Lower-extremity endovascular interventions for Medicare beneficiaries: comparative effectiveness as a function of provider specialty.

PURPOSE: Lower-extremity endovascular interventions are increasingly being performed by vascular surgeons (VSs) and interventional cardiologists (ICs) in addition to interventional radiologists (IRs). Regardless of specialty, well trained, experienced, and dedicated operators are expected to offer the best outcomes. To examine specialty-specific trends, outcomes of percutaneous lower-extremity revascularizations in Medicare beneficiaries were compared according to physician specialty types providing the service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medicare Standard Analytical Files that contain longitudinal data of all services (physician, inpatient, outpatient) provided to a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries were studied. All claims for percutaneous angioplasty, atherectomy, and stent implantation of lower-extremity arteries during the years 2005­2007 were extracted, and the following outcomes were assessed: mortality, transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) use, length of stay, and subsequent revascularization or amputation. Outcomes were compared by using regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, emergency department admission, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Most outcomes were significantly worse if the service was provided by vascular surgeons compared with other vascular specialists. The in-hospital mortality rate for procedures performed by VSs was 19% higher than for those performed by others, but this difference was not significant (P =.351). Adjusted average 1-year procedure costs were significantly lower for IRs ($17,640) than for VSs ($19,012) or ICs ($19,096). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data show that endovascular lower-extremity revascularization by vascular surgeons results in more transfusion and ICU use, longer hospital stay, more repeat revascularization procedures or amputations, and higher costs compared with procedures performed by interventional radiologists.

Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term clinical outcomes of uterine artery embolization across a wide variety of practice settings in a large patient cohort. METHODS: The Fibroid Registry for Outcomes Data (FIBROID) for Uterine Embolization was a 3-year, single-arm, prospective, multi-center longitudinal study of the short- and long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Two thousand one hundred twelve patients with symptomatic leiomyomata were eligible for long-term follow-up at 27 sites representing a geographically diverse set of practices, including academic centers, community hospitals, and closed-panel health maintenance organizations. At 36 months after treatment, 1,916 patients remained in the study, and of these, 1,278 patients completed the survey. The primary measures of outcome were the symptom and health-related quality-of-life scores from the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean symptom scores improved 41.41 points (P<.001), and the quality of life scores improved 41.47 points (P<.001), both moving into the normal range for this questionnaire. The improvements were independent of practice setting. During the 3 years of the study, Kaplan-Meier estimates of hysterectomy, myomectomy, or repeat uterine artery embolization were 9.79%, 2.82%, and 1.83% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Uterine artery embolization results in a durable improvement in quality of life. These results are achievable when the procedure is performed in any experienced community or academic interventional radiology practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Duplex Doppler Imaging of Dialysis Fistulae and Grafts.

Arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for hemodialysis access are a lifeline in patients with end-stage renal disease. A significant cause of morbidity and mortality in this population is dialysis access dysfunction. Duplex ultrasound imaging is an excellent modality to evaluate arteriovenous fistulae and grafts, the 2 main types of long-term hemodialysis access. This review provides a detailed Doppler ultrasound protocol for evaluation of fistulae or grafts to familiarize imagers with their normal appearance, highlighting common dialysis access complications.

Altered Doppler flow patterns in cirrhosis patients: an overview.

Doppler ultrasonography of the hepatic vasculature is an integral part of evaluating precirrhotic and cirrhotic patients. While the reversal of the portal venous flow is a well-recognized phenomenon, other flow patterns, although not as easily understood, may play an important role in assessing the disease status. This article discusses the different characteristic flow patterns observed from the portal vein, hepatic artery, and hepatic vein in patients with liver cirrhosis or related complications and procedures. Knowledge of these different flow patterns provides additional information that may reinforce the diagnosis of cirrhosis, help in staging, and offer prognostic information for determining the direction of therapy. Doppler ultrasonography is invaluable when liver transplantation is being considered and aids in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Chemotherapy-related complications in the kidneys and collecting system: an imaging perspective.

UNLABELLED: Nephrotoxicity is a common adverse effect of many chemotherapeutic agents. The agents most commonly associated with chemotherapy-associated nephrotoxicity are methotrexate, semustine, streptozocin, mithramycin, and cisplatin. Certain chemotherapeutic agents have adverse effects on the kidneys and urothelium that can be visualized radiographically, including cystic change, interstitial nephritis, papillary necrosis, urothelial changes, haemorrhagic cystitis, acute tubular necrosis, and infarction. This review focuses on imaging features identifying complications of chemotherapy in the kidneys and collecting system and provides didactic cases to alert referring clinicians. TEACHING POINTS: • Nephrotoxicity is a common adverse effect of many chemotherapeutic agents. • Chemotherapies have adverse renal and urothelial effects that can be visualized radiographically. • Crizotinib use can result in the development of complex renal cysts.

Interventional radiology delivers high-value health care and is an Imaging 3.0 vanguard.

Given the changing climate of health care and the imperative to add value, radiologists must join forces with the rest of medicine to deliver better patient care in a more cost-effective, evidence-based manner. For several decades, interventional radiology has added value to the health care system through innovation and the provision of alternative and effective minimally invasive treatments, which have decreased morbidity, mortality, and overall cost. The clinical practice of interventional radiology embodies many of the features of Imaging 3.0, the program recently launched by the ACR. We provide a review of some of the major contributions made by interventional radiology and offer general principles from that experience, which are applicable to all radiologists.

II. Uterine fibroid embolization: technical aspects.

Successful superselective catheterization of the uterine artery requires familiarity with female pelvic arterial anatomy, knowledge of effective catheter and guidewire combinations, and a few tricks. A learning curve can be expected for each of these elements, although it is assumed that the operator will already have experience in basic catheter techniques. Safe transcatheter delivery, understanding of embolization end points, and avoidance of nontarget embolization are essential. Equally important are knowledge of the properties of the embolic agents currently available and their indications for use. Uterine fibroid embolization unavoidably results in radiation exposure to the uterus and ovaries, and adherence to meticulous fluoroscopic technique is crucial to keep the absorbed dose as low as possible.

I. Uterine fibroid embolization: preprocedure assessment.

Increasing clinical experience with uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) has improved the ability of interventionalist radiologists to discern who is and who is not an appropriate candidate for this procedure. Initial evaluation should be directed at obtaining answers to the following key questions: (1) Does the patient have uterine fibroids that account for her symptoms and are they severe enough to require invasive treatment? (2) Does she desire future childbearing? (3) Are there any clinical indications or imaging signs of uterine malignancy? (4) Are there any medical or anatomic features that would favor a particular therapeutic modality? (5) What are her own preferences regarding treatment? Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are vital elements to the assessment and planning of the appropriate course of action. Given the lack of prospective comparative trials between UFE and surgical treatment, recommendations are often highly influenced by patient preference.

V. Uterine fibroid embolization: management of complications.

Fortunately, the number of complications reported after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) is extremely low. Angiographic mishap or drug reaction are probably more common than purely UFE-related complications. However, the possibility of infection or necrosis of the uterus, with their significant attendant morbidity, is a sobering reminder that embolotherapy can have a powerful impact on the target organ(s). Knowledge of the expected time course for symptom resolution and the often confusing imaging findings shortly after UFE are critical for avoiding unnecessary delay in surgical intervention or, perhaps more important, an inappropriate rush to surgery when antibiotics alone will suffice. Other complications include alteration of uterine physiology, which may disrupt sexual function, and menstrual irregularity and even premature menopause.

IV. Uterine fibroid embolization: follow-up.

Patients generally notice some relief of both menorrhagia and mass-effect symptoms during the first few weeks after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). Shrinkage of the fibroids continues to take place over several months, peaking somewhere between 3 and 6 months, with measurable shrinkage sometimes noted for up to 1 year. The timing of follow-up visits is intended to coincide with the time course of improvement so that diagnostic imaging and intervention can be performed if symptoms worsen or relief does not appear to be on schedule. The amount of shrinkage of fibroids correlates neither with the intensity of immediate postprocedure symptoms or the degree of symptom relief. Affected fibroids undergo hyaline degeneration, a process in which the hard, cellular tumor is replaced by softer, acellular material. A nationwide registry has been constructed for the accumulation of procedural and follow-up data so that success and complication rates can be accurately determined and long-term issues about the durability of UFE and possible side effects can be addressed.

III. Uterine fibroid embolization: pain management.

Conscious sedation and analgesia are integral components of successful uterine fibroid embolization (UFE), both in providing comfort to the anxious patient undergoing an elective procedure and for providing relief of the severe pelvic pain, cramps, and nausea that may result from acute uterine ischemia and the postembolization syndrome that may follow. The agents used are typically those with which interventional radiologists already have extensive experience in the performance of a variety of invasive procedures. Immediate postprocedure care benefits greatly from the use of narcotic delivered via PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also particularly useful for treating the pain and cramping caused by UFE and help reduce the amount of narcotic necessary for pain relief during the recovery period. Detailed instructions for the first week of convalescence are necessary to insure comfort and avoid complications.

VI. Uterine fibroid embolization: developing a clinical service.

Building a uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) practice can be a complex process. Choices must be made regarding whether to align oneself with a gynecologist or to accept direct referrals. For the interventional radiologist, the responsibilities of evaluation and patient care pose unique and time-consuming administrative and clinical challenges. Physician extenders, either nurse practitioners or physician's assistants, play key roles as clinical coordinators by guiding the patient through the medical system and making certain that she is cleared for the procedure medically and logistically. In some settings, they may also assist in many of the technical aspects of the procedure and postoperative care. Interventional radiologists must be prepared for battles with insurance companies and be willing to go through the appeals process. Business officers must also be trained to properly code for the procedures to insure optimal reimbursement. The success of building a UFE practice may also be bolstered by directly marketing to patients and by providing them with access via the Internet.

Associated vascular injury in patients with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

Cholecystectomy remains one of the most commonly performed procedures in general surgery. Although the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of bile duct (BD) injuries have been well described, studies characterizing associated vascular injuries are limited. The objective of this study was to analyze the frequency and management of associated vascular and BD injury after cholecystectomy. A total of 50 patients were referred to a tertiary institution for BD injuries from 1996 to 2010. Thirty-nine (78%) of the patients were female with the mean age of 49 years (range, 14 to 86 years). Seventy-five per cent of the injuries were Strasberg Type E. Nine patients (18%) had associated vascular injuries. Six patients had injuries to the right hepatic artery; in one patient, both the right and left hepatic arteries were damaged. Five patients had right portal vein injuries; three of these subsequently died. In conclusion, as a result of the high incidence of associated vascular injury, a thin-collimation CT angiogram and/or mesenteric angiogram with portal venous imaging should be considered as part of the preoperative evaluation in patients with BD injury.

A prospective multicenter comparative study between myomectomy and uterine artery embolization with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization (UAE) to treat uterine fibroid tumors and to compare the long-term changes in health-related quality of life (QOL) after UAE with the changes seen after myomectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients with uterine myomas were enrolled into this multicenter study, with 77 patients undergoing UAE with PVA and 69 patients undergoing myomectomy. Six-month follow-up was completed for the myomectomy, whereas 2-year follow-up was completed for the UAE group. Outcomes were assessed with the Uterine Fibroid QOL Questionnaire and based on adverse event incidence, time to return to normal activity, and changes in tumor symptom scores, QOL scores, and menorrhagia bleeding scores. For the UAE cohort, changes in total uterine volume and dominant tumor size on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were assessed. RESULTS: In the UAE cohort, 88.3% of patients experienced a reduction of tumor-related symptoms (increase >or=5 points from baseline measurement) at 6 months, with 75.4% of patients in the myomectomy group experiencing similar improvement. Median QOL questionnaire scores at 6 months were found to be significantly higher in patients treated with UAE (P = .041), with sustained improvement seen at 12 and 24 months. Both procedures resulted in significant reductions in 6-month menorrhagia bleeding scores, with sustained improvement in the UAE cohort at 12 and 24 months. MR imaging at 6 months revealed significant uterine and tumor volume reductions after UAE (P < .05). At least one adverse event occurred in 42% of patients in the myomectomy group, compared with 26% in the UAE group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: UAE performed with PVA microspheres was associated with greater sustained improvements in symptom severity and health-related QOL and with fewer complications compared with myomectomy. Six-month MR imaging data demonstrated significant reductions in uterine and tumor volumes, although the degree of tissue infarction after UAE was not assessed with contrast medium-enhanced MR imaging.

Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: a multicenter comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is significant quality of life score improvement after uterine artery embolization (UAE) and to compare UAE and myomectomy outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort controlled study. SETTING: Sixteen medical centers in the United States. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty-nine UAE patients and 60 myomectomy patients. Patients were assigned to myomectomy or UAE on the basis of a best treatment decision made by the patient and her physician. All patients were observed for 6 months. The UAE patients also had follow-up examinations at 1 year. INTERVENTION(S): Myomectomy or UAE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Quality of life score changes, menstrual bleeding score changes, uterine size differences, time off, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements in the uterine fibroid quality of life score, menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and overall postoperative quality of life. The mean hospital stay was 1 day for the UAE patients, compared with 2.5 days for the myomectomy patients. The UAE and myomectomy patients returned to their normal activities in 15 days and 44 days, respectively, and returned to work in 10 days and 37 days, respectively. At least one adverse event occurred in 40.1% of the myomectomy patients, compared with 22.1% in the UAE group. CONCLUSION(S): The uterine fibroid quality of life score was significantly improved in both groups. No significant differences were observed in bleeding improvement, uterine volume reduction, uterine fibroid quality of life score improvement, and overall quality of life score improvement between groups. Patients receiving UAE required fewer days off work, fewer hospital days, and experienced fewer adverse events.