Accuracy and Reproducibility of Virtual Reality Perimetry in Children.

PURPOSE: To determine normal threshold values for the 24-2 program of the VisuALL-K (Olleyes, Inc), a portable static automated virtual reality perimeter that uses a video game-based testing modality on an updated version of the algorithm and to repeat the test to assess retest variability. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 19 participants (aged 8 to 17 years) with healthy afferent systems. Participants performed two 24-2 automated perimetry tests on the virtual reality perimeter device. RESULTS: Mean age was 12.7 ± 2.5 years; 53% were boys and 47% were girls. Mean test location threshold was 30.5 ± 4.0 dB for test 1 and 31.3 ± 2.8 dB for test 2. Sensitivity decreased with eccentricity as expected (-0.17 dB per degree). Bland-Altman analysis showed a repeatability coefficient of ±5.1 dB for mean deviation, meaning that 95% of retest values were within ±5 dB of the threshold value for the first test. Higher thresholds for the first test regressed toward the mean values in the second test, indicating a learning effect. Intraclass correlation coefficient for mean deviation between test 1 and test 2 was 0.70 (0.55 to 0.80, P < .0001). Mean time to completion for the virtual reality perimeter was 5.1 ± 1.5 min/eye. CONCLUSIONS: The VisuALL-K virtual reality perimeter provided an assessment of the visual field in normal children aged 8 to 17 years. A shallow hill of vision was demonstrated. A notable learning effect was demonstrated, with repeatability difference wider than other published head-mounted display perimeters. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024:61(4):262-266.].

Open-angle glaucoma and Fuchs dystrophy.

A 62-year-old woman with a history of moderate myopia, long-standing open-angle glaucoma (OAG), and Fuchs dystrophy in both eyes was referred for consultative care. She had prior trabeculectomy in 1984 and 1992 in the left and right eyes, respectively. She is 3 months post-Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in the left eye, now referred with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximum tolerated medical therapy. Current medical therapy for IOP consists of acetazolamide 250 mg by mouth 2 times a day, brimonidine 2 times a day in the left eye, dorzolamide 2 times a day in the left eye, and timolol 2 times a day in the left eye. The patient has a history of presumed steroid response; however, her corneal surgeon has requested that the steroid be continued for the next several months because of the recent DSEK. The IOP in the left eye has ranged from the mid-20s to mid-30s since DSEK. The right eye has consistently had pressure in the low teens and below for many years without topical antihypertensive medications. Examination revealed stable visual acuity at 20/30 and 20/40 in the right and left eyes, respectively, IOP was 12 mm Hg in the right eye and 25 mm Hg in the left eye by Goldman applanation, irregular but reactive pupils without afferent defect, and full confrontational visual fields. Slitlamp examination showed superior low avascular bleb, moderate-to-severe guttae, and posterior chamber IOL in the right eye. The left eye showed superior low diffuse bleb, clear DSEK graft, quiet chamber, superonasal iridectomy, and posterior chamber IOL with an open posterior capsule. The conjunctiva was moderately scarred but a repeat trabeculectomy or Xen Gel stent (Abbvie) appeared possible. The angles were wide open in each eye. Fundus examination was normal aside from myopic, anomalous-appearing nerves with an approximate cup-to-disc ratio of 0.90 in both eyes. Humphrey visual field showed nonspecific changes on the right and moderate nasal defect on the left eye, stable to previous examinations dating back to 2018 (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure1/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff and Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure2/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) revealed moderated thinning in both eyes that was also stable to prior examinations (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202407000-00018/figure3/v/2024-07-10T174240Z/r/image-tiff). Her axial length measured 25.23 and 26.34 mm in the right and left eyes, respectively. Central corneal thickness was 553 µm in the right eye and 563 µm in the left eye before her DSEK procedure. What would be your approach to management of this patient's left eye, addressing the following: Rationale for your procedure of choice? Would you over-rule the corneal surgeon and stop the steroid in an attempt to obviate the need for glaucoma surgery? Does the age of onset of glaucoma affect your surgical decision making? Note that patient age at the time of trabeculectomy was 22 years. Are some procedures better suited for patients after DSEK surgery?

