Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 239
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(2): 377-391, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787924

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The role of alcohol in young-onset breast cancer (YOBC) is unclear. We examined associations between lifetime alcohol consumption and YOBC in the Young Women's Health History Study, a population-based case-control study of breast cancer among Non-Hispanic Black and White women < 50 years of age. METHODS: Breast cancer cases (n = 1,812) were diagnosed in the Metropolitan Detroit and Los Angeles County SEER registry areas, 2010-2015. Controls (n = 1,381) were identified through area-based sampling and were frequency-matched to cases by age, site, and race. Alcohol consumption and covariates were collected from in-person interviews. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was conducted to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between alcohol consumption and YOBC overall and by subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2, or triple negative). RESULTS: Lifetime alcohol consumption was not associated with YOBC overall or with subtypes (all ptrend ≥ 0.13). Similarly, alcohol consumption in adolescence, young and middle adulthood was not associated with YOBC (all ptrend ≥ 0.09). An inverse association with triple-negative YOBC, however, was observed for younger age at alcohol use initiation (< 18 years vs. no consumption), aOR (95% CI) = 0.62 (0.42, 0.93). No evidence of statistical interaction by race or household poverty was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest alcohol consumption has a different association with YOBC than postmenopausal breast cancer-lifetime consumption was not linked to increased risk and younger age at alcohol use initiation was associated with a decreased risk of triple-negative YOBC. Future studies on alcohol consumption in YOBC subtypes are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Femenino , Humanos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Progesterona , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/etiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Blanco , Edad de Inicio
2.
JAMA ; 331(4): 302-317, 2024 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261043

RESUMEN

Importance: Adverse outcomes associated with treatments for localized prostate cancer remain unclear. Objective: To compare rates of adverse functional outcomes between specific treatments for localized prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational cohort study using data from 5 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries. Participants were treated for localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2012. At baseline, 1877 had favorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT1-cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL, and grade group 1-2) and 568 had unfavorable-prognosis prostate cancer (defined as cT2cN0M0, prostate-specific antigen level of 20-50 ng/mL, or grade group 3-5). Follow-up data were collected by questionnaire through February 1, 2022. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy (n = 1043), external beam radiotherapy (n = 359), brachytherapy (n = 96), or active surveillance (n = 379) for favorable-prognosis disease and radical prostatectomy (n = 362) or external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 206) for unfavorable-prognosis disease. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were patient-reported sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormone function measured using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (range, 0-100; 100 = best). Associations of specific therapies with each outcome were estimated and compared at 10 years after treatment, adjusting for corresponding baseline scores, and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important differences were 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritation, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormone function. Results: A total of 2445 patients with localized prostate cancer (median age, 64 years; 14% Black, 8% Hispanic) were included and followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Among 1877 patients with favorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -12.1 [95% CI, -16.2 to -8.0]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -7.2 [95% CI, -12.3 to -2.0]), compared with active surveillance. Among 568 patients with unfavorable prognosis, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence (adjusted mean difference, -26.6 [95% CI, -35.0 to -18.2]), but not worse sexual function (adjusted mean difference, -1.4 [95% CI, -11.1 to 8.3), compared with external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy. Among patients with unfavorable prognosis, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.2 to -0.7]) and hormone (adjusted mean difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -9.5 to -0.3]) function compared with radical prostatectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients treated for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence but not worse sexual function at 10-year follow-up compared with radiotherapy or surveillance among people with more favorable prognosis and compared with radiotherapy for those with unfavorable prognosis. Among men with unfavorable-prognosis disease, external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with worse bowel and hormone function at 10-year follow-up compared with radical prostatectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Pronóstico , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 200(3): 391-398, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296280

