Correlation between in vivo toxicity and preclinical in vitro parameters for the immunotoxin anti-B4-blocked ricin.

Anti-B4-blocked ricin (Anti-B4-bR) is an immunotoxin comprised of the anti-B4 monoclonal antibody and the protein toxin, "blocked ricin." In blocked ricin, the galactose-binding sites of the ricin B-chain which mediate nonspecific binding to cells are blocked by covalently linked affinity ligands prepared from N-linked oligosaccharides of fetuin. Blocked ricin consists of two species, one with two covalently attached ligands and one with three covalently attached ligands. In a Phase I dose escalation clinical trial, Anti-B4-bR was administered to patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell neoplasms by 7-day continuous infusion. Although several different lots of Anti-B4-bR had similar IC37 values as determined by in vitro cytotoxicity testing on cultured human cell lines, these lots differed in their in vivo toxicity when administered to patients. Thus, IC37 values alone were not sufficient to predict in vivo toxicity. We report that the degree of cell kill at concentrations of drug that saturate the B4 antigen and murine 50% lethal dose values provide additional parameters that may be predictive of in vivo cytotoxicity. Furthermore, we performed detailed cytotoxicity studies of the ricin species containing two and three covalently attached ligands, respectively. In vitro cytotoxicity testing using these samples revealed that Anti-B4-bR made with blocked ricin containing two covalently attached ligands is capable of depleting five logs of target cells in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay, while Anti-B4-bR comprised of blocked ricin with three ligands can deplete only one log of cells. Log cell kill at antigen saturating concentration, murine 50% lethal dose and biochemical analysis of the composition of blocked ricin are therefore important considerations for establishing the potential efficacy and safety of Anti-B4-bR.

Monoclonal antibody-based therapies for hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To review recent advances in the development and clinical roles of monoclonal antibody (MoAb)-based therapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. DESIGN: A search of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT was conducted to identify relevant publications. The bibliographies of these references also were used to identify articles and abstracts. These references were then reviewed. RESULTS: In the two decades since the first patient was treated with MoAb therapy, there have been significant advances in the biology, pharmacology, and clinical application of MoAb-based therapies. Three distinct fields of research have emerged: unconjugated MoAbs, immunotoxin-conjugated MoAbs (ITs), and radionuclide-conjugated MoAbs (RICs). The unconjugated MoAbs are less toxic but depend on host mechanisms to mediate cytotoxicity. The ITs carry a potent toxin, although at the cost of a narrow therapeutic index that may limit clinical use. The RICs offer significant potency, even in refractory disease, but their complexity may limit their use to large cancer centers. The current challenges in the development of MoAb-based therapies are to identify the proper target antigens, contend with bulk disease in which penetration may be limited, and choose the optimal clinical settings for their use, such as the minimal residual disease state or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Although significant research is still needed, MoAb-based therapies promise to offer new options for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies.

Phase II study of rituximab in combination with chop chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the combination of the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody Rituxan (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated advanced aggressive B-cell NHL received six infusions of Rituxan (375 mg/m2 per dose) on day 1 of each cycle in combination with six doses of CHOP chemotherapy given on day 3 of each cycle. RESULTS: The ORR by investigator assessment confirmed by the sponsor was 94% (31 of 33 patients). Twenty patients experienced a complete response (CR) (61%), 11 patients had a partial response (PR) (33%), and two patients were classified as having progressive disease. In the 18 patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score > or = 2, the combination of Rituxan plus CHOP achieved an ORR of 89% and CR of 56%. The median duration of response and time to progression had not been reached after a median observation time of 26 months. Twenty-nine of 31 responding patients remained in remission during this follow-up period, including 15 of 16 patients with an IPI score > or = 2. The most frequent adverse events attributed to Rituxan were fever and chills, primarily during the first infusion. Rituxan did not seem to compromise the ability of patients to tolerate CHOP; all patients completed the entire six courses of the combination. The bcl-2 translocation of blood or bone marrow was positive at baseline in 13 patients; 11 patients had follow-up specimens obtained (eight CR, three PR), and all had a negative bcl-2 status after therapy. Only one patient has reconverted to bcl-2 positivity, and all patients remain in clinical remission. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Rituxan chimeric anti-CD20 antibody in combination with standard-dose CHOP in the treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The clinical responses are at least comparable to those achieved with CHOP alone with no significant added toxicity. The presence or absence of the bcl-2 translocation did not affect the ability of patients to achieve a CR with this regimen. The ability to achieve sustained remissions in patients with an IPI score > or = 2 warrants further investigation with a randomized study.

