High immunogenicity of red blood cell antigens restricted to the population of African descent in a cohort of sickle cell disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients undergo multiple red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and are regularly exposed to low-prevalence (LP) antigens specific to individuals of African descent. This study evaluated the prevalence of antibodies against LP antigens in SCD patients and the need to identify these antibodies in everyday practice. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma from 211 SCD patients was tested with RBCs expressing the following LP antigens: RH10 (V), RH20 (VS), RH23 (DW ), RH30 (Goa ), KEL6 (Jsa ), and MNS6 (He). RESULTS: Nine LP antibodies were found in eight patients (3.8%): five anti-RH23, two anti-RH30, and two anti-MNS6. The exposure risk, calculated for each LP antigen, was below 3% per RBC unit, for all antigens tested. Thus, in this cohort of transfused SCD patients, the prevalence of LP antibodies was similar to that of antibodies against antigens of the FY, JK, and MNS blood group systems. These findings also reveal the occurrence of anti-RH23 in SCD patients. No anti-RH20 or anti-KEL6 were found, despite the high frequency of mismatch situations. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the immunogenicity of these LP antigens, and the evanescence of antibodies against LP antigens. They also highlight the importance of appropriate pretransfusion testing for patients frequently transfused, who are likely to be exposed to multiple types of blood group antigens.

Family study of a Swiss patient uncovered a novel genetic basis for the S-s-U+(var) phenotype.

BACKGROUND: The rare S-s- phenotype is typically found in persons of African origin. Three genetic bases underlying this phenotype have been identified so far: a large deletion including the GYPB gene, which encodes the S and s antigens, and two mutations affecting GYPB splicing (commonly called "P2" and "NY"). The discovery of the S-s- phenotype in a Swiss patient prompted this study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The GYPB genotype of the patient was analyzed with Beadchip technology and Sanger sequencing. GYPB haplotype analysis was also carried out in the patient's family. A functional splicing assay was developed to determine the impact of the identified mutation on GYPB splicing. RESULTS: Sanger sequencing of GYPB in the patient indicated that she was homozygous for a GYPB*s allele carrying a novel mutation in the splice donor site of Intron 5 (c.270+5G>A). Analysis of GYPB haplotypes in the patient's family revealed that she actually inherited this mutated GYPB*s allele from her mother of Swiss ancestry and a deleted GYPB allele from her father of Egyptian ancestry. Using a minigene-based splicing assay, we showed that GYPB mutation c.270+5G>A causes the skipping of Exon B5, as previously reported for the P2 mutation (c.270+5G>T). Consistently, the patient's red blood cells were found to be S-s-U+(var) . CONCLUSION: A novel GYPB mutation (c.270+5G>A) accounting for the S-s-U+(var) phenotype was identified. In contrast with P2 and NY mutations, which also drive this rare phenotype, this novel GYPB mutation inactivates a GYPB*s allele and does not appear to be of African origin.

Molecular background of novel silent RHCE alleles.

BACKGROUND: The absence of expression of C/c and E/e antigens has been associated with rare variant RHCE alleles, referred to as silent RHCE alleles, classically identified among individuals with a rare D- - or Rhnull phenotype. This work reports on different molecular mechanisms identified in three novel silent RHCE alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from D- - or Rhnull individuals and their family members, from families for whom Rh phenotype and/or serologic data were unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles, were analyzed. Genomic DNA and transcripts were tested by sequencing analysis. RESULTS: The first silent allele was a RHCE*cE allele carrying an intronic IVS3+5G>A mutation. The second was a RHCE*ce allele carrying an intronic IVS7-2A>G mutation, whereas the third was a silent RHCE*ce allele carrying a 5-bp deletion (Nucleotides 679-683) in Exon 5. CONCLUSION: In addition to hybrid alleles and nucleotide deletion, intronic mutations may be associated with the nonexpression of RhCE antigens. Regarding the RH system, silent alleles may not be investigated among D- - or Rhnull individuals only. Rh phenotype and/or serologic data unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles should lead to molecular investigations.

Identification of novel silent KEL alleles causing KEL:-5 (Ko) phenotype or discordance between KEL:1,-2 phenotype/KEL*01/02 genotype.

BACKGROUND: The Kell system, encoded by the KEL gene, is one of the most clinically important blood group systems. Molecular defects may lead to the absence of Kell antigen expression. The very rare KEL:5 results from silent KEL genes, also called KELnull alleles. In a few cases, the rare KEL:1,-2 phenotype may be associated with silent KEL*02 alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to perform DNA investigations to identify silent KEL alleles among 10 KEL:-5 patients and 121 individuals presenting the rare KEL:1,-2 phenotype. Serologic investigations were performed on patients' red blood cells and serum. The KEL gene analysis was done by using a BeadChip assay (HEA Version, 1.2, Immucor), real-time polymerase chain reaction, and/or sequencing of all 19 exons of the KEL gene. RESULTS: In KEL:-5 patients, two novel KELnull alleles were described: 821G>A being the second described KELnull allele on a KEL*01 backbone and 184Tdel. In the 121 KEL:1,-2 individuals, nine (7.4%) were found to display a discordant KEL:1,-2 phenotype and KEL*01/KEL*02 genotype. Three novel silent KEL*02 alleles were described: 1084C>A, 1708G>A, and IVS11+5g>a. CONCLUSION: The number of silent KEL alleles and the notion that KEL null alleles are on a KEL*02 background may evolve in the coming years. Systematic DNA analysis showed that the number of discordant phenotype/genotype results, related to silent KEL*02 alleles was higher than expected in France. These data emphasize that clinical practice based on DNA analysis for blood group antigens requires caution and should improve the performance of the blood group phenotype prediction.

Molecular analysis of patients with weak D and serologic analysis of those with anti-D (excluding type 1 and type 2).

Whether or not patients whose red blood cells (RBCs) carry certain weak D types produce anti-D, and if they do whether it is allo- or auto anti-D, remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing a weak D other than type 1 or type 2 and to assess whether the anti-D was an allo- or autoantibody. Serologic D typing and molecular analyses were performed on 748 individuals.Serologic characterization of anti-D included autologous controls,direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum onto autologous RBCs. From molecular analyses, 459 individuals exhibited a weak D type. We described seven novel RHD variant alleles. The most frequent types of weak D were type 1 (30.1%), type 2 (23.7%), type 4.0 (10.2%), type 4.2.2(20.3%), type 11 (3.9%), and type 15 (3.7%). Anti-D was identified in the sera of 9 of 47 individuals with weak D type 4.0, in 14 of 93 with weak D type 4.2.2, in 1 of 18 with weak D type 11, in 1 of 17 with weak D type 15, and in 1 weak D type 33 individual.Anti-D was demonstrated to be an alloantibody in weak D type 4.0, type 4.2.2, and type 15 individuals, but an autoantibody in weak D type 11 and type 33 individuals. In conclusion, only a complete serologic investigation of individuals with a given weak D type identified by molecular analysis allows concluding on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D type 4.2.2 and type 15 patients with D- RBC units and proposing anti-D immunoprophylaxis to women with these weak D types should be considered.

Antibodies to co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim and/or sulfamethoxazole) related to the presence of the drug in a commercial low-ionic-strength solution.

BACKGROUND: Drug-dependent antibodies have been associated with approximately 10% of acquired immune hemolytic anemia cases. These antibodies are a rare cause of interference in pretransfusion red blood cell (RBC) serologic testing. The aim of this work was to report three cases of subjects developing antibodies against co-trimoxazole, a combination of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX). CASE REPORT AND METHODS: Blood samples of donor/patients were referred to our laboratory for the exploration of a positive antibody detection test. There was no recent history of drug taking. Antibody identification was performed by gel test using an indirect antiglobulin test, with reagent RBCs in low-ionic-strength solutions (LISS) containing co-trimoxazole or not. RESULTS: All three sera showed positive reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS containing co-trimoxazole, but negative reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS without antibiotic. We detected antibodies against co-trimoxazole showing three different antibody patterns: anti-TMP plus anti-SMX, anti-TMP alone, or anti-SMX alone. Anti-TMP showed an apparent anti-Ku specificity in the two cases where it was present. Anti-SMX showed an apparent anti-H specificity in one of the two cases described. The drug-dependent antibodies were not associated with acquired hemolytic anemia or other pathologies. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against co-trimoxazole may only be detected when using a diluent for reagent RBCs containing the drug in question. Antibody pattern (anti-TMP and/or anti-SMX) may vary according to individuals' immune response. Drug-dependent antibodies may react as antibodies against a high-prevalence antigen, supporting the hypothesis of antibodies to drug and membrane components. Drug-dependent antibodies such as anti-co-trimoxazole may be a serologic finding without clinical features.

