New Operative Reporting Standards: Where We Stand Now and Opportunities for Innovation.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's (CoC) new operative standards for breast cancer, melanoma, and colon cancer surgeries will require that surgeons provide synoptic documentation of essential oncologic elements within operative reports. Prior to designing and implementing an electronic tool to support synoptic reporting, we evaluated current documentation practices at our institution to understand baseline concordance with these standards. METHODS: Applicable procedures performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 were included. Two independent reviewers evaluated sequential operative notes, up to a total of 100 notes, for documentation of required elements. Complete concordance (CC) was defined as explicit documentation of all required CoC elements. Mean percentage CC and surgeon-specific CC were calculated for each procedure. Interrater reliability was assessed via Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS: For sentinel lymph node biopsy, mean CC was 66% (n = 100), with surgeon-specific CC ranging from 6 to 100%, and for axillary dissection, mean CC was 12% (n = 89) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 0 to 47%. The single surgeon performing melanoma wide local excision had a mean CC of 98% (n = 100). For colon resections, mean CC was 69% (n = 96) and surgeon-specific CC ranged from 39 to 94%. Kappa scores were 0.77, 0.78, -0.15, and 0.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified heterogeneity in current documentation practices. In our cohort, rates of baseline concordance varied across surgeons and procedures. Currently, documentation elements are interspersed within the operative report, posing challenges to chart abstraction with resulting imperfect interrater reliability. This presents an exciting opportunity to innovate and improve compliance by introducing an electronic synoptic documentation tool.

Robotic hepatectomy: current evidence and future directions.

Minimally invasive hepatectomy continues to gain popularity and acceptance for treatment of benign and malignant liver disease. Robotic hepatectomy offers potential advantages over open and conventional laparoscopic approaches. Review of the literature on robotic hepatectomy was performed. Search terms included "robotic hepatectomy" and "minimally invasive hepatectomy." Search was further customized to include articles related to robotic surgical technology. Across many parameters in liver surgery, robotic liver resection appears to have comparable outcomes with respect to laparoscopic resection. The benefits over open resection are largely related to less morbidity and faster recovery times. There is evidence that the robotic approach may have a shorter learning curve and enable more difficult resections to be performed minimally invasively. The robotic platform may have the potential to achieve superior margin status or parenchymal sparing resection in oncologic resections, but numerous obstacles remain. The robotic platform has not been applied to liver surgery to the same extent as either laparoscopic or open surgery. Robotic surgical technology will need to continue developing to deliver on its potential advantages.

Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: An uncommon malignancy requiring unique reconstructive approaches.

Surgery is considered for patients without metastatic disease and with resectable primary tumor. Pre-operatively, high quality imaging is reviewed to determine the likely extent of resection, specifically including the need for potential en-bloc resection of adjacent organs. In cases where up-front surgical approach would expose the patient to excessive morbidity (such as bilateral nephrectomy, multi-visceral resection, or prohibitively high risk of positive margins), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy is considered. Though data are sparse in LMS, a neoadjuvant regimen of doxorubicin and dacarbazine is typically considered for borderline resectable tumors at our institution; patients may be treated for up to 4 months with interval imaging every 2 months to evaluate for tumor response. Postoperatively, adjuvant systemic therapy or radiation may be considered for patients with positive surgical margins or high-grade tumors.

Teaching what matters: Integrating health equity education into the core surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities in surgical outcomes exist. It is imperative to prepare future doctors to eliminate disparities. Our team of senior medical students developed a surgical clerkship module examining equity in prostate cancer. Student attitudes before and after a facilitated teaching session were assessed. METHODS: A surgical equity pilot module was integrated into the core surgical clerkship starting in July 2020. This module was composed of (1) asynchronous preparatory material and (2) a synchronous interactive case discussion regarding disparities in prostate cancer. Discussion sessions were facilitated by upper-level medical students. Participants answered optional anonymous Likert-style and open-ended survey questions before and after the session. Pre- and post-responses were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen students completed the module between July 2020 and January 2021. Pre- and post-survey response rates were 66% and 29%, respectively. At baseline, almost all students (95%) agreed knowledge of disparities would make them a better physician. However, the majority (95%) described their general knowledge of surgical disparities as "nonexistent," "poor," or "average." Most students did not have a framework for assessing causes of surgical disparities (86%) and were not aware of interventions for reducing disparities (90%). After intervention, the majority rated their knowledge of surgical disparities as "good" or "excellent" (71%; P < .001). Most students indicated they had a framework 79%; P < .001) and were aware of effective interventions (62%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a successful pilot of an equity-focused clerkship module. Student attitudes after a single session reflected significant improvement in knowledge of causes and interventions related to surgical disparities. Equity-focused teaching can be incorporated into the surgical clerkship.

Double adenoma as a cause of primary hyperparathyroidism: Asymmetric hyperplasia or a distinct pathologic entity?

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) caused by double adenoma may carry a higher risk of failure to cure. We compared outcomes in single adenoma (SA), double adenoma (DA) and four-gland hyperplasia (HP). METHODS: Patients undergoing initial parathyroidectomy for PHPT were categorized by diagnosis. The primary outcome was persistent/recurrent disease postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 3408 patients, 81.3% had SA, 9.5% had DA, and 9.3% had HP. Rates of persistence/recurrence were 2.9%, 5.3%, and 4.5% in SA, DA, and HP, respectively (p = 0.281). Patients with persistence/recurrence had higher preoperative calcium (11.0 vs 10.7 mg/dl, p = 0.028) and PTH (96 vs 77 pg/ml, p = 0.015), and lower rates of IOPTH normalization (77% vs 96%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, DA was associated with increased risk of persistent/recurrent disease (OR 3.0, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with DA are cured with removal of two glands, but approximately 5% experience disease persistence/recurrence. Low-normal final IOPTH was associated with lower risk of persistent/recurrent disease.