RESUMEN
In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we propose changes to journal authorship policies and procedures to provide insight into which author is responsible for which contributions, better assurance that the list is complete, and clearly articulated standards to justify earning authorship credit. To accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (docs.casrai.org/CRediT) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier (https://orcid.org). Additionally, we recommend that universities and research institutions articulate expectations about author roles and responsibilities to provide a point of common understanding for discussion of authorship across research teams. Furthermore, we propose that funding agencies adopt the ORCID identifier and accept the CRediT taxonomy. We encourage scientific societies to further authorship transparency by signing on to these recommendations and promoting them through their meetings and publications programs.
Asunto(s)
Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto/normas , Ciencias de la Tierra/estadística & datos numéricos , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/métodos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/normas , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/normas , Reciclaje/normas , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto/economía , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto/tendencias , Ciencias de la Tierra/economía , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/economía , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/tendencias , Metadatos/normas , Metadatos/estadística & datos numéricos , Meteorología/economía , Meteorología/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/economía , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/tendencias , Reciclaje/economía , Reciclaje/métodos , Reciclaje/tendencias , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosAsunto(s)
Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Sexismo , Mujeres , Factores de Edad , Autoria , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/normas , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic affected the scientific workforce in many ways. Many worried that stay-at-home orders would disproportionately harm the productivity and well-being of women and early-career scientists, who were expected to shoulder more childcare, homeschooling, and other domestic duties while also interrupting field and lab research, essential for career advancement. AGU journal submission and author and reviewer demographic data allowed us to investigate the effect the pandemic may have had on many Earth and space scientists, especially on women and early career scientists. However, we found that submissions to AGU journals increased during the pandemic as did total submissions from women (with no difference in the proportion). Although the rate at which women agreed to review decreased slightly (down 0.5%), women still made up a larger proportion of agreed reviewers during the pandemic compared to 2 years earlier. Little difference was seen overall in median times to complete reviews except with women in their 40s and 70s, suggesting that they were affected more during the pandemic than other age and gender groups. Although AGU's data do not show that the effects of the pandemic decreased women's participation in AGU journals, the lag between research and writing/submitting may still be seen in later months, which we will continue to report on as we analyze the data. The stay-at-home orders may also have allowed people to devote time to writing up research conducted prepandemic; writing too can be done during down-time hours, which may have supported the increase in submissions to and reviews for AGU journals.