Adjuvant therapy of stage III and IV malignant melanoma using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: To evaluate granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as surgical adjuvant therapy in patients with malignant melanoma who are at high risk of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight assessable patients with stage III or IV melanoma were treated in a phase II trial with long-term, chronic, intermittent GM-CSF after surgical resection of disease. Patients with stage III disease were required to have more than four positive nodes or a more than 3-cm mass. All patients were rendered clinically disease-free by surgery before enrollment. The GM-CSF was administered subcutaneously in 28-day cycles, such that a dose of 125 microg/m(2) was delivered daily for 14 days followed by 14 days of rest. Treatment cycles continued for 1 year or until disease recurrence. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Overall and disease-free survival were significantly prolonged in patients who received GM-CSF compared with matched historical controls. The median survival duration was 37.5 months in the study patients versus 12.2 months in the matched controls (P <.001). GM-CSF was well tolerated; only one subject discontinued drug due to an adverse event (grade 2 injection site reaction). CONCLUSION: GM-CSF may provide an antitumor effect that prolongs survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage III and IV melanoma who are clinically disease-free. These results support institution of a prospective, randomized clinical trial to definitively determine the value of surgical adjuvant therapy with GM-CSF in such patients.

Anti-B4-blocked ricin: a phase I trial of 7-day continuous infusion in patients with B-cell neoplasms.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the B-cell-restricted immunotoxin anti-B4-blocked ricin (anti-B4-bR) when it is administered by 7-day continuous infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell neoplasms (26 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], four chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], four acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]) received 7-day continuous infusion anti-B4-bR. Successive cohorts of at least three patients were treated at doses of 10 to 70 micrograms/kg/d for 7 days with the dose increased by 10 micrograms/kg/d for each cohort. The initial three cohorts of patients (10, 20, and 30 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) also received a bolus infusion of 20 micrograms/kg before beginning the continuous infusion. RESULTS: The MTD was reached at 50 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days. The DLTs were National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) grade IV reversible increases in AST and ALT, and grade IV decreases in platelet counts. Adverse reactions included fevers, nausea, headaches, myalgias, hypoalbuminemia, dyspnea, edema, and capillary leak syndrome. Potentially therapeutic serum levels of anti-B4-bR could be sustained for 4 days in patients treated at the MTD. Two complete responses (CRs), three partial responses (PRs), and 11 transient responses (TRs) were observed. CONCLUSION: Anti-B4-bR can be administered safely by 7-day continuous infusion with tolerable, reversible toxicities to patients with relapsed B-cell neoplasms. Although occasional responses were seen, future trials will use anti-B4-bR in patients with lower tumor burdens to circumvent the obstacle of immunotoxin delivery to bulk disease.

Long-term update of a phase II study of rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The present study aimed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of chimeric anti-CD 20 antibody rituxan (rituximab, Biogen IDEC, San Diego, CA, USA; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty-three patients with previously untreated aggressive B-cell NHL received six infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) per dose) on day 1 of each cycle of CHOP chemotherapy, given on day 3 of each cycle of therapy. Currently, the patients now have a median follow-up of 63 months (range 34 - 82 months). The overall response (OR) rate was 94% and the complete response (CR) rate was 61% at the end of therapy. Of the 33 patients, 2 patients experienced disease progression and subsequently died of their disease, 2 patients experienced disease progression but were alive at last follow-up following additional therapy, and 2 patients died without experiencing disease progression: one due to a cerebral vascular accident at 9 months after therapy and a second patient due to small cell lung carcinoma at 55 months. The 5-year survival rate was 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72 - 97) and the 5-year progression-free survival was 82% (95% CI 64 - 93). There were no long-term adverse events noted directly related to the rituximab. The long-term follow-up of patients in this phase II trial of rituximab with CHOP chemotherapy for previously untreated aggressive NHL demonstrates a high response rate, which remains very durable with high 5-year overall and progression-free survivals.

Phase II clinical trial of bolus infusion anti-B4 blocked ricin immunoconjugate in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Immunotoxins, composed of a monoclonal antibody conjugated to a protein toxin, mediate cell death through novel cytotoxic mechanisms. Anti-B4-blocked ricin (anti-B4-bR) recognizes CD19-positive cells, which includes most B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). Previous Phase I clinical studies of anti-B4-bR, using both bolus and continuous dosing regimens, demonstrated no safety or efficacy advantage to the continuous infusion regimen. This Phase II trial in 16 patients with relapsed CD19-positive NHL was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anti-B4-bR when administered at the previously established maximum tolerated dose using a daily bolus for a 5 consecutive days schedule. Serum pharmacokinetics were measured in selected patients. Tissue samples of involved lymph nodes and bone marrow were also obtained from a portion of patients for determination of anti-B4-bR penetration into tissues. Toxicity was similar to what has been described previously for anti-B4-bR and consisted mainly of reversible elevations of hepatic transaminases and mild to moderate thrombocytopenia. No sustained clinical responses were documented. Pharmacokinetic measurements demonstrated that serum levels compatible with 3 logs of cell kill in vitro could be sustained for several hours in most patients. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples provided some insight into the low efficacy. The immunotoxin could be detected in three of the four bone marrow aspirate samples but in only two of the seven lymph node specimens. Thus, anti-B4-bR, using a single daily bolus for a 5 consecutive day schedule, is not an active agent in relapsed NHL. Poor penetration into certain sites of disease may be one explanation for its lack of efficacy.

A Phase II study of adjuvant therapy with anti-B4-blocked ricin after autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This Phase II trial was undertaken to determine the safety, toxicity, and potential efficacy of the B-cell restricted immunotoxin anti-B4-blocked ricin (Anti-B4-bR) when administered as adjuvant therapy to patients in complete remission (CR) after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Forty-nine patients with B-cell NHL in CR 46-202 days (median, 112 days) post-ABMT received Anti-B4-bR at a dose of 30 microg/kg lean body weight/day for 7 days by continuous i.v. infusion. Patients were eligible for up to two additional courses of therapy at 14-day intervals. A total of 83 courses of Anti-B4-bR were administered, with 31 patients receiving two or more courses of therapy. The mean serum level on day 7 of the first course was 0.77+/-0.41 nM. Reversible toxicities included hepatic transaminase elevations, thrombocytopenia, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, hypoalbuminemia, and dyspnea. Human antimouse antibody (HAMA) and/or human antiricin antibody (HARA) responses occurred in 23 patients at a median of 22 days from the initiation of Anti-B4-bR therapy (range, 11-100 days). The 4-year disease-free survival and overall survival are estimated at 56 and 72%, respectively. Twenty-six patients remain in CR after a median follow-up of 54.5 months. This study demonstrates that Anti-B4-bR can be administered safely to patients as adjuvant therapy early after ABMT for B-cell NHL. The toxicities are tolerable and reversible. Although the early estimate of disease-free survival was very encouraging in this single-armed trial, the 4-year follow-up data demonstrate continued relapse.

A phase I study of ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer.

A phase I study was conducted to define the maximally tolerated dose and toxicity profile of the ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (ICE-T) regimen in advanced lung cancer. This chemotherapy program uses paclitaxel given as a 24-hour continuous infusion in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy with growth factor support. The dosage of paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients have been accrued to date onto this study. Because hematologic dose-limiting toxicity was defined in terms of neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia exceeding 7 days' duration, no patient demonstrated what was defined by the protocol as dose-limiting toxicity. Nonetheless, substantial hematologic toxicity was observed. Overall, 26% had fever and neutropenia, 56% had grade 4 neutropenia, and 26% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In all cases, hematologic toxicity was short term and reversible. While grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression was frequently observed, it was not dose related (in terms of paclitaxel dosage). Nonhematologic toxicity also was not dose related and, with only a few exceptions, was not clinically significant. Among 27 patients evaluable for response, 41% achieved an objective response, including 15% with a complete response. All of five patients with small cell lung cancer responded (including two with a complete response). Among 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 27% achieved an objective response (also including two with a complete response). The results of this study suggest that with growth factor support, it is possible to safely administer full-dose, single-agent paclitaxel in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy. We will soon be initiating a phase II study of the ICE-T regimen using paclitaxel at 225 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion in advanced lung cancer. We will also conduct a phase I study of ICE-T, with paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour continuous infusion.

Treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias by antibody-mediated immunotherapy.

The use of serotherapy to treat patients with plasma cell dyscrasias (PCDs) has been sought by us and others. Candidate antigens that have been targeted or proposed for targeting in PCDs include the immunoglobulin idiotype, CD19, CD38, CD54, CD126, HM1.24, and Muc-1 core protein. Unfortunately, many of these antigens are not ideal for use in serotherapy since they are not selectively expressed, are either shed or secreted, or have not been fully characterized. Serotherapy with an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody (B4) conjugated to a blocked ricin toxin had no significant activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Circulating CD20+ clonotypic B cells have been detected in the circulation of most MM and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) patients. Plasma cells from most WM patients express CD20, but most MM patient plasma cells either lack CD20 or express it weakly. In view of recent successes with anti-CD20-directed serotherapy in other B-cell malignancies, we initiated a phase II trial to study the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (Rituxan; IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, and Genentech, Inc, San Francisco, CA) in patients with MM. We describe two PCD patients (one with WM and one with MM) who responded to therapy. By flow cytometric analysis, CD20+ plasma cells and B cells present in the bone marrow and peripheral blood of a patient with MM disappeared with response to rituximab therapy. However, residual CD20- tumor cells remained in the bone marrow following rituximab therapy, and after 6 months this patient progressed with CD20- myeloma cells. As a potential strategy to overcome this limitation, we demonstrated that interferon-gamma at pharmacologically achievable levels induced CD20 expression on these CD20- plasma cells, consistent with our recent findings that interferon-gamma is a potent inducer of CD20 expression on MM patient plasma cells and B cells. We also characterize a response to rituximab with a decrease in paraprotein and resolution of anemia in a patient with WM whose response to rituximab is ongoing after 19+ months. This preliminary experience supports the potential use of serotherapy targeting CD20 in PCDs. Our studies further suggest that interferon-gamma may enhance CD20 expression on MM plasma cells, thereby increasing their susceptibility to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies.

Ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer: update and preliminary survival analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), given as a 24-hour infusion, in conjunction with ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2 in 25-mg/m2 increments. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg/d from day 4 until the neutrophil count was > or = 10,000/microL. The study population consisted of 41 patients with a median age of 60 years and a median follow-up of 20.7 months. Stage distribution included 5% stage IIIA, 46% stage IIIB, and 49% stage IV. Histology consisted of 61% adenocarcinoma, 12% squamous cell carcinoma, 10% large cell carcinoma, 15% small cell carcinoma, and 2% mixed. The predominant toxicity was hematologic; 63% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and 49% developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Fever and neutropenia occurred in 34% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was, in all cases, short-term and reversible and was not dose related. With few exceptions, nonhematologic toxicity was not clinically important. Among 39 patients evaluable for response, 36% achieved a remission (8% complete, 28% partial, 41% had stable disease, and 23% experienced disease progression). Among 33 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the response rate was 27% (one complete response, eight partial responses, 15 had stable disease, and nine had progressive disease). Among six patients with small cell carcinoma, the response rate was 83% (two complete responses, three partial responses, and one had stable disease). The median survival of all 41 patients was 13.6 months. Survival was almost identical between stage IIIA and stage IV subsets. We conclude that it is possible to safely administer full-dose single-agent paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in conjunction with full-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. While response rates observed were not particularly notable, median survival is considerably longer than that usually achieved with combination chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer.

