Validity of a Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn for identifying neonatal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Small for gestational age is defined as a birthweight below a birthweight percentile threshold, usually the 10th percentile, with the third or fifth percentile used to identify severe small for gestational age. Small for gestational age is used as a proxy for growth restriction in the newborn, but small-for-gestational-age newborns can be physiologically small and healthy. In addition, this definition excludes growth-restricted newborns who have weights more than the 10th percentile. To address these limits, a Delphi study developed a new consensus definition of growth restriction in newborns on the basis of neonatal anthropometric and clinical parameters, but it has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of growth restriction in the newborn according to the Delphi consensus definition and to investigate associated morbidity risks compared with definitions of Small for gestational age using birthweight percentile thresholds. STUDY DESIGN: Data come from the 2016 and 2021 French National Perinatal Surveys, which include all births ≥22 weeks and/or with birthweights ≥500 g in all maternity units in France over 1 week. Data are collected from medical records and interviews with mothers after the delivery. The study population included 23,897 liveborn singleton births. The Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction was birthweight less than third percentile or at least 3 of the following criteria: birthweight, head circumference or length <10th percentile, antenatal diagnosis of growth restriction, or maternal hypertension. A composite of neonatal morbidity at birth, defined as 5-minute Apgar score <7, cord arterial pH <7.10, resuscitation and/or neonatal admission, was compared using the Delphi definition and usual birthweight percentile thresholds for defining small for gestational age using the following birthweight percentile groups: less than a third, third to fourth, and fifth to ninth percentiles. Relative risks were adjusted for maternal characteristics (age, parity, body mass index, smoking, educational level, preexisting hypertension and diabetes, and study year) and then for the consensus definition and birthweight percentile groups. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Analyses were carried out in the overall sample and among term and preterm newborns separately. RESULTS: We identified that 4.9% (95% confidence intervals, 4.6-5.2) of newborns had growth restriction. Of these infants, 29.7% experienced morbidity, yielding an adjusted relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence intervals, 2.2-2.7) compared with newborns without growth restriction. Compared with birthweight ≥10th percentile, morbidity risks were higher for low birthweight percentiles (less than third percentile: adjusted relative risk, 3.3 [95% confidence intervals, 3.0-3.7]; third to fourth percentile: relative risk, 1.4 [95% confidence intervals, 1.1-1.7]; fifth to ninth percentile: relative risk, 1.4 [95% confidence intervals, 1.2-1.6]). In adjusted models including the definition of growth restriction and birthweight percentile groups and excluding birthweights less than third percentile, which are included in both definitions, morbidity risks remained higher for birthweights at the third to fourth percentile (adjusted relative risk, 1.4 [95% confidence intervals, 1.1-1.7]) and fifth to ninth percentile (adjusted relative risk, 1.4 [95% confidence intervals, 1.2-1.6]), but not for the Delphi definition of growth restriction (adjusted relative risk, 0.9 [95% confidence intervals, 0.7-1.2]). Similar patterns were found for term and preterm newborns. CONCLUSION: The Delphi consensus definition of growth restriction did not identify more newborns with morbidity than definitions of small for gestational age on the basis of birthweight percentiles. These findings illustrate the importance of evaluating the results of Delphi consensus studies before their adoption in clinical practice.