Posterior capsular opacification and YAG laser capsulotomy in uveitis patients following cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO with visual acuity ≤20/50) and the incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in the year following cataract surgery for uveitic eyes. METHOD: Patients were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases (SITE) Cohort Study using a standardized chart review process. RESULTS: Among 1,855 uveitic eyes of 1,370 patients who had undergone cataract surgery, visually significant PCO occurred in 297 eyes (16%), and YAG laser capsulotomy was done in 407 eyes (22%) within the first year following surgery. Higher odds of developing 20/50 visual acuity attributed to PCO were noted in children and young adults compared with adults older than 65 years of age (overall p = 0.03). Poorer preoperative visual acuity (overall p = 0.0069) and postoperative inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.45; p < 0.0001) were associated with PCO incidence. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for YAG laser capsulotomy were younger age groups compared with those older than 65 years of age at the time of surgery (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.90-2.24; 95% CI, 1.90-2.24; overall p = 0.0007), female sex (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03), postoperative active inflammation (aOR = 165; 95% CI, 1.27-2.16; overall p < 0.0001), extracapsular cataract extraction compared with phacoemulsification (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.47; overall p < 0.0001), and insertion of an intraocular lens (aOR = 4.60; 95% CI, -2.29-9.25; p < 0.0001). Black race was associated with lower YAG laser capsulotomy incidence than Whites (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; overall p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vision-reducing (≤20/50) PCO is common, occurring in about one sixth of uveitic eyes within 1 year of cataract surgery; a higher number (22%) of eyes underwent YAG laser capsulotomy within the first year. Age and postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery are the variables most associated with the incidence of visually significant PCO and YAG laser capsulotomy.

Incidence and Remission of Post-Surgical Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Intraocular Inflammation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, remission, and relapse of post-surgical cystoid macular edema (PCME) following cataract surgery in inflammatory eye disease. METHODS: A total of 1859 eyes that had no visually significant macular edema prior to cataract surgery while under tertiary uveitis management were included. Standardized retrospective chart review was used to gather clinical data. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for inter-eye correlations were performed. RESULTS: PCME causing VA 20/50 or worse was reported in 286 eyes (15%) within 6 months of surgery. Adults age 18-64 years as compared to children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42, for ages 18 to 44 years and aOR = 1.93 for ages 45 to 64 years, overall P = .02); concurrent use of systemic immunosuppression (conventional aOR 1.53 and biologics aOR = 2.68, overall P = .0095); preoperative VA 20/50 or worse (overall P < .0001); cataract surgery performed before 2000 (overall P = .03) and PMCE in fellow eye (aOR = 3.04, P = .0004) were associated with development of PCME within 6 months of cataract surgery. PCME resolution was seen in 81% of eyes at 12 months and 91% of eyes at 24 months. CME relapse was seen in 12% eyes at 12 months and 19% eyes at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: PCME occurs frequently in uveitic eyes undergoing cataract surgery; however, most resolve within a year. CME recurrences likely are due to the underlying disease process and not relapses of PCME.

Evaluation of Two-Dimensional (2D) versus Three-Dimensional (3D) Video Tutorials in Cataract Surgery for New Trainees.

Purpose Microscopic ophthalmic surgery requires an understanding of three-dimensional (3D) spaces within the eye. Recently, there has been an increase in 3D video training tools in health care. Studies have evaluated the efficacy of 3D tutorials in general surgery, but little has been published within ophthalmology. We present a randomized study evaluating differences in surgically naïve trainees after watching either a 2D or 3D phacoemulsification tutorial. Design This was a double-blind, randomized study. A group of third and fourth year medical students at our institution were randomized with stratified randomization based on prior surgical courses to control for differences in baseline surgical skill. The two study arms were watching 2D or 3D instructional videos on phacoemulsification (Richard Mackool). Methods Participants received a preliminary survey and participated in an hour-long microscopic surgery session. During the session, participants performed tasks evaluating baseline microscopic spatial awareness and surgical skill. The students were then instructed to watch either a 2D or 3D video on phacoemulsification based on their randomized study arm. During the postintervention session, participants performed the biplanar incision and capsulorhexis steps of cataract surgery discussed in the video on model eyes. Students were evaluated on speed and overall capsulorhexis quality. Results Thirty-one students qualified for the study and completed the microscopic surgery session. Students in both groups had similar baseline speed and quality of preintervention microscopic tasks ( p > 0.05 for all tasks). Postintervention, students randomized to the 3D video performed significantly faster than the 2D group for biplanar incision (11.1 ± 5.5 s vs. 20.7 ± 10.5 s, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups in capsulorhexis timing ( p = 0.12) or quality score ( p = 0.60). Conclusions 3D video surgical training tutorials may improve speed of certain steps of cataract surgery for surgically naïve ophthalmology trainees. Given the limited sample size of this study, further investigation of their effectiveness is warranted.