Clinicians' rationale for using a silver dressing: the French OMAg+E observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe motivations for using a silicone, silver-releasing dressing and the type of wounds treated with this dressing, and to evaluate its short-term impact on wound characteristics. METHOD: A French, prospective, observational study of adult patients prescribed a soft-silicone, silver releasing dressing (MepilexAg; Molnlycke Health Care) in the community. Each participating physician was asked to include the first two consecutive patients they treated with the silver dressing, reporting patient and wound characteristics, as well as the presence of I 0 local signs compatible with wound infection (abscesses, purulent or copious exudate, erythema, increase in local warmth, pain, oedema,lymphangitis or satellite adenitis, malodour and delayed wound healing). Clinicians were also asked to select from a list their rationale for prescribing the silver dressing for each patient, including treating a wound infection, to stimulate granulation tissue formation, to promote wound healing, to reduce wound exudate, and to decrease wound pain. Local and general treatment were also reported. RESULTS: Overall, 794 patients (58% females), with a mean age of 69.0 ± 15.4 years, were included by 128 general practitioners, 51 dermatologists and 63 vascular specialist. Sixty-seven per cent were venous leg ulcers (VLUs), 26% were acute wounds (post-traumatic, surgical, burn wounds and animal bites) and 6.3%were other chronic wounds (pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and oncology wounds). On average 3.7 ± 1.5 local signs of infection were present and mean pain intensity (on a visual analogue scale) was 50± 24mm.According to prescribers, infection and healing delay were the primary rationale in 82% of cases,with oral antibiotics started concurrently in 19% of these wounds. Patients were followed-up at a median of 19 days, by which time all wound parameters were documented as significantly improved. Tolerability and efficiency of the silver dressing was considered as 'good'/'very good' in more than 97% of cases. CONCLUSION: While there are some variances with the French reimbursement indication, for the clinicians surveyed in this study, the primary rationale for prescription of a silver dressing was treatment of a possible wound infection. Although this indication might not always be clinically funded, based on wound characteristics, the short-term impact of this prescription in this series was favourable.

Activity of fludarabine in previously treated Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: a report of 71 cases. Groupe Coopératif Macroglobulinémie.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the treatment of patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) who develop primary or secondary resistance to frontline therapies. We report our experience on the activity and toxicity of fludarabine in 71 patients with WM resistant to prior chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1991 to June 1995, 71 patients were included in this retrospective study. The median age, median time from diagnosis to treatment, median immunoglobulin M (IgM) level, and median number of previous treatments were 68 years (range, 42 to 81), 5.9 years (range, 0.6 to 20), 35 g/L (range, 5 to 126), and two (range, one to four), respectively. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients received a median of six courses of fludarabine. Twenty-one (30%) responded with a partial response and 50 (70%) were considered as treatment failures. Forty-six patients died: 10 in the responder group and 36 in the failure group. Twenty-five patients were alive with a median follow-up time of 34 months. The overall median survival time of all treated patients was 23 months. The time to treatment failure was 32 months. The only factor that favorably influenced the response to fludarabine was a longer interval between the first treatment and the start of fludarabine. Pretreatment factors associated with shorter survival in the entire population were hemoglobin level less than 95 g/L (P = .02) and platelet count less than 75 x 10(9)/L (P = .02). CONCLUSION: The responses rate in this population with a poor prognosis is close to that reported in shorter series. Patients with WM who are resistant to alkylating agents should be identified early, so that salvage therapy with nucleoside analogs can be started without delay.

Efficacy and safety of oral fludarabine phosphate in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

PURPOSE: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial to assess oral fludarabine phosphate treatment in terms of safety, efficacy, and quality of life. Reference to a historical group of patients treated with the intravenous (IV) formulation allowed the two formulations to be compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia received 10-mg tablets of fludarabine phosphate to a dose of 40 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days, repeated every 4 weeks, for a total of six to eight cycles. Efficacy was assessed using International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and National Cancer Institute criteria for response. Safety monitoring included WHO toxicity grading for adverse events. Quality of life was also assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients received treatment. According to International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria, the overall response rate was 71.6% (complete remission, 37.0%; partial remission, 34.6%). The response rate using National Cancer Institute criteria was 80.2% (complete remission, 12.3%; partial remission, 67.9%). Median time to progression was 841 days (range, 28 to 1,146 days). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicity was myelosuppression. WHO grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included granulocytopenia (32.1%), anemia (9.9%), and thrombocytopenia (4.9%). Gastrointestinal toxicity was more common with the oral formulation than with IV fludarabine phosphate, but was generally mild to moderate and did not require treatment. Statistically significant improvements in mean emotional and insomnia quality-of-life scores were seen after treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that oral fludarabine phosphate is clinically effective and generally well tolerated by patients with previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oral fludarabine phosphate has a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile to the IV formulation. Oral fludarabine phosphate does not adversely affect quality of life and may improve emotional and insomnia scores.

Evaluating treatment strategies in advanced Waldenström macroglobulinemia: use of quality-adjusted survival analysis.

A randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial comparing the efficacy of fludarabine (FAMP) to that of the association of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (CAP) in 92 patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia in first relapse or with primarily resistant disease, was conducted on the behalf of the 'Groupe Coopératif Macroglobulinémie'. The main analysis of this study failed to demonstrate a clear cut benefit of FAMP in terms of overall survival (OS), although a significant benefit in terms of time to disease progression and event-free survival (EFS) was noted. In this rare disorder, where few randomized trials have been conducted, we took advantage of this trial to assess treatment differences while integrating quality of life considerations. We thus performed a quality-adjusted survival analysis, using the quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) approach. Four health states differing in terms of quality of life (QoL) were defined, namely treatment-related toxicity, treatment free of toxicity, no treatment or symptoms, and relapse. The average time spent in these health states (TOX, CT, TWiST and REL, respectively) were then weighted by utility coefficients reflecting relative QoL value according to that of TWiST and summed up giving the so-called Q-TWiST. No difference was found between randomized groups in terms of mean CT. Mean TOX in the two groups were similarly close except when considering alopecia as a relevant toxic event. By contrast, mean TWiST was 5.9 months longer in the FAMP group than in the CAP group (P = 0.006). Unsurprisingly, given the absence of difference in OS but the difference in EFS in favor of the FAMP group, mean REL was increased by 6.8 months in the CAP group (P = 0.047). As a result, benefit of FAMP in terms of average Q-TWiST only relied on the value of the utility coefficient attributed to REL (U(REL)), with a significant benefit when UREL ranged from 0 to 0.28, ie in patients undergoing poor QoL after relapse, which is likely.

Multicenter, randomized comparative trial of fludarabine and the combination of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-prednisone in 92 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia in first relapse or with primary refractory disease.

Few reports are available on the treatment of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and primary or secondary resistance to alkylating-agent-based regimens. From December 1993 through December 1997, 92 patients with WM resistant to first-line therapy (42) or with first relapse (50) after alkylating-agent therapy were randomly assigned to receive fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) of body-surface area on days 1-5) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and prednisone (CAP; 750 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide and 25 mg/m(2) doxorubicin on day 1 and 40 mg/m(2) prednisone on days 1-5). The first end point evaluated was the response rate after 6 treatment courses. Forty-five patients received CAP and 45 received fludarabine. Two patients died before the first course of chemotherapy. No statistical differences were observed between the 2 treatment arms with respect to hematologic toxicity or infections. Mucositis and alopecia occurred significantly more often in patients treated with CAP. Partial responses were obtained in 14 patients (30%) treated with fludarabine and 5 patients (11%) treated with CAP (P =.019). Responses were more durable in patients treated with fludarabine (19 months versus 3 months), and the event-free survival rate was significantly higher in this group (P <.01). Forty-four patients died, 22 in the fludarabine group and 22 in the CAP group. There was no statistical difference in the median overall survival time in the 2 study arms. Fludarabine was thus more active than CAP in salvage therapy of WM and should be tested as first-line therapy in a randomized comparison with alkylating agents.