An Analgesic Technique for Orogastric Tube Insertion in Newborns: DOLATSONG, a Randomized Multicentric Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Gastric tube insertion is necessary to support early enteral feeding of newborns during their neonatal intensive care stay. This frequent and invasive procedure is known to be painful. Very few analgesic techniques (sweet solutions, sucking, swaddling, and skin-to-skin contact) are available to reduce the pain caused by orogastric tube insertion procedure. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a new orogastric tube insertion technique modifies the pain response in newborns, we hypothesize that inserting an orogastric tube through the nipple of a bottle reduces pain caused by this procedure. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentered and open label study. SETTINGS: Three neonatal intensive care units in France (2 level 3 units and 1 level 2B). PARTICIPANTS: Full-term or premature newborns at 32 weeks of gestation or more, postnatal age between 48 hours and 21 days, not ventilated and requiring enteral feeding, were randomized into 2 groups: usual technique (n = 36) and experimental technique (n = 35). METHODS: Our experimental technique was to insert the orogastric tube through a modified nipple of a bottle. This method was compared with the usual technique of inserting the tube directly into the newborn's mouth without a support to guide it accompanied by a nipple encouraging sucking with a nonnutritive solution. An association of nonnutritive sucking and orally administered 30% glucose was given to all children for analgesic purposes. Pain during the orogastric tube insertion was assessed on video recordings by 2 independent experts, using a heteroassessment behavioral scale for pain (DAN-Douleur Aiguë du Nouveau-né; APN-Acute Pain in Newborns). The primary outcome was an Acute Pain in Newborns score of less than 3 at the time of the procedure. Comparisons were made using Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test. Factors associated with an Acute Pain in Newborns score of 3 and greater were explored using univariable and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: All but 1 video recording in each group were analyzed. Among the 34 neonates in the experimental group, 71.4% (95% CI: [53.7-85.4]) had an Acute Pain in Newborns score of less than 3 during orogastric tube insertion versus 41% (95% CI: [27.9-61.9]) in the control group (P = .031). Gagging was frequent and nonsignificantly different between the 2 groups (69% in the control group, 51% in the experimental group, P = .13). In multivariable analysis, the experimental technique was an independent factor of pain prevention compared with the usual technique (odds ratio = 0.21 [0.06-0.71], P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a simple, inexpensive, and feasible technique of orogastric tube insertion through the nipple of a bottle limits pain associated with this procedure in newborns.

Premedication for neonatal endotracheal intubation: results from the epidemiology of procedural pain in neonates study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency and nature of premedications used prior to neonatal endotracheal intubation; to confront observed practice with current recommendations; and to identify risk factors for the absence of premedication. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Data concerning intubations were collected prospectively at the bedside as part of an observational study collecting around-the-clock data on all painful or stressful procedures performed in neonates during the first 14 days of their admission to 13 tertiary care units in the region of Paris, France, between 2005 and 2006. INTERVENTION: Observational study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Specific premedication prior to endotracheal intubation was assessed. Ninety one intubations carried out on the same number of patients were analyzed. The specific premedication rate was 56% and included mostly opioids (67%) and midazolam (53%). Compared with recent guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics, used premedications could be classified as "preferred" (12%), "acceptable" (18%), "not recommended" (27%), and "not described" (43%). In univariate analysis, infants without a specific premedication compared with others were younger at the time of intubation (median age: 0.7 vs. 2.0 days), displayed significantly more frequent spontaneous breathing at the time of intubation (31% vs. 12%) and a higher percentage of analgesia for all other painful procedures (median values: 16% vs. 6%). In multivariate analysis, no factor remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication use prior to neonatal intubation was not systematically used and when used it was most frequently inconsistent with recent recommendations. No patient- or center-related independent risk factor for the absence of premedication was identified in this study.

Cognitive Training for Visuospatial Processing in Children Aged 5½ to 6 Years Born Very Preterm With Working Memory Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Compared with term-born peers, children born very preterm generally perform poorly in executive functions, particularly in working memory and inhibition. By taking advantage of neuroplasticity, computerized cognitive training of working memory in those children could improve visuospatial processing by boosting visual inhibition via working memory. Objective: To evaluate the long-term effect of cognitive working memory training on visuospatial processing in children aged 5½ to 6 years born very preterm who have working memory impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter (18 French university hospitals), open-label randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel groups (EPIREMED) was conducted from November 2016 to April 2018, with the last follow-up during August 2019. Eligible children from the EPIPAGE 2 cohort were aged 5½ to 6 years, were born between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation, and had a global intelligence quotient greater than 70 and a working memory index less than 85. Data were analyzed from February to December 2020. Intervention: Children were randomized 1:1 to standard care management and a working memory cognitive training program (Cogmed software) for 8 weeks (25 sessions) (intervention) or to standard management (control). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the visuospatial index score from the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 4th Edition. Secondary outcomes were working memory, intellectual functioning, executive and attention processes, language skills, behavior, quality of life, and schooling. Neurobehavioral assessments were performed at inclusion and after finishing training at 6 months (intermeditate assessment; secondary outcomes) and at 16 months (final assessment; primary outcome). Results: There were 169 children randomized, with a mean (SD) age of 5 years 11 months (2 months); 91 (54%) were female. Of the participants, 84 were in the intervention group (57 of whom [68%] completed at least 15 cognitive training sessions) and 85 were in the control group. The posttraining visuospatial index score was not different between groups at a mean (SD) of 3.0 (1.8) months (difference, -0.6 points; 95% CI, -4.7 to 3.5 points) or 12.9 (2.6) months (difference, 0.1 points; 95% CI, -5.4 to 5.1 points). The working memory index score in the intervention group significantly improved from baseline at the intermediate time point (difference, 4.7 points; 95% CI, 1.2-8.1 points), but this improvement was not maintained at the final assessment. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no lasting effect of a cognitive training program on visuospatial processing in children aged 5½ to 6 years with working memory disorders who were born very preterm. The findings suggest that this training has limited long-term benefits for improving executive function. Transient benefits seemed to be associated with the developmental state of executive functions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02757794.

Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units.

CONTEXT: Effective strategies to improve pain management in neonates require a clear understanding of the epidemiology and management of procedural pain. OBJECTIVE: To report epidemiological data on neonatal pain collected from a geographically defined region, based on direct bedside observation of neonates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Between September 2005 and January 2006, data on all painful and stressful procedures and corresponding analgesic therapy from the first 14 days of admission were prospectively collected within a 6-week period from 430 neonates admitted to tertiary care centers in the Paris region of France (11.3 millions inhabitants) for the Epidemiology of Procedural Pain in Neonates (EPIPPAIN) study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of procedures considered painful or stressful by health personnel and corresponding analgesic therapy. RESULTS: The mean (SD) gestational age and intensive care unit stay were 33.0 (4.6) weeks and 8.4 (4.6) calendar days, respectively. Neonates experienced 60,969 first-attempt procedures, with 42,413 (69.6%) painful and 18,556 (30.4%) stressful procedures; 11,546 supplemental attempts were performed during procedures including 10,366 (89.8%) for painful and 1180 (10.2%) for stressful procedures. Each neonate experienced a median of 115 (range, 4-613) procedures during the study period and 16 (range, 0-62) procedures per day of hospitalization. Of these, each neonate experienced a median of 75 (range, 3-364) painful procedures during the study period and 10 (range, 0-51) painful procedures per day of hospitalization. Of the 42,413 painful procedures, 2.1% were performed with pharmacological-only therapy; 18.2% with nonpharmacological-only interventions, 20.8% with pharmacological, nonpharmacological, or both types of therapy; and 79.2% without specific analgesia, and 34.2% were performed while the neonate was receiving concurrent analgesic or anesthetic infusions for other reasons. Prematurity, category of procedure, parental presence, surgery, daytime, and day of procedure after the first day of admission were associated with greater use of specific preprocedural analgesia, whereas mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation and administration of nonspecific concurrent analgesia were associated with lower use of specific preprocedural analgesia. CONCLUSION: During neonatal intensive care in the Paris region, large numbers of painful and stressful procedures were performed, the majority of which were not accompanied by analgesia.

Effectiveness and efficiency of tele-expertise for improving access to retinopathy screening among 351 neonates in a secondary care center: An observational, controlled before-after study.

In France, secondary care hospitals encounter difficulties to adhere to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening guidelines. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness and efficacy of a tele-expertise program for ROP screening in neonatal intensive care units without on-site ophthalmologists. We evaluated the impact of a tele-expertise program funded by the Paris Region Health Authority in a secondary care center general hospital of the Paris Region (CHSF), where there was previously no on-site ophthalmologist. We performed an observational, controlled before-after study, with a university tertiary care center with on-site ophthalmologists (Port-Royal) as the control group. Recruitment and data collection for both periods took place from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 31 2012, and from 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2015. The primary endpoint was the percentage of compliance with screening guidelines, secondary endpoints included pain scores and costs. Over the two periods, at total of 351 infants were recruited in the CHSF. Implementation of the tele-expertise resulted in an absolute +57.3% increase in the proportion of examinations realized in accordance with guidelines (3.8% during the "before" period and 61.1% during the "after" period, p<0.001). As compared with the control group, the proportion of infants appropriately screened improved (57.5% versus 43.1%, p = 0.002); median pain score on the acute pain rating scale for neonates during examination was significantly higher (median score 5.5/10, range [2.5-5.7] versus 2.0/10, range [1.0-3.1], p = 0.002). Screening rates in the control group remained unchanged. The average cost per examination increased from €337 in the "before" period to €353 in the "after period" in the tele-expertise group. The implementation of tele-expertise for ROP screening in the CHSF medical center resulted in a major improvement of access to care with a small cost increase. The issue of pain control during examination with tele-expertise should be further addressed.

Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke related to carotid artery occlusion.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke remains speculative. It is however widely accepted that the aetiology is multifactorial, involving various maternal, placental, foetal and neonatal risk factors. A resulting thromboembolic process is hypothesized and the placenta identified as the most plausible source. An arteriopathy, as observed in a significant proportion of childhood ischemic stroke, is thought to be rare. METHODS: We report here five cases of perinatal stroke that differ from the vast majority by documented carotid occlusion, and add eleven other similar cases from the literature. RESULTS: In the majority, an intraluminal thrombus of placental origin is the most probable hypothesis, while in the remaining ones, one can reasonably presume a direct vessel wall injury related to a traumatic delivery, yet generally unproven by imaging. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that most of these cases share similar pathophysiology with the more common perinatal arterial ischemic stroke but differ by a persistent identified thrombus in the carotid artery at the time of first imaging, leading to a more severe and extended ischemic damage responsible for an adverse neurological outcome.

Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.

IMPORTANCE: Up-to-date estimates of the health outcomes of preterm children are needed for assessing perinatal care, informing parents, making decisions about care, and providing evidence for clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To determine survival and neonatal morbidity of infants born from 22 through 34 completed weeks' gestation in France in 2011 and compare these outcomes with a comparable cohort in 1997. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The EPIPAGE-2 study is a national, prospective, population-based cohort study conducted in all maternity and neonatal units in France in 2011. A total of 2205 births (stillbirths and live births) and terminations of pregnancy at 22 through 26 weeks' gestation, 3257 at 27 through 31 weeks, and 1234 at 32 through 34 weeks were studied. Cohort data were collected from January 1 through December 31, 1997, and from March 28 through December 31, 2011. Analyses for 1997 were run for the entire year and then separately for April to December; the rates for survival and morbidities did not differ. Data are therefore presented for the whole year in 1997 and the 8-month and 6-month periods in 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival to discharge and survival without any of the following adverse outcomes: grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity (stage 3 or higher), or necrotizing enterocolitis (stages 2-3). RESULTS: A total of 0.7% of infants born before 24 weeks' gestation survived to discharge: 31.2% of those born at 24 weeks, 59.1% at 25 weeks, and 75.3% at 26 weeks. Survival rates were 93.6% at 27 through 31 weeks and 98.9% at 32 through 34 weeks. Infants discharged home without severe neonatal morbidity represented 0% at 23 weeks, 11.6% at 24 weeks, 30.0% at 25 weeks, 47.5% at 26 weeks, 81.3% at 27 through 31 weeks, and 96.8% at 32 through 34 weeks. Compared with 1997, the proportion of infants surviving without severe morbidity in 2011 increased by 14.4% (P < .001) at 25 through 29 weeks and 6% (P < .001) at 30 through 31 weeks but did not change appreciably for those born at less than 25 weeks. The rates of antenatal corticosteroid use, induced preterm deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and surfactant use increased significantly in all gestational-age groups, except at 22 through 23 weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The substantial improvement in survival in France for newborns born at 25 through 31 weeks' gestation was accompanied by an important reduction in severe morbidity, but survival remained rare before 25 weeks. Although improvement in survival at extremely low gestational age may be possible, its effect on long-term outcomes requires further studies. The long-term results of the EPIPAGE-2 study will be informative in this regard.

Does neonatal pain management in intensive care units differ between night and day? An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether analgesic use for painful procedures performed in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) differs during nights and days and during each of the 6 h period of the day. DESIGN: Conducted as part of the prospective observational Epidemiology of Painful Procedures in Neonates study which was designed to collect in real time and around-the-clock bedside data on all painful or stressful procedures. SETTING: 13 NICUs and paediatric intensive care units in the Paris Region, France. PARTICIPANTS: All 430 neonates admitted to the participating units during a 6-week period between September 2005 and January 2006. DATA COLLECTION: During the first 14 days of admission, data were collected on all painful procedures and analgesic therapy. The five most frequent procedures representing 38 012 of all 42 413 (90%) painful procedures were analysed. INTERVENTION: Observational study. MAIN OUTCOME ASSESSMENT: We compared the use of specific analgesic for procedures performed during each of the 6 h period of a day: morning (7:00 to 12:59), afternoon, early night and late night and during daytime (morning+afternoon) and night-time (early night+late night). RESULTS: 7724 of 38 012 (20.3%) painful procedures were carried out with a specific analgesic treatment. For morning, afternoon, early night and late night, respectively, the use of analgesic was 25.8%, 18.9%, 18.3% and 18%. The relative reduction of analgesia was 18.3%, p<0.01, between daytime and night-time and 28.8%, p<0.001, between morning and the rest of the day. Parental presence, nurses on 8 h shifts and written protocols for analgesia were associated with a decrease in this difference. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial differences in the use of analgesics around-the-clock may be questioned on quality of care grounds.