Expression of BAFF-R, but not BAFF, is an independent prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP.

B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and BAFF-receptor (BAFF-R) play crucial roles in the progression of malignant B-cells. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression profiles and the clinical significance of BAFF and BAFF-R in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Paraffin-embedded specimens from 136 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy (R-CHOP), were examined for BAFF and BAFF-R expression by immunohistochemistry. BAFF and BAFF-R were expressed in 72.1 % (98/136) and 47.1 % (64/136) of the DLBCL tissues, respectively. Negative BAFF-R expression was significantly correlated with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (P = 0.036), an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 2 or higher (P < 0.001), and a poor revised IPI (R-IPI) risk score (P = 0.043). The complete response rate after R-CHOP was higher in patients with positive BAFF-R expression than in those with negative BAFF-R expression (73.4 vs. 56.9 %, P = 0.045). Negative expression of BAFF-R, but not of BAFF, was significantly associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.020) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.028). Only negative BAFF-R expression was correlated with inferior PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.049 and 0.040, respectively). Taken together, our results showed that the majority and approximate one-half of patients with DLBCL were positive for BAFF and BAFF-R, respectively. Negative expression of BAFF-R, but not of BAFF, could be an independent risk factor for PFS and OS in patients with DLBCL treated with standard R-CHOP.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: his analysis pooled individual patient data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to more thoroughly examine clinical outcomes when adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient data were pooled from the first-line AVF2107, NO16966, ARTIST, AVF0780, AVF2192, and AGITG MAX RCTs and the second-line E3200 RCT. All analyses were based on the intent-to-treat population. To assess differences in time-to-event variables by treatment (chemotherapy with or without placebo vs. chemotherapy plus bevacizumab), stratified random-effects (overall) and fixed-effects (subgroup comparisons) models were used to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The analysis population comprised 3,763 patients (1,773 chemotherapy with or without placebo; 1,990 chemotherapy plus bevacizumab). The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90) and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71). The effects on OS and PFS across subgroups defined by chemotherapy backbone (oxaliplatin-based, irinotecan-based), extent of disease (liver metastases only, extensive disease), age (<65, ≥65 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, ≥1), and KRAS status (wild-type, mutant) were consistent with the overall analysis. Incidence rates of grade ≥3 hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, wound-healing complications, gastrointestinal perforations, and thromboembolic events were increased with bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of bevacizumab with chemotherapy resulted in statistically significant increases in OS and PFS for patients with mCRC. The PFS benefit extended across the clinically relevant subgroups examined. The observed safety profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that reported in individual trials.

Phase I clinical trial of the novel platin complex dicycloplatin: clinical and pharmacokinetic results.

UNLABELLED: TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Dicycloplatin (DCP) is a novel super molecule composed of carboplatin (CBP) and 1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate (CBDCA) joined by a strong hydrogen bond. The solubility and stability of platinum complexes have a direct bearing on their activity, toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Preclinical studies have shown that DCP overcomes the problem of CBP instability in aqueous solution and maintains anticancer effects. Clinical evaluation in a Phase I dose-escalation study in patients with tumors showed that DCP was tolerated at doses ranging from 100 to 550 mg/m(2) and had potential efficacy in Chinese cancer patients. DCP showed favourable bioavailability and stability in vivo, and the recommended Phase II dosage for DCP-containing chemotherapy is 450 mg/m(2). DCP is currently being investigated as a monotherapy in several cancer types, such as prostatic carcinoma, and in combination with paclitaxel in a Phase II non-lung cancer study. PURPOSE: Dicycloplatin (DCP) is a novel supramolecule composed of carboplatin (CBP) and 1,1-cyclobutane dicarboxylate (CBDCA) joined by a strong hydrogen bond. DCP is stable in aqueous solution unlike CBP alone. The purpose of this study was to assess the maximally tolerated dose, safety, and pharmacokinetics of DCP in Chinese cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 29 patients were included in this study. DCP was administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once every 21 days. The dose of DCP was escalated from 50 mg/m(2) to 650 mg/m(2) using a modified Fibonacci scheme. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 26 patients to determine the total and ultrafiltered platinum concentrations in plasma. RESULTS: 29 and 20 patients were evaluated for toxicities and response, respectively. The primary adverse effects were nausea/vomiting (58.6%), thrombocytopenia (24.1%), neutropenia (17.2%), anemia (20.7%), fatigue (10.3%), anorexia (10.3%), liver enzyme elevation (10.3%) and alopecia (3.5%). There was no significant toxicity with doses up to 350 mg/m(2). At higher doses, a variety of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, including Grade 3/4 anemia, Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and Grade 3/4 emesis under antiemetic treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of DCP was 550 mg/m(2). Two partial responses occurred in patients with non-cell lung cancer who had received cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Plasma decay of total and free platinum concentrations was best fitted by using a twocompartment analysis. The terminal plasma half-life of total platinum after DCP administration ranged from 41.86 to 77.20 hours without significant dose dependency. However, the terminal plasma half-life of free platinum concentrations ranged from 42.34 to 61.07 hours. CONCLUSIONS: DCP displayed a favorable safety profile at doses between 50 mg/m(2) and 550 mg/m(2), and first efficacy signals were observed. DLTs were thrombocytopenia, anemia and emesis. The recommended starting dose for a subsequent Phase II study is 450 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks.

[Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a Phase III, multi-center, randomized controlled trial, Chinese subreport].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of HER-2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: Fifteen Chinese research centers are involved in the BO18255 (ToGA) study. Patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer were eligible for inclusion if their tumor showed overexpression of HER-2 protein by immunohistochemistry +++ or FISH-positive. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine or 5-FU plus cisplatin or chemotherapy in combination with intravenous trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-five Chinese patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 84 were included in the primary analysis: trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (FP/H) (n = 36) and chemotherapy alone (FP)(n = 48). The median follow-up was 15.2 months in the FP/H group and 14.2 months in the FP group. The median survival time was 12.6 months in the FP/H group compared with 9.7 months in the FP group [hazard ratio 0.72, 95%CI (0.40; 1.29)]. Grade 3/4 adverse events were higher in the FP/H(63.9%)than FP (47.9%) groups, including neutropenia, vomiting and nausea. Two mild cardiac adverse events occurred in the FP/H group. Severe adverse events occurred in 3 cases of both two groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy is well tolerated and shows improved survival in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. These results are consistent with the results of ToGA whole population trial. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy can be considered as a new option for patients with HER-2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.

High Ki-67 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with non-germinal center subtype indicates limited survival benefit from R-CHOP therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab has significantly improved the survival of patients with DLBCL, especially those with non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) subtype. The impact of Ki-67 expression, an index of proliferation, on the clinical outcomes of patients with DLBCL has largely been unexplored. This study aimed to investigate whether Ki-67 expression is an indicator of outcome in DLBCL patients (especially non-GCB DLBCL patients) treated with standard chemotherapy combined with rituximab. METHODS: Expression of Ki-67 protein was examined immunohistochemically in 118 tumor specimens from patients newly diagnosed with DLBCL and treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were lower in patients with high Ki-67 expression than in those with low Ki-67 expression (3-year OS: 65.2% vs. 81.7%, P = 0.030; 3-year PFS: 56.4% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.020), similar in patients with GCB subtype and those with the non-GCB subtype (OS: P = 0.330; PFS: P = 0.287). According to Ki-67 expression status by immunophenotype subgroups, patients with high Ki-67 expression in non-GCB subgroup had the most unfavorable PFS and OS, comparing with the other three subgroups (P = 0.004 and P = 0.002, respectively). In multivariate analysis, non-GCB with high Ki-67 expression was an independent prognostic predictor of inferior survival in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. CONCLUSION: For DLBCL patients with non-GCB DLBCL and high Ki-67 expression, the survival benefit from R-CHOP therapy is limited.

[Chinese HER2 positive early breast cancer trastuzumab adjuvant therapy: preliminary outcomes].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab (herceptin) versus 1-year non-trastuzumab observation in Chinese patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer during a median follow-up of 1 year. METHODS: The HERA trial was an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial comparing treatment with trastuzumab for 1 and 2 years with observation after standard adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both in patients with HER2-positive node-positive or high-risk node-negative early breast cancer. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included recurrence-free survival, distant disease-free survival, overall survival and cardiac safety. The first planned interim analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year versus observation were completed in April 2005. Only the outcomes of recruited Chinese patients were reported. RESULTS: A total of 122 Chinese patients from 8 participating centers were included for planned interim analysis. And they were divided into trastuzumab (n = 68) and observation (n = 54) groups. Three and eight disease-free survival events were observed in the trastuzumab and observation groups respectively. Two-year disease-free survival rates were 92.9% and 81.4% respectively (P = 0.0489); 2-year recurrence-free survival and distant disease-free survivals were 98.1% vs 81.4% (P = 0.0064) and 98.1% vs 83.3% (P = 0.0117) respectively. Trastuzumab was generally well-tolerated with a decent safety profile. Severe cardiotoxicity was not observed. CONCLUSION: One-year treatment with adjuvant trastuzumab improves disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival and distant disease-free survival in Chinese patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial.

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with modified irinotecan, leucovorin bolus, and 5-fluorouracil intravenous infusion (mIFL) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been well evaluated in randomized clinical trials in Chinese patients. We conducted a phrase III trial in which patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 2:1 to the mIFL [irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) bolus, and 5-fluorouracil intravenous infusion (500 mg/m(2)) weekly for four weeks every six weeks] plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every two weeks) group and the mIFL group, respectively. Co-primary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and 6-month PFS rate. In total, 214 patients were enrolled. Our results showed that addition of bevacizumab to mIFL significantly improved median PFS (4.2 months in the mIFL group vs. 8.3 months in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group, P < 0.001), 6-month PFS rate (25.0% vs. 62.6%, P < 0.001), median overall survival (13.4 months vs. 18.7 months, P = 0.014), and response rate (17% vs. 35%, P = 0.013). Grades 3 and 4 adverse events included diarrhea (21% in the mIFL group and 26% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group) and neutropenia (19% in the mIFL group and 33% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group). No wound-healing complications or congestive heart failure occurred. Our results suggested that bevacizumab plus mIFL is effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with mCRC. Clinical benefit and safety profiles were consistent with those observed in pivotal phase III trials with mainly Caucasian patients.

The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma among endemic population: a meta-analysis of the phase III randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the clinical benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with radiation alone (RT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in endemic geographic areas. METHODS: Using a prospective meta-analysis protocol, two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients with NPC in endemic areas were randomly assigned to receive CCRT or RT alone were included. RESULTS: Seven trials (totally 1608 patients) were eligible. Risk ratios (RRs) of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.80), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.93) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89) were observed for 2, 3 and 5 years OS respectively in favor of the CCRT group. The RRs were larger than that detected in the previously reported meta-analyses (including both endemic and non-endemic), indicating that the relative benefit of survival was smaller than what considered before. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis of CCRT vs. RT alone in NPC treatment which included studies only done in endemic area. The results confirmed that CCRT was more beneficial compared with RT alone. However, the relative benefit of CCRT in endemic population might be less than that from previous meta-analyses.

One patient with metastastic colorectal cancer successfully treated by combination of targeted agents after failure of chemotherapy.

Either cetuximab or bevacizumab can improve the survival of patients with metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) if administered combided with cytotoxic agents. However, the effect of two or more target agents in combination is uncertain in these patients. Here, we reported a patient with mCRC successfully treated by a combination of target agents after the failure of chemotherapy. The patient received palliative resection of primary tumor followed by 9 cycles of postoperative XELOX regimen, cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK)-based biotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine, particle implantation in the lung metastatic lesions. The tumor progressed 20 months after the standard treatments. Then, the regimen cetuximab, bevacizumab and cefitinib was applied. During the treatment with targeted agents, grade IV acne-like rash and relatively severe parionychia of the toes occurred. Both of them recovered smoothly. The PET-CT reexamination at 40 days after the target treatment showed that the metabolism of mediastinal lymph nodes basically recovered to a normal level. The combination of multiple targeted agents obtained a progression-free survival(PFS) of 11 months and the patient with a good quality of life during this period.

[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in the treatment of recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer in an expanded access program (EAP)].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gefitinib in the treatment of Chinese patients with recurrent advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: 120 patients were enrolled in this trial from September 2002 to March 2005, and 103 patients were evaluable. All patients were histologically or/and cytologically confirmed to have a locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and failed to previous standard treatments. The patients received orally 250 mg of Gefitinib once daily until the disease progression or intolerance to toxicity. First evaluation of response was undertaken one month after drug initiation, then every 2 or 3 months till disease progression. Each patient was followed up every 6 months untill death or end of follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 103 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 18.4% (19/103), and the disease control rate was 51.5% (53/103). The median time to progression (mTTP) was 3 months (range: 0.2 approximately 40), the median survival time (MST) was 9.8 months (range: 0.5 approximately 51), the 1-, 2-, 3-year survival rates were 44.7%, 26.4% and 13.2%, respectively. The TTP of 41 patients was longer than 6 months with a MST of 25.5 months. The results of COX model analysis suggested that the patients with adenocarcinoma, rash and favourable performance status (PS) had longer TTP. The patients with favourable PS and well controlled disease had longer survival time. Adverse events included skin rash, dry skin, diarrhea and elevation of serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), and were usually mild. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib is effective in treatment of patient with recurrent advanced NSCLC. The patients with controlled disease may achieve a long survival, and the adverse reactions are mild and tolerable.

Clinical and prognostic analysis of hepatitis B virus infection in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is a common complication in China. However, the clinical relevance of HBV infection with respect to DLBCL disease stages and patient survival remains unclear. The main objective of the current study was to analyze the clinical features and to evaluate the prognostic factors of HBV infection in DLBCL patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, DLBCL patients were divided into two groups as HBsAg-positive (n = 81) and HBsAg-negative (n = 181) patients. The HBsAg-positive patients were further divided into two subgroups based on their hepatic function during chemotherapy. Various statistical analyses were used to determine the significance of the relevant clinical parameters. RESULTS: Compared with the HBsAg-negative group, the HBsAg-positive DLBCL group displayed a younger median onset age (46 year vs 51), more advanced stage at grade III/IV (58% vs 42%, p = 0.016), and more frequent hepatic dysfunction before (21% vs 5.5%, p < 0.001) and during (49.4% vs 16.6%, p < 0.001) chemotherapy. Female DLBCL patients exhibited a higher frequency of HBsAg positivity (p = 0.006). However, in both groups the median overall survival (OS) duration (55.8 vs 66.8 months) and response rates (91% vs 90.4%) were similar. In the HBsAg-positive DLBCL group, the poor prognostic factors were advanced stage (p < 0.001) and hepatic dysfunction during chemotherapy (p = 0.02). The OS of HBsAg-positive patients with hepatic dysfunction during chemotherapy was significantly shorter than those without liver dysfunction (p = 0.016), and the OS rates at 3 years were 48% and 72%, respectively. The use of rituximab did not increase the rates of liver dysfunction in HBsAg-positive DLBCL patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with HBsAg-negative patients, the HBsAg-positive DLBCL patients had earlier onset and more advanced stage. The disease stage and hepatic dysfunction during chemotherapy and were two significant prognostic factors in the HBsAg-positive DLBCL patients. This study suggests that prophylactic treatment of HBV may be of great importance in the cases of HBsAg-positive patients.

Phase II clinical study of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who had been pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHOD: This is an open label, single arm phase II trial. All patients were treated with single agent of gemcitabine. Gemcitabine was given in the dosage of 1.0 g/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, each cycle repeated every 4 weeks. Gemcitabine was added to 100 ml normal saline infused over 30 min. RESULT: About 32 patients were enrolled in this trial. Thirty patients were assessable for response to treatment. Fourteen patients had a partial response (PR), giving an overall response rate of 43.8% (14/32); 9 patients had stable disease (28.1%) and 7 progressed disease (21.9%). The median time to progression was 5.1 months and median survival time was 16 months, 1 year survival rate was 67%, 2 year overall survival rate was 12%. A total of 11 patients (34.4%) experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicity and the main toxicity was myelosuppression. the non-hematology toxicity was minimal. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of gemcitabine was higher and side effects were minimal in advanced NPC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy failed.

A pilot study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX-6) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FOLFOX-6) combination therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by a 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m(2) (10-min infusion) and then 5-FU 2,600-3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion). The chemotherapy was repeated every 14 days. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 46 were assessable for efficacy, and all patients were assessable for toxicity. Three of 51 patients achieved a complete response, and 18 had partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 41.2%. Stable disease was observed in 11 (21.6%) patients and progressive disease in 14 (27.5%). The median time to progression was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 12.1 months. NCI-CTC grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia in 9.8 and 7.8% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was recorded in 3 (5.9%) patients. Other NCI-CTC grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in 3 patients (5.9%) and vomiting in 5 (9.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/folinic acid regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients; further clinical trials are warranted.

[Relationship between clinopathological features and outcome of rituximab treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of clinopathological features and outcome of rituximab treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with DLBCL received intravenous infusion of rituximab in combination with different chemotherapy regimens have been retrospectively analyzed. The influencing factors such as age, stage, serum level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and bulky disease were analyzed retrospectively in terms of the response. The anti-/ pro-apoptosis proteins were detected by immunohistochemistry (SP methods). The correlation of protein expression with efficacy of rituximab treatment was also analyzed. RESULTS: In the patients with previously untreated aggressive B-NHL, the combination of rituximab with chemotherapy achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 90.7% and CR of 69.8%, while in the patients with relapsed disease, that was 80.8% (ORR) and 30.8% (CR). The disease stage (P = 0.046), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.024), physical status (P = 0.009) and bulky disease (P = 0.013) were found to be unfavorable factors for the immunochemotherapy. The treatment efficacy in the patients with Bcl-2 overexpression was better than that in cases with negative one. No correlation of the bax and survivin expression with immunochemotherapy efficacy was observed. CONCLUSION: The immunochemotherapy regimen (rituximab plus chemotherapy) can improve the response rate and CR rate without significant increase in toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The advanced stage, high serum LDH level, relapsed disease, bulky disease and negative Bcl-2 expression are unfavorable factors affecting the therapeutic efficacy.

[Preliminary result of multi-center clinical trial on the docetaxel, 5-Fu and DDP in the treatment of advanced, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: This clinical study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combined regimen of docetaxel, 5-Fu and DDP (TPF) in the treatment of advanced or relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Fifty-six patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/metastatic NPC following chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled. Both docetaxel and DDP were administered intravenously for 6 hours at the dose of 70 mg/m2 on D1. 5-Fu was given at a dose of 400-500 mg/m2 for 6 hours from D1 to D5. Dexamethasone was routinely administered before injection of docetaxel. This combination was repeated every 3 to 4 weeks, and continued for 4-6 cycles or until PD for the responders. RESULTS: Fifty-one (91.1%) patients were evaluable for response assessment. The response rate for whole group was 72.5% (37/51) with a CR rate of 9.8% (5/51). The stable disease accounted for 17.6% (9/51). There were 17(30.4%) chemotherapy-naïve patients. The overall response rate in those was 82.4% with a CR rate of 29.4%. However, the response rate for previously treated patients was 64.7% without CR. Twelve patients had progressed disease, including 5 (8.9%) died of disease progression with a median follow-up of 11 month (ranged from 1 to 19 months). Totally, 196 courses of chemotherapy were administered. The major toxicity was myelosupression, nausea/vomiting. The incidence of leucopenia was 48% with 22.2% of these in NCI grade II or IV. But only 2 patients (3.6%) experienced leucopenia with a fever. Other mild toxicities including alopecia, asthenia, mucositis and diarrhea were also observed. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary outcome shows docetaxel, 5-Fu and DDP combination is effective and safe for the patients with advanced or relapsed nasopharyngeal carcinoma. But further clinical study is warranted.

[Clinical characteristics and prognosis of different subtypes of breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with different subtypes of breast cancer: basaloid, HER-2 and luminal types, and try to find the evidence of individualized treatment for the patients. METHODS: 1280 histologically and immunohistochemically proven patients with resectable breast cancer were treated, and the clinical data including characteristics, relapse and survival of the patients with different subtypes of breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 1280 breast cancer patients, basaloid, HER-2 and luminal types accounted for 20.9%, 23.2% and 55.9%, respectively. Basaloid type was more likely to be found in younger patients frequently with a family history of breast cancer. HER-2 type usually had a tumor of larger size with more advanced stage disease and more metastatic lymph nodes. Luminal type was likely to occur in aged patients with an earlier stage disease. The recurrence rates in basaloid, HER-2 and luminal types were 25.0%, 27.9% and 11.7%, respectively. Patients with basaloid or HER-2 type were found to have a significantly higher recurrence rate than the patients with luminal type breast cancer (P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed between the basaloid and HER-2 types. However, patients with basaloid type breast cancer were more likely to develop lung metastasis than HER-2 type (13.4% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.017). Up to December 2006, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for patients with basaloid, HER-2 and luminal types were 72.2%, 68.2% and 86.2% (P < 0.001), respectively. The overall 5-yr survival (OS) rates of the three groups were 88.6%, 83.8% and 95.8% (P < 0.001) , respectively. Of the patients with luminal type breast cancer, HER2-negative patients had a higher DFS (86.2% vs 57.0%, P < 0.001) and OS (95.8% vs 87.7%, P = 0.0001) compared with those with HER2-positive. The results of Multivariate Cox Regression showed that tumor size and lymph node state were the most important factors influencing the prognosis. CONCLUSION: Each subtype of breast cancer has somewhat its own specific clinical features in terms of recurrence pattern and prognosis, therefore, individualized treatment regimen may be required.

A consensus on immunotherapy from the 2017 Chinese Lung Cancer Summit expert panel.

The notable clinical success of cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade suggests that it is likely to form the foundation of curative therapy for many malignancies. However, checkpoint blockades do not achieve sustained clinical response in most patients and thus amounts of problems needed to be figured out. Regarding these challenges, the 2017 Chinese Lung Cancer Summit expert panel organized a forum on the 14th Chinese Lung Cancer Summit to formally discuss these controversies. Five consensuses finally were reached to guide the application of checkpoint blockades.

Serum diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and further identification of response to therapy using SELDI-TOF-MS and tree analysis patterning.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no satisfactory biomarkers available to screen for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or to identify patients who do not benefit from standard anti-cancer therapies. In this study, we used serum proteomic mass spectra to identify potential serum biomarkers and biomarker patterns for detecting DLBCL and patient responses to therapy. METHODS: The proteomic spectra of crude sera from 132 patients with DLBCL and 75 controls were performed by SELDI-TOF-MS and analyzed by Biomarker Patterns Software. RESULTS: Nine peaks were considered as potential DLBCL discriminatory biomarkers. Four peaks were considered as biomarkers for predicting the patient response to standard therapy. The proteomic patterns achieved a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 94% for detecting DLBCL samples in the test set of 85 samples, and achieved a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 92% for detecting poor prognosis patients in the test set of 66 samples. CONCLUSION: These proteomic patterns and potential biomarkers are hoped to be useful in clinical applications for detecting DLBCL patients and predicting the response to therapy.

[Antitumor immune responses induced by idiotype-pulsed dendritic cells with cell-penetrating peptide vaccination in vivo].

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the therapeutic effect of dendritic cell (DC) vaccine on treatment for mice with lymphoma and the protective effect of DC vaccine loaded with different antigens on the tumor-bearing BAL B/c mice. METHODS: Firstly, a mouse tumor model was set up by s. c. inoculation of 1 x 10(6)/mouse A20 tumor cells. Then different DC vaccines were injected, respectively, and the tumor size and survival time were observed. Secondly, the immunized mice with DC vaccines were challenged with A20 tumor cells, and observed whether a new tumor occurred in the mice and the time of survival. RESULTS: The tumor of mice immunized with Id-DC vaccines grew slower than the controls (mean time of survival was 40.4 days vs. 33.4 days), but statistically not significantly different. The tumor of mice injected with CPP-Id-DC vaccines grew slower than that injected with Id-DC vaccines and controls, and one of 5 mice got CR and the tumor in another one mouse became stable. The median survival time was 70.8 days during a 90-days observation period. The difference was significant (P<0.01). The mice injected with Id-DC vaccines were challenged with A20 tumor cells showed new tumor occurred at 7 - 12 days, and 1 of the 5 mice survived for 60 days. The mice injected with CPP-Id-DC vaccines had no tumor. CONCLUSION: The DC loaded with CPP-Id was better than that loaded with Id alone in treating B cell lymphoma, and It can enhance their antitumor responses and prolong the survival time of the A20 tumor animal models. The vaccine of DC loaded with CPP-Id can protect mice from A20 tumor cell challenge.

[Nadaplatin or cisplatin combined with paclitaxol in treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled study].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect, long term survival and side effect on NSCLC patients treated with nadaplatin combined with paclitaxol and cisplatin combined with paclitaxol. METHODS: NSCLC patients with stage IIIB or IV were randomized into two groups in this prospective clinical study. TN group: nadaplatin 30 mg/m2 dl-3, paclitaxol 175 mg/m2 dl, repeated every 4 weeks. TP group: DDP 30 mg/m2 dl-3, paclitaxol 175 mg/m2 dl, repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled and 57 were evaluable with 30 in TN group and 27 in TP group. The overall response rate were 43.3% vs. 48.1% (P = 0.716), and the disease control rate were 86.7% vs. 88.8% in TN and TP group (P = 0.799), respectively. The median survival time was 14.3 vs. 13.0 months, and the 1- and 2-year survival rate was 62.5% vs. 59.1%, 0% vs. 5.8% in TN and TP group (P = 0.839), respectively. The rates of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were similar in TN and TP groups whereas more patients in TP group than in TN group suffered from anemia (38.5% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.001), nausea and vomiting (82.6% vs. 35.6%, P = 0.000), fatigue (35.9% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.000) and peripheral neurotoxicity (50.0% vs. 21.9%, calculated by case, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Nadaplatin combined with paclitaxol is an effective treatment regimen for NSCLC patients. When compared with similar regimen with cisplatin, the response rate and survival were similar; however, nadaplatin regimen shows some superiority as regards some treatment side effect.