from oncocytoma, a more commonly encountered entity. AR expression can aid in the correct diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Conductos SalivalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide a portrait of gender affirmation surgery (GAS) insurance coverage across the United States, with attention to procedures of the head and neck. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Policy review of US medical insurance companies. METHODS: State policies on transgender care for Medicaid insurance providers were collected for all 50 states. Each state's policy on GAS and facial gender affirmation surgery (FGAS) was examined. The largest medical insurance companies in the United States were identified using the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Market Share report. Policies of the top 49 primary commercial medical insurance companies were examined. RESULTS: Medicaid policy reviews found that 18 states offer some level of gender-affirming coverage for their patients, but only 3 include FGAS (17%). Thirteen states prohibit Medicaid coverage of all transgender surgery, and 19 states have no published gender-affirming medical care coverage policy. Ninety-two percent of commercial medical insurance providers had a published policy on GAS coverage. Genital reconstruction was described as a medically necessary aspect of transgender care in 100% of the commercial policies reviewed. Ninety-three percent discussed coverage of FGAS, but 51% considered these procedures cosmetic. Thyroid chondroplasty (20%) was the most commonly covered FGAS procedure. Mandibular and frontal bone contouring, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, and facial rhytidectomy were each covered by 13% of the medical policies reviewed. CONCLUSION: While certain surgical aspects of gender-affirming medical care are nearly ubiquitously covered by commercial insurance providers, FGAS is considered cosmetic by most Medicaid and commercial insurance providers, potentially limiting patient access. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
Asunto(s)
Cara/cirugía , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Medicaid , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/economía , Personas Transgénero , Femenino , Política de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/normas , Gobierno Estatal , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety of parathyroidectomy during pregnancy as treatment for hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) in comparison to nonsurgical management plans. Secondary outcomes involved analyzing the safety of surgery in the third trimester and the benefit of operating on asymptomatic pregnant patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: PRISMA-guided systematic review of all cases of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy published in peer-reviewed English journals on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS from 1980 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 75 manuscripts were included in this review describing 382 cases of gestational hyperparathyroidism. The median maternal age was 31 years. Overall, 108 cases (28.3%) underwent parathyroidectomy during pregnancy while 274 cases (71.7%) were treated nonsurgically. The majority of surgeries took place during the second trimester (67.6%). Complications and/or deaths were less likely to occur after surgery in the second trimester (4.48%) as compared to surgery in the third trimester (21.1%). Nine surgically treated cases resulted in infant complications and/or death; however, none of these nine cases had any surgical complications. Despite these complications, the overall infant complication rate for patients who underwent surgical treatment remained lower than that of patients treated with conservative therapy (9.1% vs. 38.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that for all pregnant patients with diagnosed HPTH, parathyroidectomy should be considered regardless of symptomatology. Our data suggest that parathyroidectomy is associated with fewer risks than more conservative treatments and results in better fetal outcomes. Surgery during the third trimester is feasible and surgery should be considered in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Laryngoscope, 131:1915-1921, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/terapia , Paratiroidectomía/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
At the height of the coronavirus pandemic in New York City, at our hospital (NYC Health/Hospitals-Elmhurst) 95% of inpatients tested positive for COVID-19 and it operated at 500% surge ICU capacity-one of the greatest impacted centers in the nation. In the face of this we established a systematic multidisciplinary approach to manage ventilated ICU patients and select those appropriate for tracheostomy. Members from Pulmonary Critical Care, Anesthesiology, Surgery, Ethics, and Otolaryngology, created a protocolized way to assess all ICU patients in our hospital and, if deemed appropriate, help them towards weaning or tracheostomy and subsequent discharge. Given the climbing COVID numbers throughout the nation, and once again in NY, we believe sharing our protocol and brief outcomes will be very helpful for hospitals who are struggling with what we did, as it may serve as a blueprint for these institutions.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a complication of surgical management for adult spinal deformity with a multifactorial etiology. Many risk factors are controversial and their relative importance are not fully understood. We aimed to identify the surgical, radiographic, and patient-related risk factors associated with PJK and proximal junctional failure (PJF). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE. The inclusion criteria included prospective randomized control trials and prospective/retrospective cohort studies of adult patients with radiographic evidence of PJK, which was defined as a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle ≥10° and at least 10° greater than the preoperative measurement. Studies required a minimum of 10 patients and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 14 unique studies, including 1908 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed significant differences between the PJK and non-PJK groups in age (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.80; P = .03), prevalence of osteopenia/osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.99; P = .0004), preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (WMD -17.52; P = .02), preoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) (WMD -1.22; P = .002), pedicle screw instrumentation at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (OR 1.67; P = .02), change in SVA (WMD -11.87; P = .01), fusion to sacrum/pelvis/ilium (OR 2.14; P < .00 001), change in LL (WMD -5.61; P = .01), and postoperative SVA (WMD -7.79; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that age, osteopenia/osteoporosis, high preoperative SVA, high postoperative SVA, low preoperative LL, use of pedicle screws at the UIV, SVA change/correction, LL change/correction, and fusion to sacrum/pelvis/iliac region are risk factors for PJK.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a stand-alone interbody cage versus a conventional cage and anterior cervical plate technique. METHODS: A systematic Medline search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews. Search terms included "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion," "cage," and "bone plates," or variations thereof. Only studies involving a direct comparison of ACDF with a stand-alone cage versus a cage and plate were included. From the selected studies, we extracted data on patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical risk factors, and pre- and postoperative radiographic findings. A meta-analysis was performed on all outcome measures. The quality of each study was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-only technique had significantly lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and adjacent segment disease compared with patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-plate technique. However, patients who underwent ACDF with a cage-plate technique had better radiographic outcomes with significantly less subsidence and better restoration of cervical lordosis. There were no other significant differences in outcomes or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF with a cage-only technique appears to have better clinical outcomes than the cage-plate technique, despite radiographic findings of increased rates of subsidence and less restoration of cervical lordosis. Future randomized controlled trials with longer term follow-up are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether age, sex, and race have independent effects on sagittal pelvic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic parameters and sagittal balance correlate with health-related quality of life and are important for patient assessment and surgical planning. Age, sex, and race are 3 unalterable patient factors that may influence pelvic morphology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who presented to our radiology practice between 2010 and 2015 and had a standing, lateral lumbosacral radiograph. Any patients without both femoral heads and L1-S1 visible on the radiograph, and any patients presenting with traumatic injury, coronal deformity, prior instrumentation, spondylolisthesis, or neoplasm of the spine were excluded. Univariate analysis determined differences in measurements among African American, white, and Hispanic races, as well as between male and female sexes. Correlation analysis between age and different measurements was also conducted. Multivariable regression was then used to determine the independent effect of age, sex, and race on pelvic parameters. RESULTS: We investigated 1801 adults (older than 18 y) and 1246 had a recorded race. There were 1165 women, 636 men, 525 whites, 404 African Americans, and 317 Hispanics. Multivariable regression demonstrated a statistically significant increase in pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) with aging, and statistically significant decrease in sacral slope (SS) and LL with aging. Women had a statistically greater LL than men. African Americans had a statistically smaller PT and greater SS and PI-LL relative to whites, while Hispanics had a statistically smaller PT and PI-LL, and a statistically greater SS and LL relative to whites. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic parameters were different between sexes, among races, and changed with age. These findings are important for patient assessment and preoperative planning to obtain optimal sagittal balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.