Induction therapy for esophageal cancer with paclitaxel and hyperfractionated radiotherapy: a phase I and II study.

OBJECTIVE: Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery may improve survival rates among patients with esophageal carcinoma. We designed a novel intense induction regimen with paclitaxel and high-dose hyperfractionated radiotherapy to maximize complete response rates. METHODS: Forty patients with esophageal cancer were treated in a phase I and II trial of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel) at three dosage levels (75, 125, and 100 mg/m2) and concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (45 Gy to the mediastinum, 58.5 Gy to the tumor). The mean age was 62 years, and 32 patients (80%) had adenocarcinoma. Twenty-eight of 40 (70%) patients had locally advanced tumors (T3, or stage IIB or greater). RESULTS: The average hospitalization for induction treatment was 17 days. Toxicity was substantial, with esophagitis necessitating nutritional support the most common complication. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel was 100 mg/m2. Two patients died during induction treatment. Thirty-six patients (90%) underwent resection. The median length of stay was 10 days, and two patients died after the operation. Fourteen of 36 patients (39%) had a pathologic complete response. Patients who received all prescribed chemotherapy had a higher pathologic complete response rate (50%) than did patients who required dose reduction (17%; p = 0.076). The 2-year survival rate was 61% (95% CI 35% to 86%) with a median follow-up of 11.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 appears to have acceptable toxicity. The high pathologic complete response rate in this regimen is encouraging, but it is associated with substantial toxicity. The toxicity of this regimen is not acceptable and will require substantial reduction in the radiation component. Survival data are too short-term to confirm enhanced survival.

Paclitaxel/ifosfamide or navelbine/ifosfamide chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: CALGB 9532.

In order to explore non-cisplatin containing regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted a randomized Phase-II study of two novel combinations, paclitaxel/ifosfamide and vinorelbine/ifosfamide. Both regimens were active with a 38% response rate (95% CI: 24%, 53%) and 31% (95% CI: 18%, 47%), respectively. Median survivals were 8.5 and 7.4 months. Toxicity, mostly neutropenia, was acceptable. These two combinations establish a 'proof of principle' that non-cisplatin containing regimens also have activity in this setting.

Rituximab therapy of B-cell neoplasms.

The development of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, represents a revolutionary advance in the therapy of hematological malignancies. Rituximab was approved in 1997 by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed or refractory, CD20(+), B-cell, low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Recent studies have documented activity of rituximab in other CD20-expressing hematological malignancies including mantle cell lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, aggressive NHL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. When used in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, rituximab achieves response rates of 90%-95% in low-grade follicular and aggressive NHL patients. Currently, rituximab is undergoing intensive investigation in several large phase II and III trials, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. Clinical research will help define the ultimate role of this agent and its potential impact on survival of patients with B-cell neoplasms. This article describes current clinical trials with rituximab and discusses their significance.

Pancreatic carcinoma with brain metastases: case report and literature review.

The case of a patient developing multiple brain metastases from carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas has been described. A 56-year-old man with stage IV pancreatic cancer attained a clinical and radiographic response while receiving the G-FLIP chemotherapy regimen (biweekly gemcitabine, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin). After 4 months of therapy, he developed gait imbalance and weakness in the right hand. An MRI of the brain showed multiple 1-2 mm enhancing nodules in the cerebral hemispheres and pons. A subsequent biopsy confirmed that these were pancreatic carcinoma metastases. The patient experienced a rapid deterioration in his neurological status and died 3 days after brain biopsy. Previously reported cases of brain metastases from pancreatic cancer are reviewed.