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Little is known about the factors contributing to the receipt of non-recommended surveillance testing among early-stage breast cancer survivors. We assessed primary care providers (PCP) attitudes about and tendency to order non-recommended surveillance testing for asymptomatic early-stage breast cancer survivors post-adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A stratified random sample of PCPs identified by early-stage breast cancer survivors were surveyed (N = 518, 61% response rate). PCPs were asked how likely they would be to order bone scans, imaging and/or tumor marker testing using a clinical vignette of an early-stage asymptomatic patient where these tests are non-recommended. A composite tendency to order score was created and categorized by tertiles (low, moderate, high). PCP-reported factors associated with high and moderate tendency to order non-recommended testing (vs. low) were estimated using multivariable, multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: In this sample, 26% reported a high tendency to order non-recommended surveillance tests during survivorship for early-stage breast cancer survivors. PCPs who identified as family practice physicians and PCPs reporting more confidence in ordering surveillance testing were more likely to report a high tendency to order non-recommended testing (vs. low) ((aOR family practice 2.09, CI 1.2, 3.8; aOR more confidence 1.9, CI 1.1, 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based sample of PCPs caring for breast cancer survivors, over a quarter of PCPs reported they would order non-recommended surveillance testing for asymptomatic early-stage breast cancer survivors. Efforts to better support PCPs and disseminate information about appropriate surveillance for cancer survivors are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 88(4): 831-840, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Melanoma survival literature predominantly represents patients >65 years of age. Study of younger patients may reveal potential age-group-specific differences in survival outcome. OBJECTIVE: Identify factors associated with differences in melanoma survival in 2 age groups, adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 15-39) and older adults (ages 40-64). METHODS: This population-based registry study included all cases (n = 81,597) of cutaneous melanoma diagnosed at ages 15 to 64 from 2004 to 2015 in California. Age-group-specific multivariable Cox hazard regressions were used. RESULTS: In the adjusted, age-group-specific models, AYA patients with stage IV melanoma had worse survival (hazard ratio: 20.39, 95% CI: 13.30-31.20) than was observed among older adults (hazard ratio: 10.79, 95% CI: 9.33-12.48). Thicker tumors and public insurance were also associated with worse survival for AYAs than observed in models for older adults. AYAs experienced better survival when detected at earlier stages. LIMITATIONS: Registry data do not routinely collect behavioral information or family history of melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was much worse for AYAs with stage IV melanoma than observed among older adults. To improve AYA survival, early melanoma detection is critical. Greater awareness, suspicion, and screening for AYA melanoma may disrupt delays in diagnosis and reduce the excess burden of mortality from stage IV melanoma in young patients.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Seguro de Salud , Sistema de Registros
5.
JAMA ; 330(1): 43-51, 2023 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276540

RESUMEN

Importance: Germline genetic testing is recommended by practice guidelines for patients diagnosed with cancer to enable genetically targeted treatment and identify relatives who may benefit from personalized cancer screening and prevention. Objective: To describe the prevalence of germline genetic testing among patients diagnosed with cancer in California and Georgia between 2013 and 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study including patients aged 20 years or older who had been diagnosed with any type of cancer between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019, that was reported to statewide Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries in California and Georgia. These patients were linked to genetic testing results from 4 laboratories that performed most germline testing for California and Georgia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was germline genetic testing within 2 years of a cancer diagnosis. Testing trends were analyzed with logistic regression modeling. The results of sequencing each gene, including variants associated with increased cancer risk (pathogenic results) and variants whose cancer risk association was unknown (uncertain results), were evaluated. The genes were categorized according to their primary cancer association, including breast or ovarian, gastrointestinal, and other, and whether practice guidelines recommended germline testing. Results: Among 1 369 602 patients diagnosed with cancer between 2013 and 2019 in California and Georgia, 93 052 (6.8%) underwent germline testing through March 31, 2021. The proportion of patients tested varied by cancer type: male breast (50%), ovarian (38.6%), female breast (26%), multiple (7.5%), endometrial (6.4%), pancreatic (5.6%), colorectal (5.6%), prostate (1.1%), and lung (0.3%). In a logistic regression model, compared with the 31% (95% CI, 30%-31%) of non-Hispanic White patients with male breast cancer, female breast cancer, or ovarian cancer who underwent testing, patients of other races and ethnicities underwent testing less often: 22% (95% CI, 21%-22%) of Asian patients, 25% (95% CI, 24%-25%) of Black patients, and 23% (95% CI, 23%-23%) of Hispanic patients (P < .001 using the χ2 test). Of all pathogenic results, 67.5% to 94.9% of variants were identified in genes for which practice guidelines recommend testing and 68.3% to 83.8% of variants were identified in genes associated with the diagnosed cancer type. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients diagnosed with cancer in California and Georgia between 2013 and 2019, only 6.8% underwent germline genetic testing. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, rates of testing were lower among Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Etnicidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Hispánicos o Latinos
6.
Cancer ; 128(6): 1284-1293, 2022 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34847259

