Reach Out Churches: A Community-Based Participatory Research Pilot Trial to Assess the Feasibility of a Mobile Health Technology Intervention to Reduce Blood Pressure Among African Americans.

Innovative strategies are needed to reduce the hypertension epidemic among African Americans. Reach Out was a faith-collaborative, mobile health, randomized, pilot intervention trial of four mobile health components to reduce high blood pressure (BP) compared to usual care. It was designed and tested within a community-based participatory research framework among African Americans recruited and randomized from churches in Flint, Michigan. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the Reach Out processes. Feasibility was assessed by willingness to consent (acceptance of randomization), proportion of weeks participants texted their BP readings (intervention use), number lost to follow-up (retention), and responses to postintervention surveys and focus groups (acceptance of intervention). Of the 425 church members who underwent BP screening, 94 enrolled in the study and 73 (78%) completed the 6-month outcome assessment. Median age was 58 years, and 79% were women. Participants responded with their BPs on an average of 13.7 (SD = 10.7) weeks out of 26 weeks that the BP prompts were sent. All participants reported satisfaction with the intervention. Reach Out, a faith-collaborative, mobile health intervention was feasible. Further study of the efficacy of the intervention and additional mobile health strategies should be considered.

Primary care providers perform more neurologic visits than neurologists among Medicare beneficiaries.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about which medical providers, other than neurologists, are involved in the care of neurologic conditions. We aimed to describe the current distribution of outpatient neurologic care by provider type. METHODS: We conducted a restrospective, cross-sectional analysis using a 20% national sample claims database that contains information on medical care utilizations from adult Fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015. We identified patient visits for evaluation and management services for common neurologic conditions and by medical provider type. The main outcome was the proportion of visits for neurologic conditions by medical provider type, both in aggregate and across neurologic conditions. RESULTS: 40% of neurologic visits were performed by primary care providers (PCPs) and 17.5% by neurologists. The most common neurologic conditions were back pain (49.3%), sleep disorders (8.0%), chronic pain/abnormality of gait (6.4%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), and stroke (5.5%). Neurologists cared for a large proportion of visits for Parkinson's disease (75.6% vs 20.8%), epilepsy (70.9% vs 26.6%), multiple sclerosis (63.9% vs 26.2%), other central NS disorders (54.2% vs 24.9%), and tremor/RLS/ALS (54.0% vs 31.2%) compared to PCPs. PCPs provided a greater proportion of visits for dizziness/vertigo (57.8% vs 9.3%) and headache/migraine (50.4% vs 35.0%) compared to neurologists. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs perform more neurologic visits than neurologists. With the anticipated increased demand for neurologic care, strategies to optimize neurologic care delivery could consider expanding access to neurologists as well as supporting PCP care for neurologic conditions.

Competency Committees in Undergraduate Medical Education: Approaching Tensions Using a Polarity Management Framework.

Implementing competency-based medical education in undergraduate medical education (UME) poses similar and unique challenges to doing so in graduate medical education (GME). To ensure that all medical students achieve competency, educators must make certain that the structures and processes to assess that competency are systematic and rigorous. In GME, one such key structure is the clinical competency committee. In this Perspective, the authors describe the University of Michigan Medical School's (UMMS's) experience with the development of a UME competency committee, based on the clinical competency committee model from GME, and the first year of implementation of that committee for a single cohort of matriculating medical students in 2016-2017.The UMMS competency committee encountered a number of inter dependent but opposing tensions that did not have a correct solution; they were "both/and" problems to be managed rather than "either/or" decisions to be made. These tensions included determining the approach of the committee (problem identification versus developmental); committee membership (curricular experts versus broad-based membership); student cohort makeup (phase-based versus longitudinal); data analyzed (limited assessments versus programmatic assessment); and judgments made (grading versus developmental competency assessment).The authors applied the Polarity Management framework to navigate these tensions, leveraging the strengths of each while minimizing the weaknesses. They describe this framework as a strategy for others to use to develop locally relevant and feasible approaches to competency assessment in UME.

Evaluating a Hospitalist-Based Intervention to Decrease Unnecessary Antimicrobial Use in Patients With Asymptomatic Bacteriuria.

OBJECTIVE Inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in the hospital setting is common. We sought to evaluate the treatment rate of ASB at the 3 hospitals and assess the impact of a hospitalist-focused improvement intervention. DESIGN Prospective, interventional trial. SETTING Two community hospitals and a tertiary-care academic center. PATIENTS Adult patients with a positive urine culture admitted to hospitalist services were included in this study. Exclusions included pregnancy, intensive care unit admission, history of a major urinary procedure, and actively being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI) at the time of admission or >48 hours prior to urine collection. INTERVENTIONS An educational intervention using a pocket card was implemented at all sites followed by a pharmacist-based intervention at the academic center. Medical records of the first 50 eligible patients at each site were reviewed at baseline and after each intervention for signs and symptoms of UTI, microbiological results, antimicrobials used, and duration of treatment for positive urine cultures. Diagnosis of ASB was determined through adjudication by 2 hospitalists and 2 infectious diseases physicians. RESULTS Treatment rates of ASB decreased (23.5%; P=.001) after the educational intervention. Reductions in treatment rates for ASB differed by site and were greatest in patients without classic signs and symptoms of UTI (34.1%; P<.001) or urinary catheters (31.2%; P<.001). The pharmacist-based intervention was most effective at reducing ASB treatment rates in catheterized patients. CONCLUSIONS A hospitalist-focused educational intervention significantly reduced ASB treatment rates. The impact varied across sites and by patient characteristics, suggesting that a tailored approach may be useful. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1044-1051.

Effect of Doximity Residency Rankings on Residency Applicants' Program Choices.

INTRODUCTION: Choosing a residency program is a stressful and important decision. Doximity released residency program rankings by specialty in September 2014. This study sought to investigate the impact of those rankings on residency application choices made by fourth year medical students. METHODS: A 12-item survey was administered in October 2014 to fourth year medical students at three schools. Students indicated their specialty, awareness of and perceived accuracy of the rankings, and the rankings' impact on the programs to which they chose to apply. Descriptive statistics were reported for all students and those applying to Emergency Medicine (EM). RESULTS: A total of 461 (75.8%) students responded, with 425 applying in one of the 20 Doximity ranked specialties. Of the 425, 247 (58%) were aware of the rankings and 177 looked at them. On a 1-100 scale (100=very accurate), students reported a mean ranking accuracy rating of 56.7 (SD 20.3). Forty-five percent of students who looked at the rankings modified the number of programs to which they applied. The majority added programs. Of the 47 students applying to EM, 18 looked at the rankings and 33% changed their application list with most adding programs. CONCLUSION: The Doximity rankings had real effects on students applying to residencies as almost half of students who looked at the rankings modified their program list. Additionally, students found the rankings to be moderately accurate. Graduating students might benefit from emphasis on more objective characterization of programs to assess in light of their own interests and personal/career goals.