RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of anticoagulation for patients with acute ischaemic stoke with atrial fibrillation is uncertain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of early compared with delayed initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, phase 4, randomised controlled trial at 100 UK hospitals. Adults with atrial fibrillation and a clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke and whose physician was uncertain of the optimal timing for DOAC initiation were eligible for inclusion in the study. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to early (ie, ≤4 days from stroke symptom onset) or delayed (ie, 7-14 days) anticoagulation initiation with any DOAC, using an independent online randomisation service with random permuted blocks and varying block length, stratified by stroke severity at randomisation. Participants and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment assignment, but all outcomes were adjudicated by a masked independent external adjudication committee using all available clinical records, brain imaging reports, and source images. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism incidence at 90 days in a modified intention-to-treat population. We used a gatekeeper approach by sequentially testing for a non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points, followed by testing for superiority. OPTIMAS is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17896007) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03759938), and the trial is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 5, 2019, and Jan 31, 2024, 3648 patients were randomly assigned to early or delayed DOAC initiation. 27 participants did not fulfil the eligibility criteria or withdrew consent to include their data, leaving 3621 patients (1814 in the early group and 1807 in the delayed group; 1981 men and 1640 women) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome occurred in 59 (3·3%) of 1814 participants in the early DOAC initiation group compared with 59 (3·3%) of 1807 participants in the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·000, 95% CI -0·011 to 0·012). The upper limit of the 95% CI for the adjusted RD was less than the non-inferiority margin of 2 percentage points (pnon-inferiority=0·0003). Superiority was not identified (psuperiority=0·96). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 11 (0·6%) participants allocated to the early DOAC initiation group compared with 12 (0·7%) participants allocated to the delayed DOAC initiation group (adjusted RD 0·001, -0·004 to 0·006; p=0·78). INTERPRETATION: Early DOAC initiation within 4 days after ischaemic stroke associated with atrial fibrillation was non-inferior to delayed initiation for the composite outcome of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, unclassifiable stroke, or systemic embolism at 90 days. Our findings do not support the current common and guideline-supported practice of delaying DOAC initiation after ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Isolated Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD) requires quantitative tools to detect incipient Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: A motor battery was designed and compared with the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) in people with iRBD and controls. This included two keyboard-based tests (BRadykinesia Akinesia INcoordination tap test and Distal Finger Tapping) and two dual tasking tests (walking and finger tapping). RESULTS: We included 33 iRBD patients and 29 controls. The iRBD group performed both keyboard-based tapping tests more slowly (P < 0.001, P = 0.020) and less rhythmically (P < 0.001, P = 0.006) than controls. Unlike controls, the iRBD group increased their walking duration (P < 0.001) and had a smaller amplitude (P = 0.001) and slower (P = 0.007) finger tapping with dual task. The combination of the most salient motor markers showed 90.3% sensitivity for 89.3% specificity (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.94), which was higher than the MDS-UPDRS-III (minus action tremor) (69.7% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity; AUC, 0.81) for detecting motor dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Speed, rhythm, and dual task motor deterioration might be accurate indicators of incipient PD in iRBD. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM , Humanos , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM/fisiopatología , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Caminata/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is associated with an increased risk of Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies. There is no consensus about disclosure of this risk to patients with iRBD. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the experiences of risk disclosure in a group of patients with iRBD and their views on what, when, and how this should be done. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients with iRBD to explore their experiences and views on risk disclosure. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with iRBD (28 males; mean age, 70 [SD 8.7] years; mean disease duration, 8.7 [SD 6.4] years) were included. A third reported they had not been informed about the link between iRBD and other conditions by clinicians at diagnosis, but 90% would have liked to have received prognostic information, and 60% indicated that this should happen at the point that iRBD was diagnosed. Most participants wanted this information to come from the clinician diagnosing and treating iRBD (90.3%). Almost three-quarters (72.2%) had searched for this information online. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with iRBD mostly wished to have received information regarding the potential implications of iRBD when the diagnosis was made. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM , Sinucleinopatías , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM/diagnóstico , Trastorno de la Conducta del Sueño REM/complicaciones , Revelación , Polisomnografía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: PREDICT-PD is a United Kingdom population-based study aiming to stratify individuals for future Parkinson's disease (PD) using a risk algorithm. METHODS: A randomly selected, representative sample of participants in PREDICT-PD were examined using several motor assessments, including the motor section of the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)-III, at baseline (2012) and after an average of 6 years of follow-up. We checked for new PD diagnoses in participants seen at baseline and examined the association between risk scores and incident sub-threshold parkinsonism, motor decline (increasing ≥5 points in MDS-UPDRS-III) and single motor domains in the MDS-UPDRS-III. We replicated analyses in two independent datasets (Bruneck and Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative [PPMI]). RESULTS: After 6 years of follow-up, the PREDICT-PD higher-risk group (n = 33) had a greater motor decline compared with the lower-risk group (n = 95) (30% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.031). Two participants (both considered higher risk at baseline) were given a diagnosis of PD during follow-up, with motor signs emerging between 2 and 5 years before diagnosis. A meta-analysis of data from PREDICT-PD, Bruneck, and PPMI showed an association between PD risk estimates and incident sub-threshold parkinsonism (odds ratio [OR], 2.01 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.55-2.61]), as well as new onset bradykinesia (OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.33-2.16]) and action tremor (OR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.30-1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Risk estimates using the PREDICT-PD algorithm were associated with the occurrence of sub-threshold parkinsonism, including bradykinesia and action tremor. The algorithm could also identify individuals whose motor examination experience a decline over time. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Temblor/diagnóstico , Hipocinesia/etiología , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Algoritmos , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that social interaction has an inverse association with the development of neurodegenerative diseases. PREDICT-Parkinson Disease (PREDICT-PD) is an online UK cohort study that stratifies participants for risk of future Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the methodological approach and feasibility of assessing the digital social characteristics of people at risk of developing PD and their social capital within the PREDICT-PD platform, making hypotheses about the relationship between web-based social engagement and potential predictive risk indicators of PD. METHODS: A web-based application was built to enable social interaction through the PREDICT-PD portal. Feedback from existing members of the cohort was sought and informed the design of the pilot. Dedicated staff used weekly engagement activities, consisting of PD-related research, facts, and queries, to stimulate discussion. Data were collected by the hosting platform. We examined the pattern of connections generated over time through the cumulative number of posts and replies and ego networks using social network analysis. We used network metrics to describe the bonding, bridging, and linking of social capital among participants on the platform. Relevant demographic data and Parkinson risk scores (expressed as an odd 1:x) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between risk scores (after log transformation) and network measures. RESULTS: Overall, 219 participants took part in a 4-month pilot forum embedded in the study website. In it, 200 people (n=80, 40% male and n=113, 57% female) connected in a large group, where most pairs of users could reach one another either directly or indirectly through other users. A total of 59% (20/34) of discussions were spontaneously started by participants. Participation was asynchronous, with some individuals acting as "brokers" between groups of discussions. As more participants joined the forum and connected to one another through online posts, distinct groups of connected users started to emerge. This pilot showed that a forum application within the cohort web platform was feasible and acceptable and fostered digital social interaction. Matching participants' web-based social engagement with previously collected data at individual level in the PREDICT-PD study was feasible, showing potential for future analyses correlating online network characteristics with the risk of PD over time, as well as testing digital social engagement as an intervention to modify the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the pilot suggest that an online forum can serve as an intervention to enhance social connectedness and investigate whether patterns of online engagement can impact the risk of developing PD through long-term follow-up. This highlights the potential of leveraging online platforms to study the role of social capital in moderating PD risk and underscores the feasibility of such approaches in future research or interventions.
RESUMEN
Peroxisome proliferators activated receptor is regarded as potential therapeutic targets to control various neurodegenerative disorders. However, none of the study has elucidated its effect in the treatment of Huntington's disease. We explored whether peroxisome proliferators activated receptor-α agonist may attenuate various behavioral and biochemical alterations induced by systemic administration of 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP), an accepted experimental animal model of Huntington's disease phenotype. Intraperitoneal administration of 3-NP (20mg/kg., i.p.) for 4days in rats produced hypolocomotion, muscle incoordination, and cognitive dysfunction. Daily treatment with fenofibrate (100 or 200mg/kg., p.o.), 30min prior to 3-NP administration for a total of 4days, significantly improved the 3-NP induced motor and cognitive impairment. Biochemical analysis revealed that systemic 3-NP administration significantly increased oxidative and nitrosative stress (increase lipid peroxidation, protein carbonyls and nitrite level), lactate dehydrogenase activity whereas, decreased the activities of catalase, superoxide dismutase, reduced glutathione, and succinate dehydrogenase. Fenofibrate treatment significantly attenuated oxidative damage, cytokines and improved mitochondrial complexes enzyme activity in brain. In the present study, MK886, a selective inhibitor of peroxisome proliferators activated receptor-α was employed to elucidate the beneficial effect through either receptor dependent or receptor independent neuroprotective mechanisms. Administration of MK886 (1mg/kg, i.p.) prior to fenofibrate (200mg/kg, p.o.) abolished the effect of fenofibrate. The results showed that receptor dependent neuroprotective effects of fenofibrate in 3-NP administered rats provide a new evidence for a role of PPAR-α activation in neuroprotection that is attributed by modulating oxidative stress and inflammation.