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite mandated insurance coverage for breast reconstruction following mastectomy, health care costs are increasingly passed on to women through cost-sharing arrangements and high-deductible health plans. In this population-based study, the authors assessed perceived financial and employment declines related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy. METHODS: Women with early-stage breast cancer (stages 0-II) diagnosed between July 2013 and May 2015 who underwent mastectomy were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries of Georgia and Los Angeles and were surveyed. Primary outcome measures included patients' appraisal of their financial and employment status after cancer treatment. Multivariable models evaluated the association between breast reconstruction and primary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 883 patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy, 44.2% did not undergo breast reconstruction, and 55.8% underwent reconstruction. Overall, 21.9% of the cohort reported being worse off financially since their diagnosis (25.8% with reconstruction vs 16.6% without reconstruction; P = .002). Women who underwent reconstruction reported higher out-of-pocket medical expenses (32.1% vs 15.6% with expenses greater than $5000; P < .001). Reconstruction was independently associated with a perceived decline in financial status (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.22; P = .013). Among women who were employed at the time of their diagnosis, there was no association between reconstruction and a perceived decline in employment status (P = .927). CONCLUSIONS: In this diverse cohort of women who underwent mastectomy, those who elected to undergo reconstruction experienced higher out-of-pocket medical expenses and self-reported financial decline. Patients, providers, and policymakers should be aware of the potential financial implications related to reconstruction despite mandatory insurance coverage.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Mastectomía
7.
Ann Surg ; 276(1): e40-e47, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33074908

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine physician-reported use of and barriers to active surveillance for thyroid cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is not clear whether active surveillance for thyroid cancer is widely used. METHODS: Surgeons and endocrinologists identified by thyroid cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries of Georgia and Los Angeles County were surveyed between 2018 and 2019. Multivariable weighted logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine physician acceptance and use of active surveillance. Results: Of the 654 eligible physicians identified, 448 responded to the survey (69% response rate). The majority (76%) believed that active surveillance was an appropriate management option, but only 44% used it in their practice. Characteristics of physicians who stated that active surveillance was appropriate management, but did not report using it included more years in practice (reference group <10 years in practice): 10 to 19 years [odds ratio, OR 0.50 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.28-0.92]; 20 to 29 years [OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.15-0.62)]; >30 years [OR 0.30 (95% CI 0.15-0.61)] and higher patient volume 11 to 30 patients per year [OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.21 -0.70)] and >50 patients per year [OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.16-0.71)] compared to < 10, with no significant difference in those seeing 31 to 50 patients. Physicians reported multiple barriers to implementing active surveillance including patient does not want (80.3%), loss to follow-up concern (78.4%), more patient worry (57.6%), and malpractice lawsuit concern (50.9%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite most physicians considering active surveillance to be appropriate management, more than half are not using it. Addressing existing barriers is key to improving uptake.


Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Programa de VERF , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Espera Vigilante
8.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 195(3): 353-366, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35925453

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between lifetime personal cigarette smoking and young-onset breast cancer (YOBC; diagnosed <50 years of age) risk overall and by breast cancer (BC) subtype, and whether risk varies by race or socioeconomic position (SEP). METHODS: Data are from the Young Women's Health History Study (YWHHS), a population-based case-control study of non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) women, ages 20-49 years (n = 1812 cases, n = 1381 controls) in the Los Angeles County and Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry areas, 2010-2015. Lifetime personal cigarette smoking characteristics and YOBC risk by subtype were examined using sample-weighted, multivariable-adjusted polytomous logistic regression. RESULTS: YOBC risk associated with ever versus never smoking differed by subtype (Pheterogeneity = 0.01) with risk significantly increased for Luminal A (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.68) and HER2-type (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 1.23-3.16), and no association with Luminal B or Triple Negative subtypes. Additionally, ≥30 years since smoking initiation (versus never) was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of Luminal A (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.07-2.26) and HER2-type YOBC (aOR 2.77; 95% CI 1.32-5.79), but not other subtypes. In addition, among parous women, smoking initiated before first full-term pregnancy (versus never) was significantly associated with an increased risk of Luminal A YOBC (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.11-1.89). We observed little evidence for interactions by race and SEP. CONCLUSION: Findings confirm prior reports of a positive association between cigarette smoking and Luminal A YOBC and identify a novel association between smoking and HER2-type YOBC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Fumar Cigarrillos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fumar Cigarrillos/efectos adversos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
9.
J Urol ; 208(6): 1226-1239, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006050

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Data comparing radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost are lacking. To better guide shared decision making regarding treatment, we compared patient reported outcomes through 5 years following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2011-2012, men aged <80 years with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled and followed longitudinally. Patient reported outcomes included the Expanded Prostate Index Composite. Regression models adjusted for baseline scores and covariates were constructed. RESULTS: The study population included 112 men treated with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost and 1,553 treated with radical prostatectomy. Compared to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive (adjusted mean score difference [95% confidence interval]: 5.0 [-8.7, -1.3]; P = .008 at 5 years) and better urinary incontinence function (13.3 [7.7, 18.9]; P < .001 at 5 years) through 5 years. Urinary function bother was similar between groups (P > .4 at all timepoints). Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with worse bowel function (-4.0 [-6.9, -1.1]; P = .006 at 5 years) through 5 years compared to radical prostatectomy. Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with better sexual function at 1 year (12.0 [6.5, 17.5]; P < .001 at 1 year) compared to radical prostatectomy, but there was insufficient evidence to reject the supposition that no difference was seen at 3 or 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive and bowel functions but better urinary incontinence function through 5 years after treatment. These patient-reported functional outcomes may clarify treatment expectations and help inform treatment choices for localized prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Incontinencia Urinaria , Masculino , Humanos , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Próstata/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Calidad de Vida
10.
J Urol ; 207(5): 1029-1037, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34978488

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare patient-reported mental health outcomes for men undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer longitudinally over 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective population-based analysis using the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study. Patient-reported depressive symptoms (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression [CES-D]) and domains of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form survey evaluating emotional well-being and energy/fatigue were assessed through 5 years after treatment with surgery, radiotherapy (with or without androgen deprivation therapy) and active surveillance. Regression models were adjusted for outcome-specific baseline function, demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment approach. RESULTS: A total of 2,742 men (median [quartiles] age 64 [59-70]) met inclusion criteria. Baseline depressive symptoms, as measured by the CES-D, were low (median 4, quartiles 1-8) without differences between groups. We found no effect of treatment modality on depressive symptoms (p=0.78), though older age, poorer health, being unmarried and baseline CES-D score were associated with declines in mental health. There was no clinically meaningful association between treatment modality and scores for either emotional well-being (p=0.81) or energy/fatigue (p=0.054). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, population-based cohort study of men with localized prostate cancer showed no clinically important differences in mental health outcomes including depressive symptoms, emotional well-being, and energy/fatigue according to the treatment received (surgery, radiotherapy, or surveillance). However, we identified a number of characteristics associated with worse mental health outcomes including: older age, poorer health, being unmarried, and baseline CES-D score which may allow for early identification of patients most at risk of these outcomes following treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Fatiga/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida
11.
Psychooncology ; 31(5): 761-769, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34825748

