RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response, particularly a super-response, is of great importance. STUDY QUESTION: The aim of our study was to assess the predictors for super-responders in CRT. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, observational study, which finally included 622 patients with heart failure treated with CRT between January 2008 and May 2020 who had a minimal follow-up of 6 months after CRT. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: A total of 192 super-responders, defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 45%, and/or minimum 15% increase in LVEF and an improvement of the New York Heart Association functional class by at least 2 degrees at the last follow-up, and the rest of 430 patients who did not fulfill the super-responder criteria. RESULTS: The highest rate of super-responders (41.91%, n = 171) was at patients with left ventricle-only pacing with optimal fusion (OPT) compared with patients with biventricular (BiV) pacing (9.81%, n = 21, P < 0.000). In the OPT group, univariable analysis showed that nonischemic cardiomyopathy, a smaller degree of mitral regurgitation, and better left ventricle function at enrollment were predictors for super-response compared with the BiV group where a narrower QRS after implantation, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and a better baseline LVEF were predictors for super-responders. In the multivariable analysis, both narrower QRS after implantation and nonischemic cardiomyopathy were independent predictors for super-response in the BiV group compared with OPT where nonischemic cardiomyopathy remained the only independent predictor for super-response. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, OPT CRT programing was an additional predictor of super-response to CRT besides nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Cardiomiopatías , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
AIMS: Electrophysiology (EP) is a growing field in cardiology, with an increasing involvement of young people. Nevertheless, concerns about radiation exposure and its impact on reproduction and pregnancy may discourage the choice of an EP career. The study is aimed at investigating the level of awareness and main sources of concern about the effects of radiation on reproductive potential and pregnancy, exploring the safety measures adopted in different EP labs, and verifying the adherence to the current guidelines. METHODS AND RESULTS: An online survey was conducted using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) infrastructure from April to June 2022. A total of 252 EP personnel (42% women) participated, from 50 countries and different professional roles. Most participants expressed concerns regarding the effects of radiation on reproductive capacity (67.1%) and offspring diseases (68.2%). Only 37.9% of participants were aware of the EHRA 2017 consensus document about occupational radiation exposure. Most participants (80.9%) considered that occupational radiation during pregnancy is not safe. EP female staff were not allowed to work in the EP lab during pregnancy in 48.1% of cases. Zero-fluoroscopy was the preferred choice to continue working in the EP lab during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: EP staff, including both men and women, have concerns about the effects of radiation on reproductive capacity. Despite the recommendations issued by international bodies, implementation of the policies regarding pregnancy and occupational radiation exposure is heterogeneous. Zero-fluoroscopy is the preferred approach to ensure safety during pregnancy in the EP lab.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Exposición a la Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación , Masculino , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducción , Electrofisiología Cardíaca , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Dosis de RadiaciónRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the inflammatory status in individuals diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (Afi) and establish an association between this status and the clinicopathological features. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study was conducted retrospectively and initially involved 278 patients. However, after excluding 27 patients, we ultimately ended up with 167 patients who had an inflammatory status and 84 patients who did not have an inflammatory status. These patients were then analyzed. RESULTS: Patients who had inflammation showed higher values for the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores (P= 0.0132 for CHA2DS2-VASc and P= 0.0024 for HAS-BLED). Also, it was observed that patients with associated inflammation exhibited an increase in both the volume and the area of the left atrium. Patients with hypertension had a higher prevalence of inflammation, with heart failure and with ischemic heart disease. It is worth noting that patients with atrial fibrillation and increased inflammatory status exhibited higher rates of stroke (22.75% vs 10.71% in patients without inflammation, odds ratio = 2.455, 95% confidence interval 1.161 to 5.425, p = 0.0253). CONCLUSIONS: Our research has demonstrated that patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and exhibiting a heightened inflammatory status also present association with other comorbidities, including hypertension, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and stroke.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) is becoming a standard of care for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This technology combines the use of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and wireless communication to provide physicians with continuous, real-time information on the patient's cardiac activity. The purpose of the study was to evaluate if the remote monitoring technology in the follow-up CRT patients is feasible and safe. METHODS: A total of nine patients were enrolled in the study, implanted with a CRT system with wireless transmission capabilities. Immediately after the procedure received the RM, were enrolled in the virtual clinic and instructed by the doctor how to use the device at home. Regular virtual transmissions were made automatically every 3 weeks, respecting optimal transmission conditions. The accumulation of fluid in the lungs, atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia together with system integrity automatically activate alerts. RESULTS: One hundred and one transmissions were collected and analyzed from the virtual ward. Average follow-up was 7.7±4.8 months, longest follow-up was 18 months. None of the patients experienced complications during the study period, with three of them being follow-up solely through telemetric means by implanting physician. Treatment optimization was successfully conducted via phone consultations, when necessary, without any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that RM could be integrated into routine CRT management protocols, enhancing patients care and resource utilization.
RESUMEN
Triple-chamber cardiac devices are utilized for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and is the standard-of-care therapy for heart failure (HF) patients in the current guidelines. In the setting of biventricular (BIV) pacing it involves a mandatory implantation of right ventricular (RV) lead that allows simultaneous BIV pacing with 0 ms VV (ventricular to ventricular) interval. Nevertheless, it seems that response to CRT is not related to RV lead position. RV pacing is known for deleterious effects on RV/Left Ventricle (LV) function and should not be used in persons with normal atrioventricular conduction (AV) and sinus rhythm. As it compensates for the additional asynchrony induced by unnecessary stimulation of RV pacing, only pacing the left ventricle (LV) may result in improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes and a decrease in the number of individuals who do not respond to the procedure. Furthermore, leadless LV fusion CRT pacing without RV lead could be a potential CRT therapy alternative to BIV pacing in nonischemic heart failure patients with preserved AV conduction. The aim of our study is to made an update in cardiac resynchronization therapy with LV only fusion pacing.
RESUMEN
Background: Fusion CRT pacing (FCRT) is noninferior to biventricular pacing, according to the current data. The aim of this study is to assess the response to FCRT and to identify predictors of super-responders (SRs) in a nonischemic population with normal AV conduction. Methods: LV-only CRT patients (pts) with a right atrium/left ventricle pacing system implanted in two CRT centers in Romania were included. Device interrogation, exercise tests, echocardiography, and individualized drug optimization were performed every 6 months during close follow-up. SRs pts were defined as those with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) improvement ≥30% and stable ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45%. Results: A total of 25 out of 83 pts (31%) were SRs, with nonischemic LBBB low EF cardiomyopathy (50 male, 62 ± 9 y.o.) initially included. Mean follow-up was 5 years ± 27 months. Patients were divided in two groups: SRs and non-SRs (52 responders/6 hypo-responders). Two predictors were found in the SRs group: a higher baseline LVEF (SRs 29 ± 5% vs. non-SRs 26 ± 5%, p = 0.02) and a lower pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (SRs 38 ± 11 mm Hg vs. non-SRs 50 ± 15 mmHg, p = 0.003). Baseline severe mitral regurgitation was found in 11% of SRs vs. 64% in the non-SRs group. Conclusions: SRs in the selected NICM-FCRT group are significative high. Higher baseline LVEF and mild pulmonary arterial hypertension were independently associated with super-response.
RESUMEN
Background: Betablockers (BB)/ivabradine titration in fusion CRT pacing (CRTP) is understudied. Aim: To assess drug optimization using systematic exercise tests (ET) in fusion CRTP with preserved atrioventricular conduction (AVc). Methods: Changes in drug management were assessed during systematic follow-ups in CRTP patients without right ventricle lead. Shorter AVc (PR interval) allowed BB up-titration, while longer AVc needed BB down-titration, favoring ivabradine. Constant fusion pacing was the goal to improve outcomes. Results: 64 patients, 62.5 ± 9.5 y.o divided into three groups: shorter PR (<160 ms), normal (160−200 ms), longer (200−240 ms); follow-up 59 ± 26 months. Drugs were titrated in case of: capture loss due to AVc shortening (14%), AVc lengthening (5%), chronotropic incompetence (11%), maximum tracking rate issues (9%), brady/tachyarrhythmias (8%). Interventions: BB up-titration (78% shorter PR, 19% normal PR, 5% longer PR), BB down-titration (22% shorter PR, 14% normal PR), BB exclusion (16% longer PR), adding/up-titration ivabradine (22% shorter PR, 19% normal PR, 5% longer PR), ivabradine down-titration (22% shorter PR, 3% normal PR), ivabradine exclusion (11% normal PR, 5% longer PR). Drug strategy was changed in 165 follow-ups from 371 recorded (42% patients). Conclusions: BBs/ivabradine titration and routine ET during follow-ups in patients with fusion CRTP should be a standard approach to maximize resynchronization response. Fusion CRTP showed a positive outcome with important LV reverse remodeling and significant LVEF improvement in carefully selected patients.