Analysis of RhCE variants among 806 individuals in France: considerations for transfusion safety, with emphasis on patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: DNA testing has enabled the documenting of numerous variants of RHCE alleles, especially in individuals of African origin. The risk for production of clinically significant alloantibodies to Rh antigens of patients carrying variant RHCE alleles has led us to analyze the different RhCE variants investigated by molecular biology. Alloimmunization was analyzed regarding the RHCE genetic profile. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from 806 individuals with altered expression of RhCE antigens and/or producing anti-RhCE in the presence of the corresponding antigen were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 572 individuals were shown to express RhCE variants. Variant RHCE*ce alleles and RH haplotypes were identified in 83% of cases, the most frequent ones being the R(N) haplotype, the ceMO allele, the (C)ce(s) haplotype/ce(s) 1006 allele, and the ceAR allele identified in 36, 23, 20, and 17% of the tested samples, respectively. The absence of a high-prevalence Rh antigen was documented in 93 individuals. Partial C and partial e were expressed by 53% of individuals with RhCE variants. Rh antibodies were identified in 127 (20%) of 623 patients. They were found to be alloantibodies in 48 (38%) of these 127 patients. Alloimmunization against a high-prevalence Rh antigen was detected in 25% of cases. CONCLUSION: The challenge in clinical red blood cell (RBC) transfusion of patients with sickle cell disease, notably, would be to provide not only phenotypically matched, but also genetically matched, RBC units regarding RhCE variants.

Anti-D investigations in individuals expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2: allo- or autoantibodies?

BACKGROUND: Whether anti-D produced by individuals with a weak D phenotype are allo- or autoantibodies remains a matter of debate even though blood transfusion practice is impacted. The aim of our study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing the most frequent weak D type in Caucasians that are weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2, to assess whether anti-D were allo- or autoantibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic D typing and molecular analysis enabled the including of 121 weak D Type 1 individuals and 99 weak D Type 2 individuals in our study. Serologic features of anti-D included autologous controls, direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum on autologous red blood cells (RBCs). RESULTS: Serologic D typing showed a variable reactivity of RBCs expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 (4+ to 0). Anti-D was identified in six weak D Type 1 and six weak D Type 2 individuals, respectively. The serologic data were in favor of autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: A complete anti-D investigation in individuals with a D variant (weak D or partial D identified by molecular analysis) should be systematically performed before any valid conclusion on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 patients with D+ RBC units should be recommended. Weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 pregnant women do not need anti-D immunoprophylaxis.

Heterogeneous molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr B-, Hr B- phenotype in black persons.

BACKGROUND: The rare Hr(B)- phenotype is encoded by the (C)ce(s) haplotype when present at the homozygous state. This haplotype contains two altered genes: a hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene segregated with a ce(s) allele of RHCE (733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions in Exon 5 and Exon 7 respectively). The aim of this study was to further investigate the molecular background of the (C)ce(s) haplotype. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve individuals with depressed C and/or depressed e phenotype were selected from their genomic DNA analysis showing both 733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions. Phenotypic expression of low- and high-prevalence Rh antigens was studied. Complete sequences of RHD and RHCE transcripts were analyzed when obtained. RESULTS: A new hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene (Exons 1 and 2; complete Exon 3; Exons 8, 9, and 10 from RHD; and Exons 4 through 7 from RHCE) segregated with a ce(s) allele, which genomic organization was almost identical to that of the classical (C)ce(s) haplotype, is described. The two different (C)ce(s) haplotypes encoded two different patterns of Rh antigen expression. Although both encoded weak e, VS, and did not produce D, V, hr(B), or Hr(B) antigens, the new haplotype encoded a much weaker C antigen and red blood cells lacked expression of Rh42, in contrast to the classic (C)ce(s) haplotype. CONCLUSION: The study showed the heterogeneity of the molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr(B)-, Hr(B)- phenotype in the black population. The screening of blood donors in this population for hr(B)- or Hr(B)- phenotype should implement the molecular characterization of Rh genes.