Bilateral Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction With Custom Alloplastic Implants for Pediatric Ankylosis.

For pediatric patients with refractory temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis, reconstruction with autologous techniques such as costochondral grafts or distraction osteogenesis has long been considered the gold standard. Many surgeons believed the use of alloplastic joint replacement to be contraindicated in pediatric patients due to concerns for growth restriction and the limited lifespan of the implants. However, recent data has supported TMJ prostheses in skeletally immature patients. This study aims to present a case series of pediatric patients undergoing bilateral TMJ reconstruction with custom-made implants and evaluate their postoperative results. A retrospective chart review was performed of all consecutive pediatric patients undergoing bilateral alloplastic TMJ reconstruction for refractory ankylosis. All patients underwent bilateral TMJ release and total joint replacement with custom-made implants. Preoperative and postoperative cephalometric and volumetric airway data was obtained using cone-beam computed tomography. Three patients, aged 8 to 17, underwent bilateral TMJ replacement with custom-made implants. There were no postoperative complications, and no implants required explantation or replacement. Postoperatively, all patients had increases in maximal interincisal opening, which was stable over months/years of follow-up. The patients also subjectively reported improved speech and mastication; 1 patient had significant improvements in sleep apnea symptoms. Volumetric airway analysis revealed an average airway size increase of 25.6%. Alloplastic TMJ reconstruction is a safe, effective solution for refractory ankylosis in pediatric patients and represents a promising new frontier in craniofacial surgery. Continued long-term evaluation will provide further evidence of the utility of this procedure.

Methods of measurement for pneumothorax in pediatric patients: a systematic review.

Accurate measurement of pneumothorax (PTX) size is necessary to guide clinical decision making; however, there is no consensus as to which method should be used in pediatric patients. This systematic review seeks to identify and evaluate the methods used to measure PTX size with CXR in pediatric patients. A systematic review of the literature through 2021 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was conducted using the following databases: Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. Original research articles that included pediatric patients (< 18 years old) and outlined the PTX measurement method were included. 45 studies were identified and grouped by method (Kircher and Swartzel, Rhea, Light, Collins, Other) and societal guideline used. The most used method was Collins (n = 16; 35.6%). Only four (8.9%) studies compared validated methods. All found the Collins method to be accurate. Seven (15.6%) studies used a standard classification guideline and 3 (6.7%) compared guidelines and found significant disagreement between them. Pediatric-specific measurement guidelines for PTX are needed to establish consistency and uniformity in both research and clinical practice. Until there is a better method, the Collins method is preferred.

Jaw Thrust: A Simple Predictor of Success in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The hypoplastic mandible in the congenital condition Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) displaces the base of the tongue posteriorly, which results in upper airway obstruction (UAO) that can potentially be corrected with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). Jaw thrust (JT) is routinely performed during evaluation of the airway; similar to MDO, it projects the mandible and tongue anteriorly to open the airway. The authors demonstrate that JT can be used as a criterion to predict successful MDO outcomes in infants with PRS. METHODS: The study was a single-center, retrospective chart review of infants diagnosed with PRS between 2016 and 2023. Data regarding their demographics, comorbid diagnoses, JT success, airway anomalies, laryngeal grade of view, apnea-hypopnea index, and perioperative course were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 16 patients included in the study, 11 had successful relief of their airway obstruction with JT and proceeded with MDO. The unsuccessful JT group had significantly greater proportions of females, birth prematurity, gastrostomies, tracheostomies, and longer hospital stays. In the successful JT group, both the mean laryngeal grade of view ( P =0.029) and mean apnea-hypopnea index ( P =0.025) improved significantly post-MDO. Post-MDO tracheostomy was also avoided in all but 1 patient who was not previously tracheostomized. CONCLUSIONS: There is no widely accepted algorithm to guide craniofacial surgeons on the optimal intervention for relieving UAO in infants with PRS. In our institutional experience, patients whose preoperative JT relieved UAO also successfully relieved UAO with MDO. In patients with PRS, JT may be a useful criterion for selecting appropriate candidates for MDO.

A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method. RESULTS: The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (ß = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (ß = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (ß = -0.0015, p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (ß = 0.0032, p = 0.0262) and pregnancy history (ß = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge. CONCLUSION: Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit.