Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Gene Therapy in Ambulatory Patients (Aged ≥4 to <8 Years) with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: 1-Year Interim Results from Study SRP-9001-103 (ENDEAVOR).

OBJECTIVE: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec is approved in the USA for the treatment of ambulatory patients (4-5 years) with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. ENDEAVOR (SRP-9001-103; NCT04626674) is a single-arm, open-label study to evaluate delandistrogene moxeparvovec micro-dystrophin expression, safety, and functional outcomes following administration of commercial process delandistrogene moxeparvovec. METHODS: In cohort 1 of ENDEAVOR (N = 20), eligible ambulatory males, aged ≥4 to <8 years, received a single intravenous infusion of delandistrogene moxeparvovec (1.33 × 1014 vg/kg). The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFBL) to week 12 in delandistrogene moxeparvovec micro-dystrophin by western blot. Additional endpoints evaluated included: safety; vector genome copies; CFBL to week 12 in muscle fiber-localized micro-dystrophin by immunofluorescence; and functional assessments, including North Star Ambulatory Assessment, with comparison with a propensity score-weighted external natural history control. RESULTS: The 1-year safety profile of commercial process delandistrogene moxeparvovec in ENDEAVOR was consistent with safety data reported in other delandistrogene moxeparvovec trials (NCT03375164 and NCT03769116). Delandistrogene moxeparvovec micro-dystrophin expression was robust, with sarcolemmal localization at week 12; mean (SD) CFBL in western blot, 54.2% (42.6); p < 0.0001. At 1 year, patients demonstrated stabilized or improved North Star Ambulatory Assessment total scores; mean (SD) CFBL, +4.0 (3.5). Treatment versus a propensity score-weighted external natural history control demonstrated a statistically significant difference in least squares mean (standard error) CFBL in North Star Ambulatory Assessment, +3.2 (0.6) points; p < 0.0001. INTERPRETATION: Results confirm efficient transduction of muscle by delandistrogene moxeparvovec. One-year post-treatment, delandistrogene moxeparvovec was well tolerated, and demonstrated stabilized or improved motor function, suggesting a clinical benefit for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:955-968.

Outcomes of early-treated infants with spinal muscular atrophy: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: While prompt identification and treatment of infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) can ameliorate outcomes, variability persists. This study assessed management and outcomes of early-treated infants with SMA. METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data at 12 centers on infants with SMA treated at age ≤6 weeks from August 2018 to December 2023. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients, 35 with two SMN2 copies and 31 with ≥3 SMN2 copies, were included. Twenty-five (38%, 22 with two SMN2 copies), had SMA findings before initial treatment which was onasemnogene abeparvovec in 47 (71%) and nusinersen in 19 (29%). Thirty-two received sequential or combination treatments, including 16 adding nusinersen or risdiplam due to SMA findings following onasemnogene abeparvovec. All sat independently. Compared to children with ≥3 SMN2 copies, those with two SMN2 copies were less likely to walk (23/34 [68%] vs. 31/31 [100%], p < .001) and less likely to walk on time (9/34 [26%] vs. 29/31 [94%], p < .001); one non-ambulatory child was <18 months old and was excluded from this analysis. No patients required permanent ventilation or exclusively enteral nutrition; six required nocturnal non-invasive ventilation and four utilized supplemental enteral nutrition, all with two SMN2 copies. DISCUSSION: Early treatment of infants with SMA can improve outcomes as indicated by our cohort, all of whom sat independently and are without permanent ventilation. However, our study demonstrates ongoing disability in most children with two SMN2 copies despite early monotherapy and emphasizes the need for additional research, including earlier monotherapy, initial combination therapy, prenatal treatment, and non-SMN modifying treatments.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy Following Onasemnogene Abeparvovec for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Case Series.

Spinal muscular atrophy is treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec, which replaces the missing survival motor neuron 1 gene via an adeno-associated virus vector. As of July 1, 2020, we had identified 3 infants who developed thrombotic microangiopathy following onasemnogene abeparvovec. Early recognition and treatment of drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy may lessen mortality and morbidity.

Laboratory monitoring of nusinersen safety.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study reports our tertiary care center's experience with intrathecal nusinersen administration in children and adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: We reviewed safety monitoring laboratory results and need for procedural sedation and fluoroscopy-guidance in all SMA patients receiving nusinersen between February 2017 and March 2020. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients ages 1 mo- 56 y received 494 nusinersen doses. There were 166 laboratory abnormalities in 45 patients. Most were either mild (145 [87.3%]) or were transient proteinuria (18 [10.8%]). None altered nusinersen treatment. Twenty-eight patients required either general anesthesia (75 doses) or anxiolysis with oral midazolam (133 doses, including 6 patients [23 doses] with SMA type I). Eight patients with complicated spines (45 doses) required fluoroscopic guidance. One treatment-related serious adverse event (emesis leading to intubation) occurred during general anesthesia. Two children had asymptomatic increased intracranial pressure. No patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. DISCUSSION: Intrathecal nusinersen is generally safe and well-tolerated, including in patients requiring oral anxiolysis, general sedation, and fluoroscopic guidance. Frequent serial laboratory monitoring did not identify any persistent significantly abnormal findings or alter treatment.

Management of Select Adverse Events Following Delandistrogene Moxeparvovec Gene Therapy for Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, degenerative, recessive X-linked neuromuscular disease. Mutations in the gene encoding dystrophin lead to the absence of functional dystrophin protein. Individuals living with DMD exhibit progressive muscle weakness resulting in loss of ambulation and limb function, respiratory insufficiency, and cardiomyopathy, with multiorgan involvement. Adeno-associated virus vector-mediated gene therapy designed to enable production of functional dystrophin protein is a new therapeutic strategy. Delandistrogene moxeparvovec (Sarepta Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA) is indicated for treatment of ambulatory pediatric patients aged 4 through 5 years with DMD who have an indicated mutation in the DMD gene. OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based considerations for management of potential adverse events following gene therapy treatment for DMD are lacking in clinical literature. Our goal was to provide interdisciplinary consensus considerations for selected treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (vomiting, acute liver injury, myocarditis, and immune-mediated myositis) that may arise following gene therapy dosing with delandistrogene moxeparvovec. METHODS: An interdisciplinary panel of 12 specialists utilized a modified Delphi process to develop consensus considerations for the evaluation and management of TRAEs reported in delandistrogene moxeparvovec clinical studies. Panelists completed 2 Questionnaires prior to gathering for an in-person discussion. Consensus was defined as a majority (≥58% ; 7/12) of panelists either agreeing or disagreeing. RESULTS: Panelists agreed that the choice of baseline assessments should be informed by individual clinical indications, the treating provider's judgment, and prescribing information. Corticosteroid dosing for treatment of TRAEs should be optimized by considering individual risk versus benefit for each indication. In all cases involving patients with a confirmed TRAE, consultations with appropriate specialists were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi Panel established consensus considerations for the evaluation and management of potential TRAEs for patients receiving delandistrogene moxeparvovec, including vomiting, acute liver injury, myocarditis, and immune-mediated myositis.

Evaluation of rAAVrh74 gene therapy vector seroprevalence by measurement of total binding antibodies in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Background: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are a promising platform for in vivo transfer of transgenes designed to treat diseases. Pre-existing humoral immunity to these vectors can potentially impact the safety and efficacy of gene therapies. Consequently, individuals with pre-existing antibodies to the specific AAV serotypes used may be excluded from clinical trials and treatments. Recombinant AAV serotype rh74 (rAAVrh74), a vector originally isolated from rhesus monkeys and potentially less immunogenic than other serotypes isolated from humans (e.g. AAV2, AAV5, and AAV9), efficiently transduces muscle and is being investigated for use in gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Objective: To evaluate prevalence of total binding antibodies (neutralizing and non-neutralizing) against rAAVrh74 in patients with DMD. Methods: Eligible individuals (N = 107) were ⩾ 4 to < 18 years old with genetically confirmed DMD and were excluded from the study if they lived with a person who had known exposure to rAAVrh74 or other gene transfer therapy, or if they received prior treatment with gene transfer therapy. A single blood sample was obtained from each participant, and anti-rAAVrh74 total binding antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Total binding antibody level < 1:400 was defined as not elevated or seronegative. Primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects with elevated total antibody titers to rAAVrh74. Results: A large preponderance (86.1%) of patients with DMD in this data set was seronegative for anti-rAAVrh74 total binding antibodies. These patients would potentially meet the antibody status eligibility criterion for entry into rAAVrh74-based gene therapy clinical trials. Conclusion: Measuring total binding antibodies is a more comprehensive approach to assess pre-existing immune response versus measuring neutralizing antibodies alone. The low seroprevalence of total binding antibodies against rAAVrh74 shown here supports the broad applicability of rAAVrh74-based gene transfer therapy for patients with DMD and potentially other neuromuscular diseases.