Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) recommendations and guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound training in the Americas for rheumatologists.

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSKUS) training for rheumatologists in the Americas. METHODS: A total of 25 Rheumatologists from 19 countries of the American Continent participated in a consensus-based interactive process (Delphi method) using 2 consecutive electronic questionnaires. The first questionnaire included the following: the relevance of organizing courses to teach MSKUS to Rheumatologists, the determination of the most effective educational course models, the trainee levels, the educational objectives, the requirements for passing the course(s), the course venues, the number of course participants per instructor, and the percentage of time spent in hands-on sessions. The second questionnaire consisted of questions that did not achieve consensus (>65%) in the first questionnaire, topics, and pathologies to be covered at each course MSKUS level. RESULTS: General consensus was obtained for MSKUS courses to be divided into 3 educational levels: basic, intermediate, and advanced. These courses should be taught using a theoretical-didactic and hands-on model. In addition, the group established the minimum requirements for attending and passing each MSKUS course level, the ideal number of course participants per instructor (4 participants/instructor), and the specific topics and musculoskeletal pathologies to be covered. In the same manner, the group concluded that 60% to 70% of course time should be focused on hands-on sessions. CONCLUSION: A multinational group of MSKUS sonographers using a consensus-based questionnaire (Delphi method) established the first recommendations and guidelines for MSKUS course training in the Americas. Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology urges that these guidelines and recommendations be adopted in the future by both national and regional institutions in the American continent involved in the training of Rheumatologists for the performance of MSKUS.

Intravenous tocilizumab in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical practice findings from a 6-month international, multicentre, observational study in Central America and the Caribbean / El tocilizumab intravenoso en el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide: resultados de la práctica clínica de un estudio internacional, multicéntrico y observacional de 6 meses de duración en América Central y el Caribe

ABSTRACT Tocilizumab (TCZ), an 1interieukin-6 receptor-α Inhibitor, is Indicated in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to disease modifying drugs. ACT UP is a multinational project co11ecting information from severa1 post-marketing TCZ studies. Aim: To determine the proportion of patients in the routine clinical care setting receiving intravenous TCZ after 6 months treatment. Identification of TCZ treatment patterns, efficacy, and safety were also recorded. Method: This prospective non-interventional 6-month study, collected real-world information from 169 Central American and Caribbean patients. No interventional procedures or additional visits outside routine clinical care practice were performed. Statistical analysis was essentially descriptive. Results: Adherence rate was 74.0%, with 97% of patients receiving TCZ as first biological therapy line and there were no deviations from the local label. Almost 85% of patients started with combination therapy, and the majority remained under this scheme throughout the study. A significant decrease in disease activity assessments and acute phase reactants values were detected during TCZ treatment. The percentage of patients that achieved improvement according to the different levels of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) increased during the study, and relevant enhancements in quality of life were also accomplished. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 35 patients, with metabolic and nutritional disorders being the most common. Serious AEs were reported in 3% of patients, and special interest AEs occurred in 6 patients. Conclusion: Treatment adherence was mainly determined by follow-up and compliance with the administration schedule. Efficacy analysis showed better results than those reported in international literature. The incidence of AEs was also lower than in previously published data.

RESUMEN El tocilizumab (TCZ) está indicado en la artritis reumatoide moderada a severa, principalmente en respuestas inadecuadas a fármacos convencionales. ACT UP es un proyecto multinacional que recopila información relacionada con varios estudios de poscomercialización. Objetivo: Determinar la proporción de pacientes en la atención clínica de rutina que continúan en tratamiento con TCZ intravenoso después de 6 meses. Se llevó a cabo la identificación de patrones de administración, eficacia y seguridad. Método: Este estudio observacional prospectivo recopiló información de la vida real de 169 pacientes de América Central y el Caribe. No se hicieron intervenciones ni visitas adicionales fuera de la práctica clínica habitual. El análisis estadístico fue esencialmente descriptivo. Resultados: La tasa de adherencia al tratamiento fue del 74,0%, el 97% de los pacientes reci bieron TCZ como primera línea biológica y no existieron desviaciones en las indicaciones de administración según el inserto local. Aproximadamente el 85% de los pacientes inició TCZ como terapia combinada, y la mayoría permaneció bajo este esquema. Se evidenció una dis minución en la actividad de la enfermedad y un aumento en el porcentaje de pacientes que lograron respuesta según los diferentes grados del Colegio Americano de Reumatología. En 35 pacientes se presentaron eventos adversos (EA), siendo los relacionados con metabolismo y nutrición los más comunes. Se informaron EA graves en el 3% de los pacientes y de interés especial en 6 casos. Conclusión: El seguimiento de los pacientes y el cumplimiento del programa fueron los prin cipales determinantes en la adherencia. El análisis de eficacia mostró mejores resultados que los reportados previamente y la incidencia de EA fue menor que en otros estudios.