Leadless pacemaker extraction from a single-center perspective.

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemaker can be considered as a technical revolution in cardiac pacing devices, with clear advantages over conventional pacemakers in overcoming all lead-related complications. However, the management of these devices once they reach the end of life (EOL) of the battery is still controversial. In the next years, there will be an increase in the need to define a clear strategy in the management of leadless PM once they reach their EOL. Safe extraction of these devices will define in a great manner this strategy METHODS: We performed the extraction of three functioning Nanostim leadless pacemaker prophylactically in two females and one male patients as part of the Nanostim battery depletion field action recommendation. All patients had a prior transesophageal 3D echocardiography to determine the device intracardiac mobility and the extent of possible endothelialization. For the extractions, we used the Nanostim Retrieval Catheter S1RSIN (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), which is a proprietary catheter provided by the manufacturing company based on a lasso. RESULTS: Complete extraction of the devices was achieved in all patients using a relatively short fluoroscopic time (16, 19, and 12 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: The extraction of leadless pacemakers can be considered as a safe and feasible procedure using the tools provided by the manufacturer and designed for the extraction. However, a very low threshold must be maintained to avoid any risk to the patients. Our extraction time ranges are between 983 and 1,070 days, nevertheless it is necessary to gather more long-term data to assess the feasibility and safety of these procedures.

Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators with minimal fluoroscopy using a three-dimensional navigation system: a feasibility study.

AIMS: Fluoroscopy is necessary to implant cardioverter defibrillators using the conventional approach. Modern electroanatomic navigation systems allow the visualization of multiple catheters and, as they are capable of rendering precise geometrical reconstructions of cardiac chambers, have been used for fluoroscopy-free electrophysiological procedures. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of non-fluoroscopic implants using a three-dimensional navigation system. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NavX system was used to create the virtual anatomies of heart chambers and thoracic veins. Defibrillator leads were placed at stable positions using exclusively the electrical and anatomical information provided by the navigator. A single fluoroscopy shot confirmed final lead positions. Thirty-five consecutive patients had 30 single-chamber and 5 dual-chamber defibrillators implanted. Cardiac chambers geometries were developed in 10 ± 4.3 min. Ventricular and atrial leads were implanted, with suitable positions and electrical parameters being achieved, in 18 ± 22 and 16 ± 9 min, respectively. The final confirmatory shot was the only fluoroscopy needed in 31 (89%) cases. Two patients needed fluoroscopy-guided relocation of the ventricular lead due to high defibrillation threshold and a breakdown of the active-fixation mechanism, respectively. In one patient the ventricular lead was totally extracted and reimplanted because a loop has formed in the vena cava, and one patient required fluoroscopy-guided subclavian puncture. In five cases (16%), the position of the proximal defibrillation coil was minimally modified with fluoroscopy due to incomplete geometric reconstruction of the superior vena cava. CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopy-free defibrillators implantation is feasible using a navigation system. Suitable placement of the proximal coil is a critical stage and requires a reliable and complete reconstruction of the superior vena cava.