The Inequitable Experiences of Left-Handed Medical Students in Surgical Education.

PURPOSE: Left-handed medical students contend with unique educational barriers within surgery, such as lack of educational resources, lack of left-handed-specific training, and widespread stigmatization of surgical left-handedness. This study aimed to highlight the surgical experiences of left-handed medical students so educators may be empowered to act with greater care and appreciation of these students' circumstances. METHOD: In this qualitative study, the authors conducted semistructured interviews on surgical experiences during medical school between January 31, 2021, and June 20, 2021, on 31 current surgical residents and fellows from 15 U.S. institutions and 6 surgical specialties. Left-handed trainees were included regardless of their surgical hand dominance. RESULTS: The authors identified 3 themes related to left-handed medical students' surgical experience: (1) disorienting advice from faculty or residents, (2) discouraging right-handed pressures and left-handed stigmatization, and (3) educational wishes of left-handed medical students. Trainees describe dialogues during medical school in which their handedness was directly addressed by residents and faculty with disorienting and nonbeneficial advice. Often trainees were explicitly told which hand to use, neglecting any preferences of the left-handed student. Participants also described possible changes in future surgical clerkships, including normalization of left-handedness, tangible mentorship, or granular and meaningful instruction. CONCLUSIONS: Left-handed medical students encounter unique challenges during their surgical education. These students report being disoriented by the variability of advice provided by mentors, discouraged by how pressured they feel to operate right-handed, and burdened by the need to figure things out by themselves in the absence of adequate left-handed educational resources. Surgical education leadership should detail the unique problems left-handed learners face, impartially elicit the learner's current operative hand preference, take responsibility for their left-handed students, promote acceptance and accommodation strategies of left-handed surgical trainees, and endeavor to improve the breadth of left-handed surgical resources.

One-year outcomes in unselected patients treated with a thin-strut, platinum-chromium, paclitaxel-eluting stent: primary endpoint results from the TAXUS Element European post-approval surveillance study (TE-PROVE).

AIMS: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients receiving the next-generation, paclitaxel-eluting, platinum-chromium TAXUS Element stent in a real-world setting. The PERSEUS Workhorse and Small Vessel studies showed positive results with the TAXUS Element stent in a clinical trial setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: TE-PROVE was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, "all-comers" study which enrolled 1,014 patients at 37 European sites. Follow-up was at 30 days, six months and one year, and will continue annually up to five years. The primary endpoint was overall and stent-related target vessel failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR) at one year post implantation. Secondary endpoints included the components of TVF, all-cause mortality, and ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis. Follow-up was available in 97.3% (987/1,014) of patients. Patients were 75.0% male (760/1,014), mean age was 65.1±10.8 years, 25.5% had medically treated diabetes (259/1,014), and 10.7% (109/1,014) were treated for STEMI. At baseline, mean lesion length among 1,299 treated lesions was 19.8±12.0 mm and mean reference vessel diameter was 3.1±0.5 mm. At one year, the rate of TVF (primary endpoint) was 6.0% (59/987) overall; 3.7% (37/987) of TVF events were stent-related. Cardiac death was 0.7% (7/987), target vessel-related MI was 1.1% (11/987), and TVR was 4.7% (46/987). All-cause death occurred in 1.2% (12/987) of patients and ARC definite/probable ST was 0.5% (5/987). CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint results from the TE-PROVE registry demonstrate good performance and safety for the TAXUS Element paclitaxel-eluting stent at one year in everyday clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT01242696.

Activation of coagulation occurs after electrical cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation despite optimal anticoagulation with warfarin.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence for the activation of the coagulation system and a hypercoagulable state following cardioversion. The aim of the study was to determine whether electrical cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation induced a prothrombotic state despite optimal anticoagulation. We studied the effects of electrical cardioversion on plasma levels of fibrinogen, antithrombin III, protein C and D-dimers. METHODS: We studied 24 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who were on optimal anticoagulation and were referred for electrical cardioversion. Samples of venous blood were taken 2 h pre and post cardioversion and 1 month later. RESULTS: Plasma median concentrations of fibrinogen decreased significantly from 3.8 g/l (interquartile range 3.1-4.2 g/l) before cardioversion to 3.5 g/l (interquartile range 2.9-3.9 g/l) 2 h after cardioversion levels (P=0.004). The fibrinogen levels at 1 month post cardioversion (3.45 g/l, interquartile range 3.1-3.9 g/l) were also significantly lower than baseline (P=0.02). Plasma median levels of antithrombin III fell from 93.5 U/dl (interquartile range 89.3-97.0 U/dl) pre cardioversion to 89.5 U/dl (interquartile range 83.0-93.0 U/dl) 2 h after cardioversion (P=0.001) and returned to normal by 1 month (94.0 U/dl; interquartile range 89.3-98.5 U/dl; P=0.0001). There were no significant changes in plasma median D-dimer or protein C levels at any time. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a significant fall in the plasma fibrinogen and antithrombin III levels in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation early after electrical cardioversion, indicating thrombin generation. This study suggests that there are haemostatic changes of thrombogenesis induced by cardioversion despite optimal anticoagulation with warfarin.

Quadricuspid aortic valves.

Quadricuspid aortic valves (QAV) are a rare but well recognized cause of significant aortic regurgitation. The first case was found reported in 1862. Since then there have been 110 reported cases of QAV and we report 4 more. Previously, these were diagnosed at the time of surgery or postmortem examination. With advances in echocardiography, including harmonic imaging, and also the advent of transesophageal echocardiography, more cases are being diagnosed prior to surgery. We describe four more cases, three diagnosed preoperatively and one at the time of surgery, and then review the previously reported cases. Of the 114 cases reported, 46 had the aortic valve replaced, most commonly in the 5th and 6th decade of life. Hurwitz and Roberts classified quadricuspid valves according to the size of the leaflets. It has previously been believed that QAVs with four equal sized leaflets were less likely to develop significant aortic regurgitation; however, on review of the available cases, this would not appear to be the case. The preoperative diagnosis of QAVs is important as they can be associated with abnormally placed coronary ostium. Of the 114 cases reported, there are 10 reports of abnormally placed ostia. There has been at least one reported case of death occurring because of obstruction of an abnormally placed right coronary ostium by a prosthetic aortic valve.

Direct stenting is an independent predictor of improved survival in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Randomised trials have shown that direct stenting (DS) is associated with improved markers of reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, data evaluating its impact on long-term clinical outcomes are lacking. We set out to evaluate the effect of DS on mortality in a contemporary population of patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI at two high-volume UK heart attack centres between September 2008- December 2010 (n=1562) were included in the analysis. Local databases were analysed for patient demographics, as well as details on PPCI strategy, including use of DS versus predilatation (PD) followed by stenting, manual thrombus aspiration (MT) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs). National databases were interrogated for in-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality. To determine the impact of PPCI strategy on one-year survival, multivariate logistic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Altogether 489 patients underwent DS (31.3%) and 1073 (68.7%) received PD prior to stenting. Patients receiving DS had reduced mortality at 30 days (2.04 versus 4.66%, p=0.01) and one year (3.27 versus 8.48%, p=0.0001). After multivariate adjustment, PD remained an independent predictor of one-year mortality (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.08-5.45, p=0.032) along with age, cardiogenic shock, number of diseased vessels, and left main or proximal left anterior descending artery intervention. However, neither GPI use nor MT improved survival in either univariate or multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary, unselected population of patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI, DS - when compared with stenting after PD - is independently predictive of improved 30-day and one-year survival.

Validity of self-reported smoking status: Comparison of patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndrome and the general population.

Many studies rely on self-reported smoking status. We hypothesized that patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a smoking-related condition, would be more prone to misclassify themselves as ex-smokers, because of pressure to quit. We compared patients admitted with ACS with a general population survey conducted in the same country at a similar time. We determined whether ACS patients who classified themselves as ex-smokers (n = 635) were more likely to have cotinine levels suggestive of smoking deception than self-reported ex-smokers in the general population (n = 289). On univariate analysis, the percentage of smoking deceivers was similar among ACS patients and the general population (11% vs. 12%, p = .530). Following adjustment for age, sex and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, ACS patients were significantly more likely to misclassify themselves (adjusted OR = 14.06, 95% CI 2.13-93.01, p = .006). There was an interaction with age whereby the probability of misclassification fell significantly with increasing age in the ACS group (adjusted OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97, p<.001), but not in the general population. Overall, smoking deception was more common among ACS patients than the general population. Studies comparing patients with cardiovascular disease and healthy individuals risk introducing bias if they rely solely on self-reported smoking status. Biochemical confirmation should be undertaken in such studies.