Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(5): 1636-1644, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35132765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the sex-related differences in the trends and outcomes of trans-septal transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TS-TMVR). METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2015-2018) was queried for admissions for TS-TMVR. Propensity matched analysis was conducted to compare outcomes with hospitalizations for TS-TMVR among women versus men. The main study outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 2063 hospitalizations for TS-TMVR; of whom, 58.1% were women. The proportion of women among those undergoing TS-TMVR increased from 50% in 2015 to 60.2% in 2018 (Ptrend = 0.04). Compared with men, women undergoing TS-TMVR were slightly younger, and had a distinct profile of comorbidities. After matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality among women versus men undergoing TS-TMVR (7.8% vs. 6.1%, OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.79-2.13). Subgroup analyzes showed an interaction toward higher mortality with women versus men among patients with CKD (Pinteraction = 0.07). There were no significant differences between women and men in in-hospital complications or length of stay after TS-TMVR. Compared with men, women undergoing TS-TMVR were more likely to be discharged to a nursing facility (17.7% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.01) and had higher rates of 30-day readmissions (22.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis showed an increase in the proportion of women among patients undergoing TS-TMVR during the study years. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, or length of stay between both sexes following TS-TMVR. Women were more likely to be discharged to nursing facilities and had higher rates of readmission at 30 days even after propensity matching.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(3): 664-674, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31868999

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Determine the rates, reasons, predictors, and costs of 30-day readmissions following transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) versus surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) in the United States. BACKGROUND: Data on 30-day readmissions after TMVR are limited. METHODS: High-risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing TMVR or SMVR were identified from the 2014-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Multivariable stepwise regression models were used to identify independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Risk of 30-day readmission was compared between the two groups using univariate and propensity score adjusted regression models. RESULTS: Among 8,912 patients undergoing mitral valve repair during 2014-2015 (national estimate 17,809), we identified 7,510 (84.7%) that underwent SMVR and 1,402 (15.3%) that underwent TMVR. Thirty-day readmission rates after SMVR and TMVR were 10.7% and 11.7%, respectively (unadjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89-1.39, p = .35). After propensity score adjustment, TMVR was associated with a lower risk of 30-day readmissions compared with SMVR (adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.95, p = .02). Heart failure and arrhythmias were the leading cardiac reasons for readmission. Anemia and fluid and electrolyte disorder were independent predictors of 30-day readmission after TMVR. Demographics, comorbidities, and length of stay were independent predictors of 30-day readmission after SMVR. CONCLUSIONS: One in 10 patients are readmitted within 30 days following TMVR or SMVR. Approximately half of the readmissions are for cardiac reasons. The predictors of 30-day readmission are different among patients undergoing TMVR and SMVR, but can be easily screened for to identify patients at highest risk for readmission.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
3.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 71(6): 896-903, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277506

RESUMEN

Creation of an arteriovenous access for hemodialysis can provoke a sequence of events that significantly affects cardiovascular hemodynamics. We present a 78-year-old man with end-stage renal disease and concomitant coronary artery disease previously requiring coronary artery bypass grafting including a left internal mammary graft to the left anterior descending artery, ischemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and severe aortic stenosis who developed hypotension unresponsive to medical therapy after recent angioplasty of his ipsilateral arteriovenous fistula for high-grade outflow stenosis. This case highlights the long-term effects of dialysis access on the cardiovascular system, with special emphasis on complications such as high-output cardiac failure and coronary artery steal syndrome. Banding of the arteriovenous fistula provided symptomatic relief with a decrease in cardiac output. Avoidance of arteriovenous access creation on the ipsilateral upper extremity in patients with a left internal mammary artery bypass graft may prevent coronary artery steal syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Anciano , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Nefropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Arterias Mamarias/trasplante , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Reoperación , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Heart Fail Rev ; 23(6): 821-829, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094532

RESUMEN

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) and heart failure (HF) represent an important and high-risk group of patients who are often referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to high risk for surgical intervention. Thus far, randomized controlled trials have shown comparable outcomes between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe AS and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. In the current review, we will discuss (1) the pathophysiology of HF in patients with severe AS, (2) role of imaging modalities in management, (3) role of biomarkers of HF on prognosis, (4) impact of other valvular heart diseases, (5) evidence from the contemporary trials on the role of TAVR in patients with severe AS and HF, and (6) future directions and research.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 92(4): 768-774, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) exposes patients to radiation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify factors associated with higher radiation exposure and to quantify their relative influence, which may inform reduction of this hazard. METHODS: All TAVR procedures at Rhode Island Hospital between March 20, 2012 and February 12, 2017 were included. Procedures were performed by two co-primary operators using a Siemens Artis Zeego system. Radiation metrics were generated by the imaging system. The primary metric was dose-area product (DAP, Gy*cm2 ), and secondary metrics were reference point air kerma (mGy) and fluoroscopy time (minutes). Data collected for the STS/ACC TVT Registry were utilized to develop a multivariable linear regression model predicting DAP. RESULTS: In 294 TAVRs, median DAP was 169 Gy*cm2 [interquartile range (IQR) 106-238]. The r2 values for the full 27-variable DAP model and reduced eight-variable model were 0.457 and 0.420, respectively. Valve area, aortic insufficiency, and procedure year (suggesting absence of a learning curve) were non-significant predictors in the full model, while increasing weight, cutdown transfemoral access, higher pre-procedure creatinine and hemoglobin, and vascular complications predicted higher DAP in both models. Results were unchanged when DAP was log-transformed. Secondary models for air kerma and fluoroscopy time revealed similar predictors. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with increased procedural complexity and duration as well as radiation attenuation and scatter predict increased patient radiation exposure during TAVR. Modification of procedural technique, especially using percutaneous femoral vascular access, may facilitate reduction in exposure.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Seguridad del Paciente , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Dispersión de Radiación , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos
6.
Vasc Med ; 22(3): 234-244, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28494713

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an accepted pathway for aortic valve replacement for patients who are at prohibitive, severe and intermediate risk for traditional aortic valve surgery. However, with this rising uptrend and adaptation of this new technology, vascular complications and their management remain an Achilles heel for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. The vascular complications are an independent predictor of mortality for patients undergoing TAVR. Early recognition of these complications and appropriate management is paramount. In this article, we review the most commonly encountered vascular complications associated with currently approved TAVR devices and their optimal percutaneous management techniques.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Incidencia , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 82(4): E356-64, 2013 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511502

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary revascularization of large coronary arteries using drug-eluting (DES) or bare-metal (BMS) stents. BACKGROUND: In de novo native coronary lesions with reference diameters of 2.5-3.5 mm, DES reduce target lesion revascularization (TLR) with no increase in death or myocardial infarction (MI). The relative efficacy of DES in larger coronary artery lesions is less certain. METHODS: From the prospective Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events registry, we identified patients undergoing stenting of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries 3.5-5.0 mm in diameter (n = 1,485). In-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared for BMS (n = 282) and DES (n = 1,203) patients, using propensity stratification to adjust for differences in potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Most patient characteristics were similar for the two groups, but BMS patients were more likely to have been treated in the setting of ST elevation MI, whereas DES patients had more bifurcation lesions, smaller vessels, and longer total stent lengths. In risk-adjusted analyses, the composite endpoint of 1-year death, MI or TLR was similar for BMS and DES (standardized rate: 11.9% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.10). DES was associated with a 62% reduction in the risk of TLR, although the absolute difference in event rates was small (standardized rates 4.6% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Among relatively unselected patients undergoing PCI of large native coronary arteries, use of DES was associated with a modest reduction in rates of TLR, with a neutral effect on other ischemic endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Hospitales , Metales , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Stents , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 75(2): 179-86, 2010 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19877267

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V 4.0 mm stent for the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: In the SPIRIT III trial, the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES), compared with the TAXUS EXPRESS(2) paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in 2.5-3.75 mm diameter coronary arteries, resulted in reduced angiographic late loss (LL), noninferior rates of target vessel failure (TVF), and fewer major adverse cardiac events (MACE). METHODS: The SPIRIT III 4.0 mm registry was a concurrent arm of the SPIRIT III trial consisting of 69 nonrandomized patients with lesions

Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Estenosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Everolimus , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Trombosis/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 159(1): 102-111.e11, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31014667

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample databases to identify TAVR procedures performed between January 2012 and September 2015 in the United States. Patients were propensity matched (within the strata of overt and no bleeding) on the likelihood of receiving RBC transfusion, and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in the matched cohort. RESULTS: Among 46,710 TAVR procedures performed during the study period, rates of RBC transfusion were 17.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.1%-18.5%). RBC transfusion rates decreased significantly from 29.5% during the first quarter of 2012 to 10.8% during the third quarter of 2015 (P < .001). Older age, female sex, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, anemia, coagulopathy, and fluid/electrolyte disorders were associated with increased odds, whereas elective admission, obesity, and endovascular access were associated with decreased odds of RBC transfusion. In the propensity-matched cohort (7995 pairs with and without RBC transfusion), RBC transfusion was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality, infection, and transient ischemic attack/stroke in patients without bleeding (odds ratio [OR]Mortality, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.31-4.02; ORInfection, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.03-4.39; ORTransient ischemic attack/Stroke, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.52-7.45), but not in those with overt bleeding (ORMortality, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68-1.48; ORInfection, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.45-1.45; ORTransient ischemic attack/Stroke, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.74-1.85); Pinteraction < .05 for all. CONCLUSIONS: RBC transfusion is associated with worse clinical outcomes in TAVR patients without bleeding, but not in those with overt bleeding. The utility and optimal threshold for RBC transfusion in TAVR patients, especially among those with overt bleeding, warrants further prospective investigation.

10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 107(6): 1791-1798, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30552884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between postprocedural packed red blood cell transfusion and morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 429 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Propensity-score adjusted multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to determine the association of packed red blood cell transfusion with the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 30 days and in hospital, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Patients receiving transfusions had a higher 30-day and in-hospital incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke when compared with patients who did not receive transfusions (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 4.07, p = 0.045; and hazard ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 5.41, p = 0.025, respectively). Postprocedural transfusion was independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.21 to 5.80, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Packed red blood cell transfusion for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with an increased incidence of adverse outcomes during hospitalization and at 30-day and 1-year follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Am Heart J ; 155(4): 654-60, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18371472

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine correlates of acute/subacute coronary stent thrombosis among unselected patients treated in the era of routine dual antiplatelet therapy and specifically to investigate the influence of prophylactic administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb-IIIa) inhibitors and use of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine on the development of coronary stent thrombosis (ST). BACKGROUND: Because of a relative infrequency of ST events and relatively uniform practice patterns within randomized trials, previous studies have had a limited ability to address whether the use of different antiplatelet regimens at the time of coronary stenting is associated with differences in ST. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, case-control study to evaluate clinical, angiographic, and pharmacologic/procedural correlates of ST. Between 1996 and 2000, all cases of angiographically-confirmed ST (n = 145) among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were identified from 10 participating clinical sites and were matched with a control without ST randomly selected from the same institution. RESULTS: Multivariable conditional logistic regression identified higher pre-procedure platelet count, stenting for acute myocardial infarction, use of a coil or self-expanding stent, and overt angiographic thrombus prior to the procedure, as independent predictors of ST (all P < .05). After adjusting for these factors, the use of clopidogrel (vs ticlopidine) was independently associated with an increased risk of ST (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-4.1, P = .04). The use of prophylactic glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was not associated with reduced ST in the overall analysis, but appeared to confer some protection against ST within the first 24 hours post procedure (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2-1.1] for ST during first day, OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.7-4.3] for ST on subsequent days). CONCLUSION: Both biologic and pharmacologic factors are independently associated with acute/subacute ST. The association between clopidogrel use (vs ticlopidine) and increased ST in this analysis requires confirmation in adequately powered clinical trials and suggests a potential role for newer and more potent antiplatelet agents.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Complejo GPIIb-IIIa de Glicoproteína Plaquetaria/antagonistas & inhibidores , Stents/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Clopidogrel , Angiografía Coronaria , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuento de Plaquetas , Factores de Riesgo , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 122(12): 2112-2119, 2018 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30292332

RESUMEN

Infective endocarditis (IE) of prosthetic or bioprosthetic heart valves is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data on the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of IE after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the United States are limited. We used the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases to determine the incidence of early IE after TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the US. Clinical characteristics, independent predictors, and outcomes of patients with IE post-TAVI were examined. In 29,306 TAVI and 66,077 SAVR patients, the incidence rates of early IE were 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5% to 1.9%) and 2.5% (95% CI 2.3% to 2.9%) per person-year, respectively. In a propensity-matched cohort of 15,138 TAVI and 15,030 SAVR patients (weighted), there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of IE (1.7% [95% CI 1.4% to 2.0%] vs 1.9% [95% CI 1.6% to 2.2%] per person-year, log-rank p = 0.29) or in the median (interquartile range) time to IE (91 [48 to 146] vs 92 [61 to 214] days, p = 0.13). Staphylococcus (30.4%), Streptococcus (29.9%), and Enterococcus (20.5%) were the most common causative organisms of IE post-TAVI. Younger age, history of heart failure, need for permanent pacemaker placement, cardiac arrest, major bleeding, and sepsis during the index TAVI hospitalization were independently associated with an increased risk of IE. In-hospital mortality rate during readmission for IE was 15.6%. In conclusion, in a nationally representative cohort of TAVI patients in the US, the incidence rate of early IE was 1.7% per person-year. Age, co-morbid conditions, invasive procedures, and complications during the index hospitalization were associated with incident IE post-TAVI.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endocarditis/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 25(15): 1577-1584, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30086685

RESUMEN

Background Referral rates and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation have not been evaluated in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement or compared with surgical aortic valve replacement. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 488 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( n = 199) and surgical aortic valve replacement ( n = 289) from a university-based statewide transcatheter aortic valve replacement/surgical aortic valve replacement program during 2015-2017. Cardiac rehabilitation consisted of supervised exercise, diet education, and stress and depression management. We compared changes from baseline in exercise duration and intensity during cardiac rehabilitation sessions, quality-of-life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey), and psychosocial measures (anxiety, depression, mood, social support, and diet) between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement patients using t-test and chi-square analyses. Results Of 488 patients, cardiac rehabilitation referral rates were similar at 41% (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 81/199 versus surgical aortic valve replacement 117/289), but enrollment rates were lower in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (27/199, 14%) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (102/289, 35%, p < 0.01). Among eligible patients, cardiac rehabilitation completion rates were lower in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (12%) than surgical aortic valve replacement (32%). Exercise intensity during cardiac rehabilitation improved in both groups in a similar fashion (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.03 ± 1.09 versus surgical aortic valve replacement 1.34 ± 1.15 metabolic equivalents), but increase in exercise duration was higher in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients versus surgical aortic valve replacement patients (14.52 ± 6.42 versus 10.67 ± 8.38 min, p = 0.02). Improvement in physical composite score was higher in surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (8.72 ± 7.87 versus 2.36 ± 7.6, p = 0.02) while improvement in mental composite score was higher in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (8.19 ± 8.50) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (1.18 ± 7.23, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the two groups in improvement in psychosocial measures. Conclusion Cardiac rehabilitation enrollment was low in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients versus surgical aortic valve replacement patients despite similar referral rates. Improvement in functional and quality-of-life performance was achieved in both transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. Future studies should address obstacles for enrollment of transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/rehabilitación , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/rehabilitación , Anciano , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Rehabilitación Cardiaca/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Am J Cardiol ; 122(2): 185-191, 2018 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29751953

RESUMEN

Improved procedural techniques and process of care initiatives have decreased length of stay (LOS) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there remains a subset of patients who continue to require longer LOS. We used the 2005 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample databases to identify all hospitalizations for PPCI for STEMI in patients ≥18 years of age. Hospitalizations in which patients were discharged home alive were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to examine temporal trends in LOS and to identify independent predictors of longer LOS (LOS >3 days). In 678,545 hospitalizations for PPCI for STEMI, mean ± standard error of mean LOS decreased significantly from 3.3 (±0.04) days to 2.7 (±0.02) days (ptrend<0.001). There was a marked decrease in the proportion of STEMI hospitalizations with LOS >3 days from 31.9% in 2005 to 16.9% in 2014 (p<0.001). Patient demographics, co-morbidities, hospital region, use of mechanical circulatory support, and periprocedural complications were independently associated with longer LOS. In conclusion, LOS for hospitalizations for PPCI for STEMI has decreased significantly over time. Targeting strategies to reduce procedure-related risk may translate into shorter LOS.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Anciano , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(12): 1175-1185, 2018 06 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929641

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine outcomes and identify independent predictors of mortality among patients undergoing urgent/emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Data on urgent/emergent TAVR as a rescue therapy for decompensated severe aortic stenosis (AS) are limited. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/ACC TVT) Registry linked with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims was used to identify patients who underwent urgent/emergent versus elective TAVR between November 2011 and June 2016. Outcomes assessed were device success rate, in-hospital major adverse events, and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Independent predictors of mortality after urgent/emergent TAVR were examined. RESULTS: Of 40,042 patients who underwent TAVR, 3,952 (9.9%) were urgent/emergent (median STS PROM score 11.8 [interquartile range: 7.6 to 17.9]). Device success rate was statistically lower, but not clinically different after urgent/emergent versus elective TAVR (92.6% vs. 93.7%; p = 0.007). Rates of major and/or life-threatening bleeding, major vascular complications, myocardial infarction, stroke, new permanent pacemaker placement, conversion to SAVR, and paravalvular regurgitation were similar between the 2 groups. Compared with elective TAVR, patients undergoing urgent/emergent TAVR had higher rates of acute kidney injury and/or new dialysis (8.2% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (8.7% vs. 4.3%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.48), and 1-year mortality (29.1% vs. 17.5%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.31). In patients undergoing urgent/emergent TAVR, non-femoral access and cardiopulmonary bypass were associated with increased risk, whereas use of balloon-expandable valve was associated with decreased risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent/emergent TAVR is feasible with acceptable outcomes and may be a reasonable option in a selected group of patients with severe AS.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
16.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(1)2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28034845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Readmissions after cardiac procedures are common and contribute to increased healthcare utilization and costs. Data on 30-day readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05 and 35.06) between January and November 2013 who survived the index hospitalization were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Incidence, predictors, causes, and costs of 30-day readmissions were analyzed. Of 12 221 TAVR patients, 2188 (17.9%) were readmitted within 30 days. Length of stay >5 days during index hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.73), acute kidney injury (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05-1.44), >4 Elixhauser comorbidities (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.46), transapical TAVR (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.39), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39), chronic lung disease (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34) were independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Readmissions were because of noncardiac causes in 61.8% of cases and because of cardiac causes in 38.2% of cases. Respiratory (14.7%), infections (12.8%), bleeding (7.6%), and peripheral vascular disease (4.3%) were the most common noncardiac causes, whereas heart failure (22.5%) and arrhythmias (6.6%) were the most common cardiac causes of readmission. Median length of stay and cost of readmissions were 4 days (interquartile range, 2-7 days) and $8302 (interquartile range, $5229-16 021), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day readmissions after TAVR are frequent and are related to baseline comorbidities, TAVR access site, and post-procedure complications. Awareness of these predictors can help identify and target high-risk patients for interventions to reduce readmissions and costs.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/economía , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
17.
JAMA Cardiol ; 2(7): 732-741, 2017 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28494061

RESUMEN

Importance: With the approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk, TAVR volume is projected to increase exponentially in the United States. The 30-day readmission rate for TAVR was recently reported at 17.9%. The association between institutional TAVR volume and the 30-day readmission metric has not been examined. Objective: To assess the association between hospital TAVR volume and 30-day readmission. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this observational study, we used the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitals with established TAVR programs (performing at least 5 TAVRs in the first quarter of 2014). Based on annual TAVR volume, hospitals were classified as low (<50), medium (≥50 to <100), and high (≥100) volume. Rates, causes, and costs of 30-day readmissions were compared between low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals. Data were analyzed from November to December 2016. Exposure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day readmissions. Results: Of 129 hospitals included in this study, 20 (15.5%) were categorized as low volume, 47 (36.4%) as medium volume, and 62 (48.1%) as high volume. Of 16 252 index TAVR procedures, 663 (4.1%), 3067 (18.9%), and 12 522 (77.0%) were performed at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Thirty-day readmission rates were significantly lower in high-volume compared with medium-volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85; P < .001) and low-volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92; P = .007) hospitals. Noncardiac readmissions were more common in low-volume hospitals (65.6% vs 60.6% in high-volume hospitals), whereas cardiac readmissions were more common in high-volume hospitals (39.4% vs 34.4% in low-volume hospitals). There were no significant differences in length of stay and costs per readmission among the 3 groups (mean [SD], 5.5 [5.0] days vs 5.9 [7.5] days vs 6.0 [5.8] days; P = .74, and $13 886 [18 333] vs $14 135 [17 939] vs $13 432 [15 725]; P = .63, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: We report for the first time, to our knowledge, an inverse association between hospital TAVR volume and 30-day readmissions. Lower readmission at higher-volume hospitals was associated with significantly lower cost to the health care system.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estados Unidos
20.
R I Med J (2013) ; 97(2): 38-41, 2014 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24494213

RESUMEN

In patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) improves survival, quality of life, and functional status compared with medical therapy. Based on the results of the randomized PARTNER Trial, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) using the Edwards Sapien balloon expandable valve is now available in the United States for patients who are either inoperable due to anatomic concerns or severe medical co-morbidities, or as an alternative in patients considered high risk for SAVR. Fifty-six patients have been treated with TAVR at Rhode Island Hospital from March 2012 through October 2013 with similar outcomes to The PARTNER Trial and several large European registries. Second- generation valves and lower profile delivery systems designed to reduce the incidence of vascular complications, stroke, and perivalvular leak; and extension of TAVR to intermediate risk surgical patients, are under investigation.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA