Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.

No previous studies have evaluated the intra- and interobserver reliability between the Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification systems under time constraints. This study compares the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the aforementioned classification systems under simulated time constraints. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of ankle malleolar fractures from 80 consecutive patients from 2015 to 2016 were classified by 2 independent observers according to Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Classifications were conducted over 4 successive weeks under timed (25-seconds) and untimed conditions, with 1-week gaps between each classification. Cohen's kappa and percentage agreement were calculated. Cohen's kappa for interobserver agreement ranged 0.67 to 0.67 and 0.59 to 0.73 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.38 to 0.47 and 0.44 to 0.50 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.28 to 0.49 and 0.13 to 0.37 for AO/OTA. Intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 and 0.78 to 0.79 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.46 to 0.65 and 0.59 to 0.73 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.42 to 0.63 and 0.40 to 0.51 for AO/OTA. Based on the Landis and Koch's benchmark scale, there was substantial agreement in the inter- and intraobserver variables for Weber; moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables for Lauge-Hansen; fair and moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables respectively for AO/OTA. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was the most substantial for Weber, followed by Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Time constraint did not have a statistically significant effect on the reliability of classifications. We recommend concurrent usage of the Weber and Lauge-Hansen system, since they demonstrate the greatest reliability and reproducibility, and confer better understanding of the fracture type, respectively.

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasties Performed for Proximal Humeral Fractures Versus Elective Etiologies.

Background: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is commonly performed for elective indications, such as cuff tear arthropathies, salvage arthropathies and tumours with excellent outcomes. However, its use in treating acute conditions such as 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly has been more controversial. The aim of our study is to directly compare the short-term intra-operative and post-operative outcomes of RTSA for traumatic proximal humeral fractures as compared to elective shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively identified 78 consecutive patients who had undergone RTSA from 2009 to 2018 at a tertiary hospital. These patients were classified by etiology as either elective or trauma cases. Comparative analysis of the baseline demographics, as well as post-operative surgical, functional and range-of-movement outcomes between the two groups was performed. Results: 57 Patients made up the elective cohort and 14 patients made up the trauma cohort. The elective cohort was significantly older compared to the traumatic fracture cohort (73.2 vs 78.6, p = 0.026). No significant differences were observed when comparing post-operative surgical outcomes. At 6 months, the elective cohort demonstrated greater forward flexion (105.8° vs 127.2°, p = 0.041), as well as higher SF-36 PCS (27.85 vs 43.99, p = 0.018) and ASES scores (35.5 vs 76.31, p = 0.009). However, these differences resolved by 1-year post-op and no significant differences were noted comparing functional and range-of-movement outcomes at 1-year post-op. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the application of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the management of traumatic humeral fractures may produce similarly favourable 1-year outcomes to that performed for elective etiologies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00625-4.

Forecasting the rate of hand injuries in Singapore.

PURPOSE: This study aims to analyse the correlation between the incidence rate of hand injuries and various major economic indicators in Singapore. We hypothesise that the number of hand injuries is correlated to activity in the construction and manufacturing industries in Singapore. METHODS: Twenty thousand seven hundred sixty-four patients who underwent hand surgeries in a tertiary institution between 2012 to 2018 were reviewed. Two independent, blinded observers extracted the frequency of hand surgeries performed from Electronic Medical Records. Economic indicators pertinent to Singapore's economic activity were collected and smoothed by simple moving average of the prior 3 months. Results were analysed using IBM SPSS v25.0. RESULTS: Significant independent univariate variables were Purchasing-Manager-Index and Industrial-Production-Index. Multiple linear regression of quarterly reported figures showed that Total-Livestock-Slaughtered, Total-Seafood-Handled, Purchasing-Manger-Index, Industrial-Production-Index, Gas-Tariffs, Construction-Index, Consumer-Price-Index, Total-Air-Cargo-Handled, Total-Container-Throughput, Total-Road-Traffic-Accident-Casualties, Food-&-Beverage-Services-Index were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with hand injuries, with R2 = 62.3%. CONCLUSION: Quarterly economic indicators from major economic industries can be used to predict the incidence of hand injuries with a 62.3% correlation. These findings may be useful for anticipating healthcare resource allocation to treat hand injuries. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision, Level II.