Five-year outcomes for extremely preterm babies with active perinatal management: A clinical prediction model.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a clinical prediction model for outcomes at 5 years of age for children born extremely preterm and receiving active perinatal management. DESIGN: The EPIPAGE-2 national prospective cohort. SETTING: France, 2011. POPULATION: Live-born neonates between 24+0 and 26+6 weeks of gestation who received active perinatal management (i.e. birth in a tertiary-level hospital, with antenatal steroids and resuscitation at birth). METHODS: A prediction model using logistic modelling, including gestational age, small-for gestational-age (SGA) status and sex, was developed. Model performance was assessed through calibration and discrimination, with bootstrap internal validation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival without moderate or severe neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) at 5 years. RESULTS: Among the 557 neonates included, 401 (72%) survived to 5 years, of which 59% survived without NDD (95% CI 54% to 63%). Predicted rates of survival without NDD ranged from 45% (95% CI 33% to 57%), to 56% (95% CI 49% to 64%) to 64% (95% CI 57% to 70%) for neonates born at 24, 25 and 26 weeks of gestation, respectively. Predicted rates of survival without NDD were 47% (95% CI 18% to 76%) and 62% (95% CI 49% to 76%) for SGA and non-SGA children, respectively. The model showed good calibration (calibration slope 0.85, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.16; calibration-in-the-large -0.0123, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.23) and modest discrimination (C-index 0.59, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: A simple prediction model using three factors easily known antenatally may help doctors and families in their decision-making for extremely preterm neonates receiving active perinatal management.

Trends in Maternal Mortality From Obstetric Hemorrhage in France: 15 Years of Confidential Enquiry Into Maternal Deaths.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess temporal trends in incidence and underlying causes of maternal deaths from obstetric hemorrhage in France and to describe clinical care before and after implementation of the first national guidelines published in 2004 and updated in 2014. METHODS: Data from all hemorrhage-related maternal deaths between 2001 and 2015 were extracted from the French Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths. We compared the maternal mortality ratio (MMR), cause of obstetric hemorrhage, and death preventability by triennium. Critical care, transfusion, and obstetric management among women who died were described for 2001 to 2003 and 2013 to 2015. RESULTS: The MMR from obstetric hemorrhage significantly decreased over time from 2.3 of 100,000 livebirths (54 of 2,391,551) in 2001 to 2003 to 0.8 of 100,000 livebirths (19 of 2,412,720) in 2013 to 2015. In 2001 to 2003, uterine atony accounted for 50% (27 of 54) of maternal deaths vs 21% (4 of 19) in 2013 to 2015. As compared to 2001 to 2003, an increased proportion of women had hemodynamic continuous monitoring in 2013 to 2015 (30%, 9 of 30, vs 47%, 8 of 18) and received vasopressor infusion therapy (57%, 17 of 30, vs 72%, 13 of 18), and a smaller proportion was extubated during active hemorrhage (17%, 5 of 30, vs 0 of 18). Transfusion therapy was initiated more frequently and earlier in 2013 to 2015 (71 vs 58 minutes). In 2013 to 2015, 88% of maternal deaths due to hemorrhage remained preventable. The main identified improvable care factors were related to delays in diagnosis and surgical management, particularly after cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal mortality by obstetric hemorrhage decreased dramatically in France between 2001 and 2015, particularly mortality due to uterine atony. Among women who died, we detected fewer instances of substandard transfusion management or critical care. Nevertheless, opportunities for improvement were observed in most of the recent cases.

Assessing the external validity and clinical relevance of umbilical doppler resistance index references in daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the external validity and clinical relevance of current references for umbilical artery resistance index (UA RI) in daily practice. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional single center study including all UA RI measurements between 22 and 40 gestational weeks (GW) from distinct patients between 2014 and 2022. Patients with normal pregnancies and normal neonatal outcomes that had an UA RI measurement between 2014 and 2019 were used to calculate reference ranges. The established reference for the 95th centile was compared to two current references. The clinical relevance of the established reference was tested by comparing neonatal outcomes according to the 95th percentile among the consecutive distinct patients between 2020 and 2022. RESULTS: Among the 13342 consecutive distinct patients with a singleton pregnancy that had an UA RI measurement between 22 and 40 GW between 2014 and 2022, 5298 patients were included to establish the reference ranges, and 3634 patients to validate these ranges. For each gestational age, the established references were similar to current references. Using the established references, the proportion of patients presenting an UA RI>95th percentile among the patients with normal pregnancies in the validation population was comparable to the proportion when using the two current references. Among the validation population, 268 patients (7.4 %) (95%CI[6.5-8.2]) presented an UA RI ≥ 95th percentile. Of these 268 patients, 67.9% had a SGA newborn (versus 19.2%, p<0.001) and 59% a preterm birth (versus 13.9%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reference range obtained from daily practice is clinically relevant and similar to current references.

[How to respond to a stubborn refusal of care during delivery]. / Quelle réponse apporter à un refus obstiné de soins lors de l'accouchement ?

Our team was confronted with a situation of stubborn refusal of care, including the indication of a cesarean section for an adult patient able to express her wishes. This refusal was formulated during pregnancy follow-up, during the discussion of the birth plan and during delivery, the patient having accepted the indication of a possible emergency cesarean section under general anesthesia only in the occurrence of severe fetal heart rate abnormalities. The impasse forced caregivers to violate the rules of good clinical practice, which indicated the performance of a cesarean section, and to wait for a complication to arise in order to be able to act, taking the risk of intervening too late. This situation has led to direct risks to the health of the mother and the unborn child, without putting the life of either of them in imminent danger. Finally, the time devoted to this patient in a tense organization was to the detriment of the care of other patients.

Passive second stage of labor: Does a fourth hour increase maternal morbidity in nulliparous patients at term with epidural?

OBJECTIVES: Prolonging the passive second stage of labor could increase vaginal birth rate, but the data concerning maternal and fetal morbidity are contradictory. The French guidelines did not specify a maximum duration of the passive second stage. Our objective was to assess if allowing a 4th hour after full dilatation before pushing increased maternal morbidity, compared to 3 h after full dilatation. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study took place from January 1-December 31, 2020, in a tertiary maternity unit. All consecutive term nulliparous women who delivered under epidural anesthesia and without pathological fetal heart rate and reaching a second-stage passive phase of labor lasting at least 3 h were included. We compared 2 groups according to the duration of the passive second stage: "3-hour group" and "4-hour group". In the "3-hour group," featuring a second-stage passive phase of up to 3 h, pushing is initiated for favorable conditions, while a cesarean section is performed if conditions are deemed unfavorable. In the "4-hour group", obstetric conditions not justifying immediate pushing after three hours, and the obstetric team believed that an additional hour of expectant management could lead to a successful vaginal delivery. The principal endpoint was a composite criterion of maternal morbidity including obstetric anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion and intrauterine infection. RESULTS: We included 111 patients in the "4-hour group" and 349 in the "3-hour group". Composite maternal morbidity did not increase in the "4-hour group" compared to the "3-hour group" (21 (18.9 %) versus 61 (17.5 %); p = 0.73). Neonatal morbidity was similar between the two groups. In the "4-hour group, 91 (82 %) patients had vaginal deliveries", 62 (55,9 %) by spontaneous vaginal delivery and 29 (26,1 %) with instrumental assistance. CONCLUSION: For selected patients, waiting for 4 h at full dilation can be beneficial due to the high rate of vaginal delivery and low incidence of maternal and fetal complications.

Predicting Long-Term Childhood Survival of Newborns with Congenital Heart Defects: A Population-Based, Prospective Cohort Study (EPICARD).

Backgroud: Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most frequent group of major congenital anomalies, accounting for almost 1% of all births. They comprise a very heterogeneous group of birth defects in terms of their severity, clinical management, epidemiology, and embryologic origins. Taking this heterogeneity into account is an important imperative to provide reliable prognostic information to patients and their caregivers, as well as to compare results between centers or to assess alternative diagnostic and treatment strategies. The Anatomic and Clinical Classification of CHD (ACC-CHD) aims to facilitate both the CHD coding process and data analysis in clinical and epidemiological studies. The objectives of the study were to (1) Describe the long-term childhood survival of newborns with CHD, and (2) Develop and validate predictive models of infant mortality based on the ACC-CHD. Methods: This study wasbased on data from a population-based, prospective cohort study: Epidemiological Study of Children with Congenital Heart Defects (EPICARD). The final study population comprised 1881 newborns with CHDs after excluding cases that were associated with chromosomal and other anomalies. Statistical analysis included non-parametric survival analysis and flexible parametric survival models. The predictive performance of models was assessed by Harrell's C index and the Royston-Sauerbrei RD2, with internal validation by bootstrap. Results: The overall 8-year survival rate for newborns with isolated CHDs was 0.96 [0.93-0.95]. There was a substantial difference between the survival rate of the categories of ACC-CHD. The highest and lowest 8-year survival rates were 0.995 [0.989-0.997] and 0.34 [0.21-0.50] for "interatrial communication abnormalities and ventricular septal defects" and "functionally univentricular heart", respectively. Model discrimination, as measured by Harrell's C, was 87% and 89% for the model with ACC-CHD alone and the full model, which included other known predictors of infant mortality, respectively. The predictive performance, as measured by RD2, was 45% and 50% for the ACC-CHD alone and the full model. These measures were essentially the same after internal validation by bootstrap. Conclusions: The ACC-CHD classification provided the basis of a highly discriminant survival model with good predictive ability for the 8-year survival of newborns with CHDs. Prediction of individual outcomes remains an important clinical and statistical challenge.

Population-based surveillance of congenital anomalies over 40 years (1981-2020): Results from the Paris Registry of Congenital Malformations (remaPAR).

INTRODUCTION: Registries of congenital anomalies (CAs) play a key role in the epidemiological surveillance of CAs. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of CAs and proportions of prenatal diagnosis, terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) and infant mortality in the Paris Registry of Congenital Malformations (remaPAR) over 40 years, from 1981 to 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: remaPAR records all births (live births, stillbirths ≥22 weeks of gestation and TOPFA at any gestational age) with CAs detected prenatally until the early neonatal period. We estimated the prevalence of CAs and proportions of prenatal diagnosis, TOPFA and infant mortality, overall and for a selected group of CAs in 3-year intervals. RESULTS: The prevalence of CAs remained stable during the study period: 2.9 % of total births and 2.1 % of live births. Genetic anomalies were the most frequent subgroup (about 23 %), followed by congenital heart defects (about 22 %) and limb defects (about 20 %). Among non-genetic anomalies, the prevalence per 10,000 births was the highest for hypospadias (about 18 %) and the lowest for bilateral renal agenesis (about 1 %). Prenatal diagnoses increased from about 17 % in the 1980s to approximately 70 % in the most recent period (2018-2020), whereas the proportion of early TOPFA <16 weeks of gestation increased from 0.4 % to 14 %. Infant mortality ranged from 0 % for transverse limb reduction defects to 86 % for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of CAs was fairly stable in Paris from 1981 to 2020. Prenatal diagnoses substantially increased, accompanied by much smaller increases in TOPFA.

Routine maneuvers in eutocic breech vaginal delivery at term: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed. RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g. CONCLUSION: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

Patient experience in prostaglandins-induced cervical ripening: A comparative study using a standardized questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical ripening for induction of labor is often associated with negative patient experience. The debate over the most effective cervical ripening method persist, with a significant gap in research specifically addressing patient satisfaction. Our study aims to compare patient experience with two induction methods, slow-release intravaginal dinoprostone device and orally administered misoprostol. METHOD: We conducted a before-and-after comparative study at a university tertiary hospital, including all patients undergoing cervical ripening with a Bishop score of 3 or lower. Our study compared two separate two-month periods, where the methods for cervical ripening differed. The first period employed an intravaginal dinoprostone slow-release device, while the second period used oral misoprostol. The primary outcome was patient experience, assessed using the EXIT questionnaire, a standardized and validated self-reported measure. Secondary outcomes were efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included, 81 induced with dinoprostone and 84 induced with misoprostol. The EXIT questionnaire completion rate was 67.9 % (n = 55) in the dinoprostone group and 76.1 % (n = 64) in the misoprostol group (p = 0.23). Patients induced with misoprostol reported higher levels of satisfaction compared to those induced with dinoprostone, which can be attributed to reduced discomfort associated with the induction process (mean satisfaction score 2.26 ± 0.98 versus 2.80 ± 0.85 on a 1 to 5 likert-scale, p-value < 0.01). Adverse effects were reported less frequently with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone (20.2 % vs 48.1 %, p-value < 0.01). Time between cervical ripening and delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (27.0 ± 10.2 h vs 32.5 ± 10.0, p < 0.01). There were no difference in mode of delivery or other obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: For women undergoing cervical ripening, oral misoprostol appears to be a less invasive method for labor induction, associated with higher levels of satisfaction and reduced discomfort compared to the intravaginal dinoprostone slow-release device.

Maintenance oxytocin in the immediate postpartum period: Frequency, determinants and practices in a tertiary maternity unit.

OBJECTIVE: To prevent post-partum haemorrhage (PPH), national and international guidelines recommend the administration of a prophylactic injection of oxytocin after all vaginal births. Although additional maintenance oxytocin is not recommended in the immediate postpartum, its administration is quite common (30 % of French births in 2021). To assess in a single center, the frequency and determinants associated with the administration of maintenance oxytocin in immediate postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational single-centre study was conducted in a tertiary-care university centre in Paris (France), with data from April-May 2022. All women who gave birth vaginally at or after 37 weeks, except for those with immediate PPH. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare determinants between the group receiving maintenance oxytocin and the control group without this intervention. A sensitivity analysis in a population of women at low risk of PPH was performed. Maternal, obstetrical, perinatal and organisational determinants were collected. RESULTS: This study included 584 patients, 278 (47.6 %) of whom received maintenance oxytocin. We observed a significantly higher rate of maintenance oxytocin administration to parous women (OR 1.57, 90 %CI 1.09-2.27) and women with a history of PPH (OR 2.88, 90 %CI 1.08-9.08). Additional maintenance oxytocin was also administered more often when the midwife handling the birth had more than 5 years of practice since completion of training (OR 1.77, 1.24-2.53) or during night-time births (OR 1.47, 90 %CI 1.03-2.10). CONCLUSION: Maintenance oxytocin administration is a frequent practice, performed for almost half the patients in our center. This practice is associated with maternal and obstetric factors, but also with health professionals' individual decisions and practices.

Impact of an e-learning training for interpreting intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring to avoid perinatal asphyxia: A before-after multicenter observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Perinatal asphyxia, a condition that results from compromised placental or pulmonary gas exchange during the birth process, is rare but can lead to serious neonatal and long-term consequences. The visual analysis of cardiotocography (CTG) is designed to avoid perinatal asphyxia, but its interpretation can be difficult. Our aim was to test the impact of an e-learning training program for interpreting CTG on the rate of avoidable perinatal asphyxia at term. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective multicenter before-after study comparing two periods, before and after the implementation of e-learning training program from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, in CTG interpretation for midwives and obstetricians in five maternity hospitals in the Paris area, France. The training involved theoretical aspects such as fetal physiology and heart rhythm abnormalities, followed by practical exercises using real case studies to enhance skills in interpreting CTG. We included all term births that occurred between the "before" period (July 1 to December 31, 2014) and the "after period (January 1 to June 30, 2017). We excluded multiple pregnancies, antenatal detection of congenital abnormalities, breech births and all scheduled caesarean sections. Perinatal asphyxia cases were analyzed by a pair of experts consisting of midwives and obstetricians, and avoidability of perinatal asphyxia was estimated. The main criterion was the prevalence of avoidable perinatal asphyxia. RESULTS: The e-learning program was performed by 83 % of the obstetrician-gynecologists and 65 % of the midwives working in the delivery rooms of the five centers. The prevalence of perinatal asphyxia was 0.45 % (29/7902 births) before the training and 0.54 % (35/7722) after. The rate of perinatal asphyxia rated as avoidable was 0.30 % of live births before the training and 0.28 % after (p = 0.870). The main causes of perinatal asphyxia deemed avoidable were delay in reactions to severe CTG anomalies and errors in the analysis and interpretation of the CTG. These causes did not differ between the two periods. CONCLUSION: One session of e-learning training to analyze CTG was not associated with a reduction in avoidable perinatal asphyxia. Other types of e-learning, repeated and implemented over a longer period should be evaluated.

Analysis of MRI brain biometrics in fetuses monitored for intra uterine growth restriction and their prognostic value: Results of a prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Show a prognostic value of brain changes in fetuses with intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR) on early neonatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively recruited pregnant women whose fetuses presented fetal weight < 5th centile. A brain MRI was performed between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation (WG). Several brain biometrics were measured (as fronto-occipital diameter (FOD) and transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD)). Neonatal prognosis was evaluated according to a composite criterion. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients included, 62 had a fetal brain MRI. The mean centile value of FOD was lower in the unfavorable outcome group (n = 9) compared to the favorable outcome group (n = 53) (24.5 ± 16.8 vs. 8.6 ± 13.2, p = 0.004). The ROC curve for predicting risk of unfavorable neonatal outcome based on FOD presented an area under the curve of 0.81 (95 % CI, [0.63---0.99]) and a threshold determined at the 3rd centile was associated with sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.89. In multivariate analysis, a FOD less than the 3rd centile was significantly associated with an unfavorable neonatal risk. There also was a reduction in TCD (25.5 ± 21.5 vs. 10.4 ± 10.4, p = 0.03) in the unfavorable neonatal outcome group. CONCLUSION: We found an association between a reduction in FOD and TCD in fetal MRIs conducted between 28 and 32 WG in fetuses monitored for IUGR with an unfavorable neonatal outcome. Our results suggest that these biometric changes could constitute markers of poor neonatal prognosis.

Association of severe postpartum hemorrhage and development of psychological disorders: Results from the prospective and multicentre HELP MOM study.

OBJECTIVE: Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading preventable cause of worldwide maternal morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for psychological disorders following PPH are currently unknown. HELP-MOM study aimed to determine the incidence and identify risk factors for psychological disorders following PPH. METHODS: HELP-MOM study was a prospective, observational, national, and multicentre study including patients who experienced severe PPH requiring sulprostone. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of psychological disorders (anxiety and/or post-traumatic disorder and/or depression) following PPH, assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months after delivery using HADS, IES-R, and EPDS scales. RESULTS: Between November 2014 and November 2016, 332 patients experienced a severe PPH and 236 (72%) answered self-questionnaires at 1, 3, and 6 months. A total of 161 (68%) patients declared a psychological disorder following severe PPH (146 (90.1%) were screened positive for anxiety, 96 (58.9%) were screened positive for post-traumatic stress disorder, and 94 (57.7%) were screened positive for post-partum depression). In multivariable analysis, the use of intra-uterine tamponnement balloon was associated with a lower risk to be screened positive for psychological disorder after severe PPH (OR = 0.33 [IC95% 0.15-0.69], p = 0.004, and after propensity score matching (OR=0.34 [IC95% 0.12-0.94], p = 0.04)). Low hemoglobin values during severe PPH management were associated with a higher risk of being screened positive for psychological disorders. Finally, we did not find differences in desire or pregnancy between patients without or with psychological disorders occurring in the year after severe PPH. DISCUSSION: Severe PPH was associated with significant psychosocial morbidity including anxiety, post-traumatic disorder, and depression. This should engage a psychological follow-up. Large cohorts are urgently needed to confirm our results. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT02118038.