Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 95
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 38(12): 3085-3090, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32103332

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) represents the upcoming standard for the staging of prostate cancer (PCa). However, there is still an unmet need for the validation of PSMA PET/CT at primary staging and consecutive histological correlation. Consequently, we decided to analyze the prediction parameter of PSMA PET/CT at primary staging. METHODS: We relied on 90 ≥ intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. All patients were administered to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to surgery. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT data were retrospectively reevaluated by a single radiologist and consequently compared to histological results from RP. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of lymph node metastases were analyzed per-patient (n = 90), per-pelvic side (n = 180), and per-anatomic-region (external iliac artery and vein left/right vs. obturator fossa left/right vs. internal iliac artery left/right) (n = 458), respectively. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-patient were: 43.8, 96.0, 70.0, and 88.8%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-pelvic-side were: 42.9, 95.6, 56.3, and 92.7%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-anatomic-region were: 47.6, 98.9, 66.7, and 97.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results were highly reliable in our study. Positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results, however, revealed less reliable results. Larger and ideally prospective trials are justified to clarify the potential role of PSMA PET/CT based primary staging.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Oligopéptidos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radiofármacos , Anciano , Correlación de Datos , Isótopos de Galio , Radioisótopos de Galio , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
World J Urol ; 36(7): 1067-1072, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29497861

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Obesity might negatively affect prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. However, evidence according to the associations between obesity and metastases-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) is still inconsistent. METHODS: We relied on PCa patients treated with RP at the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center between 2004 and 2015. First, multivariable Cox regression analyses examined the impact of obesity on metastases after RP. Last, in a propensity score matched cohort, Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed metastases-free survival according to body mass index (kg/m2) (BMI) strata (≥ 30 vs. < 25). RESULTS: Of 13,667 individuals, 1990 (14.6%) men were obese (BMI ≥ 30). Median follow-up was 36.4 month (IQR 13.3-60.8). Obese patients were less likely to exhibit metastases after RP (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.97, p = 0.03). Similarly, after propensity score adjustment, obesity was associated with increased metastases-free survival (log rank p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We recorded the obesity paradox phenomenon in PCa patients. In particular, high BMI (≥ 30) was associated with decreased risk of metastases after RP, despite an increased risk being anticipated. Whether statin use might have affected the results was not assessed. Further research is needed to unravel the controversially debated association between obesity and PCa.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Puntaje de Propensión , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Urologe A ; 59(5): 573-582, 2020 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In urology, the health implications of open pelvic surgery (OPS) on the patient have been the subject of numerous studies. However, health effects on the surgeon have not yet been sufficiently considered. The present study investigates the relationship between musculoskeletal disorders in urological surgeons and their activity in OPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the point of view of occupational physiology, exemplary operations in OPS were examined using the key indicator method (KIM). In addition, a web-based survey among German clinicians was carried out. From the collected variables, models for the prediction of the endpoints pain and disc herniation (DH) were generated by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Risk assessment of the operations with KIM could show that OPS presents a significantly increased physical workload and thus potential physical overstraining. Of the 605 participants in the survey, 35.4% were urologists performing OPS, 32.0% were urologists not performing OPS and 32.6% were gastroenterologists (control groups). Activity in OPS had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.09 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-1.66, p = 0.69) for predicting pain, and an OR of 1.14 for prediction of DH CI: 0.66-1.94; p = 0.64). Statistically significant factors influencing the perception of pain were BMI, gender and work ability index (WAI), whereas age and WAI were significant for the occurrence of DH. CONCLUSION: Our survey could not show that surgeons practicing OPS have a significantly increased rate of musculoskeletal disorders or, in particular, an increased rate of DH in comparison to the control groups. Nevertheless, the rate of reported complaints among all clinicians surveyed is high, and the random risk assessment of the examplary OPS operations could also demonstrate the risk of physical overstraining. Further considerations should therefore be made as to how reduce the strain on the musculoskeletal system.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Cirujanos/psicología , Urólogos/psicología , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Urologe A ; 58(10): 1185-1197, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone has long been the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mCSPC). A paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with mCSPC has now been initiated by the results of three major phase 3 clinical trials (CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE): They demonstrated a significant advantage of ADT in combination with docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone over ADT alone. OBJECTIVES: This review presents the current evidence for the use of docetaxel or abiraterone/prednisone in combination with ADT and discusses-in the absence of directly comparing studies-which patients may have an advantage of ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone over ADT plus docetaxel or vice versa. METHODS: A systematic review based on bibliographic literature search was conducted. RESULTS: Both the combinations of ADT with docetaxel and with abiraterone/prednisone represent a major advance in the treatment of patients with mCSPC, in particular of patients with multiple metastases. Compared to chemotherapy, the use of abiraterone in addition to ADT avoids (rare) neutropenic complications and treatment-associated deaths. Long-term oral treatment with abiraterone/prednisone as a complementary therapy to ADT replaces short-term intravenous treatment (docetaxel). CONCLUSION: In patients with mCSPC, ADT plus docetaxel or ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone is recommended. In particular in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, ADT should be considered with a GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist to reduce the risk of cardiotoxic side effects.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Androstenos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Urologe A ; 58(9): 1066-1072, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041460

RESUMEN

There is an ongoing change of paradigm in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Taxan-based chemotherapy demonstrated a prolonged survival of patients in several randomized phase III trials. This is true in the situation of metastatic castration-resistent prostate cancer (mCRPC) as well as in the hormone-naïve stage (metastatic castration-naive PC [mCNPC]). In patients with mCNPC, treatment with docetaxel in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prolonged the median total survival time by 15 months in comparison to ADT alone. Comparable results were obtained by the endocrine combination treatment with ADT/abiraterone. With the current data in mind it seems to be useful to discuss the value of early combination therapy with ADT/docetaxel or ADT/abiraterone as well as the impact on further treatment options in the mCRPC setting and to define criteria for treatment decisions in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Urologe A ; 57(7): 813-820, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808368

RESUMEN

In March 2017 the 'Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference' (APCCC) took place in St. Gallen (Switzerland). The APCCC-panelists are internationally well known experts. With the actual data in mind they discussed treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer in order to update the international APCCC-recommendations from the previous meeting in 2015. Recently these consensus recommendations have been published in "European Urology".A group of German experts discussed this year APCCC-votes during the meeting and the recommendations that were concluded from the votes from the German perspective. Reasons for an additional German discussion are country-specific variations that may have influenced the APCCC-votes und recommendations. Due to the concept of the APCCC-meeting the wording of the questions could not always be as necessary.One focus of this year consensus discussion was the treatment of metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (mCNPC). There are new data which may also influence the therapeutic situation of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Further points of discussion were the impact of new imaging procedures in the clinical setting as well as the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Metástasis de la Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Orquiectomía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Urología/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Alemania , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Suiza , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Oncogene ; 25(36): 4965-74, 2006 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16568082

RESUMEN

We demonstrate here that epithelial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related cell adhesion molecule-1 (CEACAM1) downregulation in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is inversely correlated with its upregulation in adjacent blood vessels. CEACAM1 silencing in prostate cancer cell line DU-145 via small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) increased but its overexpression suppressed the expression of angiogenic/lymphangiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, -C and -D, and angiogenic inhibitor collagen 18/endostatin. Furthermore, CEACAM1 overexpression in DU-145 cells increased but CEACAM1 silencing reduced angiopoietin-1 expression. Inverse relation was found for angiopoietin-2. Supernatant of CEACAM1-overexpressing DU-145 suppressed but that of CEACAM1-silenced increased the VEGF-induced endothelial tubes. Electron microscopically the majority of PIN-associated blood vessels was structurally destabilized exhibiting endothelial fenestration, trans- and inter-endothelial gaps. In some PIN areas, invasion of single tumor cells into the destabilized blood vessels was observed. These data show that disappearance of epithelial CEACAM1 in PIN is accompanied by its upregulation in adjacent vasculature which apparently correlates with vascular destabilization and increased vascularization of prostate cancer. Strategies to either conserve the epithelial CEACAM1 or to target endothelial CEACAM1 might be useful for an anti-angiogenic therapy of prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD/fisiología , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/fisiología , Neovascularización Patológica/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Antígenos CD/genética , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular , Regulación hacia Abajo , Endotelio Vascular/citología , Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Silenciador del Gen , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo
8.
Aktuelle Urol ; 52(2): 121-124, 2021 04.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33822343
10.
Urologe A ; 54(12): 1811-20; quiz 1821-2, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26704284

