Testing for Cytomegalovirus in Pregnancy.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a relevant cause of deafness and neurological damage in newborns. Intrauterine CMV transmission might result after primary or nonprimary infections, though at different rates (30% versus 0.2%, respectively). At present, a prenatal diagnosis of CMV infection is based mainly on maternal serology, the detection of CMV-DNA in amniotic fluid and fetal blood, and ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recent evidences suggest that congenital CMV infection may be an immune-mediated disease and that evaluation of humoral and especially T-cell immunities may improve the overall prenatal diagnosis. This review summarizes the most recent advancements in the diagnosis of maternal and prenatal CMV infections.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot Assay but Not CMV QuantiFERON Assay Is a Novel Biomarker To Determine Risk of Congenital CMV Infection in Pregnant Women.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) and CMV QuantiFERON assays were examined as potential biomarkers predictive of congenital CMV (cCMV) transmission. Fifty-seven pregnant women with primary CMV infection and 23 with nonprimary CMV infection were recruited in the study. Maternal age, CMV IgG avidity, viremia, and viruria were also included among the potential predictors. Spearman's statistical correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between the CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay results (P < 0.001), but only the CMV ELISPOT assay correlated with cCMV (P < 0.001). cCMV was positively correlated with maternal viremia and viruria (P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with CMV IgG avidity (P < 0.01). Maternal age and CMV QuantiFERON assay results were not statistically associated with cCMV. CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity detected by the CMV ELISPOT assay plays a critical role in cCMV.

Comparison of the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot and CMV QuantiFERON Cell-Mediated Immune Assays in CMV-Seropositive and -Seronegative Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of congenital infection leading to birth defects and sensorineural anomalies, including deafness. Recently, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) in pregnant women has been shown to correlate with congenital CMV transmission. In this study, two interferon gamma release assays (IGRA), the CMV enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) and CMV QuantiFERON assays, detecting CMV-specific CMI were compared. These assays were performed for 80 CMV-infected (57 primarily and 23 nonprimarily) pregnant women and 115 controls, including 89 healthy CMV-seropositive pregnant women without active CMV infection, 15 CMV-seronegative pregnant women, and 11 seropositive or seronegative nonpregnant women. Statistical tests, including frequency distribution analysis, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Wilcoxon rank sum test for equality on unmatched data, and lowess smoothing local regression, were employed to determine statistical differences between groups and correlation between the assays. The CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay data were not normally distributed and did not display equal variance. The CMV ELISPOT but not CMV QuantiFERON assay displayed significant higher values for primarily CMV-infected women than for the healthy seropositive pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P = 0.0057 and 0.0379, respectively) and those with nonprimary infections (P = 0.0104). The lowess local regression model comparing the assays on an individual basis showed a value bandwidth of 0.8. Both assays were highly accurate in discriminating CMV-seronegative pregnant women. The CMV ELISPOT assay was more effective than CMV-QuantiFERON in differentiating primary from the nonprimary infections. A substantial degree of variability exists between CMV ELISPOT and CMV QuantiFERON assay results for CMV-seropositive pregnant women.

High Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia Predicts CMV Sequelae in Asymptomatic Congenitally Infected Newborns Born to Women With Primary Infection During Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the kinetics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) clearance in blood and urine and the relationship between the viral load in blood at birth and the development of late-onset sequelae in asymptomatic congenital CMV infection. METHODS: Thirty-three newborns with congenital asymptomatic CMV infection born to women with primary CMV infection during pregnancy were enrolled. CMV infection was monitored by polymerase chain reaction analysis of blood and urine. The follow-up examination was concluded at 6 years of age. RESULTS: Ten infants developed postnatal sequelae, whereas twenty-three infants remained asymptomatic. Fifty percent of babies cleared CMV in blood and urine within 3 and 36 months, respectively. Logistic multivariate regression revealed that the risk of neonatal clinical disease crossed the level of 50% with a DNAemia at birth of ≥ 12,000 copies/mL (P = .0002). The risk of hearing deficit crossed the level of 50% with a DNAemia at birth of ≥ 17,000 copies/mL (P = .0001). No significant difference was found between the kinetics of CMV clearance in asymptomatic children as compared to babies with late-onset disease. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic newborns with a CMV DNAemia at birth of ≥ 12,000 copies/mL were more likely to experience CMV-related sequelae. The risk of hearing deficit increased with a viral load in blood of ≥ 17,000 copies/mL.

Strong Cell-Mediated Immune Response to Human Cytomegalovirus Is Associated With Increased Risk of Fetal Infection in Primarily Infected Pregnant Women.

BACKGROUND: Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents one of the leading causes of congenital infections worldwide. Early diagnosis of fetal infection and consequent rapid therapeutic intervention with immunoglobulin treatment may prevent fetal transmission and virus-related sequelae. In this study, the cell-mediated immunity and immunoglobulin avidity were evaluated as potential predictors of congenital transmission of the infection. METHODS: CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) avidity and CMV enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays were employed in 80 pregnant women including 57 primary and 23 nonprimary CMV infections. Congenital infection was assessed using CMV DNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction on amniotic fluid or offspring urine. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic statistical methods were employed to determine the association with congenital infection. RESULTS: Low CMV IgG avidity (25%) alone correlated with a probability of congenital transmission of 18.2% (95% confidence interval, 7.7%-28.8%). In contrast to the expectations, an increase in CMV ELISpot levels was statistically associated with congenital transmission (P = .006). The combined use of CMV ELISpot and low CMV IgG avidity resulted in a higher level of association than either method alone with the incidence of fetal transmission (area under the curve, 0.8685). CONCLUSIONS: CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity represents a relevant marker in assessing the likelihood of congenital CMV transmission, particularly in combination with CMV IgG avidity.

Early primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: maternal hyperimmunoglobulin therapy improves outcomes among infants at 1 year of age.

BACKGROUND: Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy is the leading infectious cause of congenital neurological disabilities. Early CMV infection carries a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcome (sensorineural hearing loss or neurological deficits). Intravenous hyperimmunoglobulin (HIG) therapy seems to be promising, but its efficacy needs further investigation. METHODS: Since 2002, we have enrolled consecutively all pregnant women with early (ie, before gestational week 17) CMV infection. Beginning in 2007, all women were offered treatment with HIG (200 UI per kilogram of maternal weight, in a single intravenous administration). Outcome of infants was evaluated at the age of 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 592 women with early primary CMV infection, amniocentesis for CMV DNA detection was performed for 446. Of the 92 CMV-positive fetuses, pregnancy was terminated for 24, HIG was administered to mothers of 31, and no treatment was received by mothers of 37. Fetuses of treated mothers did not differ from fetuses of nontreated mothers according to mother's age, gestational week of infection, CMV load, or detection of abnormal ultrasonography findings. At the 1-year evaluation, 4 of 31 infants with treated mothers (13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-25%) and 16 of 37 infants with nontreated mothers (43%; 95% CI, 27%-59%) presented with poor outcomes (P < .01, by the 2-tailed Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: HIG treatment improved the outcome of fetuses from women who had primary CMV infection before gestational week 17.

Four-Year Follow-Up of the Maternal Immunological, Virological and Clinical Settings of a 36-Year-Old Woman Experiencing Primary Cytomegalovirus Infection Leading to Intrauterine Infection.

The present study aims to provide the sequential immunological, clinical and virological events occurring in a CMV-infected pregnant woman experiencing intrauterine CMV transmission. In brief, a case of primary CMV infection occurred in a 36-year-old pregnant woman. The patient exhibited early-sustained viremia and viruria, detectable presence of CMV in saliva concomitant with a strong CMV-specific cell-mediated response (427 EliSpots). CMV was detected in the amniotic fluid at 15 weeks of pregnancy (>1 × 106 CMV copies/mL). The pregnancy was deliberately interrupted at 16 weeks of gestation. Fetal histological and pathological examinations revealed placentitis and fetal brain alterations as microcephaly and cortical dysplasia. Interestingly, this clinical report shows: (1) there was a rapid and sustained CMV-specific cell mediated immune response (Th1) in association with low IgG avidity (Th2) correlated with fetal CMV transmission. (2) The levels of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune response persisted at high levels up to 200 weeks after infection despite clinical and viral clearance. (3) The histological and pathological evidence suggests that a potent pro-inflammatory condition at the placental level may lead to cCMV.

GB virus C infection in pregnancy: maternal and perinatal importance of the infection.

OBJECTIVES: The more effective way of transmission of GB virus C (GBV-C) is parenteral, but sexual and vertical transmission seem to be the main way of spreading. We evaluated the prevalence and the effect of GBV-C infection on pregnant women, vertical transmission and viral effects on the newborn. STUDY DESIGN: This study has consecutively enrolled 879 pregnant women. All patients had blood sampling to determine GBV-C RNA, serologic tests for chronic viral infections and seric tests of hepatic damage. The newborns from infected mothers had blood sampling to detect the presence of GBV-C at birth, and after 3 and 6 months. Positive babies were checked until 18 months. RESULTS: 36 (4.1%) women resulted GBV-C positive. Among the positive patients none presented complications during pregnancy. Neither embryonic-fetal abnormalities nor relevant differences in fetal birth weight and week of gestation at delivery were found. 20 out of 36 babies had a follow-up. At birth, 13 (65%) babies were positive. 4 out of 9 vaginal deliveries (44%) and 9 out of 11 cesarean sections (82%) resulted positive to GBV-C RNA. The risk of GBV-C vertical transmission was not significantly increased by type of delivery (p=0.274). At 3 months, 13 babies were GBV-C positive (65%) and 7 were negative (35%). At the end of the follow-up, 9 babies were positive (45%), while 11 were negative (55%). CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients positive to GBV-C RNA was comparatively high (4.1%). This prevalence, in a population without particular risk factors, confirms that common ways of transmission, such as the sexual and vertical ones, might have an important role in viral diffusion. Our data suggest that the infection does not influence the course of pregnancy. The rate of transmission found in our study is high. Type of delivery does not seem to be actually involved in vertical transmission and the protective role of cesarean section has not been confirmed.