De-escalation of Post-mastectomy Irradiation in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer with One to Three Positive Nodes.

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) is used to predict benefit from chemotherapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer with one to three positive lymph nodes. Prospective-retrospective studies have shown that the RS is prognostic for both systemic and locoregional recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients. We aimed to assess whether RS could be utilized to predict a survival benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify women ≤ 75 years of age with HR+, HER2-negative, T1-3, N1, M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and axillary staging with available RS during the years 2010-2016. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify association between treatment and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables correlating with PMRT and OS. RESULTS: A total of 8907 patients were identified. Of the total, 3203 (36%) patients received adjuvant PMRT and 5704 (64%) did not. Across the entire cohort, 5-year OS was 97.5% for patients receiving PMRT and 96.8% for those who did not (P = 0.063). After adjusting for all covariates, in patients with RS ≤ 25, there was no statistically significant improvement in 5-year OS with the addition of adjuvant PMRT (97.5% versus 98.1% P = 0.093). Moreover, no survival benefit was seen with axillary node dissection (P = 0.58) or with the addition of chemotherapy (P = 0.312). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patients with one to three positive nodes and a RS ≤ 25, omission of post-mastectomy radiation therapy had no impact on OS. Our results suggest that RS may be utilized in the individualized decision making on PMRT.

Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer for patients of advanced age or significant comorbidities.

The addition of surgery to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer has not shown a survival benefit in randomized trials. Patients with more comorbidities or advanced age are more likely to be given definitive chemoradiation due to surgical risk. We aimed to identify subsets of patients in whom the addition of surgery to chemoradiation does not provide an overall survival (OS) benefit. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received either definitive chemoradiation or neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. Bivariate analysis was used to assess the association between patient characteristics and treatment groups. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess for differences in survival. A total of 15,090 with adenocarcinoma and 5,356 with squamous cell carcinoma met the inclusion criteria. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery had significantly improved survival by Cox proportional hazards model regardless of histology if <50, 50-60, 61-70, or 71-80 years old. There was no significant benefit or detriment in patients 81-90 years old. Survival advantage was also significant with a Charlson/Deyo comorbidity condition score of 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 in adenocarcinoma squamous cell carcinoma with scores of 2 or ≥3 had no significant benefit or detriment. Patients 81-90 years old or with squamous cell carcinoma and a Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score ≥ 2 lacked an OS benefit from neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with definitive chemoradiation. Careful consideration of esophagectomy-specific surgical risks should be used when recommending treatment for these patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and use of the 21-gene recurrence score: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is traditionally considered less responsive to chemotherapy. Although the Oncotype recurrence score (RS) has been validated to identify high-risk patients who benefit from chemotherapy, some studies have questioned its relevance in patients with ILC. The objective of this study was to better characterize potential use of the RS in these patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage I through III, T1 through T3, N0 or N1, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative ILC or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) who had an available RS between 2010 and 2016. Multivariable Cox regression was used to model the effect of variables on 5-year overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS according to the RS, nodal status, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 15,763 patients with ILC and 100,070 with IDC were identified. The mean age of patients with ILC and IDC was 59.2 ± 9.1 and 57.2 ± 9.8, respectively. A lower percentage of patients with ILC versus those with IDC had a high RS, defined as >25 (6.6% vs 16.0%; P < .0001). ILC patients with a high RS who had N0 or N1 disease received approximately 10% less chemotherapy compared with similar patients who had IDC. The results indicated that the RS had statistically significant prognostic value for patients with ILC. In addition, an absolute OS advantage was correlated with the receipt of chemotherapy by patients with ILC who had a high RS with N0 or N1 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC who have a high RS are treated less often with chemotherapy compared with similar patients who have IDC. Nevertheless, the RS has a prognostic as well as a predictive value in ILC, with an association between OS benefit and chemotherapy receipt in patients who have ILC with a high RS, especially if they have N1 disease. LAY SUMMARY: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a subtype of breast cancer comprising about 15% of cases. The Oncotype recurrence score (RS) is a genetic test of breast tumors that helps predict which patients might benefit from chemotherapy. Some have doubted the relevance of the RS for patients with ILC. In this study, the authors show that the RS is relevant for patients who have ILC. The RS has the potential of predicting the risk of recurrence and identifying patients with ILC who might benefit from chemotherapy.

Prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation status in high risk grade II glioma.

BACKGROUND: MGMT promoter methylation has been associated with favorable prognosis and survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma and WHO grade III glioma. However, the effects of promoter methylation of MGMT in patients with WHO grade II gliomas have not been established. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the prognostic impact and predictive values of MGMT methylation in patients with grade II glioma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2016) for patients with newly diagnosed grade II glioma. Demographics and clinical characteristics of these patients were examined. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis alongside Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: A total of 11,223 patients met the selection criteria; 1252 patients (11%) had MGMT testing. Of the patients who had MGMT testing, 58.5% were MGMT methylated (mMGMT), and 43.5% were MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT). mMGMT patients had greater median overall survival (77.3 months) than both uMGMT patients (42.6 months) and patients with no MGMT status reported (61.9 months (p < 0.001 for both). mMGMT was also associated with improved OS, when compared to patients with uMGMT, for patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date demonstrating both the prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT methylation on patients with grade II glioma. The current results show that mMGMT is a prognostic factor and possibly a predictive biomarker for grade II glioma patients. MGMT methylation status can be used to determine and stratify patients by risk levels, and thus select patients for treatment intensification. IMPORTANCE OF STUDY: The present study is the largest to date examining the prognostic and predictive significance of MGMT methylation (mMGMT) in patients with WHO grade II glioma. The results suggest that mMGMT is prognostic with increasing overall survival rates for patients with mMGMT compared to uMGMT patients. The results also suggest that mMGMT is predictive as shown by improved overall survival in patients receiving gross total resection, adjuvant chemoradiation or adjuvant radiation therapy, but no difference was observed in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or no adjuvant treatment.

Quantifying the rate and predictors of occult lymph node involvement in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: It is essential to evaluate the risk of occult lymph node (LN) disease in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially because delivering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) assumes no occult spread. This study was designed to assist clinicians in roughly quantifying this risk for cN0 NSCLC. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for cN0 cM0 lung squamous cell or adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery and LN dissection without neoadjuvant therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with pN + disease. RESULTS: 109,964 patients were included. For tumors with size ≤1.0, 1.1-2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, 4.1-5.0, 5.1-6.0, 6.1-7.0, and >7.0 cm, the pN + rate was 4.4, 7.7, 12.9, 18.0, 20.2, 22.5, 24.4, and 26.4%, respectively. When examining patients with more complete LN dissections (defined as removal of at least 10 LNs), the respective values were 6.6, 11.5, 17.6, 25.3, 26.8, 29.7, 30.7, and 31.6%. Moderately-poorly differentiated disease and adenocarcinomas were associated with a higher rate of pN + disease (p < .001 for both). For every cm increase in tumor size, the relative occult nodal risk increased by 10-14% (p < .001). For every elapsed day from initial diagnosis, the relative risk increased by ∼1% (p < .001). Graphs with best-fit lines were created based on tumor size, histology, and differentiation to aid physicians in estimating the pN + risk. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study can allow clinicians to roughly estimate the rate of occult LN disease in cN0 NSCLC. These data can also assist in guiding enrollment on randomized trials of SABR ± immunotherapy, individualizing follow-up imaging surveillance, and patient counseling to avoid post-diagnosis delays.

De-escalation of Endocrine Therapy in Early Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer: When Is Local Treatment Enough?

OBJECTIVE: To identify subgroups of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients that might not benefit from adding endocrine therapy (ET) to their local treatment. BACKGROUND: De-escalation in breast cancer treatment has included surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy and has often focused on older patient populations. Systemic ET has yet to be de-escalated, though it carries serious side-effects, decreasing quality of life over 5 to 10 years. We hypothesize the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) could identify subgroups of younger patients whose long-term survival is unaffected by adjuvant ET. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women aged ≥50, with HR+, HER2-negative tumors, ≤3 cm in size, N0 status, and a RS≤25, who underwent breast-conserving surgery in 2010 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify association between treatment and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 45,217 patients identified, 80.6% were 50 to 69 years old. 42,632 (94.3%) patients received ET and 2585 (5.7%) did not. The 5-year OS was 96.4% for patients receiving ET and 93.1% for those who did not (P < 0.001). After adjusting for all covariates, patients aged 50 to 69 with RS < 11 showed no statistically significant improvement in OS when adding ET to surgery, with or without radiation (P = 0.40). With RS 11 to 25, there was a significant improvement of OS with ET plus radiation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Local treatment only, with de-escalation of long-term ET, for patients aged 50 to 69 with RS < 11, seems not to impact OS and should have an anticipated quality of life improvement. Prospective studies investigating this approach are warranted.

The 21-gene recurrence score in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a cautionary tale from an NCDB analysis.

PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS) has not been prospectively validated to predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), node-positive breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, de-escalation based on RS has been demonstrated and partially advocated by retrospective data. The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with low to intermediate RS who still benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify 28,591 women with stage I-III, T1-T3, N1, HR+, HER2- breast cancer and a RS ≤ 25 between 2010 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables correlating with chemotherapy use and 5-year survival. Subgroup analysis was performed to discern patients in whom the use of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with better survival. RESULTS: A 35% decline in chemotherapy use was observed from 2010 to 2016. Patients with younger age, higher RS, larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes, and those treated by mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection and radiation, were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use was associated with an improved 5-year survival (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.28-2.07). Upon subgroup analysis, this association was lost in patients > 70 years and those with a RS ≤ 11, while patients ≤ 70 with a RS of 12-25 treated with chemotherapy had an absolute 5-year survival advantage of 3.0% (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.42-2.57). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be cautious when considering omission of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≤ 70 years, with HR+, HER2-, N1 tumors and a RS 12-25, at least until the results of the anticipated RxPONDER trial become available.

Prognosis and Chemotherapy Use in Breast Cancer Patients with Multiple Lymphatic Micrometastases: An NCDB Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The number of involved lymph nodes negatively affects prognosis in breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, current staging and treatment recommendations do not distinguish between patients with single versus multiple lymphatic micrometastases. In this study, we aim to better characterize these patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried to identify 486,800 women with stage I-III, estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/PR+/HER2-) breast cancer and nodal status of N0, N1mi with 1 (Nmic1) or more (Nmic > 1) involved nodes, and N1 with 1 involved node (N1.1), from 2010 to 2016. Patients with different nodal statuses were compared regarding treatment characteristics, survival, and benefit from chemotherapy by their 21-gene recurrence score (RS). RESULTS: Of the 23,072 N1mi patients, 88.3% were Nmic1 and 11.7% were Nmic > 1. Nmic > 1 patients were younger, had larger and higher-grade tumors, with more lymphovascular invasion, and were more commonly treated by axillary dissection, radiation, and chemotherapy than Nmic1 patients. In that, they were comparable with N1.1 patients. Five-year survival of Nmic > 1 patients (88.1%) was worse than Nmic1 patients (90.1%; p = 0.02), but similar to N1.1 patients (87.9%). Nmic1, Nmic > 1, and N1.1 patients with RS 11-25 exhibited a < 2% absolute survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. With RS > 25, Nmic > 1 patients showed a 3.5% benefit, similar to Nmic1 (4.8%) and lower than N1.1 (10.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nmic > 1 breast cancer patients have worse prognoses than Nmic1 patients, similar to N1.1 patients. Our data suggest those patients with RS 11-25 have minimal benefit from chemotherapy. These findings should be taken into account when discussing prognosis and considering chemotherapy in patients with lymphatic micrometastases.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes With/Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Desmoplastic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare variant of cutaneous melanoma with a high rate of local recurrence. Recent studies have indicated a potential benefit in local control with the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant RT for patients with DM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic DM. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: RT or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant RT, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS: There was no difference in median OS between patients treated with RT when compared with patients observed (111.4 months vs 133.9 months, p = .1312). On multivariable analysis, older age, T stage ≥2, N stage ≥1, and no receipt of immunotherapy were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: In this large study evaluating efficacy of adjuvant RT in DM, no overall survival benefit was observed among patients receiving adjuvant RT.

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiation therapy by molecular subtype of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study quantified clinical outcomes by molecular subtype of metastatic breast cancer (BC) following whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Doing so is important for patient counseling and to assess the potential benefit of combining targeted therapy and brain radiotherapy for certain molecular subtypes in ongoing trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for BC (invasive ductal carcinoma) cases receiving brain radiotherapy (divided into WBRT and SRS ). Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with SRS delivery, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 1,112 patients, 186 (16.7%) received SRS and 926 (83.3%) underwent WBRT. Altogether, 410 (36.9%), 195 (17.5%), 162 (14.6%), and 345 (31.0%) were ER+/HER2-, ER+/HER2+, ER-/HER2+, and ER-/HER2-, respectively. In the respective molecular subtypes, the proportion of subjects who underwent SRS was 13.4%, 19.4%, 24.1%, and 15.7%. Respective OS for WBRT patients were 12.9, 22.8, 10.6, and 5.8 months; corresponding figures for the SRS cohort were 28.3, 40.7, 15.0, and 12.9 months (p < 0.05 for both). When comparing OS between treatment different histologic subtypes, patients with ER-/HER2+ and ER-/HER2- disease had worse OS than patients with ER+/HER2- disease, for both patients treated with SRS and for patients treated with WBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtype may be a useful prognostic marker to quantify survival following SRS/WBRT for metastatic BC. Patients with HER 2-enriched and triple-negative disease had the poorest survival following brain irradiation, lending credence to ongoing studies testing the addition of targeted therapies for these subtypes.

The impact of HER2-directed targeted therapy on HER2-positive DCIS of the breast.

BACKGROUND: In invasive breast cancer, HER2 is a well-established negative prognostic factor. However, its significance on the prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is unclear. As a result, the impact of HER2-directed therapy on HER2-positive DCIS is unknown and is currently the subject of ongoing clinical trials. In this study, we aim to determine the possible impact of HER 2-directed targeted therapy on survival outcomes for HER2-positive DCIS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to retrieve patients with biopsy-proven DCIS diagnosed from 2004-2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: systemic HER2-directed targeted therapy or no systemic therapy. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving systemic therapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS: Altogether, 1927 patients met inclusion criteria; 430 (22.3%) received HER2-directed targeted therapy; 1497 (77.7%) did not. Patients who received HER2-directed targeted therapy had a higher 5-year OS compared to patients that did not (97.7% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.043). This survival benefit remained on multivariable analysis. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis included Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Score ≥ 2 and no receipt of hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION: In this large study evaluating HER2-positive DCIS patients, the receipt of HER2-directed targeted therapy was associated with an improvement in OS. The results of currently ongoing clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Clinical presentation, national practice patterns, and outcomes of breast adenomyoepithelioma.

Breast adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare tumor with the published literature mainly in the form of case reports. Thus, there is currently only limited published data to guide evidence-based management. We sought to use a large, contemporary US database to evaluate how these patients are managed and describe expected outcomes. The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for women with AME. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Overall, 110 patients were analyzed. At diagnosis, the median age was 67 years and the median tumor size was 2.0 cm. All but four patients had node-negative disease. A majority (55%) of tumors were estrogen receptor negative, and only one was positive for HER2/neu. The most common surgical procedure was lumpectomy (60%); a minority (10.9%) of subjects underwent complete axillary nodal dissection, with one-quarter not undergoing pathologic nodal sampling. Chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were utilized in a minority of patients (26%, 8%, and 36%, respectively), and none were associated with OS. At median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year OS for the entire population was 74.4%. Disease-related characteristics and practice patterns are described for AME, the largest study of this rare tumor to date. Resection is the most important aspect of management, and based on this dataset the low rate of nodal involvement suggests that in some cases nodal sampling could be safely omitted. Adjuvant therapy may be considered on a case-by-case basis. Taken together, these data provide valuable insight into a rare neoplasm that may better inform management of these patients.

Survival Outcomes and Patterns of Management for Anal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Anal adenocarcinoma (AA) is a rare histologic subtype of anal cancer believed to have worse outcomes than anal squamous cell carcinoma (AS). This study aimed to examine practice patterns and treatment outcomes for this rare subtype using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). METHODS: Patients who had new diagnoses of anal cancer treated with chemoradiation were selected from the NCDB from 2004 to 2015. The patients were divided into two histologic groups (AA or AS). Statistics included the Chi square test to analyze categorical proportions in demographic information, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS: The study analyzed 24,461 patients. Compared with AS patients, AA patients were more likely to be male, to present with a higher cancer stage, to be older (> 65 years), and to undergo surgery with an abdominoperineal resection (APR). The median OS was 72.5 months for the AA patients and 143.8 months for the AS patients (P < 0.001). Survival was longer for the AA patients undergoing APR within 6 months after chemoradiation (CRT) than for the AA patients who had an APR 6 months after CRT (88.3 vs. 58.1 months; P < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the factors associated with worse survival included adenocarcinoma subtype, age of 55 years or older, male gender, T stage of 3 or higher, comorbidity score of 1 or higher, lower income, and treatment at a nonacademic institution. CONCLUSIONS: In this largest study of anal adenocarcinoma to date, trimodality therapy was associated with better survival than chemoradiation alone.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer: practice patterns and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Up-front stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been historically thought of as inadequate for brain metastases (BM) from newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study evaluates national practice patterns and clinical outcomes for BM from SCLC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic SCLC receiving intracranial radiotherapy. Patients were grouped into three categories: upfront SRS, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone, or WBRT with boost (SRS or fractionated radiotherapy). Statistics included temporal trend assessment by annual percent change (APC), logistic regression, exploratory Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis without and with propensity matching, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: A total of 14,722 patients met selection criteria, of whom 487 (3.3%), 13,657 (92.8%), and 578 (3.9%) received upfront SRS, WBRT and WBRT with boost, respectively. Utilization of SRS showed a slight increasing trend from 2004 to 2013 (2.7-4.3%). In addition to socioeconomic factors, other variables associated with SRS use included diagnosis after 2010, treatment at academic centers, and residing in higher-educated regions. SRS was less often delivered to patients with node-positive disease (p < .05). On exploratory analysis, SRS cohort was observed to have a higher overall survival (OS) than WBRT-based groups (p < .001), namely in patients without extracranial metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of up-front SRS for SCLC BM has been increasing over time but is driven by socioeconomic disparities. Although there are likely numerous biases associated with the OS findings herein, further research is needed to validate this finding as well as the role of SRS on patients with brain metastases due to SCLC.

Neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is a strategy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, but a consensus approach regarding optimal management is undetermined. Neoadjuvant options include chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a novel radiation technique that may provide benefit over conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) in the neoadjuvant setting. The purpose of the present study is to determine neoadjuvant treatment with SBRT to other neoadjuvant treatment options for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Material and methods: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by pancreatectomy. Patients were categorized based on the type of neoadjuvant treatment administered. Statistics included temporal trend assessment by annual percent change (APC), predictors for SBRT by multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis without and with propensity matching, and Cox proportional hazards modeling for univariable OS analysis. Results: Of 5828 patients, 332 (5.7%), 3234 (55.5%) and 2262 (38.8%) received neoadjuvant chemo-SBRT, chemotherapy, and chemo-CFRT, respectively. SBRT utilization increased from 0% in 2004 to 9.5% in 2015, with a greater APC after 2010 (p < .001). SBRT was more likely to be utilized in patients with T3-4 and node-positive disease (p < .05 for all). The chemo-SBRT cohort was associated with a higher OS rate before and after propensity matching (p < .05 for both). The rate of R0 resection was higher in radiotherapy groups than the chemotherapy cohort (p < .001). Conclusions: Utilization of neoadjuvant SBRT for pancreatic cancer is increasing. In the neoadjuvant setting, chemo-SBRT may improve R0 resection and OS over chemotherapy and chemo-CFRT, although confirmatory prospective studies are needed for confirmation.

The impact of molecular status on survival outcomes for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is an uncommon variant of breast cancer. Previous studies demonstrated this subtype is often hormone receptor (HR)-positive, resulting in survival outcomes similar to invasive ductal carcinoma. However, many of these studies were conducted prior to HER2 testing availability. We aim to determine the impact of molecular marker status (including HER2 status) on IMPC survival outcomes. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to retrieve patients with biopsy-proven IMPC from 2007 to 2012. Only patients with known HR and HER2 status were included. Cox multivariate regression was used to determine prognostic factors. In total, 865 patients were included; median follow-up was 2.5 years. Overall, 651 patients (75.3%) had HR + HER2- disease, 128 (14.8%) had HR + HER2+ disease, 41 (4.7%) had HR-HER2 + disease, and 45 (5.2%) had triple negative disease. Patients with triple negative disease were more likely to have poorly differentiated histology (66.7%), lymphovascular invasion (73.3%), stage 3 disease (37.8%), undergone mastectomy (68.9%), and positive surgical margins (15.6%). On Cox multivariate regression, those with triple negative disease had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 7.28, P < 0.001). Other adverse prognostic factors included African-American descent (HR 2.24, P = 0.018), comorbidity score of 1 (HR 2.50, P = 0.011), comorbidity score ≥2 (HR 3.27, P = 0.06), and ≥3 positive lymph nodes (HR 3.23, P = 0.007). Similar to invasive ductal carcinoma, triple negative disease in IMPC results in worse survival outcomes. This is the largest and first study to characterize molecular status (including HER2 status) in patients with IMPC and its impact on survival outcomes.

Omission of radiation therapy following breast conservation in older (≥70 years) women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although randomized data support omitting adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast conservation for T1-2N0 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer in ≥70-year-old women, there remains a knowledge gap regarding its omission for triple-negative BC (TNBC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for ≥70-year-old females with newly diagnosed T1-2N0M0 TNBC treated with breast conservation. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with adjuvant RT administration. Overall survival (OS) between patients treated with or without adjuvant RT was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. RESULTS: Of 8526 patients, 6283 (74%) patients received adjuvant RT, and 2243 (26%) did not. RT was more frequently withheld in older patients, those with higher comorbidities, lower income, pT2 disease, following margin-positive resection, receipt of chemotherapy, and at academic centers (P < 0.05 for all). Median follow-up was 38.0 months. Five-year OS was greater in the adjuvant RT group (77.2% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001); these differences persisted when stratifying for age, T stage, and chemotherapy utilization (P < 0.001 for all). Omission of RT was also independently associated with poorer OS on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation, the largest known such study to date, observed that omission of adjuvant RT for elderly women with T1-2N0 TNBC was associated with poorer OS; this was observed across a range of age groups, as well as following stratification by T stage and chemotherapy usage. Although these results do not imply causation, caution must be exercised when considering omission of adjuvant RT in node-negative TNBC patients.

Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This is the largest study to date evaluating response rates and pathologic complete response (pCR) and predictors thereof, based on molecular subtype, in women with breast cancer having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-4N1-3M0 breast cancer having received NC. Patients were divided into four subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, Her2, or triple negative (TN). Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with developing pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients by degree of response to NC when stratifying patients by subtype. RESULTS: Of a total of 13,939 women, 322 (2%) were luminal A, 5941 (43%) luminal B, 2274 (16%) Her2, and 5402 (39%) TN. Overall, 19% of all patients achieved pCR, the lowest in luminal A (0.3%) and the highest in Her2 (38.7%). Molecular subtype was an independent predictor of both pCR and OS in this population. Clinical downstaging was associated with improved survival, mostly in women with luminal B, Her2, and TN subtypes. Subgroup analysis of the pCR population demonstrated 5-year OS in the luminal B, Her2, and TN cohorts of 93.0, 94.2, and 90.6%, respectively (Her2 vs. TN, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Assessing nearly 14,000 women from a contemporary United States database, this is the largest known study examining the relationship between response to NC and molecular subtype. Women with luminal A disease are the least likely to undergo pCR, with the highest rates in Her2 disease. Degree of response is associated with OS, especially in luminal B, Her2, and TN patients. Despite the comparatively higher likelihood of achieving pCR in TN cases, this subgroup may still experience a survival detriment, which has implications for an ongoing national randomized trial.

Concurrent Versus Sequential Chemoradiation Therapy in Completely Resected Pathologic N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

BACKGROUND: Following complete resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), national guidelines recommend either sequential (sCRT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This is the largest study to date evaluating survival between both approaches. In sCRT patients, sequencing 'chemotherapy first' versus 'radiotherapy first' was also addressed. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with primary NSCLC undergoing surgery (without neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy), pN2 disease with negative surgical margins, and receiving postoperative CRT. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with cCRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching was performed to address group imbalances and indication biases. RESULTS: Of 1924 total patients, 1115 (58%) received sCRT and 809 (42%) underwent cCRT. Median OS in the sCRT and cCRT cohorts was 53 months versus 37 months (p < 0.001); differences persisted following propensity matching (p = 0.002). In the sCRT population, there was a trend for higher OS in the 'chemotherapy first' group, relative to 'radiotherapy first' (55 vs. 44 months, p = 0.079), but there were no statistically apparent differences following propensity matching (p = 0.302). CONCLUSIONS: For completely resected pN2 NSCLC, delivering adjuvant sCRT was associated with improved survival over cCRT. Toxicity-related factors may help to explain these results but need to be better addressed in further investigations. Differential sequencing of sCRT did not appear to affect survival.

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Practice Patterns, Outcomes, and the Role of Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare, aggressive form of breast cancer with limited data to guide management. This study of a large, contemporary US database described national practice patterns and addressed the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried (2004-2013) for women with non-metastatic MBC. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with RT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between patients treated with either lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without RT, while substratifying patients into pT1-2N0 and pT3-4/N+ subcohorts. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. RESULTS: Of 5211 total patients, 447 (9%) had lumpectomy alone, 1831 (35%) had post-lumpectomy RT, 2020 (39%) had mastectomy alone, and 913 (18%) had post-mastectomy RT (PMRT). Most patients underwent chemotherapy (79%), and mastectomy was the most common surgical approach (56%). RT delivery was impacted by many factors, including higher nodal disease (p < 0.001), but not T classification or estrogen receptor status (p > 0.05 for both). Post-lumpectomy RT was associated with higher OS in both the pT1-2N0 and pT3-4/N+ subsets (p < 0.001 for both), while PMRT was associated with OS benefits in pT3-4/N+ cases (p < 0.001), but not in pT1-2N0 cases (p = 0.259). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date evaluating MBC, practice patterns of surgery, systemic therapy, and RT are described. The addition of RT in the post-lumpectomy setting was associated with higher OS, in addition to pT3-4/N+ in the post-mastectomy setting. Although not implying causation, further work is required to corroborate the conclusions herein.