RESUMEN

Over the last decade there has been a 25% decrease in the mortality rates for prostate cancer. The reasons for this significant decrease are most likely associated with the application of urological screening tests. The main tools for early detection are currently increased public awareness of the disease, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided topographically assignable biopsy sampling. Together with the histopathological results these features provide essential information for risk stratification, diagnostics and therapy decisions. The evolution of prostate biopsy techniques as well as the use of PSA testing has led to an increased identification of asymptomatic men, where further clarification is necessary. Significant efforts and increased clinical research focus on determining the appropriate indications for a prostate biopsy and the optimal technique to achieve better detection rates. The most widely used imaging modality for the prostate is TRUS; however, there are no clearly defined standards for the clinical approach for each individual biopsy procedure, dealing with continuous technical optimization and in particular the developments in imaging. In this review the current principles, techniques, new approaches and instrumentation of prostate biopsy imaging control are presented within the framework of the structured educational approach.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/normas , Aumento de la Imagen/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Posicionamiento del Paciente/normas , Urología/normas
11.
Hum Pathol ; 25(5): 476-84, 1994 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8200641

RESUMEN

Prostatic cancer frequently shows striking morphological heterogeneity and multifocal growth. To better understand the relationship between chromosomal changes and pathological characteristics, 31 routinely processed radical prostatectomy specimens were studied for the presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations by in situ hybridization with centromeric nucleic acid probes specific for chromosomes 7, 10, 17, X, and Y. In 24 of the cases preoperative core biopsy specimens were available and were examined with the probe for the X chromosome. In eight of the prostatectomy specimens chromosome numbers consistent with a normal male karyotype were found. Three cases, besides diploid chromosome numbers, showed a focal doubling of hybridization signals, consistent with tetraploidy. The other 20 cases displayed numerical chromosomal aberrations to a various degree. In this group the appearance of numerical chromosomal aberrations often showed considerable local heterogeneity, generally coinciding with morphological dedifferentiation, and was significantly correlated with tumor stage (P = .0004) as well as primary (P = .0068), worst (P = .0002), and combined (P < .0001) Gleason grades, total tumor volume (P = .0448), and the volume of tumor with Gleason grades 4 or 5 (P < .0001). In four of the 24 core biopsy specimens no residual tumor tissue was left for cytogenetic examination. In the remaining 20 biopsy specimens the presence or absence of numerical changes matched the result obtained on the corresponding prostatectomy specimen. We conclude that in prostatic cancer the presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations is associated with advanced disease. Especially in low differentiated tumors local heterogeneity in 2 chromosome numbers can be very marked. It is possible to forecast the presence or absence of numerical chromosomal changes on preoperative core biopsy specimens.


Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Anciano , Humanos , Hibridación in Situ , Interfase/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
12.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 123(3): 180-4, 1997.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9119884

RESUMEN

The intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and late postoperative morbidity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in 511 consecutive patients with clinical T1b, T1c, and T2 tumors, who underwent anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy, have been discussed. Between 1988 and 1995, prostatic cancer was diagnosed in 511 patients on the basis of PSA and prostate biopsy, when life expectancy was more than 10 years and frozen sections of obturator lymph nodes were negative. All specimens were cut into 3 mm sections by the step-section technique, after the surgical margin had been inked with formalin-resistant dye to identify the margin status. The mean age of the 511 patients was 63.4 years. Blood loss during the operation decreased to 986 ml in the last 2 years. Of the patients, 4.3% had intraoperative rectal perforation; only 5 required a second operation, which was done with a simple rectal approach. Ureteral injury occurred in 1.4% and this was repaired during the operation; 11% had prolonged lymphocele; all were treated conservatively. Deep-venous thromboses were seen in 3.7%; 5 patients (1%) had pulmonary embolism, which was lethal in 3 patients (0.6% of the whole group). There were no intraoperative deaths. No patient death was observed in the last 3 years, when all lymphoceles were diagnosed with thorough ultrasonographic evaluation and drained immediately. Complete continence after 1 year was achieved in 92% of the patients; 5.8% of the patients had anastomotic stricture; most were treated with a single calibration. Twelve months after the operation, 80% of the patients had no measurable PSA. There was a clear correlation of PSA negativity to tumor stage. Anatomical radical prostatectomy is safe and can cure about 70% of patients with clinical T1b, T1c, and T2 prostatic tumors.


Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Neoplasias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
13.
Urology ; 52(6): 1070-2, 1998 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9836556

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Prostatic evaluation in men who have undergone prior abdominoperineal resection pose an unusual challenge for the urologist. Neither digital rectal examination nor transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) can be performed. Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) has been suggested as an alternative means of imaging. This imaging modality was compared directly with the standard TRUS method. METHODS: TPUS was performed with a 4-MHz abdominal probe or biplane multiple frequency probe at a frequency of 5 to 7 MHz followed by TRUS at 7 MHz in 50 consecutive men referred for prostate ultrasound and biopsy who had not undergone prior abdominoperineal resection. Dimensions of the prostate and ultrasound findings such as hypoechoic, anechoic, or hyperechoic areas were noted for each sonographic approach. Volume calculation was performed by the prolate spheroid method. RESULTS: There was good TPUS visualization of the prostate in the transverse plane in 48 (96%) of 50 patients and in the sagittal plane in 45 (90%) of 50 patients. Prostate volume calculation by TPUS correlated well with the volume calculated by TRUS (r=0.876). Twenty-nine patients (58%) were found to have suspicious hypoechoic lesions by TRUS; none were seen by TPUS. Prostatic calcifications were present in 12 patients and were visualized by both TPUS and TRUS in all 12 patients. Six prostate glands demonstrated cystic lesions on TRUS imaging; three of these cystic lesions were also seen with TPUS imaging. CONCLUSIONS: TPUS allows visualization of the prostate with volume determination that is comparable to the volume determination by TRUS. Some intraprostatic findings such as calcifications and cysts can be identified; however, suspicious hypoechoic lesions were not identified by TPUS imaging of the prostate.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perineo , Recto , Ultrasonografía/métodos
14.
Urology ; 51(3): 437-42, 1998 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9510349

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The selection criteria for a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) are not thoroughly investigated and are based mainly on preoperative digital rectal examinations and intraoperative findings. At our institution NSRP is performed only on patients whose preoperative systematic sextant biopsy of the prostate showed only unilateral cancer. To prove the safety of these criteria, we analyzed the incidence of positive surgical margins and tumor progression rate in patients who were selected for an NSRP only by the result of the biopsy. METHODS: Preoperative systematic sextant biopsies revealed unilateral cancer in 69 preoperatively potent men of 289 consecutive prostatic cancer patients (23.9%); contralateral NSRP was performed on these 69 patients. The prostate specimens were investigated by using a 3-mm step-section technique to identify positive surgical margins. Tumor progression was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 0.4 ng/mL in the native and greater than 0.025 ng/mL in the suprasensitive postoperative blood test. Mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 24). RESULTS: In 69 patients who underwent NSRP, 11 positive margins (15.9%) were found. Only 3 patients (4.3%) had a positive margin on the nerve-sparing side. In 220 patients who underwent non-NSRP 59 positive margins (26.8%) were detected. PSA recurrence rate after 12 months was similar in patients with NSRP and non-NSRP. Analysis of systematic sextant biopsies gives safe selection criteria because in approximately 95% the surgical margin on the nerve-sparing side will be negative. CONCLUSIONS: Basing the indication for an NSRP on the results of preoperative systematic biopsies was safe according to margin status and postoperative PSA, when all patients with tumor in one of the three biopsy cores of each side of the prostate were excluded from an NS technique on that side. Such a strict approach will exclude approximately 30% of patients from NSRP unnecessarily because of tumor findings on a prostate side where the cancer is still organ-confined. Less strict criteria, including patients with only well-differentiated cancer and a maximum of one positive biopsy on the evaluated side, seem to be as safe as the described selection. However, data on these patients need further evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Biopsia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Próstata/inervación , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
15.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 5(4): 279-84, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12627212

RESUMEN

Prostate carcinomas located in the transition zone are suspected to behave differently from the more frequent peripheral zone cancers. In this study, large transition zone prostate cancers were investigated for pathological and clinical features. From 365 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens, 73 cases were disclosed with tumours larger than 10 cm(3). Of these, 14 were predominantly (>70% tumour area) located in the transition zone. Pathological investigations included a complete histological work-up, immunohistochemistry for p53 and bcl-2, and interphase cytogenetics for chromosomes 7, 8, 17, and X. Despite large tumour volumes and high preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA)-values, most tumours showed quite favourable pathological features. Only two of these patients suffered from a postoperative PSA-recurrence during a median follow-up of 50 months. For comparison, 36 cases that contained tumours predominantly located in the peripheral zone mostly displayed adverse prognostic signs and 68.8% of these patients suffered from postoperative PSA-recurrence. We conclude that the peculiar pathological and clinical characteristics of large prostate cancers in the transition zone might be important for prognostic considerations.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adenocarcinoma/química , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Cromosomas Humanos/ultraestructura , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Hibridación in Situ , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Proteínas de Neoplasias/análisis , Pronóstico , Próstata/química , Próstata/ultraestructura , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/química , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/análisis , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/análisis
16.
Anticancer Res ; 20(6D): 5217-20, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11326698

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 are antagonist angiogenic factors acting via the same receptor Tie-2. Their role in prostate carcinoma (PCa) is not known. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, localization of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2 and their receptor Tie-2 was studied in normal human prostate and PCa. RESULTS: Few epithelial cells of normal prostate expressed angiopoietin-1 and Tie-2 but not angiopoietin-2. Normal prostate blood vessels were negative. In PCa, intraductal grown tumor cells showed angiopoietin-1 but not angiopoietin-2. Blood vessels close to the ducts and some apical tumor cells expressed angiopoietin-1 and Tie-2. In glandular PCa, most of the tumor and intraglandular stromal cells were positive for both angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2. Angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 were also found in tumor capillaries. Additionally, angiopoietin-2 was expressed in smooth muscle cells of intratumoral blood vessels which also exhibited Tie-2. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented indicate a role of angiopoietin-Tie-2 system, particularly of angiopoietin-2 in the vascularization of PCa.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/metabolismo , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/biosíntesis , Proteínas de Neoplasias/biosíntesis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Biosíntesis de Proteínas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Angiopoyetina 1 , Angiopoyetina 2 , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Humanos , Inmunoensayo , Masculino , Próstata/citología , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Receptor TIE-2
17.
Anticancer Res ; 20(6D): 5253-5, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11326705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the longitudinal comparison of % f-PSA in patients before radical prostatectomy and after PSA relapse. Is % f-PSA a consistent tumor specific parameter or does this ratio change during untreated tumor progression? MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 41 out of 420 patients with untreated increasing PSA-progression (> 0.5 ng/ml) were analysed. Patients with neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded. T-PSA were f-PSA were analyzed by Immulite DPC (Diagnostic Products Coop., CA) and Abbott Axsym (Abbott Park, Il, USA). RESULTS: Pre-operative % f-PSA ratio was 10.6% (range 4.6-22%; Std. dev.: 4.9); T-PSA concentration was 26.4 ng/ml (range 5.5-10.2 ng/ml Std. dev.: 20.3). In men with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy % f-PSA ratio was 14.73% (range 2.2-4.5% Std. dev.: 9.7). Repeated post-operative % f-PSA measurements resulted in 12.94% f-PSA (range 2.7-3.8% Std. dev.: 9.9%) with a regression of R = 0.57. All men with pre-operative elevated % f-PSA (> 15%) had post-operative elevated % f-PSA. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicates that post-operative % f-PSA is a constant tumor specific parameter in men with untreated PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy. Post-operative % f-PSA was higher compared with pre-operative % f-PSA concentrations. No correlation with Gleason score or pathological stage was found.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Próstata/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Recurrencia
18.
Rofo ; 155(2): 117-22, 1991 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1878537

RESUMEN

85 patients suffering from urinary bladder carcinoma were examined by magnetic resonance imaging in a prospective study. Following precontrast diagnosis, 15 patients were given an intravesicular application of gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA). Another 35 patients received an intravenous bolus of GD-DTPA. A diagnostic advantage was achieved in only 2 of 15 tumours by using intravesicular contrast application. Compared to the precontrast diagnosis, a 14% improvement from 69% (precontrast) to 83% (contrast medium) was seen with Gd-DTPA applied intravenously in the diagnosis of the tumour stage. The diagnostic gain lies in the improved tumour recognition, the improved demarcation of papillary, non-muscle-infiltrating tumours and in the more definite diagnosis of infiltration into neighbouring organs and the pelvic wall. Demarcation of perivesicular fatty infiltration is rendered more difficult by Gd-DTPA.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Medios de Contraste , Gadolinio , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Compuestos Organometálicos , Ácido Pentético , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Administración Intravesical , Carcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinoma/patología , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Gadolinio/administración & dosificación , Gadolinio DTPA , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Ácido Pentético/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
19.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 55(4): 251-61, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14765017

RESUMEN

In this paper the authors provide an overview of contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Literature on disease progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) is reviewed and a selection of articles made. Key words used for the Medline research included: prostate cancer (PC), RP, disease recurrence, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression and biochemical failure (BF). Within 10 years following RP for clinically localized PC, about 1/3 of patients will present disease recurrence. This is generally diagnosed by BF. The prognosis of these men may vary considerably. Differences in PSA kinetics (PSA doubling time, PSADT, onset of PSA rise) are useful for differentiating between local recurrence and distant disease. Indications and results are provided for different treatment strategies such as local radiation therapy, hormone therapy or watchful waiting. The present paper reviews the recent international literature. Diagnostic strategies and therapeutic manoeuvres are discussed. Prognostic factors as well as treatment indications are presented with the aim of applying an individual therapy.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía
20.
Urologe A ; 30(6): 370-7, 1991 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1722920

RESUMEN

The role of transrectal prostate ultrasonography (TRUS) for screening and early detection is controversial due to its low sensitivity and specificity. The digital rectal examination (DRE) in combination with PSA still remains useful in screening for prostate cancer. Less than 4% of patients with normal DRE and normal PSA have prostate cancer found on random biopsies. We recommend TRUS for exact determination of prostate volume, in patients with suspicious DRE findings, in combination with the Biopty gun for ultrasound-guided biopsies, and in staging before radical prostatectomy.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopios , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Biopsia con Aguja/instrumentación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA