Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 45: 191-201, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28666965

RESUMEN

International experts suggest tailoring antibiotic duration in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to patients' characteristics. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an individualized approach to antibiotic duration based on time in which CAP patients reach clinical stability during hospitalization. In a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial hospitalized adult patients with CAP reaching clinical stability within 5 days after hospitalization were randomized to a standard vs. individualized antibiotic duration. In the Individualized group, antibiotics were discontinued 48 h after the patient reached clinical stability, with at least five days of total antibiotic treatment. Early failure within 30 days was the primary composite outcome. 135 patients were randomized to the Standard group and 125 to the Individualized group. The trial was interrupted by the safety committee because of an apparent inferiority of the Individualized group over the Standard treatment: 14 (11.2%) patients in the Individualized group experienced early failure vs. 10 (7.4%) patients in the Standard group, p = 0.200, at the intention-to-treat analysis. 30-day mortality rate was four-time higher in the Individualized group than the Standard group. Shortening antibiotic duration according to patients' characteristics still remains an open question.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Medicina de Precisión , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Respir Res ; 17(1): 98, 2016 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alterations of cardiac autonomic control (CAC) are associated with poor outcomes in patients with infectious and non-infectious diseases. No evaluation of CAC in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been performed so far. The aim of the study was to assess CAC in patients with CAP and evaluate the impact of its alterations on disease severity and clinical outcomes in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized for CAP were enrolled between 2011 and 2013 two university hospitals in Italy. CAC was assessed by linear spectral and non-linear symbolic analysis of heart rate variability. The presence of severe CAP was evaluated on hospital admission. The primary study outcome was time to clinical stability (TCS) during hospitalization. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients enrolled (median age: 75 years; 57 % males), a significantly lower total variability and reduction of sympathetic rhythmical component with predominant respiratory modulation was detected in comparison to controls. Among CAP patients affected by a severe CAP on admission, CAC showed a lower sympathetic modulation and predominant parasympathetic oscillatory rhythm. At the multivariate analysis, variables independently correlated with a TCS >7 days were total power, as marker of total variability, [OR (95 % CI): 0.997 (0.994-1.000), p = 0.0454] and sympathetic modulation [OR (95 % CI): 0.964 (0.932-0.998), p = 0.0367]. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of sympathetic rhythmical oscillation is associated with a more severe disease and worse early clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with CAP.


Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/fisiopatología , Neumonía/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 28(2): 177-84, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25692271

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The appropriate duration of antimicrobial treatment in patients with pneumonia remains a matter of controversy. The purpose of this article is to review different approaches that have been used to determine the duration of antimicrobial therapy mainly driven either by the antibiotic chosen, isolated pathogen, host characteristics, or severity of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: When considered individually, every approach has strengths and weaknesses. Targeting the duration of antibiotic therapy based on a single biomarker, such as procalcitonin, is a promising approach that showed a reduction in antibiotic exposure in different settings, diseases, and study populations. Furthermore, an individualized approach according to time to reach clinical stability takes into account all the previous cited factors and may be another feasible and effective strategy to determine the most appropriate duration of the antibiotic therapy in patients with pneumonia. SUMMARY: A shorter duration of antibiotic course based on response to treatment may be favorable in patients with pneumonia due to a potential reduction of adverse events and antibiotic resistance, the opportunity to enhance patients' compliance and to decrease healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
5.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 194, 2014 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25476922

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) according to baseline radiological patterns and the etiology of ARF. METHODS: In a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, consecutive DILD patients undergoing NIV because of an episode of ARF were evaluated in six Italian high dependency units. Three groups of patients were identified based on the etiology of ARF: those with pneumonia (Group A), those with acute exacerbation of fibrosis, (Group B) and those with other triggers (Group C). Clinical failure was defined as any among in-hospital mortality, endotracheal intubation and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation use. RESULTS: Among the 60 patients enrolled (63% males; median age: 71 years), pneumonia (42%) and acute exacerbation of fibrosis (39%) were the two most frequent causes of ARF. A significant increase of PaO2/FiO2 ratio during NIV treatment was detected in Group A (p = 0.010), but not in Group B. No significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2 and pH values during NIV treatment was detected in patients with a radiological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). 22 patients (37%) suffered for a clinical failure. No significant differences in the study outcome were detected in Group A vs. Group B, as well as among patients with a radiological pattern of UIP vs. NSIP CONCLUSIONS: NIV treatment should be individualized in DILD patients with ARF according to the etiology, but not the baseline radiological pattern, in order to improve oxygenation.


Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/complicaciones , Ventilación no Invasiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Neumonía en Organización Criptogénica/complicaciones , Neumonía en Organización Criptogénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno , Presión Parcial , Neumonía/complicaciones , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 87(8): 915-926, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34036769

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To date, a shared international consensus on treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with invasive or non-invasive respiratory support is lacking. Patients' management and outcomes, especially in severe and critical cases, can vary depending on regional standard operating procedures and local guidance. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Rapid review methodology was applied to include all the studies published on PubMed and Embase between December 15th, 2019 and February 28th, 2021, reporting in-hospital and respiratory support-related mortality in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 that underwent either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Only English language studies with ≥100 patients and reporting data on respiratory failure were included. Data on comorbidities, ventilatory parameters and hospital-related complications were registered. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Fifty-two studies (287,359 patients; 57.5% males, mean age 64 years, range 24-98 years) from 17 different countries were included in the final analysis. 33.3% of patients were hospitalized in intensive care units. 44.2% had hypertension, 26.1% had diabetes, and 7.1% a chronic respiratory disease. 55% of patients underwent respiratory support (36% IMV, 62% NIV and 2% CPAP). Without considering a study with the highest number of patients treated with NIV (N.=96,729), prevalence of NIV and CPAP use was 12.5% and 13.5% respectively. Globally, invasive and non-invasive approaches were heterogeneously applied. In-hospital mortality was 33.7%, and IMV-related mortality was 72.6% (range: 4.3-99%). Specific mortality in patients treated with CPAP or NIV was available for 53% of studies, and was 29% (range: 7.2-100%). The median length of hospital stay was 13 days (range: 6-63). The most frequent hospital-related complication was acute kidney injury being reported in up to 55.7% of enrolled patients. CONCLUSIONS: Global employment of respiratory supports and related outcomes are very heterogeneous. The most frequent respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is IMV, while NIV and CPAP are less frequently and equally applied, the latter especially in Europe, while data on NIV/CPAP-related mortality is often under-reported. Integrated and comprehensive reporting is desirable and needed to construct evidence-based recommendations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ventilación no Invasiva , Neumonía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
7.
BMJ Open ; 10(10): e043651, 2020 10 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040020

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 causes lung parenchymal and endothelial damage that lead to hypoxic acute respiratory failure (hARF). The influence of hARF severity on patients' outcomes is still poorly understood. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, multicentre study. SETTING: Three academic hospitals in Milan (Italy) involving three respiratory high dependency units and three general wards. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive adult hospitalised patients with a virologically confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients aged <18 years or unable to provide informed consent were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Anthropometrical, clinical characteristics and blood biomarkers were assessed within the first 24 hours from admission. hARF was graded as follows: severe (partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) <100 mm Hg); moderate (PaO2/FiO2 101-200 mm Hg); mild (PaO2/FiO2 201-300 mm Hg) and normal (PaO2/FiO2 >300 mm Hg). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the assessment of clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality based on the severity of respiratory failure. Secondary outcomes were intubation rate and application of continuous positive airway pressure during hospital stay. RESULTS: 412 patients were enrolled (280 males, 68%). Median (IQR) age was 66 (55-76) years with a PaO2/FiO2 at admission of 262 (140-343) mm Hg. 50.2% had a cardiovascular disease. Prevalence of mild, moderate and severe hARF was 24.4%, 21.9% and 15.5%, respectively. In-hospital mortality proportionally increased with increasing impairment of gas exchange (p<0.001). The only independent risk factors for mortality were age ≥65 years (HR 3.41; 95% CI 2.00 to 5.78, p<0.0001), PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤200 mm Hg (HR 3.57; 95% CI 2.20 to 5.77, p<0.0001) and respiratory failure at admission (HR 3.58; 95% CI 1.05 to 12.18, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A moderate-to-severe impairment in PaO2/FiO2 was independently associated with a threefold increase in risk of in-hospital mortality. Severity of respiratory failure is useful to identify patients at higher risk of mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04307459.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/patología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Oxígeno/sangre , Neumonía Viral/patología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/metabolismo , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Hipoxia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Italia/epidemiología , Pulmón/metabolismo , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Presión Parcial , Neumonía Viral/metabolismo , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/mortalidad , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/terapia , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/virología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA