Early and late results of open surgical and endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, selected according to surgical risk / Resultados precoces e tardios dos tratamentos aberto e endovascular de aneurismas da aorta abdominal infrarrenal, selecionados de acordo com o risco cirúrgico

Abstract Background Open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surgery are alternative treatments for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (IRAAA). Objectives To compare OSR and EVAR for the treatment of IRAAA. Methods 119 patients with IRAAA were electively operated by the same surgeon between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015, following selection for OSR or EVAR according to surgical risk. Complications, reinterventions, failures, and early and late mortality were analyzed. Results 63 OSR and 56 EVAR patients were analyzed. They were similar in terms of age (70 years), gender (92% men), and average diameter of IRAAA (6.5 cm), but with different comorbidities, surgical risk, and anatomy. EVAR was better than OSR regarding time in the operating theatre (177.5 vs. 233.3 minutes), need for transfusion (25 vs. 73%), and length of stay in ICU (1.3 vs. 3.3 days) and hospital (8.1 vs. 11.1 days). OSR allowed more associated procedures to be conducted simultaneously (19.0 vs. 1.8%). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to complications (25.4 vs. 25.1%), reinterventions (3.2 vs. 5.2%), or early mortality (1.6 vs. 0%). During follow-up, OSR was associated with fewer revisions (3.13 vs. 4.21), angio-CTs (0.22 vs. 3.23), complications (6.4 vs. 37.5%), reinterventions (3.2 vs. 23.2%), and failures (1.6 vs. 10.7%), and had better survival (78.2 vs. 63.2%). Conclusions Correct selection of patients achieves excellent results because it avoids OSR in patients at high risk and avoids EVAR in patients with high anatomical complexity, achieving similar results in the perioperative period, but better results for OSR over the course of follow-up.

Resumo Contexto A cirurgia aberta (CA) e o reparo endovascular de aneurisma (REVA) são tratamentos alternativos para o aneurisma da aorta abdominal infrarrenal (AAAIR). Objetivos Comparar CA e REVA no tratamento do AAAIR. Métodos Foram incluídos 119 pacientes com AAAIR, operados eletivamente pelo mesmo cirurgião entre 1 de janeiro de 2006 e 31 de dezembro de 2015, após seleção para CA ou REVA de acordo com o risco cirúrgico. Complicações, reintervenções, falhas e mortalidade precoce e tardia foram analisadas. Resultados Foram analisados 63 pacientes de CA e 56 de REVA, com semelhanças de idade (70 anos), sexo (92% homens) e diâmetro médio do AAAIR (6,5 cm), mas com diferentes comorbidades, riscos cirúrgicos e anatomias. O REVA foi melhor que a CA em relação ao tempo na sala de cirurgia (177,5 vs. 233,3 minutos), necessidade de transfusão (25 vs. 73%) e tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva (1,3 vs. 3,3 dias) e no hospital (8,1 vs. 11,1 dias). A CA permitiu que mais procedimentos associados fossem realizados simultaneamente (19,0 vs. 1,8%). Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos em relação a complicações (25,4 vs. 25,1%), reintervenções (3,2 vs. 5,2%) e mortalidade precoce (1,6 vs. 0%). Durante o acompanhamento, a CA apresentou menos revisões (3,13 vs. 4,21), angiotomografias (0,22 vs. 3,23), complicações (6,4 vs. 37,5%), reintervenções (3,2 vs. 23,2%) e falhas (1,6 vs. 10,7%), além de ter melhor sobrevida (78,2 vs. 63,2%). Conclusões A seleção correta dos pacientes proporciona excelentes resultados porque evita pacientes com alto risco para CA e com complexidade anatômica para REVA. Os resultados são semelhantes no período perioperatório, mas melhores para CA durante o acompanhamento.

La trombosis venosa superficial no es una enfermedad benigna / Superficial venous thrombosis is not a benign disease

La trombosis venosa superficial es una enfermedad frecuente, no siempre benigna. Nuevos conocimientos, aparecidos en la última década, refuerzan aún más si cabe que esta entidad, tradicionalmente considerada como una patología banal de fácil diagnóstico y sencillo tratamiento, presenta cada día más evidencia de ser todo lo contario; es decir, una patología potencialmente grave (al poder asociarse a TVP y embolias pulmonares [EP] o ser un marcador de otras situaciones patologías) que precisa de forma casi sistemática de exploraciones complementarias de diagnóstico (eco Doppler, estudios de trombofilia, etc.) para instaurar un tratamiento específico, en cuyo contexto puede estar indicado un determinado fármaco anticoagulante

Superficial venous thrombosis is a common disease, not always benign. New knowledge, appeared in the last decade, reinforces even more if this entity is classically considered as a banal pathology of easy diagnosis and simple treatment, every day presents more evidence of being everything else, that is to say a potentially serious pathology (to power be associated with DVT and pulmonary embolisms-EP or be a marker of other pathological situations), which requires almost systematically complementary diagnostic examinations (echo-Doppler, thrombophilia studies, etc.), to establish a specific treatment, in whose context a certain anticoagulant drug may be indicated

Vascular target organ damage in patients with Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative syndrome: A propensity score analysis / Lesión de órgano diana vascular en pacientes con síndrome mieloproliferativo cromosoma Filadelfia negativo: comparación con población sana mediante Propensity Score

Purpose:To assess whether subjects with Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPNs) show differences in the presence of vascular, cardiac or renal target organ damage (TOD) and other vascular function parameters as compared to individuals without this condition.Methods:An observational study was conducted. Fifty-seven subjects diagnosed with Ph-MPNs used as cases and 114 subjects without Ph-MPNs as controls. We matched the subjects with and without Ph-MPNs using the propensity scores in a 1:2 ratio using the variables gender, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, hyperlipidaemia and smoking. Vascular, cardiac and renal TOD were established according to the criteria of the European Society of Hypertension and Cardiology guidelines. Arterial stiffness was also assessed using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI).Results:Mean age was 63.50±11.70 and 62.90±8.32 years in subjects with and without Ph-MPNs, 32 females (56%) in the first group and 62 (54%) in the second. Subjects with Ph-MPNs have a higher percentage of carotid injury than subjects without Ph-MPNs (35.1% vs. 21.1%) and higher albumin/creatinine ratio. In the logistic regression analysis, subjects with Ph-MPNs had an OR=2.382 (IC95% 1.066–5.323) for carotid injury versus those without haematological disease.Conclusions:Subjects with Ph-MPNs have twice the risk of by carotid injury than those without haematological disease. (AU)

Objetivo:Evaluar si los sujetos con neoplasias mieloproliferativas Filadelfia negativos (NMPs-FN) muestran diferencias en cuanto a presencia de lesión de órgano diana (LOD) vascular, cardiaca o renal y en otros parámetros de función vascular con respecto a los individuos sin esta patología.Métodos:Se realizó un estudio observacional. Se incluyeron 57 sujetos con diagnóstico de NMPs-FN utilizados como casos y 114 sujetos sin NMPs-FN como controles. Emparejamos a los sujetos con y sin NMPs-FN con la técnica de Propensity Score en la proporción 1:2, utilizando las variables sexo, diabetes mellitus tipo2, hipertensión arterial, hiperlipemia y consumo de tabaco. La LOD vascular, cardiaca y renal se estableció siguiendo los criterios de las guías de las sociedades europeas de hipertensión y cardiología. La rigidez arterial también se evaluó con el índice vascular corazón-tobillo (CAVI).Resultados:La edad media fue de 63,50±11,70 y 62,90±8,32 años en los sujetos con y sin NMPs, 32 mujeres (56%) en el primer grupo y 62 (54%) en el segundo. Los sujetos con NMPs-FN tienen un mayor porcentaje de lesión carotídea que los sujetos sin NMPs-FN (35,1% frente al 21,1%) y un mayor ratio albúmina/creatinina. En el análisis de regresión logística, los sujetos con NMPs-FN tenían un OR=2,382 (IC95%: 1,066 a 5,323) para la lesión carotídea frente a los que no presentaban enfermedad hematológica.Conclusiones:Los sujetos con NMPs-FN presentan el doble de riesgo de lesión de órgano diana vascular que los sujetos que no presentaban enfermedad hematológica. (AU)