Global benchmarks in primary robotic bariatric surgery redefine quality standards for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Whether the benefits of the robotic platform in bariatric surgery translate into superior surgical outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the 'best possible' outcomes for robotic bariatric surgery and compare them with the established laparoscopic benchmarks. METHODS: Benchmark cut-offs were established for consecutive primary robotic bariatric surgery patients of 17 centres across four continents (13 expert centres and 4 learning phase centres) using the 75th percentile of the median outcome values until 90 days after surgery. The benchmark patients had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnoea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, history of thromboembolic events, BMI greater than 50 kg/m2, or age greater than 65 years. RESULTS: A total of 9097 patients were included, who were mainly female (75.5%) and who had a mean(s.d.) age of 44.7(11.5) years and a mean(s.d.) baseline BMI of 44.6(7.7) kg/m2. In expert centres, 13.74% of the 3020 patients who underwent primary robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 5.9% of the 4078 patients who underwent primary robotic sleeve gastrectomy presented with greater than or equal to one complication within 90 postoperative days. No patient died and 1.1% of patients had adverse events related to the robotic platform. When compared with laparoscopic benchmarks, robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had lower benchmark cut-offs for hospital stay, postoperative bleeding, and marginal ulceration, but the duration of the operation was 42 min longer. For most surgical outcomes, robotic sleeve gastrectomy outperformed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with a comparable duration of the operation. In robotic learning phase centres, outcomes were within the established benchmarks only for low-risk robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. CONCLUSION: The newly established benchmarks suggest that robotic bariatric surgery may enhance surgical safety compared with laparoscopic bariatric surgery; however, the duration of the operation for robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is longer.

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Internal Hernia After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Multicentric Retrospective Cohort: The Swirl, Weight Excess Loss, Liquid Score.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction score for internal hernia (IH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical diagnosis of IH is challenging. A sensitivity of 63% to 92% was reported for computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for abdominal pain after RYGB and undergoing CT and surgical exploration were included retrospectively. Potential clinical predictors and radiological signs of IH were entered in binary logistic regression analysis to determine a predictive score of surgically confirmed IH in the Geneva training set (January 2006-December 2014), and validated in 3 centers, Geneva (January 2015-December 2017) and Neuchâtel and Strasbourg (January 2012-December 2017). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients were included, 80 of whom (35.5%) had surgically confirmed IH, 38 (16.6%) had a negative laparoscopy, and 110 (48.2%) had an alternate diagnosis. In the training set of 61 patients, excess body weight loss >95% (odds ratio [OR] 6.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-39.96), swirl sign (OR 8.93, 95% CI: 2.30-34.70), and free liquid (OR 4.53, 95% CI: 1.08-19.0) were independent predictors of IH. Area under the curve (AUC) of the score was 0.799. In the validation set of 167 patients, AUC was 0.846. A score ≥2 was associated with an IH incidence of 60.7% (34/56), and 5.3% (3/56) had a negative laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The score could be incorporated in the clinical setting. To reduce the risk of delayed IH diagnosis, emergency explorative laparoscopy in patients with a score ≥ 2 should be considered.

Does the socio-demographic profile of patients limit access to bariatric surgery?

PURPOSE: Surgery remains the only treatment allowing for a significant and sustainable weight loss in case of severe obesity. Patients undergo a specific multidisciplinary preparation and selection before the operation. This study aims to correlate the psychosocial profile with the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery in patients enrolled in the preparation program of a Swiss reference center. METHODS: All patients referred to an obesity center between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, seeking a first bariatric procedure were included. Socio-demographic data, BMI, preoperative psychological and dietary evaluations were collected. Usually, the preoperative process lasts 1 year. Patients who left the preparation or who had not undergone surgery after more than 2 years of follow-up were considered withdrawers. Surgery completion predictors were reviewed with bivariate analysis and socio-demographic clusters established using the K-means method. RESULTS: Out of a total of 221 patients, 99 (45%) patients had not undergone bariatric surgery 2 years after their first consultation. The patients were divided into four distinct socio-demographic clusters, among which a particularly deprived one. Criteria such as unfavorable psychological (p < 0.001) and dietary (p < 0.001) evaluations, and male gender (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with non-operation, unlike socio-demographic indicators and clusters (p > 0.1). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients starting a bariatric program are not operated on, which is related to an unfavorable psychological or dietary evaluation and to the male gender. This study also demonstrates that a significant share of patients combines several factors of social deprivation, without influencing the likelihood of surgery completion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Descriptive study.

Is an Early Resumption of a Regular Diet After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Safe?

BACKGROUND: Return to a normal diet is a crucial step after bariatric surgery. Proximal anastomosis is a source of concern for early feeding as the passage of solid food through a recent anastomosis could well increase pressure and the risk of leakage. This study aims to assess the safety of an early normal diet after a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2015 and December 2020 were included prospectively. Three postoperative pureed diets were compared at 4 weeks, 2 weeks, and 1 week. All-cause morbidity at 90 days was the main outcome. Overall complications, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 3a), length of hospital stay, number of emergency, and unplanned consultations during the 3 postoperative months were recorded for each group. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-seven patients with a mean BMI of 42.10 kg/m2 (± SD: 4.78) were included. All-cause morbidity at 90 days was 11.7% (43/367) and no significant difference was observed between the 3 groups. Adjustment for patients and operative cofounders did not demonstrate any increased risk of postoperative complications between the 3 groups, with an odds ratio of 1, 1.23(95% CI [0. 55-2.75]), and 1.14 (95% CI [0.49, 2.67]) for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 3a) and emergency or unplanned consultations were also similar in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Return to a normal diet 1 week after LRYGB did not increase short-term morbidity and unplanned consultations. It may be safe and contribute to patient comfort.

Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. RESULTS: The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. CONCLUSION: Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.

Prognostic Factors for Enteroatmospheric Fistula in Open Abdomen Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: a Multicentre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Reductions in mortality were reported with negative pressure wound therapy for laparostomy. However, some authors have voiced concern over an increased risk of enteroatmospheric fistulae. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that surgical and metabolic derangements could increase the incidence of enteroatmospheric fistulae. We aimed to assess our experience and report long-term outcomes. METHODS: A multicentre review of all patients with a laparostomy managed with negative pressure wound therapy between 2005 and 2015 was undertaken. Features associated with enteroatmospheric fistulae were included in multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were treated according to uniform protocol. Fourteen per cent (8/57) presented enteroatmospheric fistulae. Mesenteric ischaemia and preoperative arterial serum lactate >3.5 mmol/L were associated with a significantly increased risk of enteroatmospheric fistulae. Preoperative arterial serum lactate >3.5 mmol/L was an independent predictor of enteroatmospheric fistulae with an odds ratio of 12.41 (95% CI 1.54-99.99). All mesenteric ischaemia patients with anastomosis (5/15) presented enteroatmospheric fistulae. In-hospital mortality was 26.3% (15/57). One-year mortality was 33.3% (19/57). Incisional hernia rate was 5.2% (2/38) after 14.2 (2.4-56.3) months of follow-up. DISCUSSION: Mesenteric ischaemia increases the risk of enteroatmospheric fistulae. Anastomosis should only be created in revascularized patients. When mesenteric vascularization is not restored, diversion is advised.