RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary vector control interventions in Zambia are long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying. Challenges with these interventions include insecticide resistance and the outdoor biting and resting behaviours of many Anopheles mosquitoes. Therefore, new vector control tools targeting additional mosquito behaviours are needed to interrupt transmission. Attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations, which exploit the sugar feeding behaviours of mosquitoes, may help in this role. This study evaluated the residual laboratory bioefficacy of Westham prototype ATSB® Sarabi v.1.2.1 Bait Station (Westham Ltd., Hod-Hasharon, Israel) in killing malaria vectors in Western Province, Zambia, during the first year of a large cluster randomized phase-III trial (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04800055). METHODS: This was a repeat cross-sectional study conducted within three districts, Nkeyema, Kaoma, and Luampa, in Western Province, Zambia. The study was conducted in 12 intervention clusters among the 70 trial clusters (35 interventions, 35 controls) between December 2021 and June 2022. Twelve undamaged bait stations installed on the outer walls of households were collected monthly (one per cluster per month) for bioassays utilizing adult female and male Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (Kisumu strain) mosquitoes from a laboratory colony. RESULTS: A total of 84 field-deployed ATSB stations were collected, and 71 ultimately met the study inclusion criteria for remaining in good condition. Field-deployed stations that remained in good condition (intact, non-depleted of bait, and free of dirt as well as mold) retained high levels of bioefficacy (mean induced mortality of 95.3% in males, 71.3% in females, 83.9% combined total) over seven months in the field but did induce lower mortality rates than non-deployed ATSB stations (mean induced mortality of 96.4% in males, 87.0% in females, 91.4% combined total). There was relatively little variation in corrected mortality rates between monthly rounds for those ATSB stations that had been deployed to the field. CONCLUSION: While field-deployed ATSB stations induced lower mortality rates than non-deployed ATSB stations, these stations nonetheless retained relatively high and stable levels of bioefficacy across the 7-month malaria transmission season. While overall mean mosquito mortality rates exceeded 80%, mean mortality rates for females were 24 percentage points lower than among males and these differences merit attention and further evaluation in future studies. The duration of deployment was not associated with lower bioefficacy. Westham prototype ATSB stations can still retain bioefficacy even after deployment in the field for 7 months, provided they do not meet predetermined criteria for replacement.
Asunto(s)
Anopheles , Control de Mosquitos , Mosquitos Vectores , Zambia , Animales , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Anopheles/efectos de los fármacos , Anopheles/fisiología , Mosquitos Vectores/efectos de los fármacos , Mosquitos Vectores/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria/transmisión , Estaciones del Año , Insecticidas/farmacología , Azúcares , Humanos , Conducta AlimentariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSBs) offer a complementary vector control strategy to interventions targeting blood feeding or larval control by attacking the sugar feeding behaviour of adult mosquitoes using an attract-and-kill approach. Western Zambia was the first location to receive and deploy ATSB Sarabi version 1.2 stations in a Phase III cluster randomized controlled trial. This paper describes ATSB station installation, monitoring, removal, and disposal, quantifies ATSB station coverage, and reports major reasons for ATSB station replacement. METHODS: ATSB stations were deployed during two annual transmission seasons, through scheduled installation and removal campaigns. During deployment, monitoring was conducted per protocol to maintain high coverage of the ATSB stations in good condition. Routine monitoring visits during the trial captured details on ATSB station damage necessitating replacement following pre-defined replacement criteria. Annual cross-sectional household surveys measured ATSB station coverage during peak malaria transmission. RESULTS: A total of 67,945 ATSB stations were installed in Year 1 (41,695 initially installed+ 26,250 installed during monitoring) and 69,494 ATSB stations were installed in Year 2 (41,982 initially installed+ 27,512 installed during monitoring) across 35 intervention clusters to maintain high coverage of two ATSB stations in good condition per eligible household structure. The primary reasons for ATSB station replacement due to damage were holes/tears and presence of mold. Cross-sectional household surveys documented high coverage of ATSB stations across Year 1 and Year 2 with 93.1% of eligible structures having ≥ 2 ATSB stations in any condition. DISCUSSION: ATSB station deployment and monitoring efforts were conducted in the context of a controlled cRCT to assess potential product efficacy. Damage to ATSB stations during deployment required replacement of a subset of stations. High coverage of eligible structures was maintained over the two-year study despite replacement requirements. Additional research is needed to better understand the impact of damage on ATSB station effectiveness under programmatic conditions, including thresholds of threats to physical integrity and biological deterioration on product efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing ATSB stations to address causes of damage and conducting implementation research to inform optimal delivery and cost-effective deployment will be important to facilitate scale-up of ATSB interventions.
Asunto(s)
Control de Mosquitos , Zambia , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Humanos , Animales , Femenino , Malaria/prevención & control , Azúcares , Estudios Transversales , Mosquitos Vectores/fisiología , Anopheles/fisiología , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations are a novel tool with potential to complement current approaches to malaria vector control. To assess the public health value of ATSB station deployment in areas of high coverage with standard vector control, a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) of Sarabi ATSB® stations (Westham Ltd., Hod-Hasharon, Israel) was conducted in Western Province, Zambia, a high-burden location were Anopheles funestus is the dominant vector. The trial included 70 clusters and was designed to measure the effect of ATSBs on case incidence and infection prevalence over two 7-month deployments. Reported here are results of the vector surveillance component of the study, conducted in a subset of 20 clusters and designed to provide entomological context to guide overall interpretation of trial findings. METHODS: Each month, 200 paired indoor-outdoor human landing catch (HLC) and 200 paired light trap (LT) collections were conducted to monitor An. funestus parity, abundance, biting rates, sporozoite prevalence, and entomological inoculation rates (EIR). RESULTS: During the study 20,337 female An. funestus were collected, 11,229 from control and 9,108 from intervention clusters. A subset of 3,131 HLC specimens were assessed for parity: The mean non-parous proportion was 23.0% (95% CI 18.2-28.7%, total n = 1477) in the control and 21.2% (95% CI 18.8-23.9%, total n = 1654) in the intervention arm, an OR = 1.05 (95% CI 0.82-1.34; p = 0.688). A non-significant reduction in LT abundance (RR = 0.65 [95% CI 0.30-1.40, p = 0.267]) was associated with ATSB deployment. HLC rates were highly variable, but model results indicate a similar non-significant trend with a RR = 0.68 (95%CI 0.22-2.00; p = 0.479). There were no effects on sporozoite prevalence or EIR. CONCLUSIONS: Anopheles funestus parity did not differ across study arms, but ATSB deployment was associated with a non-significant 35% reduction in vector LT density, results that are consistent with the epidemiological impact reported elsewhere. Additional research is needed to better understand how to maximize the potential impact of ATSB approaches in Zambia and other contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04800055, 16 March 2021).
Asunto(s)
Anopheles , Control de Mosquitos , Mosquitos Vectores , Zambia , Anopheles/fisiología , Animales , Mosquitos Vectores/fisiología , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Azúcares , Malaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Wastewater-based epidemiology has expanded as a tool for collecting COVID-19 surveillance data, but there is limited information on the feasibility of this form of surveillance within decentralized wastewater systems (e.g., septic systems). This study assessed SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater samples from a septic system servicing a mobile home park (66 households) and from two pumping stations serving a similarly sized (71 households) and a larger (1,000 households) neighborhood within a nearby sewershed over 35 weeks in 2020. Also, raw wastewater from a hospital in the same sewershed was sampled. The mobile home park samples had the highest detection frequency (39/39 days) and mean concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (2.7 × 107 gene copies/person/day for the N1) among the four sampling sites. N1 gene and N2 gene copies were highly correlated across mobile home park samples (Pearson's r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). In the larger neighborhood, new COVID-19 cases were reported every week during the sampling period; however, we detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 12% of the corresponding wastewater samples. The results of this study suggest that sampling from decentralized wastewater infrastructure can be used for continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Aguas Residuales , Aguas Residuales/virología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , SARS-CoV-2/genética , ARN Viral/genética , ARN Viral/análisis , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico Basado en Aguas Residuales , Aguas del Alcantarillado/virologíaRESUMEN
Women are more susceptible to HIV transmission through unprotected heterosexual intercourse due to biological and social vulnerabilities. Intravaginal delivery of siRNAs targeting viral genes, host genes, or in combination has shown promising outcomes against HSV, HPV and HIV. Therefore, in this study, we designed, developed and evaluated a pH-sensitive RNAi-based combination nanomicrobide for the prevention/reduction of vaginal transmission of HIV. The nanomicrobide was composed of siRNA-PEI encapsulated PLGA-PEG nanoparticles (siRNA NP) loaded in a HEC gel dosage form with siRNA targeting host gene CCR5 and the viral gene Nef as a dual preventive strategy. Knocking down CCR5, a co-receptor for HIV could prevent HIV from attaching to and entering host cells and knocking down Nef could reactivate autophagy that was inhibited by Nef to improve the elimination of intracellular virus that escaped the first line of defense. The siRNA NP showed a desirable particle size and zeta potential for intravaginal delivery and a pH-dependent release profile whereby low amounts of siRNA was released under acidic vaginal conditions (vaginal fluid simulant; VFS, pH 4.2) (6.0 ± 0.4% released over 15 days) but significantly higher amounts of siRNA was released under neutral pH conditions (phosphate buffered saline; PBS, pH 7.4) (22.9 ± 0.4% released over 15 days). The CCR5-Nef-specific siRNA NP efficiently knocked down CCR5 and Nef protein expression by 43% and 63%, respectively, reactivated Nef-blocked autophagy and inhibited the replication of HIV in vitro (71.8% reduction in p24 expression). After being formulated into a gel dosage form, siRNA NP could be readily released from the gel, penetrate the vaginal epithelial layer, get taken up into the target cells and knockdown Nef and CCR5 without causing cytotoxicity in a vaginal mucosal co-culture model. Functionalization of siRNA NP with anti-CD4 antibody and loaded into a 0.5% HEC gel improved vaginal distribution and uptake of siRNA in a mouse model with distribution of siRNA restricted to the reproductive tract without any unwanted systemic uptake. The 0.5% HEC gel loaded with siRNA NP-(m)CD4 significantly downregulated approximately 40% of CCR5 protein in the lower vagina and 36% of CCR5 protein in the upper vaginal and cervical region. In contrast, 0.5% HEC gel loaded with siRNA NP-IgG did not result in significant gene knockdown.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Vagina , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Ratones , Autofagia , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/metabolismo , Vagina/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wastewater monitoring data can be used to estimate disease trends to inform public health responses. One commonly estimated metric is the rate of change in pathogen quantity, which typically correlates with clinical surveillance in retrospective analyses. However, the accuracy of rate of change estimation approaches has not previously been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the performance of approaches for estimating rates of change in wastewater pathogen loads by generating synthetic wastewater time series data for which rates of change were known. Each approach was also evaluated on real-world data. METHODS: Smooth trends and their first derivatives were jointly sampled from Gaussian processes (GP) and independent errors were added to generate synthetic viral load measurements; the range hyperparameter and error variance were varied to produce nine simulation scenarios representing different potential disease patterns. The directions and magnitudes of the rate of change estimates from four estimation approaches (two established and two developed in this work) were compared to the GP first derivative to evaluate classification and quantitative accuracy. Each approach was also implemented for public SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring data collected January 2021-May 2023 at 25 sites in North Carolina, USA. RESULTS: All four approaches inconsistently identified the correct direction of the trend given by the sign of the GP first derivative. Across all nine simulated disease patterns, between a quarter and a half of all estimates indicated the wrong trend direction, regardless of estimation approach. The proportion of trends classified as plateaus (statistically indistinguishable from zero) for the North Carolina SARS-CoV-2 data varied considerably by estimation method but not by site. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that wastewater measurements alone might not provide sufficient data to reliably track disease trends in real-time. Instead, wastewater viral loads could be combined with additional public health surveillance data to improve predictions of other outcomes.