Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0194567, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biologics containing growth factors are frequently used to enhance healing after musculoskeletal injuries. One mechanism of action is thought to be though the ability of biologics to induce homing and migration of endogenous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to a target tissue. However, the ability of biologics to stimulate chemotaxis (directed migration of cells) and chemokinesis (increase rate of cell migration) of MSCs is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to directly compare the ability of biologics including platelet rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) to induce MSC migration. The hypothesis was that leukocyte-low platelet rich plasma (Llo PRP) would induce migration to a greater extent than leukocyte-high platelet rich plasma (Lhi PRP) or BMC. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived MSCs were isolated from 8 horses. Migration of MSCs toward a biologic (BMC, Llo PRP, and Lhi PRP) or the positive control platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) was continuously traced and measured for 24hrs using time-lapse microscopy and a microfluidics device. Cell migration, chemotaxis and chemokinesis were determined by measurements of displacement, number of cells migrated, and cell flux. RESULTS: All biologics resulted in a significantly greater percentage of MSCs migrated compared to the positive control (PDGF). MSCs migrated further toward BMC compared to Llo PRP. Cell migration, measured as cell flux, was greater toward BMC and Lhi PRP than Llo PRP. CONCLUSION: The biologics BMC and Lhi PRP elicit greater chemotaxis and chemokinesis of MSCs than Llo PRP. However, all biologics recruited the same number of MSCs suggesting that differences in other regenerative effects, such as growth factor concentration, between biologics should be strongly considered when choosing a biologic for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. The results of this study have the potential to reduce the need, risks, and costs associated with MSC culture and delivery.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/farmacología , Quimiotaxis/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/fisiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesiones , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Animales , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Quimiotaxis/fisiología , Caballos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Leucocitos , Osteogénesis , Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/farmacología , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas/citología
2.
Cell Stem Cell ; 12(5): 602-15, 2013 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642368

RESUMEN

microRNAs regulate developmental cell-fate decisions, tissue homeostasis, and oncogenesis in distinct ways relative to proteins. Here, we show that the tumor suppressor microRNA miR-34a is a cell-fate determinant in early-stage dividing colon cancer stem cells (CCSCs). In pair-cell assays, miR-34a distributes at high levels in differentiating progeny, whereas low levels of miR-34a demarcate self-renewing CCSCs. Moreover, miR-34a loss of function and gain of function alter the balance between self-renewal versus differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, miR-34a sequesters Notch1 mRNA to generate a sharp threshold response where a bimodal Notch signal specifies the choice between self-renewal and differentiation. In contrast, the canonical cell-fate determinant Numb regulates Notch levels in a continuously graded manner. Altogether, our findings highlight a unique microRNA-regulated mechanism that converts noisy input into a toggle switch for robust cell-fate decisions in CCSCs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , MicroARNs/genética , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Receptores Notch/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , División Celular Asimétrica , Carcinogénesis/genética , Diferenciación Celular/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Linaje de la Célula/genética , Proliferación Celular , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/metabolismo , Transporte de Proteínas , Transducción de Señal/genética , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA