FK506 rescues peripheral nerve allografts in acute rejection.

This study investigated the ability of the immunosuppressant FK506 to reverse nerve allograft rejection in progress. Eighty-four Buffalo rats received posterior tibial nerve grafts from either Lewis or Buffalo donor animals. Allografts were left untreated for either 7, 10, or 14 days before receiving daily subcutaneous FK506 injections (2 mg/kg). Time-matched control animals received either an isograft, an allograft with continuous FK506, or an allograft with no postoperative FK506 therapy. All animals underwent weekly evaluation of nerve function by walking track analysis. Experimental group animals were sacrificed either immediately prior to initiation of FK506 therapy (days 7, 10, or 14), after 2 weeks of immunosuppressive treatment, or 8 weeks postsurgery. Histomorphometric analysis, consisting of measurements of total number of nerve fibers, neural density, and percent of neural debris, demonstrated a statistically significant increase in regeneration in the isograft group relative to the untreated allograft group within 28 days of transplantation. Grafts harvested from animals receiving 2 weeks of FK506 after 7 or 10 days of rejection were histomorphometrically similar to time-matched isografts. By contrast, grafts from animals receiving 2 weeks of FK506 following 14 days without therapy resembled untreated allografts and demonstrated significant histomorphometric differences from isografts at the corresponding time point. Analysis of walking track data confirmed that relative to untreated allografts, functional recovery was hastened in animals receiving an isograft, or allograft treated with FK506. This study demonstrated that when started within 10 days of graft placement, FK506 could reverse nerve allograft rejection in rats evaluated following 2 weeks of treatment.

Rat-strain differences in recovery following peripheral-nerve allotransplantation.

The rat model is commonly utilized in peripheral nerve research. Due to the short length of the rat limb and the animal's inherent neuroregenerative capacity, the timing of assessment of nerve regeneration is critical, and significant differences between groups can be lost if assessment is done too late. Additionally, the comparison of data from different rat-strain combinations has been questioned. This study better defines the time course of recovery after peripheral nerve grafting, and examines differences between Buffalo (BUF), Lewis (LEW), and ACI rats. Tibial-nerve isografts and allografts were performed and harvested at 6, 8, 10, or 14 weeks. Histomorphometry documented a statistically significant difference in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination at 10 weeks. No strain differences in graft rejection were noted. The optimal time to assess for histomorphometric differences in the ACI/LEW and LEW/LEW combination is at 10 weeks postoperatively.

Safe injection of cultured schwann cells into peripheral nerve allografts.

The effects of cultured host Schwann cells on axonal regeneration in peripheral nerve allografts were studied. Fischer rats served as recipient animals and Buffalo rats provided nerve allografts. Animals were randomized into 9 groups. Rats receiving tibial nerve isografts were left untreated (group I), or injected with isogeneic Fischer Schwann cells (group II) or placebo suspension (group III). Allografts obtained from Buffalo rats were left untreated (group IV), or received isogeneic Fischer Schwann cells (group V), 2 mg/kg Cyclosporin A and Fischer Schwann cells (group VI), 5 mg/kg Cyclosporin A (group VII), or 5 mg/kg Cyclosporin A with Schwann cells (group VIII). No Schwann cell tumors were identified 4 or 8 weeks postoperatively. Group IX animals, harvested 3 days postoperatively, demonstrated no evidence of injection injury. Schwann cells modestly improved axonal regeneration in both isografts and allografts and may have a clinical role in the treatment of peripheral nerve allografts.