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Acculturation discrepancy occurs when the rate of host culture acquisition and/or heritage culture retention between non-native parents and their children diverges. The resulting conflict may exacerbate mental health conditions in already vulnerable populations. The present study examined discrepancies between Hispanic and Anglo-American acculturation, as two separate constructs, and mental health symptomology in Hispanic childhood cancer survivors (HCCS) and their parents. METHODS: Participants were 68 matched parent-child dyads (HCCS (Mage  = 19.4 (2.77) years., 50.0% female); and parent (Mage  = 46.3 (6.07) years., 89.7% female)). Study variables were HCCS posttraumatic-growth (PTG) and quality-of-life (PedsQL); parent posttraumatic stress (PTSD); and parent/HCCS depressive symptoms (CESD) and acculturation orientations. Discrepancy was calculated as the dyadic difference between like acculturation measures. RESULTS: After controlling for covariates, Hispanic acculturation discrepancy and HCCS psychosocial health (a subset of PedsQL) was negatively correlated (r = -0.26, p < 0.5); while Anglo-American acculturation discrepancy was positively associated with HCCS PTG (r = 0.34, p < 0.01) and overall PedsQL (r = 0.24, p < 0.05), and moderated the relationship between parent CESD and HCCS PedsQL. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the two acculturation discrepancy constructs have opposite effects. HCCS losing their heritage culture while their parents simultaneously retain it appears to be a deleterious process; whereas, HCCS learning the US culture more rapidly than parents may have protective benefits. This study has important implications for mental health interventions among HCCS. Findings should be used to inform the survivorship clinical community of the value of acculturation timing and parent/child discrepancy.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Aculturación , Adulto , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Niño , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Asociaciones de Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Padres/psicología , Adulto Joven
12.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 24(11): 1705-1713, 2022 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35291014

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: It is established that higher prediagnostic circulating androgen and estrogen levels are associated with increased breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Pooled analyses in postmenopausal women report higher androgen and estrogen levels in current heavy cigarette smokers compared to nonsmokers. However, evidence among premenopausal women has been inconsistent. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate differences in standardized mean hormone levels among current premenopausal smokers compared to nonsmokers. We reviewed and collated publications with sex hormone levels by smoking status among healthy, premenopausal women who were nonusers of exogenous hormones, including oral contraceptives, using PubMed through December 2019. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to combine the standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate, and sex hormone-binding globulin by smoking status. Findings were summarized by menstrual cycle phase and overall. RESULTS: Nineteen published peer-reviewed articles were included. Significantly increased testosterone levels among smokers compared to nonsmokers were identified from cross-sectional studies with varied menstrual phase timing (SMD 0.14; 95% CI 0.0005, 0.29) and significantly increased dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels were found over all phases (SMD 0.12; 95% CI 0.01, 0.22). However, substantial heterogeneity existed in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that smoking may increase blood androgen levels in healthy premenopausal women which may increase breast cancer risk; however, the differences were modest. Larger and covariate-adjusted studies with standardized collection over the menstrual cycle are needed to better understand this relationship and to reduce heterogeneity. IMPLICATIONS: Existing research has described associations between high prediagnostic estradiol and androgen levels with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women and has established active smoking as a breast cancer risk factor. However, the smoking and circulating sex hormone associations among premenopausal women remain inadequately studied. In this meta-analysis, we identified an association between smoking and higher mean testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels with consideration of menstrual phase, providing additional information on smoking's potential pathway to premenopausal breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Globulina de Unión a Hormona Sexual , Femenino , Humanos , Globulina de Unión a Hormona Sexual/análisis , Globulina de Unión a Hormona Sexual/metabolismo , Andrógenos , Progesterona , Estudios Transversales , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales , Estradiol , Testosterona , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Estrógenos , Fumar , Deshidroepiandrosterona , Anticonceptivos Orales , Sulfatos/metabolismo
13.
Cancer ; 127(11): 1912-1925, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595853

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To inform patients who are in the process of selecting prostate cancer treatment, the authors compared disease-specific function after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone versus EBRT plus a low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost (EBRT-LDR). METHODS: For this prospective study, men who had localized prostate cancer in 2011 and 2012 were enrolled. Assessments at baseline, 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 years included the patient-reported Expanded Prostate Index Composite, the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey, and treatment-related regret. Regression models were adjusted for baseline function and for patient and treatment characteristics. The minimum clinically important difference in scores on the Expanded Prostate Index Composite 26-item instrument was from 5 to 7 for urinary irritation and from 4 to 6 for bowel function. RESULTS: Six-hundred ninety-five men met inclusion criteria and received either EBRT (n = 583) or EBRT-LDR (n = 112). Patients in the EBRT-LDR group were younger (median age, 66 years [interquartile range [IQR], 60-71 years] vs 69 years [IQR, 64-74 years]; P < .001), were less likely to receive pelvic radiotherapy (10% vs 18%; P = .040), and had higher baseline 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey physical function scores (median score, 95 [IQR, 86-100] vs 90 [IQR, 70-100]; P < .001). Over a 3-year period, compared with EBRT, EBRT-LDR was associated with worse urinary irritative scores (adjusted mean difference at 3 years, -5.4; 95% CI, -9.3, -1.6) and bowel function scores (-4.1; 95% CI, -7.6, -0.5). The differences were no longer clinically meaningful at 5 years (difference in urinary irritative scores: -4.5; 95% CI, -8.4, -0.5; difference in bowel function scores: -2.1; 95% CI, -5.7, -1.4). However, men who received EBRT-LDR were more likely to report moderate or big problems with urinary function bother (adjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.2) and frequent urination (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6) through 5 years. There were no differences in survival or treatment-related regret between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EBRT alone, EBRT-LDR was associated with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative and bowel function over 3 years after treatment and more urinary bother at 5 years. LAY SUMMARY: In men with prostate cancer who received external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without a brachytherapy boost (EBRT-LDR), EBRT-LDR was associated with clinically worse urinary irritation and bowel function through 3 years but resolved after 5 years. Men who received EBRT-LDR continued to report moderate-to-big problems with urinary function bother and frequent urination through 5 years. There was no difference in treatment-related regret or survival between patients who received EBRT and those who received EBRT-LDR. These intermediate-term estimates of function may facilitate counseling for men who are selecting treatment.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Braquiterapia/métodos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 32(10): 1129-1148, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292440

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The etiology of young-onset breast cancer (BC) is poorly understood, despite its greater likelihood of being hormone receptor-negative with a worse prognosis and persistent racial and socioeconomic inequities. We conducted a population-based case-control study of BC among young Black and White women and here discuss the theory that informed our study, exposures collected, study methods, and operational results. METHODS: Cases were non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) women age 20-49 years with invasive BC in metropolitan Detroit and Los Angeles County SEER registries 2010-2015. Controls were identified through area-based sampling from the U.S. census and frequency matched to cases on study site, race, and age. An eco-social theory of health informed life-course exposures collected from in-person interviews, including socioeconomic, reproductive, and energy balance factors. Measured anthropometry, blood (or saliva), and among cases SEER tumor characteristics and tumor tissue (from a subset of cases) were also collected. RESULTS: Of 5,309 identified potentially eligible cases, 2,720 sampled participants were screened and 1,812 completed interviews (682 NHB, 1140 NHW; response rate (RR): 60%). Of 24,612 sampled control households 18,612 were rostered, 2,716 participants were sampled and screened, and 1,381 completed interviews (665 NHB, 716 NHW; RR: 53%). Ninety-nine% of participants completed the main interview, 82% provided blood or saliva (75% blood only), and SEER tumor characteristics (including ER, PR and HER2 status) were obtained from 96% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the successfully established YWHHS should expand our understanding of young-onset BC etiology overall and by tumor type and identify sources of racial and socioeconomic inequities in BC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
15.
J Urol ; 205(3): 761-768, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252300

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Contemporary treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer provide comparable overall and cancer-specific survival. However, the degree of financial burden imposed by treatment, the factors contributing to that burden, and how different treatments compare with regard to financial toxicity remain poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study enrolled men with localized prostate cancer from 2011 to 2012. Questionnaires were collected at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months after enrollment. Differences in patient-reported financial burden were compared between active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 2,121 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 15% reported large or very large burden of treatment costs within 6 months, declining to 3% by year 5. When controlling for age, education, income and other covariates, external beam radiotherapy was associated with greater financial burden than active surveillance and radical prostatectomy at 1 year (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.1 and OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.3, respectively) and 3 years (OR 3.1 95% CI 1.1-8.8 and OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7, respectively). Radical prostatectomy and active surveillance had similar rates of financial burden at all time points. Age, race, education, and D'Amico risk group were associated with financial burden. CONCLUSIONS: External beam radiotherapy was associated with the highest financial burden, even when controlling for age, education and income. Prospective studies that directly measure out-of-pocket and indirect costs and account more thoroughly for baseline socioeconomic differences are warranted in order to identify those most at risk.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía , Programa de VERF , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Med Care ; 59(4): 295-303, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528232

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, our objective was to identify whether racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences (PE) with health care are associated with stage at CRC diagnosis. METHODS: The authors used the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry data linked with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems to conduct a retrospective cohort analysis. They examined composite measures from surveys to assess 3 domains: patient-centeredness, timeliness, and realized access. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between PE with care and earlier stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 9211 patients, 31.1% non-Hispanic White, 27.2% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 32.3% Hispanic, and 36.4% Asian were diagnosed with early stage cancer. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, for the timeliness domain, Hispanic [ß=-2.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.42 to -0.39] and Asian (ß=-6.65; 95% CI, -9.44 to -3.87) patients had significant lower adjusted mean score for getting care quickly. For the realized access domain, Asian (ß=-5.78; 95% CI, -8.51 to -3.05) and NHB patients (ß=-3.18; 95% CI, -5.50 to -0.87) had significantly lower adjusted mean score for getting needed prescription drugs compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Among NHB patients, a 5-Unit increase in getting needed care quickly was associated with higher odds of earlier CRC stage at diagnosis (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10). CONCLUSION: There are racial/ethnic disparities in PE with timeliness and realized access to care preceding a CRC diagnosis. Among NHB patients, poor experiences with timeliness and realized access of care may be associated with later stage at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(7): 3649-3656, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180201

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: As childhood cancer survivors (CCS) age, they face numerous long-term consequences, or late effects, from their cancer treatments. Late effects may be mitigated by health-promoting behaviors, including the avoidance of substance use. CCS with greater depression symptomology have reported greater substance use, but whether their habits are associated with the mental health of their caregivers is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine caregiver psychosocial correlates of CCS substance use. METHODS: This study utilizes data from the Project Forward pilot study, which collected data from 129 CCS-caregiver dyads (CCS mean age = 19.43, SD = 2.78; years since diagnosis = 7.62, SD = 2.06) from two large hospitals in Los Angeles County. CCS provided self-reported information on substance use, while caregivers self-reported on posttraumatic stress symptomatology (PTSS) associated with their child's cancer and current depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Among CCS, prior 30-day tobacco, marijuana, binge drinking, and polysubstance use were 12.50%, 14.17%, 13.18%, and 12.40%. In multivariable logistic regression models, caregiver PTSS was independently positively associated with CCS tobacco use. No other significant relationships between caregiver mental health (PTSS or depressive symptoms) and CCS substance use were observed. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that caregiver PTSS is partially associated with CCS behavioral health. Survivorship care may improve tobacco use prevention efforts by incorporating family or caregiver mental health needs. Future research should examine the potential mediating effect of CCS mental health, including depressive symptoms, on this relationship.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Uso de la Marihuana/efectos adversos , Salud Mental/normas , Uso de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven
18.
J Health Commun ; 26(2): 83-91, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688790

RESUMEN

For childhood cancer survivors (CCS), parents play an important role in communicating with providers and conveying patient's needs. This exploratory study examined the prevalence of cancer-related information-seeking among parents of CCS and investigated the association between parents' race/ethnicity and language preference with health communication and satisfaction with child's medical providers. One hundred and sixty CCS and their parents from two hospitals in Los Angeles County were recruited from the SEER registry. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed associations between parents' race/ethnicity and language preference and their health communication with their child and with their child's medical care providers. Among the parents, 29% were Spanish-speaking Hispanics, 27% English-speaking Hispanics, and 43% English-speaking non-Hispanics. Regardless of language preference, Hispanic parents were more likely than non-Hispanic parents to receive health information about their CCS's cancer from hospital sources versus the internet. There was no difference by ethnicity/language in parent satisfaction with their CCS's medical provider. Spanish-speaking Hispanic parents were more likely to report talking to their CCS about the need for cancer-related follow-up care compared to non-Hispanic English-speaking parents. These findings point to the potential importance of parents' ethnicity and language for sources of health information and frequency of communication with their CCS about their cancer care.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación en Salud , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Neoplasias/terapia , Padres/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/etnología
19.
Cancer ; 126(7): 1512-1521, 2020 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31869452

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, studies regarding risk perception among survivors of thyroid cancer are scarce. METHODS: The authors surveyed patients who were diagnosed with differentiated thyroid cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries of Georgia and Los Angeles County (2632 patients; 63% response rate). The analytic cohort was defined by a ≤5% risk of disease recurrence and mortality (1597 patients). Patients estimated their recurrence and mortality risks separately (increments of 10% and endpoints of ≤5% and ≥95%). Both outcomes were dichotomized between reasonably accurate estimates (risk perception of ≤5% or 10%) versus overestimation (risk perception of ≥20%). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with risk overestimation, and the relationships between overestimation and both worry and quality of life were evaluated. RESULTS: In the current study sample, 24.7% of patients overestimated their recurrence risk and 12.5% overestimated their mortality risk. A lower educational level was associated with overestimating disease recurrence (≤high school diploma: odds ratio [OR], 1.64 [95% CI, 1.16-2.31]; and some college: OR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.02-1.81]) and mortality (≤high school diploma: OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.18-2.93]) risk compared with those attaining at least a college degree. Hispanic ethnicity was found to be associated with overestimating recurrence risk (OR, 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.03) compared with their white counterparts. Worry about recurrence and death was found to be greater among patients who overestimated versus those who had a reasonably accurate estimate of their risk of disease recurrence and mortality, respectively (P < .001). Patients who overestimated mortality risk also reported a decreased physical quality of life (mean T score, 43.1; 95% CI, 41.6-44.7) compared with the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Less educated patients and Hispanic patients were more likely to report inaccurate risk perceptions, which were associated with worry and a decreased quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Femenino , Georgia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Percepción , Calidad de Vida , Programa de VERF , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/psicología
20.
Cancer Causes Control ; 31(10): 881-890, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757117

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Intensity of Treatment Rating (ITR) Scale condenses treatment and clinical characteristics into a single measure to study treatment effects on downstream health outcomes across cancer types. This rating was originally developed for clinicians to determine from medical charts. However, large studies are often unable to access medical charts for all study participants. We developed and tested a method of estimating treatment intensity (TI) using cancer registry and patient self-reported data. METHODS: We estimated two versions of TI for a cohort of pediatric cancer survivors-one utilized information solely available from cancer registry variables (TIR) and the other included registry and self-reported information (TIS) from survey participants. In a subset of cases (n = 135) for whom the gold standard TI (TIC) was known, both TIR and TIS were compared to TIC by calculating percent agreement and weighted Cohen's kappa, overall and within cancer subtypes. RESULTS: In comparison to TIC, 71% of TI scores from both methods were in agreement (k = 0.61 TIR/0.54 TIS). Among subgroups, agreement ranged from lowest (46% TIR/39% TIS) for non-defined tumors (e.g., "Tumor-other"), to highest (94% TIR/94% TIS) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a methodology to estimate TI for pediatric cancer research when medical chart review is not possible. High reliability was observed for ALL, the most common pediatric cancer. Additional validation is needed among a larger sample of other cancer subgroups. The ability to estimate TI from cancer registry data would assist with monitoring effects of treatment during survivorship in registry-based epidemiological studies.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Algoritmos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/clasificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Programa de VERF , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA