Does the Addition of Oral Sampling Improve Waveform Capnography When Compared to Traditional Nasal Sampling in Open-Airway Patients?

BACKGROUND: End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) is an invaluable anesthesia measure due to minimal delay in monitoring ventilation. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) presents special challenges because oral exhalations are not sampled effectively via nasal cannula normally used to avoid interfering with procedures. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare EtCO2 waveforms obtained in subjects using nasal monitoring and combined nasal and oral monitoring under simulated ventilatory conditions. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A single-blinded, randomized crossover controlled study was conducted at the University of Illinois Chicago with healthy volunteers, who were blinded to the monitoring system used. Inclusion criteria required subjects be ≥ 18 years of age, be consentable, and English-speaking. Exclusion criteria required no airway abnormalities, no edentulism, and no conditions that preclude undergoing an OMS procedure under sedation. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was the EtCO2 monitoring system: nasal with a standard nasal cannula, and combined with a nasal cannula and oral device. The secondary predictor variable evaluated 3 ventilatory states (nasal breathing, oral breathing, and apnea) in each arm, standardizing by maintaining consistent breath counts across observation periods. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The main outcome variable was the number of waveforms recorded over 30 seconds for nasal and combined monitoring. Each recording was standardized by dividing it by the baseline waveforms and multiplying by 20. Higher values, closer to baseline, were considered more accurate depictions of ventilation. COVARIATES: Covariates were body mass index (BMI), age, sex, Mallampati score, and breathing method. ANALYSES: Analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multivariate analysis of variance were performed. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The sample included 25 subjects (18 male and 7 female) with mean age 29.9 ± 7.98 years and BMI 23.9 ± 3.51 kg/m2. Combined sampling detected more waveforms during nasal and oral breathing (P < .001). Higher BMI correlated with reduced waveform capture during nasal sampling in oral breathing (P = .013). Combined sampling detected more waveforms during nasal breathing (P = .005) in subjects with BMI < 23.5 kg/m2. Mallampati score correlated with increased waveforms during nasal breathing. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Oral EtCO2 sampling may improve accuracy of capnography waveform capture. Further clinical studies in sedated subjects undergoing OMS procedures are needed.

Does Maxillomandibular Fixation Technique Affect Occlusion Quality in Segmental LeFort I Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Segmental maxillary osteotomies require precise occlusal control due to variability in individual segment positioning. The role of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) technique on occlusal control has not been validated. PURPOSE: The purpose is to measure and compare the accuracy of occlusal positioning among MMF techniques. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a double-blinded in vitro study on experiment models to simulate a 3-piece LeFort I osteotomy. The models were constricted posteriorly and expanded using 3 different MMF techniques and compared to the unaltered baseline occlusion. Based on sample size calculation, 32 separate attempts were made for each MMF technique. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was MMF technique (brackets, MMF screws, and embrasure wires). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the visual occlusal analysis score, a 1.00 to 4.00 continuous scale measuring the similarity of the achieved occlusion to the planned (control) occlusion assessed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an orthodontist. High visual occlusal analysis score indicated greater occlusal accuracy, with 3.50 defined as the threshold for accuracy. The secondary outcome variable was the linear error of the achieved occlusion at the canine and first molar teeth, with lower error indicating greater accuracy. An a priori accuracy threshold of 0.5 mm was set for this variable. COVARIATES: None. ANALYSES: Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc testing was used to analyze the difference in the outcome variables of interest. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two attempts for each technique showed that brackets had higher VAOS than MMF screws and embrasure wires (median differences 1.49 and 0.48, P < .001), and had lower linear occlusal error (median differences 0.35 to 0.99 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MMF technique influences the quality of occlusal control, with greater visual rating scores and lower linear errors seen with brackets than with embrasure wires or MMF screws.

Predicting the Future Focus of Orthognathic Surgery: Outcome-Driven Planning and Treatment With Function, Esthetics, and Occlusion as Key Indicators.

As an international group of orthognathic surgeons, we believe the next big thing in orthognathic surgery will be a clinical and research focus on patient-oriented outcomes and improved quality of life. We expect to see advances in diagnosis and treatment planning, materials development, and patient management.

Are There Differences in the Causes and Complications of Mandibular Third Molar Extraction in Older Patients Compared to Younger Patients?

BACKGROUND: Although most impacted third molars (ITMs) are extracted in the teens and early 20s, some undergo extractions after their 40s. It is unclear whether the reasons for extraction, the degree of impaction, and complications differ in patients in an older age group compared with a younger age group. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the association between age and 1) reason for extraction and 2) postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone surgical extraction of at least one mandibular ITM at a single institution. We excluded 1) age under 20 years, 2) follow-up period of less than 1 week, and 3) tooth extraction under general anesthesia. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was age, classified into 3 groups (20s:20-29; 30s:30-39; over 40s: 40 and greater). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variables were the reason for extraction (prophylactic or symptomatic) and the presence of complications. The secondary outcome variable was type of complication (postoperative infection, dry socket, neurosensory disturbance, presenting pain over 1 month, retained root requiring secondary treatment). COVARIATES: The covariates were sex, laterality of ITM, and difficulty of extraction as measured by the difficulty index, a measure based on depth, orientation, and ramus relationship/space available, with a higher score indicating greater difficulty. ANALYSES: χ2 test was performed to analyze the association of categorical outcome variables and covariates. Level of statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Of a total of 831 eligible subjects, there were 555 (66.8%), 159 (19.1%), and 117 (14.1%) in the 20s, 30s, and over 40s age groups, respectively. The percentage of symptomatic extraction of ITM was significantly higher in the over-40 age group compared with the 20s group (92.3 vs 69.4%, (P < .001). Complication rate also significantly differed between over 40s group and the 20s group (7.7 vs 1.8%, P < .001). Difficulty index and indications for ITM extraction were significantly different between groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Symptoms, difficulty, and complications related to ITM increase at over 40 years of age. This should be taken into consideration during the joint clinical decision-making process with patients with ITM.

What Is the Linear Accuracy of Regional Voxel-Based Registration for Orthognathic Surgery Landmarks?

PURPOSE: While regional voxel-based registration (R-VBR) has been shown to have excellent reproducibility and angular accuracy, there are limited data on the linear accuracy of R-VBR for common orthognathic surgery landmarks, or on whether angular accuracy correlates with linear accuracy. The purpose of this study was to estimate the linear accuracy of R-VBR for several skeletal landmarks commonly used in orthognathic surgical planning, and to measure the correlation between angular and linear discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients treated at a single center with nonsegmental LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy surgery from January 2019 to November 2020. Cone beam computed tomography at the preoperative (T0) and immediate postoperative (T1) stages were analyzed to measure the postoperative positional changes of 11 orthognathic landmarks in 4 regions of interest (ROI) using R-VBR performed twice by two examiners. Pairwise correlation analysis and canonical correlation analysis were performed for the angular discrepancies (primary predictor variable) and the linear discrepancies (primary outcome variable) to measure the correlation between the two. RESULTS: In cone beam computed tomography analysis of 28 eligible subjects (16 males, 12 females; mean age 18.9 years, range 15 to 25), the mean absolute (MA) angular discrepancies ranged from 0.15° to 0.55°, while the corresponding MA linear discrepancies ranged from 0.05 to 0.41 mm. There was a strong correlation between angular and linear discrepancies that was statistically significant (P = .001 to .04, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.38 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: For nonsegmental LeFort I osteotomies and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, R-VBR has excellent linear accuracy within a single voxel size (0.3 mm) for commonly used orthognathic landmarks in the maxillary and distal mandibular ROI. The MA linear discrepancy for the proximal mandibular segment ROI was greater than a single voxel size, with a maximum of 0.41 mm.

Which Factors Affect the Reduction Quality of Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular subcondylar fractures (MSF) involves several variables that could affect decision making. There is insufficient data regarding factors influencing the outcomes of MSF ORIF. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with quality of bony reduction of MSF and occlusion, after ORIF. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE: We designed a retrospective cohort study of consecutively treated subjects for MSF ORIF, ages 18 to 64 years, by University of Illinois' Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, between January 1, 2013, and January 26, 2021. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was the vertical level of MSF from the gonial angle. Secondary predictor variables included surgeon, fixation scheme (number and configuration of miniplate), surgical approach, time to surgery, mechanism of injury, vertical fragment overlap, overlying soft tissue thickness, presence of other mandibular fractures, and severity and direction of displacement. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the mean radiographic reduction score (RRS), rated by 2 blinded observers on a 1 to 5 scale. The secondary outcome variable was presence of postoperative malocclusion as documented in the medical records. COVARIATES: Covariates were age and sex. ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics were computed. To investigate the influence of the predictor variables on reduction quality, multifactorial analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test was performed. For malocclusion, χ2 test was performed. The level of significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Thirty-eight MSF in 37 subjects were included. Mean age was 32.7 years (range 18 to 64), and 83.8% were male. Mean RRS was 4.38 (standard deviation 0.77). Fixation scheme was the only variable that showed significant impact on RRS: single-straight miniplate had lower scores than double-straight (-1.50, P = .011), rhomboid (-1.29, P = .036), and ladder miniplates (-1.38, P = .048). There was 1 incidence of malocclusion (2.7%) which resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Favorable reduction (anatomic reduction to mild discrepancies) can be achieved without malocclusion using double-straight, or rhomboid-shaped or ladder-shaped miniplates, without influences from patient or injury-related factors. In contrast, single-straight miniplate fixation resulted in moderate discrepancies in reduction, although it did not lead to malocclusion.

The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): A systematic review.

The aim of this systematic review was (i) to determine the role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement BSSO and (ii) to investigate the effect of advancement BSSO on the perimandibular muscles. This systematic review reports in accordance with the recommendations proposed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Electronic database searches were performed in the databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were as follows: assessment of relapse after advancement BSSO; assessment of morphological and functional change of the muscles after advancement BSSO; and clinical studies on human subjects. Exclusion criteria were as follows: surgery other than advancement BSSO; studies in which muscle activity/traction was not investigated; and case reports with a sample of five cases or fewer, review articles, meta-analyses, letters, congress abstracts or commentaries. Of the initial 1006 unique articles, 11 studies were finally included. In four studies, an intervention involving the musculature was performed with subsequent assessment of skeletal relapse. The changes in the morphological and functional properties of the muscles after BSSO were studied in seven studies. The findings of this review demonstrate that the perimandibular musculature plays a role in skeletal relapse after advancement BSSO and may serve as a target for preventive strategies to reduce this complication. However, further research is necessary to (i) develop a better understanding of the role of each muscle group, (ii) to develop new therapeutic strategies and (iii) to define criteria that allow identification of patients at risk.

Do We Need Safety Nets for Outsourced Computer-Aided Orthognathic Planning? A Two-Center Analysis.

PURPOSE: While the accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and time-efficiency of computer-aided orthognathic surgical planning (CAOP) have been studied, little is known about the influence of logistical factors of outsourced CAOP (OS-CAOP) on patient care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the limitations of OS-CAOP and their effect on treatment planning workflow and surgical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was designed involving subjects who had undergone orthognathic surgery using CAOP from 2 academic oral and maxillofacial surgery centers in South Korea (Kyungpook National University, KNU) and the United States (University of Illinois Chicago, UIC) over an 8-year period. The primary predictor variable was use of modifications or alternatives to OS-CAOP. The primary outcome variable was the frequency of planning changes due to reasons that may have affected outcomes. Covariates included age and sex. Descriptive statistics was used, in addition to a chi-square test to analyze differences among categorical variables. RESULTS: Of a total of 642 eligible subjects in both centers, 5.8% used alternatives to OS-CAOP. 78.4% of these were due to reasons that may have affected outcomes (P < .001), representing 4.5% of all cases. The frequency of the need for OS-CAOP alternatives was identical in both centers (5.8%), but the specific reasons varied, with KNU having mostly plan-related changes (38.1% of alternatives), and UIC with more access and education-related reasons (68.8% of alternatives). At KNU, 71.4% of all alternatives were by repeat OS-CAOP, whereas at UIC, all were by in-house CAOP (IH-CAOP). CONCLUSIONS: In 2 major academic oral and maxillofacial surgery centers in South Korea and the United States, a substantial portion of OS-CAOP required pre-surgical modification, or use of alternatives. Most of the changes were for reasons that could potentially impact outcomes, prompting the need to consider establishing a "safety net" plan compatible with individual clinician's practice setting and healthcare system.

What Is the Perception of an Esthetic Lower Facial Third Profile in the Korean Layperson Population?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there were differences in perception of facial profile esthetics at the upper lip, gnathic, and genial levels according to observer gender and age in the Korean layperson population. METHODS: Ten male (M1 to M10) and 10 female (F1 to F10) silhouettes with differing facial profiles at the level of the upper lip, mandibular, and chin were created from a male and female facial profile deemed well-balanced and orthognathic by reviewer consensus. These silhouettes were presented to 288 participants who were asked to rank the 5 most attractive male and female profiles. The participants were composed of 144 males and 144 females divided into 4 age groups: group I (under 20 years), group II (20 to 39 years), group III (40 to 59 years), and group IV (over 60 years). The most preferred profile and observer scores were investigated and calculated. Descriptive analysis, χ2 test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis according to age and gender. RESULTS: The most preferred male and female silhouettes were orthognathic profiles. There was no significant difference according to gender when rating male (P = .281) and female (P = .442) silhouettes. No statistically significant difference was observed even when analyzed according to age groups. Although the difference in observer scores among each ranking showed a statistical difference according to age groups, the overall rankings showed a similar pattern both in male and female silhouettes. In the same age group, no difference in rank scores according to gender was observed. Severe concave profiles were found to have the lowest rank. CONCLUSIONS: An orthognathic profile was rated as the most desirable in the Korean layperson population, with few differences in perception of esthetic facial profile according to age and gender.

What Do We Know Beyond Reliability in Voxel-Based Registration? Validation of the Accuracy of Regional Voxel-Based Registration (R-VBR) Techniques for Orthognathic Surgery Analysis.

PURPOSE: Despite having excellent reproducibility, the accuracy of regional voxel-based registration (R-VBR) techniques used for postoperative orthognathic surgical analysis has not been validated. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of R-VBR. METHODS: Preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of consecutive patients treated at a single center with nonsegmental LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were included. T1 CBCTs were oriented to match that of the standardized T0, and thus were assigned a known rotational transformation matrix in pitch/roll/yaw (P/R/Y), to create T1-prime (T1'). A copy of T1 (cT1) was made and was superimposed to T1' using R-VBR for 4 regions of interest (ROI): maxilla, distal mandible, right proximal mandible, and left proximal mandible, to create cT1'. The transformation matrix for each of the ROI was compared to those of T1' using paired t test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eligible subjects' CBCTs were analyzed. Mean difference between T1' and cT1' ranged from -0.08 to 0.14° (maximum 0.73°), with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.216 to 1). Mean absolute difference ranged from 0.13 to 0.31° (maximum 0.73°). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between T1' and cT1', indicating excellent accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: R-VBR using the maxilla, distal mandible, and the bilateral proximal mandibular segments as ROI has excellent accuracy in terms of rotational measurements.

Three-dimensional assessment of the anterior and inferior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve using computed tomography images in patients with and without mandibular asymmetry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in configuration and dimensions of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve (ALIAN) in patients with and without mandibular asymmetry. METHOD: Preoperative computed tomography images of patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery from January 2016 to December 2018 at a single institution were analyzed. Subjects were classified into two groups as "Asymmetry group" and "Symmetry group". The distance from the most anterior and most inferior points of the ALIAN (IANant and IANinf) to the vertical and horizontal reference planes were measured (dAnt and dInf). The distance from IANant and IANinf to the mental foramen were also calculated (dAnt_MF and dInf_MF). The length of the mandibular body and symphysis area were measured. All measurements were analyzed using 3D analysis software. RESULTS: There were 57 total eligible subjects. In the Asymmetry group, dAnt and dAnt_MF on the non-deviated side were significantly longer than the deviated side (p < 0.001). dInf_MF on the non-deviated side was also significantly longer than the deviated side (p = 0.001). Mandibular body length was significantly longer on the non-deviated side (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in length in the symphysis area (p = 0.623). In the Symmetry group, there was no difference between the left and right sides for all variables. CONCLUSION: In asymmetric patients, there is a difference tendency in the ALIAN between the deviated and non-deviated sides. In patients with mandibular asymmetry, this should be considered during surgery in the anterior mandible.

"Monoblock" Occlusal Model to Enhance Occlusal Verification During Orthognathic Surgery.

Intraoperative verification of the planned occlusion is critical in ensuring the accuracy of orthognathic surgery. This step is limited to visual inspection, which can be especially challenging when the planned occlusal setup is less-than-stable. The authors introduce a cost-effective method of an accurate reproduction of the planned occlusion using additive manufacturing which can aid in intraoperative verification of positionally unstable occlusal setups. The authors present a case example, and discuss various technical considerations.

How Accurate Is 3-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Planning for Segmental Maxillary Surgery?

PURPOSE: The 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of computer-assisted planning (CAP) of segmental maxillary osteotomies has seldom been reported with a comprehensive 3D analysis. The aim of the present study was to measure the accuracy of computer-planned segmental maxillary surgery and to identify the factors associated with accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present retrospective, cross-sectional study investigated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients who had undergone segmental maxillary osteotomy with CAP at a single center from January 2013 to October 2019. The predictor variables were age, gender, diagnosis, CAP method, type of maxillary segmentalization, surgeon, surgical sequence, and magnitude of planned and actual movements. The primary outcome variable was surgical discrepancy (linear differences between the actual and planned maxillary movements using CAP in the x, y, and z coordinates) at various 3D landmarks. The mean difference and absolute mean difference (AMD) were computed to estimate the direction and magnitude of the discrepancies. In addition, a 2.0-mm threshold of surgical discrepancy was used to determine clinically acceptable accuracy. The association between the predictor and outcome variables were analyzed statistically using correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS: The sample included 63 patients (mean age, 20.1 years; 42.9% male). The surgical discrepancy was similar for 2- and 3-piece segmental maxillary osteotomies. Overall, the AMD for all patients was 0.96 ± 0.69 mm transversely, 1.23 ± 0.83 mm vertically, and 1.16 ± 0.80 mm anteroposteriorly (P < .01 for all). The discrepancy between the actual and planned movements was within 2.0 mm for more than 80% of cases. The major predictor variable that affected surgical discrepancy was the magnitude of the actual surgical movements (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: 3D CAP showed clinically acceptable accuracy for segmental maxillary osteotomies comparable to that of nonsegmental cases. Although the magnitude of actual surgical movements was shown to affect surgical accuracy, the sources of surgical discrepancies requires further investigation.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Lip Asymmetry and Occlusal Cant Change After Two-Jaw Surgery.

PURPOSE: Lip asymmetry greatly influences patient satisfaction after 2-jaw surgery. The purpose of the present study was to identify the influence of skeletal changes on lip cant correction in 2-jaw surgery for mandibular prognathism with asymmetry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present retrospective cohort study included consecutive skeletal Class III patients who had undergone Le Fort I and sagittal split ramus osteotomy with preoperative and 6-month postoperative cone-beam tomography scans available. The primary predictor variables were the postoperative hard tissue changes (canine cant, first molar cant, transverse change at menton [Me] after surgery, and changes postoperatively from preoperatively). The primary outcome variable was the change in the soft tissue lip cant. The secondary outcome variables were the changes in various landmarks representing perioral asymmetry, including center of cupid's bow, lower lip vermilion, and subnasale. Other variables included subject age and gender. Descriptive statistics and regression and correlation analyses were used to investigate the important predictors influencing lip cant change. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (33 males; average age, 21.7 years) were included in the present study. The demographic variables of the asymmetry group (Me deviation >4 mm) were not different from those of the control group. Postoperative changes in Me deviation correlated significantly with the changes in the transverse position of the subnasale, upper lip, and horizontal and vertical differences in the mouth corner position (P < .01 for all) but not with the maxillary occlusal cant change. Linear regression analysis showed lip cant correction was associated with changes in Me deviation (P < .001) and molar cant change (P = .032), but not with canine cant change. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary occlusal cant correction itself cannot fully account for changes in lip cant. The transverse Me change-rather than maxillary cant correction-had the greatest influence on lip cant. These results suggest that correction of chin deviation must be addressed in lip cant correction for facial asymmetry.

Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of the maxilla: Analysis of new landmarks.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical evaluation of the midface including the paranasal and upper lip regions is highly subjective and complex. Traditional and 3-dimensional cephalometrics were not developed with the clinical appearance of these midfacial areas in mind and are therefore inappropriate surrogates for the clinical appearance of the midface, making them unsuitable as aids in diagnosing dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate traditional as well as newly defined landmarks and measurements and their correlation with clinical appearance of the midface. METHODS: Fifty-two subjects who underwent full-field cone-beam computed tomography were recruited for this study. A single examiner assessed each subject's midfacial region (paranasal and upper lip), and a second examiner obtained traditional and newly defined cephalometric measurements for each subject. Both examiners were blinded to each other's data throughout the study. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlations of the traditional and novel cephalometric measurements with clinical midfacial findings. The impact of the soft tissue thickness in the paranasal region was also analyzed. The performance of any classification derived from statistically significant variables was analyzed with the use of micro-F scores and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Both traditional (SNA) and newly defined measurements (SNANS, SNPR, SNNP, SNh) had no statistically significant correlation with clinical paranasal diagnosis. However, in the absence of upper lip procumbency or protrusion, SNNP and SNh had statistically significant correlations with clinical paranasal diagnosis (P = 0.047 and P = 0.003, respectively). For upper lip analysis, both traditional (SNA) and newly defined measurements (SNCEJ) had strong correlations with clinical upper lip diagnosis (P < 0.001). All statistically significant cephalometric variables had good intra- and interobserver reliability (correlation coefficients ≥0.972 and ≥ 0.968, respectively) except SNA, which had a low interobserver reliability (correlation coefficient 0.739). Fitted models for paranasal and upper lip analyses showed low micro-F scores, indicating low precision and recall. However, AUC values of 0.7019 and 0.6362 for the paranasal and upper lip analysis, respectively, suggest improved performance of the model when properly trained with a larger sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Newly defined measurements SNh and SNNP correlated with clinical paranasal diagnosis only in the absence of upper lip procumbency and protrusion. SNA and SNCEJ were strongly correlated with clinical upper lip diagnosis. However, fitted models based on this study sample yielded low micro-F scores, making the fitted models currently unsuitable for anything besides correlation with clinical findings. A larger sample size will be necessary to further clarify the potential roles of these measurements, especially given the reasonable AUC values. The findings of this study demonstrate the highly subjective and relative nature of midfacial diagnosis and the importance of clinical judgment despite the potential utility of some traditional and new measurements.

Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Imaging for Assessment of Perioperative Maxillary Perfusion During Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the changes in maxillary perfusion during different stages of Le Fort I osteotomies as measured by laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging (LAICGI) and to determine whether various clinical factors affect maxillary vascular perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of those who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with LAICGI at the University of Illinois from 2016 to 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The maxillary perfusion levels using LAICGI were measured before induction, after induction, after down fracture, after segmentalization (for segmental osteotomies), and after wound closure. The effects of clinical variables, including gender, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, type of Le Fort I osteotomy, intraoperative status of the descending palatine vessels, maxillary movements (anteroposterior, vertical, transverse), and hemodynamic data (mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate), were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the preoperative baseline values, the indocyanine green (ICG) levels decreased after down fracture and mobilization, segmentalization, and wound closure; no statistically significant differences were found among these 3 points. Segmentalization did not affect the ICG levels compared with the nonsegmentalized cases. Male gender and the amount of maxillary impaction were significantly associated statistically with decreased ICG levels, although the difference was not clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the baseline levels, maxillary perfusion, as measured by LAICGI, decreased from down fracture to wound closure. Segmentalization did not appear to influence maxillary perfusion, although male gender and impaction were associated with decreased perfusion. Because of its safety and convenience, LAICGI shows promise as a method of assessing maxillary perfusion in future largescale prospective studies linking perioperative perfusion to the occurrence of aseptic necrosis.

Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Outcomes Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Landmarks-The Case for Apples and Oranges?

PURPOSE: To verify predicted versus obtained surgical movements in 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) measurements and compare the equivalence between these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study of bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries was performed. Postoperative cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans were superimposed on preoperative scans and a lateral cephalometric radiograph was generated from each CBCT scan. After identification of the sella, nasion, and upper central incisor tip landmarks on 2D and 3D images, actual and planned movements were compared by cephalometric measurements. One-sample t test was used to statistically evaluate results, with expected mean discrepancy values ranging from 0 to 2 mm. Equivalence of 2D and 3D values was compared using paired t test. RESULTS: The final sample of 46 cases showed by 2D cephalometry that differences between actual and planned movements in the horizontal axis were statistically relevant for expected means of 0, 0.5, and 2 mm without relevance for expected means of 1 and 1.5 mm; vertical movements were statistically relevant for expected means of 0 and 0.5 mm without relevance for expected means of 1, 1.5, and 2 mm. For 3D cephalometry in the horizontal axis, there were statistically relevant differences for expected means of 0, 1.5, and 2 mm without relevance for expected means of 0.5 and 1 mm; vertical movements showed statistically relevant differences for expected means of 0, 0.5, 1.5 and 2 mm without relevance for the expected mean of 1 mm. Comparison of 2D and 3D values displayed statistical differences for the horizontal and vertical axes. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of 2D and 3D surgical outcome assessments should be performed with caution because there seems to be a difference in acceptable levels of accuracy between these 2 methods of evaluation. Moreover, 3D accuracy studies should no longer rely on a 2-mm level of discrepancy but on a 1-mm level.

Zygoma and Mandibular Angle Reduction: Contouring Surgery to Correct the Square Face in Asians.

Changing the facial appearance with facial contouring surgery is popular, especially in East Asian countries where a square face is a common chief complaint. Mandibular angle reduction, malar reduction, genioplasty, and chin and body contouring surgery can be performed as independent or ancillary procedures during orthognathic surgery. Many techniques have been developed and different osteotomy designs have been proposed to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks. Here, we review the surgical techniques and considerations for mandibular angle and malar reduction, the two most commonly performed contouring surgeries in East Asia to correct the square face.

The Role of the Pediatric and General Dentist in Management of Odontogenic Infections: An Algorithmic Approach From Triage to Management.

Odontogenic infections are preventable yet common in adults and children, and can progress to life-threatening levels if not definitively managed in a timely manner. Children with odontogenic infections often first present to the pediatric or general dental practice, making pediatric and general dentists key players in the management of odontogenic infections. While the pediatric or general dentist can definitively manage several types of infections, their critical role goes well beyond treatment to include timely and appropriate triage as well as facilitation of care when the severity of the infection exceeds the scope of their practice. Thorough and efficient triage allows the dentist to determine the most appropriate timing and setting of definitive care, thus preventing avoidable delays or inefficient use of health care resources. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss key concepts in the overall management of odontogenic infections in children, with a focus on the clinical significance of each concept, in an algorithmic format.

Accuracy of Patient-specific Soft-tissue Prediction Algorithms for Maxillomandibular Surgery in Class III Patients.

Context: Improved esthetics is an important factor for most patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Thus, a treatment simulation that can provide patients with a realistic view of the esthetic outcome after surgery is important in clinical practice. Aims: To evaluate the accuracy of simulations generated using algorithms specific for patient's type of malocclusion and surgical procedure compared to nonspecific algorithms. Settings and Design: A total of 36 patients (average age 18.41 years) who had undergone maxillary advancement and mandibular setback for Class III malocclusion were included. Subjects and Methods: The presurgical and postsurgical cone-beam computed tomography scans were used to generate the lateral cephalograms and the surgical simulations were created with the patient-specific algorithm (specific for Class III patients) and the nonspecific algorithm (default algorithm not specific for any particular malocclusion or type of surgery) using the treatment simulation feature in Dolphin Imaging software. The accuracy of the simulations was examined by comparing the soft-tissue changes in the surgical simulations with the postsurgical result. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS-software at 0.05 significance level. For the mean difference between the postsurgical and surgical-simulation landmarks, a paired sample t-test (Student's t-test) was performed. Results: Patient-specific algorithms were accurate in vertical prediction of lower lip, B', tip of nose, upper lip, and horizontal prediction of pogonion'. Whereas the nonspecific algorithm was accurate in the horizontal prediction of the lower lip, pogonion', and menton'. Conclusions: Patient-specific and nonspecific algorithms for generating surgical simulations showed different accuracy for vertical and horizontal predictions of the parameters.