Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 11: 139, 2011 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21627846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early onset and high prevalence of chronic disease among Indigenous Australians call for action on prevention. However, there is deficiency of information on the extent to which preventive services are delivered in Indigenous communities. This study examined the variation in quality of preventive care for well adults attending Indigenous community health centres in Australia. METHODS: During 2005-2009, clinical audits were conducted on a random sample (stratified by age and sex) of records of adults with no known chronic disease in 62 Indigenous community health centres in four Australian States/Territories (sample size 1839). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: i) adherence to delivery of guideline-scheduled services within the previous 24 months, including basic measurements, laboratory investigations, oral health checks, and brief intervention on lifestyle modification; and ii) follow-up of abnormal findings. RESULTS: Overall delivery of guideline-scheduled preventive services varied widely between health centres (range 5-74%). Documentation of abnormal blood pressure reading ([greater than or equal to]140/90 mmHg), proteinuria and abnormal blood glucose ([greater than or equal to]5.5 mmol/L) was found to range between 0 and > 90% at the health centre level. A similarly wide range was found between health centres for documented follow up check/test or management plan for people documented to have an abnormal clinical finding. Health centre level characteristics explained 13-47% of variation in documented preventive care, and the remaining variation was explained by client level characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial room to improve preventive care for well adults in Indigenous primary care settings. Understanding of health centre and client level factors affecting variation in the care should assist clinicians, managers and policy makers to develop strategies to improve quality of preventive care in Indigenous communities.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Preventiva/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Australia , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Conducta Cooperativa , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Preventiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
2.
Aust J Rural Health ; 19(3): 111-7, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21605223

RESUMEN

This paper reviews what is known about the challenges of implementing quality improvement programs and draws on data from a systematic continuous quality improvement (CQI) project in remote communities in Australia and Fiji, known as Audit and Best practice for Chronic Disease, to synthesise lessons and discuss the potential for broader application in low and middle income countries, including Pacific Island countries and territories. Although a number of systematic reviews have indicated that quality improvement programs can be effective in changing professional practice and improving the quality of care and patient outcomes, little is known about the key ingredients for change or how services use and implement different strategies to achieve improvements. We identify key features of an innovative CQI model and factors related to implementation that support improvement in diabetes service delivery and intermediate outcomes. Requirements for supporting CQI are identified and the potential for wider application discussed. It is argued that the participatory action research approach supports innovation and broad-based change and the evidence it has produced extends the current knowledge base and facilitates the translation of knowledge into action, for both policy and practice.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Gestión de la Calidad Total/organización & administración , Australia , Enfermedad Crónica , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Difusión de Innovaciones , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Islas del Pacífico , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA