Induction therapy with the selective interleukin-23 inhibitor risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: The interleukin-23 pathway is implicated genetically and biologically in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab (BI 655066, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany), a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23, in patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, we enrolled patients at 36 referral sites in North America, Europe, and southeast Asia. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease for at least 3 months, assessed as moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease at screening, defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) of 220-450, with mucosal ulcers in the ileum or colon, or both, and a Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) of at least 7 (≥4 for patients with isolated ileitis) on ileocolonoscopy scored by a masked central reader. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 using an interactive response system to a double-blind investigational product, and stratified by previous exposure to TNF antagonists (yes vs no). Patients received intravenous 200 mg risankizumab, 600 mg risankizumab, or placebo, at weeks 0, 4, and 8. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CDAI <150) at week 12 (intention-to-treat population). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02031276. FINDINGS: Between March, 2014, and September, 2015, 213 patients were screened, and 121 patients randomised. At baseline, 113 patients (93%) had been previously treated with at least one tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (which had failed in 96 [79%]). At week 12, 25 (31%) of 82 risankizumab patients (pooled 41 patients in 200 mg and 41 patients in 600 mg arms) had clinical remission versus six (15%) of 39 placebo patients (difference vs placebo 15·0%, 95% CI 0·1 to 30·1; p=0·0489). Ten (24%) of 41 patients who received 200 mg risankizumab had clinical remission (9·0%, -8·3 to 26·2; p=0·31) and 15 (37%) of 41 who received the 600 mg dose (20·9%, 2·6 to 39·2; p=0·0252). 95 (79%) patients had adverse events (32 in the placebo group, 32 randomised to 200 mg risankizumab, 31 randomised to 600 mg risankizumab); 18 had severe adverse events (nine, six, three); 12 discontinued (six, five, one); 24 had serious adverse events (12, nine, three). The most common adverse event was nausea and most common serious adverse event was worsening of underlying Crohn's disease. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In this short-term study, risankizumab was more effective than placebo for inducing clinical remission in patients with active Crohn's disease. Therefore, selective blockade of interleukin-23 via inhibition of p19 might be a viable therapeutic approach in Crohn's disease. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Risankizumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, for ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept, dose-finding phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A total of 159 patients with biological-naïve AS, with active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score of ≥4), were randomised (1:1:1:1) to risankizumab (18 mg single dose, 90 mg or 180 mg at day 1 and weeks 8, 16 and 24) or placebo over a 24-week blinded period. The primary outcome was a 40% improvement in Assessment in Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS40) at week 12. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. RESULTS: At week 12, ASAS40 response rates were 25.5%, 20.5% and 15.0% in the 18 mg, 90 mg and 180 mg risankizumab groups, respectively, compared with 17.5% in the placebo group. The estimated difference in proportion between the 180 mg risankizumab and placebo groups (primary endpoint) was -2.5% (95% CI -21.8 to 17.0; p=0.42). Rates of adverse events were similar in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with risankizumab did not meet the study primary endpoint and showed no evidence of clinically meaningful improvements compared with placebo in patients with active AS, suggesting that IL-23 may not be a relevant driver of disease pathogenesis and symptoms in AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02047110; Pre-results.

Planning and core analyses for periodic aggregate safety data reviews.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Safety Planning, Evaluation and Reporting Team gave detailed recommendations for a well-planned and systematic approach for safety data collection and analysis. Important aspects of this approach included regular reviews of aggregate data by a multidisciplinary team focusing on safety. PURPOSE: This article provides information to facilitate the planning and implementation of aggregate data reviews. METHODS: Our recommendations are based on experience of the authors and review of relevant literature. RESULTS: We present information regarding the planning of aggregate data reviews as well as examples of data displays that are useful for many different compounds. A subset of these data displays could form a set of 'core' analyses to be generated for aggregate data reviews.

Efficacy of short-course AZT plus 3TC to reduce nevirapine resistance in the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Single-dose nevirapine (sdNVP)-which prevents mother-to-child transmission of HIV-selects non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance mutations in the majority of women and HIV-infected infants receiving it. This open-label, randomised trial examined the efficacy of short-course zidovudine (AZT) and lamivudine (3TC) with sdNVP in reducing NNRTI resistance in mothers, and as a secondary objective, in infants, in a setting where sdNVP was standard-of-care. METHODS AND FINDINGS: sdNVP alone, administered at the onset of labour and to the infant, was compared to sdNVP with AZT plus 3TC, given as combivir (CBV) for 4 (NVP/CBV4) or 7 (NVP/CBV7) days, initiated simultaneously with sdNVP in labour; their newborns received the same regimens. Women were randomised 1ratio1ratio1. HIV-1 resistance was assessed by population sequencing at: baseline, 2, and 6 wk after birth. An unplanned interim analysis resulted in early stopping of the sdNVP arm. 406 pregnant women were randomised and took study medication (sdNVP 74, NVP/CBV4 164, and NVP/CBV7 168). HIV-1 resistance mutations emerged in 59.2%, 11.7%, and 7.3% of women in the sdNVP, NVP/CBV4, and NVP/CBV7 arms by 6 wk postpartum; differences between NVP-only and both NVP/CBV arms were significant (p<0.0001), but the difference between NVP/CBV4 and NVP/CBV7 was not (p = 0.27). Estimated efficacy comparing combined CBV arms with sdNVP was 85.6%. Similar resistance reductions were seen in infants who were HIV-infected by their 6-wk visit. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of AZT plus 3TC, supplementing maternal and infant sdNVP, reduces emergent NNRTI resistance mutations in both mothers and their infants. However, this trial was not powered to detect small differences between the CBV arms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.govNCT 00144183.

Recommendations for safety planning, data collection, evaluation and reporting during drug, biologic and vaccine development: a report of the safety planning, evaluation, and reporting team.

BACKGROUND: The Safety Planning, Evaluation and Reporting Team (SPERT) was formed in 2006 by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. PURPOSE: SPERT's goal was to propose a pharmaceutical industry standard for safety planning, data collection, evaluation, and reporting, beginning with planning first-in-human studies and continuing through the planning of the post-product-approval period. METHODS: SPERT's recommendations are based on our review of relevant literature and on consensus reached in our discussions. RESULTS: An important recommendation is that sponsors create a Program Safety Analysis Plan early in development. We also give recommendations for the planning of repeated, cumulative meta-analyses of the safety data obtained from the studies conducted within the development program. These include clear definitions of adverse events of special interest and standardization of many aspects of data collection and study design. We describe a 3-tier system for signal detection and analysis of adverse events and highlight proposals for reducing "false positive" safety findings. We recommend that sponsors review the aggregated safety data on a regular and ongoing basis throughout the development program, rather than waiting until the time of submission. LIMITATIONS: We recognize that there may be other valid approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The proactive approach we advocate has the potential to benefit patients and health care providers by providing more comprehensive safety information at the time of new product marketing and beyond.

Risankizumab in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease: an open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin 23 antibody, was superior to placebo in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission at week 12 in a randomised, phase 2 induction study in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Here we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of extended intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance therapy with risankizumab. METHODS: All patients who completed the 12-week induction phase of the double-blind phase 2 induction study were included in this open-label extension study. Patients who did not achieve deep remission, defined as clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] <150) and endoscopic remission (Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS] ≤4, or ≤2 for patients with isolated ileitis), at week 12 received open-label intravenous therapy with 600 mg risankizumab every 4 weeks for 12 weeks; patients in deep remission at week 12 entered a 12-week washout phase. Patients in clinical remission at week 26 were invited to participate in the maintenance phase of the study, in which they received open-label subcutaneous risankizumab (180 mg) every 8 weeks for 26 weeks. 26-week efficacy endpoints were the proportion of patients in clinical remission (CDAI <150), and the proportion of patients who achieved clinical response (either CDAI of <150 or a reduction from baseline of at least 100 points). 52-week efficacy endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving: clinical remission; clinical response; endoscopic response (>50% CDEIS reduction from baseline); endoscopic remission, as defined previously; mucosal healing; and deep remission. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug during the open-label phases of the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02031276. FINDINGS: Of the 108 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind induction trial, six patients were in deep remission and entered the 12-week washout phase. 102 patients were not in deep remission, 101 of whom received 12 weeks of 600 mg risankizumab (33 from the original placebo group, 34 from the 200 mg risankizumab group, and 34 from the 600 mg risankizumab group); the other patient declined to continue the study. At week 26, 54 (53%) of 101 patients treated with 600 mg rizankizumab were in clinical remission. Among patients included in the open-label extension trial, clinical remission rates at week 26 versus week 12 were: 18 (55%) versus six (18%) of 33 patients in the original placebo group; 20 (59%) versus seven (21%) of 34 patients in the original 200 mg risankizumab group; and 16 (47%) versus nine (26%) of 34 patients in the original 600 mg risankizumab group. 62 patients received risankizumab maintenance treatment, including the 54 patients who achieved clinical remission at week 26, the six patients who had achieved deep remission at week 12, and one patient because of a protocol violation. At week 52, clinical remission was maintained in 44 (71%) patients; 50 (81%) patients had a clinical response, 22 (35%) patients were in endoscopic remission, and 34 (55%) patients had an endoscopic response. 15 (24%) patients had mucosal healing and 18 (29%) patients achieved deep remission at week 52. Risankizumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals noted. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were arthralgia (25 [22%] of 115 patients), headache (23 [20%]), abdominal pain (21 [18%]), nasopharyngitis (18 [16%]), nausea (18 [16%]), and pyrexia (15 [13%]). Most adverse events were mild or moderate and considered to be unrelated to study treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Extended induction treatment with open-label intravenous risankizumab was effective in increasing clinical response and remission rates at week 26. Open-label subcutaneous risankizumab maintained remission until week 52 in most patients who were in clinical remission at week 26. Selective blockade of interleukin 23 warrants further investigation as a treatment for Crohn's disease. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Case-control exploration of relationships between early rash or liver toxicity and plasma concentrations of nevirapine and primary metabolites.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation measured trough nevirapine and five oxidative metabolite concentrations in plasma specimens collected from patients who exhibited a rash or liver function abnormality during the first 6 weeks of treatment. METHOD: Patient selection came from three clinical trials, totaling 1,357 patients, from which frozen specimens had been stored and were available for assay. The control patients were matched according to trial, steroid use, CD4 cell count, gender, race, and hepatitis B/C status. Observed plasma metabolite concentrations were compared using signed rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 49 case-control pairs were studied. Women had significantly greater exposure than men to nevirapine and four of the five metabolites at week 2, but the plasma concentrations were comparable by week 4. Steroid (prednisone) co-medication produced significantly different plasma nevirapine and metabolite concentrations for the majority of case-control comparisons at week 3, a week after cessation of steroid treatment, but only occasionally produced a measurable difference at other weeks. CONCLUSION: During the first 6 weeks of nevirapine therapy, the rashes and liver enzyme elevations that occurred appear to be idiosyncratic. There were no strong relationships observed between the plasma concentrations of nevirapine or any of its five metabolites to a casedefining event. The systemic exposure of the metabolite 12-hydroxynevirapine and its successor 4-carboxynevirapine, hypothesized in the skin rash female Brown Norway rat model as reactive intermediates for idiosyncratic immune-mediated adverse reactions, were comparable between case and control samples and were comparable in proportion to the precursor nevirapine exposure.

A group sequential adaptive treatment assignment design for proof of concept and dose selection in headache trials.

The trial objective was to test whether a new mechanism of action would effectively treat migraine headaches and to select a dose range for further investigation. The motivation for a group sequential, adaptive, placebo-controlled trial design was (1) limited information about where across the range of seven doses to focus attention, (2) a need to limit sample size for a complicated inpatient treatment and (3) a desire to reduce exposure of patients to ineffective treatment. A design based on group sequential and up and down designs was developed and operational characteristics were explored by trial simulation. The primary outcome was headache response at 2 h after treatment. Groups of four treated and two placebo patients were assigned to one dose. Adaptive dose selection was based on response rates of 60% seen with other migraine treatments. If more than 60% of treated patients responded, then the next dose was the next lower dose; otherwise, the dose was increased. A stopping rule of at least five groups at the target dose and at least four groups at that dose with more than 60% response was developed to ensure that a selected dose would be statistically significantly (p=0.05) superior to placebo. Simulations indicated good characteristics in terms of control of type 1 error, sufficient power, modest expected sample size and modest bias in estimation. The trial design is attractive for phase 2 clinical trials when response is acute and simple, ideally binary, placebo comparator is required, and patient accrual is relatively slow allowing for the collection and processing of results as a basis for the adaptive assignment of patients to dose groups. The acute migraine trial based on this design was successful in both proof of concept and dose range selection.

Nevirapine and efavirenz elicit different changes in lipid profiles in antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients infected with HIV-1.

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with HIV-1 initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) show presumably fewer atherogenic lipid changes than those initiating most ARTs containing a protease inhibitor. We analysed whether lipid changes differed between the two most commonly used NNRTIs, nevirapine (NVP) and efavirenz (EFV). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospective analysis of lipids and lipoproteins was performed in patients enrolled in the NVP and EFV treatment groups of the 2NN study who remained on allocated treatment during 48 wk of follow-up. Patients were allocated to NVP (n = 417), or EFV (n = 289) in combination with stavudine and lamivudine. The primary endpoint was percentage change over 48 wk in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), total cholesterol (TC), TC:HDL-c ratio, non-HDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. The increase of HDL-c was significantly larger for patients receiving NVP (42.5%) than for patients receiving EFV (33.7%; p = 0.036), while the increase in TC was lower (26.9% and 31.1%, respectively; p = 0.073), resulting in a decrease of the TC:HDL-c ratio for patients receiving NVP (-4.1%) and an increase for patients receiving EFV (+5.9%; p < 0.001). The increase of non-HDL-c was smaller for patients receiving NVP (24.7%) than for patients receiving EFV (33.6%; p = 0.007), as were the increases of triglycerides (20.1% and 49.0%, respectively; p < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (35.0% and 40.0%, respectively; p = 0.378). These differences remained, or even increased, after adjusting for changes in HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cell levels, indicating an effect of the drugs on lipids over and above that which may be explained by suppression of HIV-1 infection. The increases in HDL-c were of the same order of magnitude as those seen with the use of the investigational HDL-c-increasing drugs. CONCLUSION: NVP-containing ART shows larger increases in HDL-c and decreases in TC:HDL-c ratio than an EFV-containing regimen. Based on these findings, protease-inhibitor-sparing regimens based on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, particularly those containing NVP, may be expected to result in a reduced risk of coronary heart disease.

Short-course Combivir after single-dose nevirapine reduces but does not eliminate the emergence of nevirapine resistance in women.

BACKGROUND: In the Treatment Options Preservation Study (TOPS) trial, 4 or 7 days of Combivir (CBV; zidovudine/lamivudine) with maternal single-dose nevirapine (sdNVP) significantly reduced the emergence of NVP resistance as determined by virus population genotyping. To detect NVP resistance with greater sensitivity, we analysed TOPS samples by allele-specific real-time PCR (ASP). METHODS: In a random subset of women from each arm of the trial, plasma samples from before and 6 weeks after sdNVP were analysed using ASP at codons 103, 181, 184 and 190. RESULTS: Samples were analysed from 27 women in the sdNVP arm and 24 each in the CBV 4-day (sdNVP/CBV4) and 7-day (sdNVP/CBV7) arms. ASP detected NVP-resistant variants in week 6 samples from 70% of women in the sdNVP arm, 29% in the sdNVP/CBV4 arm and 33% in sdNVP/CBV7 arm (P<0.01 for sdNVP/CBV4 or sdNVP/CBV7 versus sdNVP; P=1.0 for sdNVP/CBV4 versus sdNVP/CBV7). Lamivudine resistance was detected by ASP in only 1 of 51 women who received CBV. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course CBV significantly reduced but did not eliminate the emergence of NVP resistance after sdNVP. NVP-resistant variants were detected in about one-third of women despite CBV treatment, but the duration of persistence and clinical impact of these variants in response to antiretroviral therapy is uncertain.

Improving the prediction of virological response to tipranavir: the development and validation of a tipranavir-weighted mutation score.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a tipranavir-weighted mutation score that provides guidance to treating physicians on the relative effect of specific protease mutations on tipranavir activity. METHODS: Weights were developed using data from RESIST tipranavir-treated patients based on regressions of virological response at weeks 8 and 24, accounting for baseline CD4(+) T-cell count and background regimen activity. The resulting weighted score and cutoffs were validated using a set of cohort patients external to the tipranavir development programme. Response rates were tabulated for the new weighted score and compared with other tipranavir mutation scores used in clinical practice. RESULTS: The final weights were 74P, 82L/T, 83D and 47V (+4), 58E and 84V (+3), 36I, 43T and 54A/M/V (+2), 10V, 33F and 46L (+1), 24I and 76V (-2), 50L/V (-4), and 54L (-6). Tipranavir-weighted score susceptibility categories were susceptible ≤3, partially susceptible >3 but ≤10, and resistant ≥11. Week 48 response rates for RESIST patients were 34.6%, 15.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Using the external cohort data (n=150), the weighted score was highly associated with week 8 viral load reduction (P=0.0027). Only one other score achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The tipranavir-weighted score developed and externally validated here, in three datasets representing a broad population of treatment-experienced patients, can be used to make clinical decisions about whether to consider tipranavir in a treatment-experienced patient who has limited treatment options.

Genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease associated with reduced susceptibility and virologic response to the protease inhibitor tipranavir.

Tipranavir is a novel, nonpeptidic protease inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with activity against clinical HIV-1 isolates from treatment-experienced patients. HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic data from phase II and III clinical trials of tipranavir with protease inhibitor-experienced patients were analyzed to determine the association of protease mutations with reduced susceptibility and virologic response to tipranavir. Specific protease mutations were identified based on stepwise multiple-regression analyses of phase II study data sets. Validation included analyses of phase III study data sets to determine if the same mutations would be selected and to assess how these mutations contribute to multiple-regression models of tipranavir-related phenotype and of virologic response. A tipranavir mutation score was developed from these analyses, which consisted of a unique string of 16 protease positions and 21 mutations (10V, 13V, 20M/R/V, 33F, 35G, 36I, 43T, 46L, 47V, 54A/M/V, 58E, 69K, 74P, 82L/T, 83D, and 84V). HIV-1 isolates displaying an increasing number of these tipranavir resistance-associated mutations had a reduced phenotypic susceptibility and virologic response to tipranavir. Regression models for predicting virologic response in phase III trials revealed that each point in the tipranavir score was associated with a 0.16-log10 copies/ml-lower virologic response to tipranavir at week 24 of treatment. A lower number of points in the tipranavir score and a greater number of active drugs in the background regimen were predictive of virologic success. These analyses demonstrate that the tipranavir mutation score is a potentially valuable tool for predicting the virologic response to tipranavir in protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Plasma HIV-1 RNA decline within the first two weeks of treatment is comparable for nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs combined and is not predictive of long-term virologic efficacy: A 2NN substudy.

BACKGROUND: The initial rate of plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) decline has been proposed as a marker of early efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and a possible predictor of late efficacy. We compared the rate of pVL decline in patients starting ART with nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV), or both drugs combined in addition to lamivudine (3TC) and stavudine (d4T). METHODS: Analysis of the viral decay constant (VDc) during the first 2 weeks of treatment in patients enrolled in the 2NN study who remained on allocated treatment. RESULTS: The median VDc (log10 copies per day, [interquartile range]) was similar for NVP (0.30 [0.25-0.36], EFV (0.31 [0.27-0.37]), and NVP + EFV (0.30 [0.27-0.36]). Patients with a baseline pVL >100,000 copies/mL were 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-12.3) times more likely to have a VDc >75th percentile. A high VDc was not associated with plasma drug concentration or with a decreased risk of virologic failure at week 48 after the start of therapy (hazard ratio = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.2). CONCLUSION: NVP, EFV, or NVP + EFV in combination with 3TC and d4T show similar rates of pVL decline during the first 2 weeks of treatment. The VDc with these regimens is not predictive of late virologic efficacy.

Dose response and safety study of meloxicam up to 22.5 mg daily in rheumatoid arthritis: a 12 week multicenter, double blind, dose response study versus placebo and diclofenac.

OBJECTIVE: This Phase III, placebo and active controlled, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg daily for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A 12 week, randomized, double blind, double dummy, parallel group trial compared daily oral meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg to placebo (negative control) and diclofenac 75 mg BID (positive control). A total of 894 patients (18 years of age with confirmed RA who flared following an NSAID-free period) were randomized to be treated. Baseline scores for all endpoints were similar among the treatment groups. Patient assessments were at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks or early termination. RESULTS: All treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement from baseline (p < 0.001). Meloxicam 7.5 and 22.5 mg was significantly superior to placebo in all 5 primary efficacy endpoints (swollen joint count, tender joint count, patient pain, patient and physician global; all p < 0.05). Diclofenac 150 mg was superior to placebo for 4 of 5 primary efficacy measures (all but swollen joint count; p < 0.05) and meloxicam 15 mg was superior for 3 of 5 primary endpoints (patient pain and patient and physician global). AUC of patient global, patient pain, and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire demonstrated dose-response (p < 0.04), while AUC ACR20 showed a qualitative trend in the same direction. The rate of gastrointestinal (GI) events during the 12 week trial for all doses of meloxicam and diclofenac did not differ significantly from placebo (23.2-32.0%). GI withdrawals were comparable and not significantly different across all treatment groups (4.3-5.7%). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated a dose response relationship for meloxicam 7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg using AUC measurement of response for the treatment of RA. All 3 doses of meloxicam. and positive control, were effective in the treatment of RA. The overall incidence rate of GI events did not differ significantly from placebo in either the meloxicam treatment groups or the positive control.

Randomized, controlled study of the effects of a short course of prednisone on the incidence of rash associated with nevirapine in patients infected with HIV-1.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with prednisone on the incidence of nevirapine-associated rash in HIV-1-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: This was a 24-week, prospective, randomized, open-label, international study. Patients were randomized to receive nevirapine plus open-label prednisone (40 mg once daily for 14 days) (n = 69) or nevirapine alone (n = 69). All patients received at least two other antiretroviral drugs. Nevirapine was administered at the lead-in dosage of 200 mg once daily. After the initial 2 weeks of the study, the nevirapine dosage was increased to 200 mg twice daily. RESULTS: During the first 6 weeks of treatment, rash was not reduced in the patients who received prednisone: prednisone treatment group, 23 (33%)/69; nonprednisone treatment group, 13 (19%)/69 (one-tailed Fisher exact test for prednisone reducing the incidence of rash, p =.984). There tended to be more severe rashes (7% versus 1%, respectively) and more therapy discontinuations due to rash (16% versus 9%, respectively) in the prednisone treatment group than in the nonprednisone treatment group. Risk factors for rash included higher pretreatment CD4 cell count, lower HIV-1 RNA level, female sex, and higher trough nevirapine concentrations. The prednisone treatment group had a marked increase in the median CD4 cell count in the first 2 weeks, which stabilized at a level similar to that in the nonprednisone treatment group. HIV-1 RNA responses were similar between the two groups. Treatment-naive patients had similar decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at week 24: approximately 2.3 log(10) copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 2 weeks of concomitant therapy with prednisone does not decrease the occurrence of nevirapine-associated rash. The use of prednisone is not recommended to prevent rash in patients receiving nevirapine. Prednisone administration had no adverse effects on the virological responses or on CD4 cell count changes at 24 weeks.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation and short-term activity of stavudine, nevirapine, and nelfinavir therapy in HIV-1-infected adults.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate pharmacokinetic interaction, short-term safety, and antiretroviral activity of stavudine (d4T), nevirapine (NVP), and nelfinavir (NFV) as combination HIV-1 therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study investigating the pharmacokinetic interactions between d4T, NVP, and NFV and documenting short-term tolerability and virologic and immunologic activity. METHODS: Twenty-five HIV-1-infected adults, naive to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs), < or = 6 months of d4T treatment, CD4 > or = 100 cells/mm, and viral load > = 5,000 copies/mL enrolled. All received NFV 750 mg 3 times daily and d4T 30-40 mg twice daily for 1 week, then added NVP at 200 mg once daily for 2 weeks and 200 mg twice daily thereafter. Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of NFV, AG1402 (metabolite of NFV), and d4T were compared before and after the addition of NVP. RESULTS: No statistically significant changes in NFV or d4T pharmacokinetics were observed following the addition of NVP. Levels of AG1402 were suppressed 60-70%. Drug-related adverse events were seen at expected rates. At day 36, median viral load suppression was 2.0 log10 and absolute CD4 count increased by 111 cells/mm. CONCLUSIONS: NVP administration did not significantly affect the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of NFV or d4T. The combination of d4T, NVP, and NFV induced rapid suppression of HIV-1 viral load and rises in CD4 cell count.